SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies / 2026 / Issue: 6

An Evaluation of Open Data Sources in the Health Sector in Türkiye and Around the World and Data Quality Analysis in Open Data Sources Using Business Intelligence Applications

Melih Takyaci(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0008-5987-5924
Niyazi Cenk Genek(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0003-8495-6789
Alp Güzel0009-0001-8584-5832
Muhammet Ali Aydın(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-7650-8860
Samet Özkök(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-8545-0531
Hasan Bertuğ Taş(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-4651-9356
Senai Sinan Sungur(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0009-0006-8484-4578
Özgür Alp Yavuz(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0009-0005-5759-2486
Muhammet Damar(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3985-3073
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These recommendations indicate that such planning and actions will contribute more to extracting insights from health system data, enabling more scientific value to be drawn, and ensuring that the budget and time spent on data are better allocated to other phases of research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of open data widely used in the healthcare sector, the methods of its sharing, and its applications in Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Open data plays a strategic role today in increasing transparency and enhancing research capabilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These recommendations indicate that such planning and actions will contribute more to extracting insights from health system data, enabling more scientific value to be drawn, and ensuring that the budget and time spent on data are better allocated to other phases of research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Open data · health informatics · business intelligence

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of open data widely used in the healthcare sector, the methods of its sharing, and its applications in Türkiye. It also aims to compare these practices with international examples in a detailed manner. Open data plays a strategic role today in increasing transparency and enhancing research capabilities. Proper open data sharing within the healthcare system will support health-related research and enable researchers to perform various analyses on the data. As a result, the energy and resources spent on finding data for scientific developments can be redirected to other areas of scientific activities, leading to more scientific output through various analyses that can be performed with the available data. In our study, we first examine sources that provide health-related data in Türkiye. Notable open data sources in Türkiye include Open Data Izmir, the Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Open Data Platform, the Turkish Statistical Institute Statistical Data Portal, and the National Smart City Open Data Platform. Internationally, leading open data platforms include the World Health Organization, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the U.S. Health Data Portal, and the World Bank Open Data Portal. In particular, the shared data contents, data types, data formats, reports created for the data, and the privacy measures regarding the data were analyzed. The seasonality and sustainability of the data were also examined. National open data sources were analyzed and compared with international sources. The results of the analysis showed that while there is a special effort in three major cities in Türkiye regarding data sharing, open data in the healthcare sector remains an area that can be improved in Türkiye. Sharing open data in a high-quality and efficient manner, in accordance with international standards, is considered highly valuable both for academic and practical applications. Examples were taken from systems that share appropriate datasets for analysis, and reporting was carried out using Microsoft Power BI business intelligence tools. A comprehensive assessment was made regarding what kinds of analyses can be performed, what kinds of research can be conducted, and what kind of extensions could enable further research. Additionally, as a result of the business intelligence applications, it was observed that the open data practices in Türkiye were generally limited compared to those in other countries. For developing countries like Türkiye, it is suggested that open data reach international standards, that the Ministries of Health support open data, that the formats for open data be diversified, that sharing standards comply with rules and regulations, and that an appropriate legal and regulatory framework be rapidly established. These recommendations indicate that such planning and actions will contribute more to extracting insights from health system data, enabling more scientific value to be drawn, and ensuring that the budget and time spent on data are better allocated to other phases of research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Takyaci, M., Genek, N. C., Güzel, A., Aydın, M. A., Özkök, S., Taş, H. B., Sungur, S. S., Yavuz, Ö. A., Damar, M. (2026). An Evaluation of Open Data Sources in the Health Sector in Türkiye and Around the World and Data Quality Analysis in Open Data Sources Using Business Intelligence Applications. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1618598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (99)

  1. Abedjan, Z., Boujemaa, N., Campbell, S., Casla, P., Chatterjea, S., Consoli, S., Costa-Soria, C., Czech, P., Despenic, M., Garattini, C., Hamelinck, D., Heinrich, A., Kraaij, W., Kustra, J., Lojo, A., Sanchez, M. M., Mayer, M. A., Melideo, M., Menasalvas, E.,. Wuyts, R. (2019). Data science in healthcare: Benefits, challenges and opportunities. In Data science for healthcare: Methodologies and applications (pp. 3–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05249-2_1
  2. Akçetin, E., Çelik, U., & Takçı, H. (2013). Lojistik ve denizcilik sektörü açısından veri madenciliği uygulamalarının önemi. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 1(2), 73-80.
