Journals / Maruf İktisat İslâm İktisadı Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Sayı: 10

Family Takaful Research: Trends, Themes, and Contributions

Aile Tekafülü Üzerine Araştırmalar: Eğilimler, Temalar ve Katkılar

Pages
4–33
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future research should consider broader datasets, explore underrepresented regions, and integrate technological innovations and supply-side perspectives to advance the takaful literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review of global research on family takaful, identifying publication trends, leading contributors, influential works, and emerging thematic areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study utilized a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 78 documents related to family takaful, indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases, covering the period from 2009 to 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future research should consider broader datasets, explore underrepresented regions, and integrate technological innovations and supply-side perspectives to advance the takaful literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aile Tekafülü · Scopus · WOS

Abstract

This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis and systematic review of global research on family takaful, identifying publication trends, leading contributors, influential works, and emerging thematic areas. It also seeks to highlight research gaps and propose future research directions. The study utilized a systematic review and bibliometric analysis of 78 documents related to family takaful, indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science (WOS) databases, covering the period from 2009 to 2025. Tools such as VOSviewer, Biblioshiny, Bibliometrix (R package), and Microsoft Excel were employed for data visualization and analysis. Descriptive and network analyses were conducted to map publication trends, author collaborations, thematic clusters, citation patterns, and to show the research gaps and future research directions. The results reveal a steady increase in family takaful research, with Malaysia dominating authorship, institutional affiliations, and publication outputs. Key research themes include consumer behavior, product modeling, Shariah compliance, and service quality. Influential studies highlight trust, awareness, and subjective norms as pivotal drivers of takaful adoption. However, research is predominantly region-specific (Malaysia and Pakistan), with limited cross-cultural validation, empirical field testing, and supply-side analyses. This study is the first to conduct a dedicated bibliometric analysis and systematic review focused solely on family takaful literature, addressing a significant gap in existing takaful research, which has largely been general in scope. By providing a comprehensive overview of the intellectual structure and evolution of family takaful studies, the paper offers valuable insights for academics, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to enhance the growth and innovation within the takaful industry. The analysis is constrained to documents indexed in Scopus and WOS, excluding grey literature and publications in non-English languages. The limited number of high-quality empirical studies restricts a deeper analysis of behavioral adoption factors. Future research should consider broader datasets, explore underrepresented regions, and integrate technological innovations and supply-side perspectives to advance the takaful literature.

Özet

Bu çalışma, aile tekafülü (Katılım Hayat Sigortası) alanında yürütülen küresel araştırmaları kapsamlı bir bibliyometrik analizini ve sistematik bir incelemesini sunmayı; yayın eğilimlerini, önde gelen katkı sağlayıcıları, etkili çalışmaları ve ortaya çıkan tematik alanları belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Ayrıca araştırma boşluklarını ortaya koymayı ve gelecekteki araştırma yönelimlerine dair öneriler sunmayı hedeflemektedir. Çalışmada, 2009–2025 dönemini kapsayan ve Scopus ile Web of Science (WOS) veri tabanlarında dizinlenen Katılım Hayat Sigortası ile ilgili 78 belge üzerinde sistematik inceleme ve bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veri görselleştirme ve analiz için VOSviewer, Biblioshiny, Bibliometrix (R paketi) ve Microsoft Excel gibi araçlar kullanılmıştır. Yayın eğilimlerini, yazar işbirliklerini, tematik