SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Women's Reproductive Health And Childbirth In Space

Uzayda Kadın Üreme Sağlığı Ve Doğum

Melissa Ağca(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ)0009-0005-0641-0769
Nazan Oran(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2103-6769
Pages
79–88
Publication Date
2026-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to eliminate these problems and take precautions, the biological and physical conditions of space should be fully understood and more research is needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Going into space and living in space has been a dream of mankind for decades and is now one of the future goals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, this dream brings with it many questions and problems regarding the condition of reproductive organs, menstrual cycles, pregnancy process, fetal well-being and how birth will take place in space.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to eliminate these problems and take precautions, the biological and physical conditions of space should be fully understood and more research is needed.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ebelik · uzay uçuşu · üreme sağlığı

Abstract

Going into space and living in space has been a dream of mankind for decades and is now one of the future goals. However, this dream brings with it many questions and problems regarding the condition of reproductive organs, menstrual cycles, pregnancy process, fetal well-being and how birth will take place in space. The studies that have been carried out are inadequate and limited in their modus operandi. However, space conditions are currently unfavourable for reproduction, pregnancy and birth. In particular, space radiation causes many structural and functional malformations and defects in the female reproductive organs, pregnant and foetus. In order to eliminate these problems and take precautions, the biological and physical conditions of space should be fully understood and more research is needed.

Özet

Uzaya çıkma ve uzayda yaşama onlarca yıldır insanoğlunun hayali ve şimdilerde ise gelecek hedeflerinden biridir. Ancak bu hayal beraberinde, uzayda üreme organlarının durumuna, menstrüel döngülere, gebelik sürecine, fetal iyilik haline ve doğumun nasıl gerçekleşeceğine dair birçok soruyu ve sorunu da beraberinde getirmektedir. Yapılan çalışmalar yetersiz ve çalışma şekli olarak sınırlıdır. Bununla birlikte, uzay koşulları şu anki haliyle üreme, gebelik ve doğum için elverişsizdir. Özellikle uzay radyasyonu, kadın üreme organlarında, gebe ve fetüs üzerinde yapısal ve fonksiyonel olmak üzere çok sayıda malformasyona ve defekte sebep olmaktadır. Bu sorunları ortadan kaldırmak ve önlem almak amacıyla uzayın biyolojik ve fiziksel koşulları tam olarak anlaşılmalı ve daha fazla sayıda araştırma gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ağca, M., Oran, N. (2026). Women's Reproductive Health And Childbirth In Space. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.71255/maunsbd.1802753