  3. Alamoudi, E., Mehmood, R., Aljudaibi, W., Albeshri, A., & Hasan, S. H. (2019). Open source and open data licenses in the smart infrastructure era: Review and license selection frameworks. In Smart infrastructure and applications: Foundations for smarter cities and societies (pp. 537–559). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13705-2_22
  4. Aliprandi, S. (2012). Opening licensing and databases. International Free and Open Source Software Law Review, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.5033/ifosslr.v4i1.62
  5. Almuqrin, A., Mutambik, I., Alomran, A., Gauthier, J., & Abusharhah, M. (2022). Factors influencing public trust in open government data. Sustainability, 14(15), 9765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159765
  6. Bates, J. (2014). The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of open government data in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 388-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.02.009
  7. Bernelin, M. (2020). The compatibility of open/free licences: A legal imbroglio. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa010
  8. Bloom, G. (2013). Towards a community data commons. In B. Goldstein & L. Dyson (Eds.), Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation (pp. 255–270). San Francisco: America Press.
  9. Boeing, G., Higgs, C., Liu, S., Giles-Corti, B., Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Lowe, M., Adlakha, D., Hinckson, E., Moudon, A. V., Salvo, D., Adams, M. A., Barrozo, L. V., Bozovic, T., Delclòs-Alió, X., Dygrýn, J., Ferguson, S., Gebel, K., Ho, T. P.,. Arundel, J. (2022). Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), e907–e918. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9
  10. Buchanan, E. M., Crain, S. E., Cunningham, A. L., Johnson, H. R., Stash, H., Papadatou-Pastou, M., Isager, P. M., Carlsson, R., & Aczel, B. (2021). Getting started creating data dictionaries: How to create a shareable data set. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920928007. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920928007
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.cdc.gov/DataStatistics
  12. Chelak, K., & Chakole, S. (2023). The role of social determinants of health in promoting health equality: A narrative review. Cureus, 15(1), Article e33425. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33425
  13. Chen, C., Howe, J., Kariotis, T., & Jackson, S. (2024). Open data, workplace relations law compliance, and digital regulation. Data & Policy, 6, e26. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2024.18
  14. Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1165-1188. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703503
  15. Chorley, K. M. (2017). The challenges presented to records management by open government data in the public sector in England: A case study. Records Management Journal, 27(2), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2016-0034
  16. Creative Commons. (n.d.). About CC licenses. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/
  17. Damar, M. (2022a). Dijital çağda bilişim sektörünün ihtiyacı olan yetkinlikler üzerine bir değerlendirme. Journal of Information Systems and Management Research, 4(1), 25–40.
  18. Damar, M. (2022b). Dijital dünyanın dünü, bugünü ve yarını: Bilişim sektörünün gelişimi üzerine değerlendirme. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 12(Dijitalleşme), 51–76.
  19. Damar, M. (2024). Sağlık sektöründe karar destek araçları: İş zekâsı, makine öğrenmesi, derin öğrenme ve yapay zeka uygulamaları. İzmir Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 90–115. https://doi.org/10.47899/ijss.1591168
  20. Damar, M., & Karaman, D. (2021). Açık veri ve iş zekâsı teknolojisi: İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi dava verileri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 206–228. https://doi.org/10.31200/makuubd.899741
  21. Damar, M., Kop, O., Şaylan, Ö. F., Özen, A., Çakmak, Ü. E., & Erenay, F. S. (2024). Digital health: The critical value of mobile technology for the health sector, different application examples from the world and current trends. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, 4(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.57020/ject.1514154
  22. Damar, M., Özdağoğlu, G., & Özdağoğlu, A. (2018). İş zekasını ve ilgili teknolojileri konu alan araştırmalara küresel ölçekte bilimetrik bakış. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 13(2), 197–217.