kümeleri ve atıf örüntülerini haritalamak için betimleyici analizler ve ağ analizleri yapılmış; araştırma boşlukları ve geleceğe yönelik araştırma alanları belirlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, aile tekafülü araştırmalarında istikrarlı bir artış olduğunu göstermektedir; Malezya ise yazar sayısı, kurumsal bağlılıklar ve yayın çıktıları açısından alana hâkimdir. Başlıca araştırma temaları tüketici davranışı, ürün modellemesi, Fıkhî uyum ve hizmet kalitesidir. Etkili çalışmalar, tekafül benimsenmesinde güven, farkındalık ve öznel normların önemli belirleyiciler olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bununla birlikte, araştırmalar büyük ölçüde bölgeseldir (Malezya ve Pakistan) ve kültürlerarası doğrulama, ampirik saha testleri ve arz tarafına yönelik analizler sınırlıdır. Bu çalışma, yalnızca aile tekafülü literatürüne odaklanan özel bir bibliyometrik analiz ve sistematik inceleme gerçekleştiren ilk araştırma olma niteliğini taşımakta; mevcut tekafül araştırmalarında genel kapsamlı çalışmaların bıraktığı önemli bir boşluğu doldurmaktadır. Aile tekafülü çalışmalarının entelektüel yapısına ve gelişimine kapsamlı bir genel bakış sunarak akademisyenler, uygulayıcılar ve politika yapıcılar için tekafül sektöründe büyümeyi ve yeniliği desteklemeye yönelik değerli içgörüler sağlamaktadır. Analiz, yalnızca Scopus ve WOS veri tabanlarında dizinlenen belgelerle sınırlı olup gri literatürü ve İngilizce dışındaki yayınları kapsamamaktadır. Yüksek kaliteli ampirik çalışmaların sınırlı olması, davranışsal benimseme faktörlerinin daha derinlemesine analiz edilmesini zorlaştırmaktadır. Gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalar daha geniş veri setlerini dikkate almalı, temsil edilmeyen bölgeleri incelemeli ve teknolojik yenilikler ile arz tarafı bakış açılarını entegre ederek tekafül literatürünü geliştirmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ahmid, A. F., Korkut, Ü., Şahin, H. (2025). Family Takaful Research: Trends, Themes, and Contributions. Maruf İktisat İslâm İktisadı Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 10, 4–33. https://doi.org/10.58686/marufiktisat.1806090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (98)

  1. Abdullah, N.I. and Aziz, N.A.A. (2010), “Case studies of the practice of nomination and hibah by Malaysian Takaful operators”, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 67-100. doi:10.55188/ijif.v2i2.106
  2. Abdullah, N., Roslan, A., Yusuf, R.Y.M. and Rasid, M.F.R.M. (2021), “Behavior of Malaysian iGeneration in purchasing life insurance policy”, Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 8 No. 4. doi: 10.13189/UJAF.2020.080408
  3. Abduh, M. and Isma, S.N.Z. (2016), “Dynamic financial model of life insurance and family takaful companies in Malaysia”, Middle East Journal of Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 72-93. doi:10.1504/MEJM.2016.077144
  4. Abduh, M. and Zein Isma, S.N. (2017), “Economic and market predictors of solvency of family takaful in Malaysia”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 334-344, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-06-2015-0030.
  5. Abubakar, Y.S., Zahud, M.A. and Markom, R. (2014), “Effect of Nomination Under Life Insurance and Family Takāful”, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 67-85. doi: 10.12816/0019252
  6. Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C. and Di Nauta, P. (2021), “Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis”, Public OrganizationReview, Vol. 21No. 1,pp. 137-156.
  7. Akhter, W., Jamil, H. and Fam, K.-S. (2021), “Islamic influence on customer satisfaction: evidence from Takaful and conventional insurance industry”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 524-543, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0148.
  8. Alam, A., Fianto, B.A., Ratnasari, R.T., Ahmi, A. and Handayani, F.P. (2023), “History and development of Takaful research: A bibliometric review”, SAGE Open, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 1-20, doi: 10.1177/21582440231184852.
  9. Al-Amri, K. and Hossain, M.Z. (2017), “A survey of the Islamic insurance literature - Takaful”, International Journal of Economic Research, Vol. 14 No. 9, pp. 173-185.
  10. Al Husaeni, D.F. and Nandiyanto, A.B.D. (2022), “Bibliometric using VOSviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post COVID-19 pandemic”, ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 19-46.