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Ahrari, K., Omolaoye, T. S., Goswami, N., Alsuwaidi, H., du Plessis, S. S. (2022). The effects of spaceflight on sperm function and integrity: A systematic review. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, 904375. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.904375
  2. Balistreri, M., & Umbrello, S. (2022). Should the colonisation of space be based on reproduction? Critical considerations on the choice of having a child in space. Journal of Responsible Technology, 11, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100040
  3. Beheshti, A., et al. (2021). Radiation-induced DNA damage and microgravity-induced genomic alterations in human cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22010123
  4. Blaber, E. A., et al. (2015). Microgravity reduces differentiation and regenerative potential of embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells and Development, 24, 2605-2621. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2015.0218
  5. Boda, K. (1991). Embryonic development of Japanese quail under microgravity conditions. The Physiologist, 34(1), S59-S61.
  6. Brasted, M., White, C. A., Kennedy, T. G., Salamonsen, L. A. (2003). Mimicking menstrual events in the mouse uterus. Biology of Reproduction, 69, 1273–1280. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.016550
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Radiation and Pregnancy: Information for Clinicians. https://www.cdc.gov/radiation-emergencies/hcp/clinical-guidance/pregnancy.html
  8. Cheng, K., Feng, X., Yang, C., Ma, C., Niu, S., Jia, L., Yang, X., Liang, J., Bo, Y., Geng, K., Li, Q., Zhang, H., Lei, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Simulated microgravity reduces quality of ovarian follicles and oocytes by disrupting communications of follicle cells. NPJ microgravity, 9(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-023-00248-5
  9. Cho, H. J., et al. (2019). Microgravity impedes decidualization by reducing Akt activity and FOXO3a expression in human endometrial stromal cells. Scientific Reports, 9, 12094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48580-9
  10. Cole, V. M., Savulescu, J., Illanes, S. E., Batiz, F., Benny, P. A. T., Huang, Z., Carter, S. W. D., Choolani, M. A., & Kemp, M. W. (2025). A biological and ethical assessment of whether humans could or should reproduce in space. NPJ microgravity, 11(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-025-00535-3
  11. Craenen, K., et al. (2018). Detailed characterization of congenital defects and mortality following moderate X-ray doses during neurulation. Birth Defects Research, 110, 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1161
  12. Craenen, K., et al. (2020). Folate supplementation prevents the morphological and behavioral effects of X-ray exposure during neurulation. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 609660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.609660
  13. Drago-Ferrante, R., et al. (2022). Extraterrestrial gynecology: Could spaceflight increase the risk of cancer development in female astronauts? An updated review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23072973
  14. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: [email protected] (2024). Planned oocyte cryopreservation to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and sterility, 121(4), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.030
  15. Fiebich, M., et al. (2021). Prenatal radiation exposure in diagnostic and interventional radiology. Rofo, 193, 778–786. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1313-7527
  16. Forsman, A., Nier, A. (2013). Effects of spaceflight on mucus production in the mouse uterus. Gravitational and Space Research, 1, 20-28.
  17. Gimunová, M., Paludo, A. C., Bernaciková, M., Bienertova-Vasku, J. (2024). The effect of space travel on human reproductive health: A systematic review. NPJ Microgravity, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-024-00351-1
  18. Groen, R. S., Bae, J. Y., Lim, K. J. (2012). Fear of the unknown: Exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 206, 456–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.001
  19. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O., et al. (2014). Long-acting progestin-only contraceptives increase neuronal pentraxin-1 expression and reactive oxygen species in human endometrial stromal cells, promoting endothelial cell apoptosis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 99, E1957–E1966. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1275
  20. Hyun, I., Wilkerson, A., & Johnston, J. (2016). Embryology policy: Revisit the 14-day rule. Nature, 533(7602), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/533169a
  21. Ijiri, K. (2004). Ten years after medaka fish mated and laid eggs in space: Further preparations for the life cycle experiment on the ISS. Biological Sciences in Space, 18(3), 138–139.
  22. Jennings, R. T., Baker, E. S. (2000). Gynecological and reproductive concerns in women in space: A review. Obstetrics & Gynecology Survey, 55, 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200002000-00025
  23. Jennings, R. T., Santy, P. A. (1990). Reproduction in space: Part II. Concerns regarding human reproduction. Obstetrics & Gynecology Survey, 45, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199001000-00006
  24. Jit, B. P., Pattnaik, S., Arya, R., Dash, R., Sahoo, S. S., Pradhan, B., Bhuyan, P. P., Behera, P. K., Jena, M., Sharma, A., Agrawala, P. K., & Behera, R. K. (2022). Phytochemicals: A potential next generation agent for radioprotection. Phytomedicine: international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 106, 154188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154188
  25. Kantha, S. S. (1994). Challenges for space medicine. Ceylon Medical Journal, 39, 40-42. Kim, J., Seli, E. (2019). Mitochondria as a biomarker for IVF outcomes. Reproduction, 157, R235–R242. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-18-0674
  26. Kojima, Y., Sasaki, S., Kubota, Y., Ikeuchi, T., Hayashi, Y., Kohri, K. (2000). Effects of simulated microgravity on mammalian fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development in vitro. Fertility and Sterility, 74(6), 1142-1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01583-1
  27. Lei, X., et al. (2020). Preimplantation embryo development in mice during spaceflight. National Science Review, 7, 1437–1446. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa062
  28. Lung, C.-F., Lu, H.-H., Chung, C.-Y., Lin, P.-T., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2026). A systematic review of microgravity on reproductive systems: Implications for space biology and human health. iScience, 29(2), 114663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.114663
  29. Mandt K. E. (2023). Increasing diversity on spacecraft mission teams reduces risk. Science (New York, N.Y.), 382(6675), eadk7373. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk7373
  30. Mathyk, B., Imudia, A. N., Quaas, A. M., et al. (2024). Understanding the effects of space travel on the female reproductive system to the Moon and beyond. NPI Women’s Health, 2, 20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44294-024-00009-z
  31. Miquel, J., Philpott, D. E. (1978). Effects of weightlessness on the genetics and aging process of Drosophila melanogaster. In N. Rosenzweig & K. A. Souza (Eds.), Final report: U.S. experiments flown on the Soviet satellite Cosmos 936 (NASA Technical Memorandum 78525, pp. 32–59). California: NASA.