  23. Damar, M., Özdağoğlu, G., & Saso, L. (2022). Designing a business intelligence-based monitoring platform for evaluating research collaborations within university networks: The case of UNICA – the Network of Universities from the Capitals of Europe. Information Research, 27(4), Article 945. https://doi.org/10.47989/irpaper945
  24. Damar, M., Yüksel, İ., Çetinkol, A. E., Aydın, Ö., & Küme, T. (2024). Advancements and integration: A comprehensive review of health informatics and its diverse subdomains with a focus on technological trends. Health and Technology, 14(4), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-024-00872-5
  25. De Robbio, A. (2011). OL4OD: Open licenses for open data. JLIS.it, 2(2), Article 4695. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-4695
  26. Demir, G., Riaz, M., & Almalki, Y. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making in evaluation of open government data indicators: An application in G20 countries. AIMS Mathematics, 8(8), 18408–18434. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2023936
  27. EHDEN Consortium. (n.d.). European Health Data & Evidence Network (EHDEN). Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.ehden.eu/
  28. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. (n.d.). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/data-tools
  29. European Commission. (n.d.-a). DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe (DCAT-AP). Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/semantic-interoperability-community-semic/solution/dcat-application-profile-data-portals-europe
  30. European Commission. (n.d.-b). European Health Data Space Regulation (EHDS). Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://health.ec.europa.eu/ehealth-digital-health-and-care/european-health-data-space-regulation-ehds_en
  31. European Commission. (n.d.-c). European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://open-science-cloud.ec.europa.eu/
  32. European Commission. (n.d.-d). Horizon Europe: EU research and innovation funding programme. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/horizon-europe_en
  33. European Data Portal. (2023). Open data formats - eLearning module. https://data.europa.eu/en/training/elearning/open-data-formats
  34. European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1024 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019L1024
  35. Global Data Barometer. (2022). First edition report: Global Data Barometer. ILDA. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6488349
  36. González-Mora, C., Garrigós, I., & Zubcoff, J. (2020). An apification approach to facilitate the access and reuse of open data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Engineering (pp. 512–518). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_36
  37. Guadamuz, A. (2006). Open science: Open source licences in scientific research. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 7(2), 321–366. https://ssrn.com/abstract=764064
  38. Hagedorn, G., Mietchen, D., Morris, R. A., Agosti, D., Penev, L., Berendsohn, W. G., & Hobern, D. (2011). Creative Commons licenses and the non-commercial condition: Implications for the re-use of biodiversity information. ZooKeys, 150, 127. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2189
  39. Hardwicke, T. E., Mathur, M. B., MacDonald, K., Nilsonne, G., Banks, G. C., Kidwell, M. C., Hofelich Mohr, A., Clayton, E., Yoon, E. J., Henry Tessler, M., Lenne, R. L., Altman, S., Long, B., & Frank, M. C. (2018). Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: Evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition. Royal Society Open Science, 5(8), 180448. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180448
  40. HealthData.gov. (n.d.). U.S. Health Data Portal. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.healthdata.gov/
  41. Heijlen, R., & Crompvoets, J. (2021). Open health data: Mapping the ecosystem. Digital Health, 7, Article 20552076211050167. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211050167
  42. Hufstedler, H., Roell, Y., Peña, A., Krishnan, A., Green, I., Barbosa-Silva, A., Kremer, A., Blacketer, C., Fortier, I., Howard, K., LeRoy, B., Hafeza, E., Baorto, D., Swertz, M., Maxwell, L., & Jaenisch, T. (2024). Navigating data standards in public health: A brief report from a data-standards meeting. Journal of Global Health, 14, 03024. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.03024
  43. Huston, P., Edge, V. L., & Bernier, E. (2019). Reaping the benefits of open data in public health. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 45(11), 252. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v45i10a01
  44. İBB Açık Veri. (n.d.). Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Open Data Portal. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://data.ibb.gov.tr/
  45. İzmir Açık Veri. (n.d.). Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Open Data Portal. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://acikveri.bizizmir.com/
  46. Jaakkola, H., Mäkinen, T., & Eteläaho, A. (2014). Open data: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 25-39). Ruse, Bulgaria, June 27 - 28, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659594
  47. Jee, K., & Kim, G. H. (2013). Potentiality of big data in the medical sector: Focus on how to reshape the healthcare system. Healthcare Informatics Research, 19(2), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2013.19.2.79
  48. Karaca, Y., & Özsalmanlı, A. Y. (2022). Kamu yönetiminde açık veri yönetimi ve şeffaflık: ABD ve İngiltere uygulamaları. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.52791/aksarayiibd.1049900
  49. Kassen, M. (2019). Open data and e-government-related or competing ecosystems: A paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia. Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 552–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1412289
  50. Khan, N., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2023). Data sharing and reuse practices: Disciplinary differences and improvements needed. Online Information Review, 47(6), 1036-1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423
  51. Khayyat, M., & Bannister, F. (2015). Open data licensing: More than meets the eye. Information Polity, 20(4), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-150357
  52. Kostkova, P., Brewer, H., de Lusignan, S., Fottrell, E., Goldacre, B., Hart, G., Koczan, P., Knight, P., Marsolier, C., McKendry, R. A., Ross, E., Sasse, A., Sullivan, R., Chaytor, S., Stevenson, O., Velho, R., & Tooke, J. (2016). Who owns the data? Open data for healthcare. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00007
  53. KVKK. (2016). Kişisel verilerin korunması kanunu, Kanun No: 6698. Retrieved March 17, 2025, from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=6698&MevzuatTur=1&MevzuatTertip=5
  54. Lakomaa, E., & Kallberg, J. (2013). Open data as a foundation for innovation: The enabling effect of free public sector information for entrepreneurs. IEEE Access, 1, 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2013.2279164
  55. Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6
  56. Marques, J. F., & Bernardino, J. (2020). Analysis of data anonymization techniques. In KEOD (pp. 235-241). https://doi.org/10.5220/0010142302350241