  11. Ansari, Z. (2022), “A review of 20 years of Takaful literature using a systematic method”, Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 2-25, doi: 10.1108/ajeb-08-2021-0100
  12. Arifin, J., Yazid, A.S. and Sulong, Z. (2013), “A conceptual model of literature review for family Takaful (Islamic life insurance) demand in Malaysia”, International Business Research, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 210-222, doi: 10.5539/ibr.v6n3p210.
  13. Arifin, J., Ghazali, P.L., Noor, N.S.M., Razak, R.A. and Muhammad, H. (2024), “The scale validation of family Takāful awareness: An exploratory factor analysis”, Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, JULY2024(SPECIALISS), pp. 115-128, doi: 10.7187/GJATSI072024-8
  14. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017), “Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis”, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 959-975, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
  15. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2018), “Science mapping analysis with bibliometrix R-package: an example”, Bibliometrix, available at: https://bibliometrix.org/documents/bibliometrix_Report.html.
  16. Ashikin, N., Rom, M. and Rahman, Z.A. (2012), “Financial protection for the poor in Malaysia: Role of Zakah and Micro-Takaful”, JKAU: Islamic Econ., Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 119-140, doi: 10.4197/Islec.
  17. Aziz, S. and Husin, M.M. (2023), “Intention to purchase family takaful policy: evaluation of the mediating effects of perceived trust”, Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, Vol. 16 No. 1. doi: 10.1285/i20705948v16n1p165
  18. Aziz, S., Husin, M.M. and Hussin, N. (2017), “Conceptual framework of factors determining intentions towards the adoption of family takaful-an extension of decomposed theory of planned behaviour”, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, Vol. 6 No. 3, p. 385
  19. Aziz, S., Md Husin, M. and Hussin, N. (2017), “Intention to family Takaful adoption: A review theory and empirical work”, International Journal of Organizational Leadership, Vol. 6, pp. 373-384. doi: 10.33844/ijol.2017.60310
  20. Aziz, S., Md Husin, M., Hussin, N. and Afaq, Z. (2019), “Factors that influence individuals’ intentions to purchase family Takaful: Mediating role of perceived trust”, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 81-104, doi: 10.1108/APJML-12-2017-0311
  21. Bangaan Abdullah, H.S., Yakob, R., Yakob, S. and Sharif, N.S. (2022), “Indicators of having a micro-family takaful plan amongst low-income earners”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 12, pp. 2695-2716. doi:10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0128
  22. Baharin, R. (2018), “Box Cox-Fourier flexible functional forms in stochastic metafrontier analysis: the cost efficiency of the insurance industry in Malaysia”, Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 135-144.
  23. Baharin, R. and Isa, Z. (2013), “The efficiency of life insurance and family Takaful in Malaysia: Relative efficiency using the stochastic cost frontier analysis”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1522, pp. 1098-1104, doi: 10.1063/1.4801253.
  24. Bhatti, T. and Md Husin, M. (2020), “An investigation of the effect of customer beliefs on the intention to participate in family Takaful schemes”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 709-727, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-04-2018-0066
  25. Boudaly Hamid, E. and Abdelbari, K. (2024), “Bibliometric review on Takaful insurance: Application of R Biblioshiny”, Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 25-41. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiibf-journal/index.php/jif/article/view/883
  26. Chin, H. and Chew, C.M. (2021), “Profiling the research landscape on electronic feedback in educational context from 1991 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis”, Journal of Computers in Education, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 551-586, doi: 10.1007/s40692-021-00192-x.
  27. Dusuki, A.W. (2011), Islamic Financial System - Principles & Operations, International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance (ISRA), Kuala Lumpur.
  28. Dusuki, A.W., Zainal, N.A., Ali, M.M., Jinnah, M.A. and Yueh, L.C. (2012), “Shari’ah parameters for the application of wadi’ah concept in traditional family takaful products”, Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, pp. 1414-1423
  29. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. and Lim, W.M. (2021), “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 133, pp. 285-296, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  30. Effendy, F., Gaffar, V., Hurriyati, R. and Hendrayati, H. (2021), “Analisis bibliometrik perkembangan penelitian penggunaan pembayaran seluler dengan VOSviewer”, Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 10-17, doi: 10.35969/interkom.v16i1.92.