  32. Mishra, B., Luderer, U. (2019). Reproductive hazards of space travel in women and men. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 15, 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0267-6
  33. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Health Risks of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation. (2006). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academies Press.
  34. NASA (2025). Female Reproductive Health: Space Flight Induced Ovarian and Estrogen Signaling Dysfunction, Adaptation, and Recovery. https://taskbook.nasaprs.com/tbp/index.cfm?action=public_query_taskbook_content&TASKID=16068
  35. Öztemel, E. (2020).Yapay Zekâ ve İnsanlığın Geleceği. İçinde M. Şeker, Y. Bulduklu, C. Korkut, M. Doğrul (Editör). Bilişim Teknolojileri ve İletişim: Birey ve Toplum Güvenliği (s. 77-90). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.
  36. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: [email protected] (2019). Fertility preservation in patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy or gonadectomy: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility, 112(6), 1022–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.013
  37. Proshchina, A., et al. (2021). Reproduction and early development of vertebrates in space: Challenges, outcomes, and opportunities. Life (Basel), 11, 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11020109
  38. Rahimzadeh, V., Fogarty, J., Caulfield, T., Auñón-Chancellor, S., Borry, P., Candia, J.,. & McGuire, A. L. (2023). Ethically cleared to launch?. Science, 381(6665), 1408-1411.
  39. Ronca, A. E. (2003). Studies on birth and early mammalian development in space. Advances in Space Research, 32(8), 1483–1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(03)90385-1
  40. Ronca, A. E., Alberts, J. R. (2000). The physiology of microgravity: Selected contributions: Effects of spaceflight on labor and delivery in pregnancy and birth at 1G. Journal of Applied Physiology, 89(2), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.849
  41. Rose, B. I. (2022). Women astronauts: The effects of space radiation on menopause. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 271, 210-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.022
  42. Schuster, H., Peck, S. L. (2016). Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kid: Ethical implications of pregnancy on missions to colonize other planets. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 12(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-016-0043-5
  43. Serova, L. V. (1993). Changes in gravity levels and animal development. Physiologist, 36(1 Suppl), S31–S33. Smith, R. C., Neff, A. W. (1986). Organization of Xenopus egg cytoplasm: Response to simulated microgravity. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 239(3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402390314
  44. Smith, T. A., Kirkpatrick, D. R., Smith, S., Smith, T. K., Pearson, T., Kailasam, A., Herrmann, K. Z., Schubert, J., & Agrawal, D. K. (2017). Radioprotective agents to prevent cellular damage due to ionizing radiation. Journal of translational medicine, 15(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1338-x
  45. Snetkova, E., Chelnaya, N., Serova, L., Saveliev, S., Cherdanzova, E., Pronych, S., Wassersug, R. (1995). The effects of spaceflight on the larval development of Xenopus laevis. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 273(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402730105
  46. Soroka, L., & Kurkova, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence and space technologies: Legal, ethical and technological issues. Advanced Space Law, 3(1), 131-139.
  47. Souza, K. A., Black, S. D., Wassersug, R. J. (1995). Amphibian development in the virtual absence of gravity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(6), 1975–1978. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.6.1975 SpaceBorn (2026). Research. https://www.spacebornunited.com/
  48. Steller, J. G., Alberts, J. R., Ronca, A. E. (2018). Oxidative stress as a cause, consequence, or biomarker of altered female reproductive and developmental health in space environments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19, 3729. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123729
  49. Tash, J. S., Kim, S., Schuber, M., Seibt, D., Kinsey, W. (2001). Effects of low hypergravity on fertilization of sea urchin eggs and sperm motility relevant to spaceflight. Biology of Reproduction, 65(4), 1224–1231. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.65.4.1224
  50. Tucker, R. (1990). Giving birth in space: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 19, 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01656.x
  51. Ubbels, G. A., Berendsen, W., Kerkvliet, S., Narraway, J. (1992). Fertilization and development of Xenopus laevis eggs in spaceflight-simulating rocket probes. Advances in Space Research, 12(1), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(92)90031-A
  52. (UK), H. F. a. E. A. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents (2008).
  53. Verreet, T., et al. (2016). Permanent effects of in utero irradiation on mouse brain structure and function as characterized by MR imaging and behavioral analysis. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 83. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00083
  54. Wakayama, S., et al. (2009). Harmful effects of microgravity on in vitro preimplantation development in mice. PLoS ONE, 4, e6753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006753
  55. Wallace, W. H. B., Kelsey, T. W. (2010). Human ovarian reserve from conception to menopause. PLoS One, 5(1), e8772. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008772
  56. Wallace, W. H. B., Thomson, A. B., Saran, F., Kelsey, T. W. (2005). Predicting the age of ovarian failure after radiation to an area containing the ovaries. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 62(3), 738-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.027
  57. WHO, 2026. Midwifery education and care. https://www.who.int/teams/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-health-and-ageing/maternal-health/midwifery
  58. Wong, A. M., DeSantis, M. (1997). Pregnancy in rats during spaceflight: Outcomes for female rats and offspring after returning to Earth. Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science, 32, 322–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688630
  59. Yılmaz Kuşaklı, B., Yerköy Ateş, A. ve Çetin, G. (2019). Hemşirelik Mesleğinin Kuşaklararası Değişimi ve Kuşakların Yönetimi. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Dergisi, 1(3), 203-208.
  60. Yoshida, K., et al. (2021). Intergenerational effects of short-term spaceflight in mice. iScience, 24, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102773
  61. Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., Li, Z., Wu, H., Zou, B., & Xu, Y. (2023). Exploring Natural Products as Radioprotective Agents for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Opportunities. Cancers, 15(14), 3585. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15143585
  62. Jit, B. P., Pattnaik, S., Arya, R., Dash, R., Sahoo, S. S., Pradhan, B., Bhuyan, P. P., Behera, P. K., Jena, M., Sharma, A., Agrawala, P. K., & Behera, R. K. (2022). Phytochemicals: A potential next generation agent for radioprotection. Phytomedicine: international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 106, 154188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154188
  63. Rahimzadeh, V., Fogarty, J., Caulfield, T., Auñón-Chancellor, S., Borry, P., Candia, J.,. & McGuire, A. L. (2023). Ethically cleared to launch?. Science, 381(6665), 1408-1411.