  57. Miller, P., Styles, R., & Heath, T. (2008). Open data commons, a license for open data. LDOW, 369.
  58. Mudzana, T., & Maharaj, M. (2015). Measuring the success of business-intelligence systems in South Africa: An empirical investigation applying the DeLone and McLean model. SA Journal of Information Management, 17(1), a646. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v17i1.646
  59. Murray-Rust, P. (2008). Open data in science. Nature Precedings, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.1526.1
  60. Nascimento Silva, P., & Nascimento Silva, S. (2025). Open government data in health sector: A systematic literature review. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-21149-6
  61. Nogueras-Iso, J., Lacasta, J., Ureña-Cámara, M. A., & Ariza-López, F. J. (2021). Quality of metadata in open data portals. IEEE Access, 9, 60364-60382. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3073455
  62. Norn, M. T., & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2025). Open for business: Can open science partnerships mitigate barriers to academia-industry collaboration and science-based innovation? Industry and Innovation, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2025.2499531
  63. Novais, T., Albuquerque, J. P. D., & Craveiro, G. S. (2013). An account of research on open government data (2007–2012): A systematic literature review. In Electronic government and electronic participation: Joint proceedings of ongoing research of IFIP EGOV and IFIP ePart (pp. 76–83), Berlin: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
  64. OECD. (2023). 2023 OECD Open, Useful and Re-Usable Data (OURdata) Index (OECD Public Governance Policy Papers). Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023-oecd-open-useful-and-re-usable-data-ourdata-index_a37f51c3-en.html
  65. Okunleye, O. (2024). The role of open data in driving sectoral innovation and global economic development. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(7), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i71205
  66. Open Data Watch. (2024). Open Data Inventory 2024 biennial report. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://odin.opendatawatch.com/Report/biennialReport2024
  67. Open Knowledge Foundation. (n.d.). Open Data Commons. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://opendatacommons.org/
  68. Park, S., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2017). Understanding transparency and accountability in open government ecosystems: The case of health data visualizations in a state government. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 39–47). Staten Island NY USA, June 7 - 9, 201. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085318
  69. Puttanapong, N., Luenam, A., & Jongwattanakul, P. (2022). Spatial analysis of inequality in Thailand: Applications of satellite data and spatial statistics/econometrics. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 3946. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073946
  70. Ramachandran, R., Bugbee, K., & Murphy, K. (2021). From open data to open science. Earth and Space Science, 8(5), e2020EA001562. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001562
  71. Shadbolt, N., O'Hara, K., Berners-Lee, T., Gibbins, N., Glaser, H., Hall, W., & schraefel, m. c. (2012). Linked open government data: Lessons from data.gov.uk. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(3), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2012.23
  72. Shepherd, E. (2015). Freedom of information, right to access information, open data: Who is at the table? The Round Table, 104(6), 715-726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2015.1112101
  73. Shollo, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2016). Towards an understanding of the role of business intelligence systems in organisational knowing. Information Systems Journal, 26(4), 339-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12071
  74. Sivarajah, U., Weerakkody, V., Waller, P., Lee, H., Irani, Z., Choi, Y., Morgan, R., & Glikman, Y. (2016). The role of e-participation and open data in evidence-based policy decision making in local government. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1125171
  75. Šlibar, B., Oreški, D., & Begičević Ređep, N. (2021). Importance of the open data assessment: An insight into the (meta) data quality dimensions. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211023178. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211023178
  76. Stazi, A. (2026). The European Health Data Space: Steps forward and critical limitations (Techno Polis Forum-Lab Policy Brief No. 1/2026). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6035915
  77. Susha, I., Janssen, M., & Verhulst, S. (2017). Data collaboratives as a new frontier of cross-sector partnerships in the age of open data: Taxonomy development. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS–50). Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, January 4 - 7, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.325