  31. Fikri, S.M., Naim, A.M., Maamor, S., Isa, M.Y., Ahmad, S.N., Shari, W. and Muhamed, N.A. (2022), “Rules and regulations review on micro-takaful scheme development in Malaysia”, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 509-525. doi: 10.1108/QRFM-02-2021-0030
  32. Farhat, K., Aslam, W. and Sany Sanuri, B.M.M. (2019), “Predicting the intention of generation M to choose family Takaful and the role of halal certification”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 724-742, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-12-2017-0143.
  33. Farooq, R. (2023), “Knowledge management and performance: a bibliometric analysis based on Scopus and WOS data (1988–2021)”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 1948-1991.
  34. Ghazali, P.L., Abu Bakar, N.M., Tahir, I.M., Haron, M., Wan Ismail, W.Z. and Mamat, M. (2015), “Optimization of integration model in family Takaful”, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9 No. 37-40, pp. 1899-1909, doi: 10.12988/ams.2015.411930.
  35. Ghazali, P.L.B., Mamat, M., Omar, L.B., Foziah, N.H.M., Guci, D.A., Abdullah, Y.B. and Sazali, N.E.S.B. (2017), “Medical integration model of family Takaful for blue collar”, Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 101 No. 6, pp. 1197-1205, doi: 10.17654/MS101061197
  36. Ghazali, P.L.B., Mohd, I.B., Mamat, M.B. and Ahmad, W.M.A.W. (2011), “Mathematical modelling in Family Takaful”, Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 11 No. 19, pp. 3381-3388, doi: 10.3923/jas.2011.3381.3388
  37. Ghazali, P.L., Mohd, I., Ahmad, W.M.A.W. and Mamat, M. (2012), “Integration model in premium life table of family takaful”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 8 No. 7, pp. 3763-3776.
  38. Ghazali, P.L., Ismail, M., Ahmad, W.M.A.W. and Mamat, M. (2012), “Integration model of education plan Takaful: A case study for Terengganu, Kelantan and Perlis, states in Malaysia”, Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 65 No. 1, pp. 97-117.
  39. Ghazali, P.L., Mohd, I., Ahmad, W.M.A.W. and Mamat, M. (2012), “Comparison of premium life tables between existing model and integration model in family Takaful”, Journal of Applied Sciences Research, Vol. 8 No. 7, pp. 3754-3762.
  40. Ghazali, P. L., Foziah, H., Mamat, M., Razak, R. A., Omar, L., Afthanorhan, A., & Wan Daud, W. M. N. (2019). Mathematical concept in integration model of education plan Takaful. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(5), 594-599.
  41. Ha, M., Ab Rahman, A., & Seman, A. C. (2018). Society’s understanding of family Takaful. In New Developments in Islamic Economics (pp. 151-166). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/978-1-78756-283-720181010
  42. Haberbeck, A. (1987), “Risk sharing in an Islamic society”, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 138-147.
  43. Htay, S.N.N., Jawahir, M.K. and Salman, S.A. (2013), “Shariah scholars’ viewpoint on the practice of underwriting and risk rating for family Takaful model”, Asian Social Science, Vol. 9 No. 9, pp. 280-286, doi: 10.5539/ass.v9n9p280.
  44. Husin, M.M. and Rahman, A.A. (2016), “Predicting intention to participate in family Takaful scheme using decomposed theory of planned behaviour”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 43 No. 12, pp. 1351-1366, doi: 10.1108/IJSE-03-2015-0074.
  45. Hussin, M.Y.M., Rahman, A.A., Ahmad, W.M.W., Ratnasari, R.T. and Ismail, Z. (2024), “Takaful as an Islamic alternative to conventional insurance: A thematic and bibliometric review”, International Journal of Religion, Vol. 5 No. 10, pp. 2619-2636, doi: 10.61707/9hb39r85.
