SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Laboratuvar Hayvanları Bilimi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

The Prevalence of Helicobacter spp. in Licensed Experimental Animal Facilities in Aegean Region, Turkey.

Ege Bölgesindeki Ruhsatlı Deney Hayvanı Tesislerinde Helicobacter spp. Prevalansı

Necdet İlker İçil(Bornova Veteriner Kontrol Enstitüsü)0000-0001-9305-6641
Göksel Erbaş(ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1839-754X
Pages
33–43
Publication Date
2024-03-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended that the Experimental Animal facilities moniterize for this agent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Colon and stool samples were collected from a total of 200 animals, 10 mice, 10 rats and 10 gerbils, from separate cages randomly selected between the ages of 15-22 weeks from each of the 11 licensed experimental animal facilities.From the DNA obtained, Helicobacter spp. 16S ribosomal RNA gene was determined by PCR method, and positive samples were determined by Multiplex PCR.The prevalence of Helicobacter spp. in mice was 90.91%.According to the species-based PCR results of the positive samples, the most common species was H. rodentium with a prevalence of 90.91%.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study in which H. bilis and H. muridarum species were not detected in any facility, it was determined that H. typhlonius was the second most common species with a prevalence rate of 72.73%, followed by H. hepaticus with a prevalence of 27.27%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended that the Experimental Animal facilities moniterize for this agent.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gerbil · Helicobacter spp. · Fare

Abstract

Colon and stool samples were collected from a total of 200 animals, 10 mice, 10 rats and 10 gerbils, from separate cages randomly selected between the ages of 15-22 weeks from each of the 11 licensed experimental animal facilities.From the DNA obtained, Helicobacter spp. 16S ribosomal RNA gene was determined by PCR method, and positive samples were determined by Multiplex PCR.The prevalence of Helicobacter spp. in mice was 90.91%.According to the species-based PCR results of the positive samples, the most common species was H. rodentium with a prevalence of 90.91%. In the study in which H. bilis and H. muridarum species were not detected in any facility, it was determined that H. typhlonius was the second most common species with a prevalence rate of 72.73%, followed by H. hepaticus with a prevalence of 27.27%. The prevalence of Helicobacter spp. in rats was 87.5%. According to the PCR results of the positive samples, the most common species was H. rodentium with a prevalence of 87.5%.In the study where H. bilis, H. hepaticus and H. muridarum species were not detected in any facility, H. typhlonius was the second common species with a prevalence of 12.5% in rats. On the other hand, only H. rodentium and H. typhlonius were detected in the colon samples taken from a single facility containing gerbils. It was determined that Helicobacter spp., which causes infections in experimental animals, especially subclinical, is quite common in the study area. It is recommended that the Experimental Animal facilities moniterize for this agent.

Özet

Ruhsatlı 11 adet deney hayvanı tesisinin her birinden 15-22 haftalık yaşlar arasından rastgele seçilen ayrı kafeslerden 10 adet fare, 10 adet rat ve 10 adet te gerbil olmak üzere toplam 200 hayvandan kolon ve dışkı örnekleri toplanmıştır. Elde edilen DNA lardan Helicobacter spp., 16S ribozomal RNA geni kullanılarak PCR yöntemi ile, pozitif örneklerin tür tayini ise Multiplex PCR ile belirlenmiştir. Farelerde Helicobacter spp. prevalansı %90.91 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Pozitif örneklerin tür bazındaki PCR sonuçlarına göre en yaygın tür %90.91 prevalansla H. rodentium olmuştur. H. bilis ve H. muridarum türlerinin hiçbir tesiste tespit edilmediği çalışmada H. typhlonius %72.73 prevalans oranıyla ikinci yaygın tür olurken onu %27.27’lik prevalansla H. hepaticus’un takip ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Ratlarda Helicobacter spp. prevalansı %87.5 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Pozitif örneklerin PCR sonuçlarına göre en yaygın tür %87.5 prevalansla H. rodentium olmuştur. H. bilis, H. hepaticus ve H. muridarum türlerinin hiçbir tesiste tespit edilmediği çalışmada H. typhlonius %12.5 prevalans oranıyla ikinci yaygın türdür. Gerbil bulunduran tek tesisten alınan kolon örneklerinde ise sadece H. rodentium ve H. typhlonius tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmaya konu olan bölgede, özellikle subklinik olmak üzere deney hayvanlarındaki enfeksiyonlara neden olan Helicobacter spp.'nin oldukça yaygın olduğu belirlenmiştir. Deney Hayvanı tesislerinin bu ajan yönünden takibinin yapılması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İçil, N. İ., Erbaş, G. (2024). The Prevalence of Helicobacter spp. in Licensed Experimental Animal Facilities in Aegean Region, Turkey.. Laboratuvar Hayvanları Bilimi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10894467