  78. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2019). Kişisel sağlık verileri hakkında yönetmelik. Resmî Gazete, 30808. Retrieved June 8, 2025, from https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/31003/0/kisisel-saglik-verileri-hakkinda-yonetmelikpdf.pdf
  79. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2011). Sağlık bilgi yönetim sistemleri hakkında yönetmelik. Resmî Gazete, 27840. Retrieved June 8, 2025, from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/yonetmelik/7.5.39682.pdf
  80. Torres-Espín, A., Almeida, C. A., Chou, A., Huie, J. R., Chiu, M., Vavrek, R., Sacramento, J., Orr, M. B., Gensel, J. C., Grethe, J. S., Martone, M. E., Fouad, K., Ferguson, A. R., & the STREET-FAIR Workshop Participants. (2022). Promoting FAIR data through community-driven agile design: The open data commons for spinal cord injury (odc-sci.org). Neuroinformatics, 20(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-021-09533-8
  81. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (n.d.). Directive on open government. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=28108
  82. TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. (n.d.). Aperta: Türkiye açık bilim platformu. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/
  83. TÜİK. (n.d.). TÜİK istatistik veri portalı. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/
  84. TURCOVID19. (2020). Türkiye COVID–19 pandemi izleme ekranı. https://turcovid19.com/
  85. U.S. Congress. (2018). Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (Title II: OPEN Government Data Act). Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4174/text
  86. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives (OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 22). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
  87. Uhlir, P. F., & Schröder, P. (2007). Open data for global science. Data Science Journal, 6, OD36–OD53. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.6.OD36
  88. ULASAV. (n.d.). Ulusal akıllı şehir açık veri platformu. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://ulasav.csb.gov.tr/
  89. Van Panhuis, W. G., Grefenstette, J., Jung, S. Y., Chok, N. S., Cross, A., Eng, H., Lee, B. Y., Zadorozhny, V., Brown, S., Cummings, D., & Burke, D. S. (2013). Contagious diseases in the United States from 1888 to the present. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369(22), 2152-2158. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1215400
  90. Van Veen, E. B. (2011). Patient data for health research: A discussion paper on anonymization procedures for the use of patient data for health research. Den Haag: MedLawconsult.
  91. Weerakkody, V., Kapoor, K., Balta, M. E., Irani, Z., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data. Production Planning & Control, 28(11-12), 891-905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1336802
  92. World Bank. (n.d.). Open data portal: Health. Retrieved December 10, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/topic/health
  93. World Health Organization. (n.d.). WHO data platform. Retrieved April 10, 2025, from https://www.who.int/data
  94. Yorulmaz, M. (2025). Analysis of health data sharing and transparency in Türkiye within the framework of open data policies. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 15(3), 245-260 https://doi.org/10.26579/jocress.15.3.4
  95. Zeng, L., Li, L., & Duan, L. (2012). Business intelligence in enterprise computing environment. Information Technology and Management, 13(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-012-0123-z
  96. Zillner, S., & Neururer, S. (2016). Big data in the health sector. In J.M. Cavanillas, E. Curry, & W. Wahlster, (Eds.), New horizons for a data-driven economy: A roadmap for usage and exploitation of big data in Europe (pp. 179–194). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21569-3_10
  97. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Davis, C. (2014). Innovation with open data: Essential elements of open data ecosystems. Information Polity, 19(1–2), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-140329
  98. Abedjan, Z., Boujemaa, N., Campbell, S., Casla, P., Chatterjea, S., Consoli, S., Costa-Soria, C., Czech, P., Despenic, M., Garattini, C., Hamelinck, D., Heinrich, A., Kraaij, W., Kustra, J., Lojo, A., Sanchez, M. M., Mayer, M. A., Melideo, M., Menasalvas, E.,. Wuyts, R. (2019). Data science in healthcare: Benefits, challenges and opportunities. In Data science for healthcare: Methodologies and applications (pp. 3–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05249-2_1
  99. Boeing, G., Higgs, C., Liu, S., Giles-Corti, B., Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Lowe, M., Adlakha, D., Hinckson, E., Moudon, A. V., Salvo, D., Adams, M. A., Barrozo, L. V., Bozovic, T., Delclòs-Alió, X., Dygrýn, J., Ferguson, S., Gebel, K., Ho, T. P.,. Arundel, J. (2022). Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), e907–e918. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9