  46. Ishak, N. H. I., & Saraih, U. N. (2021). Word of mouth, trust and customer satisfaction in family takaful industry in Malaysia. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2339, No. 1, p. 020102). AIP Publishing LLC. doi: 10.1063/5.0044185
  47. Ishak, N.H.I., Saraih, U.N., Idrus, S.S., Shah, I.A. and Ardian, Z. (2023), “The effects of service quality and word of mouth towards customer satisfaction in family Takaful industry”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2750 No. 1, p. 090007. doi:10.1063/5.0148543
  48. Ismail, H.B. (2014), “A simulation model for the determination of tabarru’ rate in a family takaful”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1602 No. 1, pp. 449-452. American Institute of Physics. doi: 10.1063/1.4882524
  49. Ismail, H.B. (2013), “Observing the tabarru’ rate in a family takaful”, AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1522 No. 1, pp. 1152-1158. American Institute of Physics. doi: 10.1063/1.4801261
  50. Jamaludin, H., Mohamed, B., Abdul Razak, F.Z. and Zaidi Abdul Razak, F. (2020), “Perceived service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty in takaful industry”, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 100. doi: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.83
  51. Jamil, H. and Akhter, W. (2016), “Investigating the impact of Shari’ah perception on customer switching intentions: A study of Takāful and conventional insurance”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2016.1261525.
  52. Jeflea, F.V., Danciulescu, D., Sitnikov, C.S., Filipeanu, D., Park, J.O. and Tugui, A. (2022), “Societal technological mega trends: A bibliometric analysis from 1982 to 2021”, Sustainability, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 1-27, doi: 10.3390/su14031543.
  53. Khan, A., Hassan, M.K., Paltrinieri, A., Dreassi, A. and Bahoo, S. (2020), “A bibliometric review of takaful literature”, International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 69, pp. 389-405, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.05.013.
  54. Khan, I., Abdul Rahman, N.N.B., Zulkifli Bin Mohd Yusoff, M.Y., Mohd Nor, M.R. and Bin Noordin, K. (2018), “A narrative on Islamic insurance in Bangladesh: problems and prospects”, International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 186-199. doi: 10.1108/IJOES-06-2017-0087
  55. Kudaibergenova, R., Uzakbay, S., Makanova, A., Ramadin kyzy, K., Kistaubayev, E., Dussekeev, R., and Smagulov, K. (2022), “Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: A case study”, Scientometrics, Vol. 127 No. 1, pp. 453-479, doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04139-y.
  56. Lee, H. S., Cheng, F. F., Har, W. M., Md Nassir, A., and Ab Razak, N. H. (2019), “Efficiency, firm-specific and corporate governance factors of the Takaful insurance”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 368-387, doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-06-2018-0187.
  57. Lee, H.S., Cheng, F.F., Nassir, A.M. and Hisyam Ab Razak, N. (2019), “Impacts of risk-based capital regulation in Malaysian Islamic insurers (takaful)”, Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, Vol. 15 No. 1. doi: 10.21315/aamjaf2019.15.1.2
  58. Maduku, D. K., & Mbeya, S. (2024), “Understanding family takaful purchase behaviour: the roles of religious obligation and gender”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 440-458, doi: 10.1057/s41264-023-00213-z.
  59. Magomadova, M.M., Khominich, I.P., Savvina, O.V. and Dzhurbina, E.M. (2017), “Formation of institutional basics of takaful in Russia”, International Journal of Economic Research, Vol. 14 No. 15, pp. 441-448.
  60. Madahi, N. and Ismail, A. (2021), “Pandemic crisis Malaysian Takāful market”, Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 387-400. doi: 10.26414/A2378
  61. Mahsyar, N. M., & Aslan, H. (2023), “Determinants of family takaful in ASEAN: Evidence from business unit sharô’óh and full-fledged operations”, Hamdard Islamicus, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 73-89, doi: 10.57144/hi.v46i3.875.
  62. Mehboob Shaikh, I., & Amin, H. (2024), “Customers’ willingness to choose family takaful: Extending the theory of interpersonal behaviour”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 100-118, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-0113.
  63. Md Husin, M., Ismail, N., & Ab Rahman, A. (2016), “The roles of mass media, word of mouth and subjective norm in family takaful purchase intention”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 59-73, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-03 2015-0020.