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Beckwith, C. S., Franklin, C. L., Hook Jr, R. R., Besch-Williford, C. L., & Riley, L. K. (1997). Fecal PCR assay for diagnosis of Helicobacter infection in laboratory rodents. Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(6), 1620-1623. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1620-1623.1997
  2. Bohr, U. R. M., Selgrad, M., Ochmann, C., Backert, S., Konig, W., Fenske, A., Wex, T., & Malfertheiner, P. (2006). Prevalence and spread of enterohepatic Helicobacter species in mice reared in a specific-pathogen-free animal facility. Journal of clinical microbiology, 44(3), 738-742. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.44.3.738-742.2006
  3. Bracken, T. C., Cooper, C. A., Ali, Z., Truong, H., & Moore, J. M. (2017). Helicobacter infection significantly alters pregnancy success in laboratory mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 56(3), 322-329.
  4. Cao, S., Zhu, C., Feng, J., Zhu, L., Yin, J., Xu, Y., Yang, H., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Helicobacter hepaticus infection induces chronic hepatitis and fibrosis in male BALB/c mice via the activation of NF‐κB, Stat3, and MAPK signaling pathways. Helicobacter, 25(2), e12677. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12677
  5. Mähler, M., Berard, M., Feinstein, R., Gallagher, A., Illgen-Wilcke, B., Pritchett-Corning, K., & Raspa, M. (2014). FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Laboratory animals, 48(3), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677213516312
  6. Feng, S., Ku, K., Hodzic, E., Lorenzana, E., Freet, K., & Barthold, S. W. (2005). Differential detection of five mouse-infecting helicobacter species by multiplex PCR. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 12(4), 531-536. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.4.531-536.2005
  7. Fox, J. G., Dewhirst, F. E., Tully, J. G., Paster, B. J., Yan, L., Taylor, N. S., Collins, Jr M. J., Gorelick, P. L., & Ward, J. M. (1994). Helicobacter hepaticus sp. nov., a microaerophilic bacterium isolated from livers and intestinal mucosal scrapings from mice. Journal of clinical microbiology, 32(5), 1238-1245. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.32.5.1238-1245.1994
  8. Franklin, C. L.,Gorelick, P. L., Riley, L. K., Dewhirst, F. E., Livingston, R. S., Ward, J. M.,. & Fox, J. G. (2001). Helicobacter typhlonius sp. nov., a novel murineurease- negative Helicobacter species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(11), 3920-3926. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.11.3920-3926.2001
  9. Goto, K., Ohashi, H., Takakura, A., & Itoh, T. (2000). Current status of Helicobacter contamination of laboratory mice, rats, gerbils, and house musk shrews in Japan. Current microbiology, 41, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002840010111
  10. Jacoby, R. O., & Lindsey, J. R. (1998). Risks of infection among laboratory rats and mice at major biomedical research institutions. Ilar Journal, 39(4), 266-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.39.4.266
  11. Johansson, S. K., Feinstein, R. E., Johansson, K. E., & Lindberg, A. V. (2006). Occurrence of Helicobacter species other than H. hepaticus in laboratory mice and rats in Sweden. Comparative medicine, 56(2), 110-113.
  12. Matos-Rodrigues, G. E., Masseron, C. C., SILVA, F. J., Frajblat, M., Moreira, L. O., & Martins, R. A. (2020). PCR-based detection of Helicobacter spp. in animal facilities of a University in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 92. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202020191517