  64. Md Husin, M.M. and Rahman, A.A. (2013), “What drives consumers to participate in family Takaful schemes? A literature review”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 264-280, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-04-2012-0019.
  65. Mohamad, A.I., Tumin, M.H., Noor, N.L.M., Saman, F.M. and Amin, M.N.M. (2018), “Application of System Dynamic Approach for Family Takaful Product Analysis”, Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, Vol. 26 No. 1.
  66. Mohd Fauzi, P.N.F.N. and Laldin, M.A. (2022), “Micro-takāful scheme for the protection of houses belonging to low-income groups in Malaysia”, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 303-314. doi: 10.1108/IJIF-05-2021-0090
  67. Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020), “Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review”, Profesional de La Informacion, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 1-20, doi: 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03.
  68. Zuki, M. F., & Abu Bakar, N. (2023), “Dataset on the conceptualization of institutional trust on intention to participate in family takaful products”, Data in Brief, Vol. 51, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109808.
  69. Mustapha, Z., & Anas, L. (2024), “Analyse bibliométrique de la littérature sur l’assurance Takaful”, Scientific Journal, Vol. 3 No. 25, pp. 1249-1275, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13757142.
  70. Nuraini, I., & Marlina, L. (2023), “Research Mapping on Takaful Performance”, Tamkin Journal, Vol. 2 No. 1, doi: 10.58968/tj.v2i1.162.
  71. Osman, I., Abdur Rehman, M., Mohy Ul Din, S., Shams, G. and Aziz, K. (2022), “Let’s get acquainted: an empirical study on takaful customer-service provider relationships from Saudi Arabian perspectives”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 13 No. 11, pp. 2209-2231. doi: 10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0175
  72. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography; An Interim Bibliography.
  73. Qadri, H. M. U. D., Ali, H., Jafar, A., Tahir, A. U. M., & Abbasi, M. A. (2024), “Exploring the hot spots and global trends in Takaful research through bibliometric analysis based on Scopus database (2001-2022)”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 291-305, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-02-2022-0055.
  74. Rahman, K.-U., Akhter, W., & Khan, S. U. (2017), “Factors affecting employee job satisfaction: A comparative study of conventional and Islamic insurance”, Cogent Business and Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-15, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2016.12 73082.
  75. Rahman, M. H., Abdullah, M. F., Hoque, M. N., & Ahmad, A. U. F. (2023), “The application of hibah al-ʿumra in disbursement of family Takāful benefits: an exploratory study”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 192–209, doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-08-2021-0341.
  76. Rahman, M.H., Abdullah, M.F., Ghazali, P.L. and Osmani, N.M. (2019), “Application of umra and ruqba in disbursement of family Takaful benefit: an analysis from Shariah perspective”, Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, pp. 107-123. doi: 10.21315/aamj2019.24.s1.8
  77. Rahman, Z.A., Yusof, R.M. and Majid, M.S.A. (2009), “The role of goods, money and securities markets in promoting family takaful in Malaysia”, International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Vol. 2 Nos. 3-4, pp. 317-335. doi: 10.1504/IJMEF.2009.029066
  78. Riaz, S., Saleem, Q., Ishaq, H.M. and Aqdas, R. (2021), “The determinants of family Takaful demand in Pakistan”, Hamdard Islamicus, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 77-100.
  79. Rusuli, M.S.C., Ruwaida, R., Noraani, M., Takala, J. and Nizamuddin, M. (2019), “Influence of marketing mix strategy in insurance business: the case of Kota Bharu”, Research in World Economy, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 88-. doi: 10.5430/rwe.v10n2p88
  80. Saputra, J., Kusairi, S. and Sanusi, N. (2017), “Modeling the premium and contract properties of family takaful (Islamic life insurance)”, Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, Vol. 30 No. 2. doi: 10.4197/Islec.30-2.12
  81. Saputra, J., Kusairi, S. and Sanusi, N.A. (2021), “Determining equity-linked policy premium for family Takaful: an application of Black-Scholes option pricing with escrowed dynamic model”, Decision Science Letters, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 247-262. doi: 10.5267/j.dsl.2021.3.004
  82. Salleh, M. C. M. (2016), “The significant contribution of Islamic relationship marketing practice in Malaysian takaful industry towards determining customer gratitude, trust, and commitment”, Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 171–207, doi: 10.21315/aamj2016.supp.1.8.
  83. Salman, S.A., Hassan, R. and Yusoff, A. (2018), “Feasibility of introducing takaful (Islamic Insurance) in India from the perspective of Islamic finance experts”, Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, Vol. 9 No. 12, pp. 2656-2661. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.02117.4
  84. Soualhi, Y. (2016), “The practice of Takāful benefit (nomination) in the context of IFSA 2013: A critical appraisal”, ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 197-202.
  85. Soualhi, Y. and Djafri, F. (2021), “Sharī’ah framework for pricing family Takāful products”, Intellectual Discourse, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 89-116.
  86. Malik, N. S. A., & Sulaiman, S. (2023), “A bibliometric study on takaful literature from 2000 to 2023: Embarking toward agriculture protection”, I-IECONS E-Proceedings, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 26–30, doi: 10.33102/iiecons.v10i1.69.
  87. Sadeghi, M. (2010), “The evolution of Islamic insurance-Takaful: A literature survey”, Insurance Markets and Companies: Analyses and Actuarial Computations, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, pp. 100–107.
  88. Saidon, R., Ramly, A., Ishak, A.H. and Razaly, M.Z. (2019), “Significant factors influencing the choice of family Takaful”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 820-825.
  89. Shaikh, I. M., Bin Noordin, K., Arijo, S., Shaikh, F., & Alsharief, A. (2020), “Predicting customers’ adoption towards family takaful scheme in Pakistan using diffusion theory of innovation”, Journal of Islamic Marketing, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 1761– 1776, doi: 10.1108/JIMA-02-2018-0037.
  90. Sherif, M., & Azlina Shaairi, N. (2013), “Determinants of demand on family Takaful in Malaysia”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 26–50, doi: 10.1108/17590811311314276.
  91. Sherif, M., & Hussnain, S. (2017), “Family Takaful in developing countries: the case of Middle East and North Africa (MENA)”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 371–399, doi: 10.1108/IMEFM-01-2016-0016.
  92. Sukmaningrum, P. S., Hendratmi, A., Rusmita, S. A., & Abdul Shukor, S. (2022), “Productivity analysis of family takaful in Indonesia and Malaysia: Malmquist productivity index approach”, Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 649–665, doi: 10.1108/JIABR-03-2021-0097.
  93. Sum, C.Y., Ali, H.M. and Markom, R. (2018), “Legal issues concerning insurable interest and permissible takaful interest at the time of death under conventional and family takaful contracts”, International Journal of Business and Society, Vol. 19 No. S3, pp. 353-367.
  94. Suprapto, N., Sukarmin, S., Puspitawati, R. P., Erman, E., Savitri, D., Ku, C. H., & Mubarok, H. (2021), “Research trend on TPACK through bibliometric analysis (2015-2019)”, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 1375–1385, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v10i4.
  95. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021), Manual de VOSviewer, Universiteit Leiden, available at: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
  96. Zainordin, N.A., Ali, E.R.A.E. and Haron, R. (2024), “Consumers’ acceptance intentions towards family takaful in Malaysia: a focus on the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2)”, in International Conference on Business and Technology, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, pp. 157-165. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67444-0_15
  97. Zakaria, M.Z., Salleh, A.Z., Hasbullah, M., Ismail, A.M. and Ab Jalil, M.A. (2019), “Exploring waqf-based takaful fund as financial aid for the B40 group in Malaysia”, Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation (ISTAC), pp. 149-167.
  98. Abduh, M. and Isma, S.N.Z. (2016), “Dynamic financial model of life insurance and family takaful companies in Malaysia”, Middle East Journal of Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 72-93. doi:10.1504/MEJM.2016.077144