  13. Minitab, LLC. (2021). Minitab. Retrieved from https://www.minitab.com
  14. Myles, M. H., Livingston, R. S., Livingston, B. A., Criley, J. M., & Franklin, C. L. (2003). Analysis of gene expression in ceca of Helicobacter hepaticus-infected A/JCr mice before and after development of typhlitis. Infection and immunity, 71(7), 3885-3893. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.71.7.3885-3893.2003
  15. Myles, M. H., Livingston, R. S., & Franklin, C. L. (2004). Pathogenicity of Helicobacter rodentium in A/JCr and SCID mice. Comparative medicine, 54(5), 549-557.
  16. Neubert, V., Sadek, A., Burell, T., Ralser, A., Erhard, M., Gerhard, M., Seidel K., & Kalali, B. (2022). Validation and improvement of a multiplex PCR method to detect murine Helicobacter species in feces samples of mice. Helicobacter, 27(3), e12888. https://doi.org/10.1111/hel.12888
  17. Nilsson, H. O., Ouis, I. S., Stenram, U., Ljungh, A., Moran, A. P., Wadström, T., & Al-Soud, W. A. (2004). High prevalence of Helicobacter species detected in laboratory mouse strains by multiplex PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and pyrosequencing. Journal of clinical microbiology, 42(8), 3781-3788. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.8.3781-3788.2004
  18. Pritchett-Corning, K. R., Cosentino, J., & Clifford, C. B. (2009). Contemporary prevalence of infectious agents in laboratory mice and rats. Laboratory animals, 43(2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2008.008009
  19. Riley, L. K., Franklin, C. L., Hook Jr, R. R., & Besch-Williford, C. (1996). Identification of murine helicobacters by PCR and restriction enzyme analyses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 34(4), 942-946. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.4.942-946.1996
  20. Scavizzi, F., & Raspa, M. (2006). Helicobacter typhlonius was detected in the sex organs of three mouse strains but did not transmit vertically. Laboratory animals, 40(1), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367706775404390
  21. Shames, B., Fox, J. G., Dewhirst, F., Yan, L., Shen, Z., & Taylor, N. S. (1995). Identification of widespread Helicobacter hepaticus infection in feces in commercial mouse colonies by culture and PCR assay. Journal of clinical microbiology, 33(11), 2968-2972. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.11.2968-2972.1995
  22. Solnick, J. V., & Schauer, D. B. (2001). Emergence of diverse Helicobacter species in the pathogenesis of gastric and enterohepatic diseases. Clinical microbiology reviews, 14(1), 59-97. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.14.1.59-97.2001
  23. Taylor, N. S., Xu, S., Nambiar, P., Dewhirst, F. E., & Fox, J. G. (2007). Enterohepatic Helicobacter species are prevalent in mice from commercial and academic institutions in Asia, Europe, and North America. Journal of clinical microbiology, 45(7), 2166-2172. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00137-07
  24. Whary, M. T., & Fox, J. G. (2006). Detection, eradication, and research implications of Helicobacter infections in laboratory rodents. Lab animal, 35(7), 25-36.
  25. Franklin, C. L.,Gorelick, P. L., Riley, L. K., Dewhirst, F. E., Livingston, R. S., Ward, J. M.,. & Fox, J. G. (2001). Helicobacter typhlonius sp. nov., a novel murineurease- negative Helicobacter species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 39(11), 3920-3926. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.11.3920-3926.2001