SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies / 2026 / Issue: 6

A Comprehensive Study of Data Storage Technologies and Forensic Imaging

Aybeyan Selim(International Vision University)0000-0001-8285-2175
İlker Ali(International Vision University)0000-0002-2111-415X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study provides a comprehensive reference for researchers, students, and digital forensic practitioners while highlighting emerging challenges and future directions in digital forensic investigations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid evolution of data storage technologies and the increasing complexity of digital artifacts have significantly transformed the field of digital forensics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This review systematically examines the evolution of data storage technologies, from punch cards to modern optical media, with a particular emphasis on forensic imaging, major file systems (FAT, NTFS, EXT, HFS+, and APFS), and digital artifacts relevant to forensic investigations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study provides a comprehensive reference for researchers, students, and digital forensic practitioners while highlighting emerging challenges and future directions in digital forensic investigations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Digital forensics · Data storage · Forensic imaging

Abstract

The rapid evolution of data storage technologies and the increasing complexity of digital artifacts have significantly transformed the field of digital forensics. This review systematically examines the evolution of data storage technologies, from punch cards to modern optical media, with a particular emphasis on forensic imaging, major file systems (FAT, NTFS, EXT, HFS+, and APFS), and digital artifacts relevant to forensic investigations. The study analyzes how advances in storage technologies influence evidence acquisition, preservation, integrity verification, and forensic analysis while highlighting the forensic significance of Internet history, metadata, registry artifacts, deleted data, and volatile evidence in reconstructing user activities and supporting legal investigations. Furthermore, the review discusses current challenges, including data volume, storage diversity, encryption, and the dynamic nature of digital evidence, emphasizing the need for advanced forensic tools and methodologies. By integrating the evolution of storage technologies, forensic imaging techniques, modern file systems, and digital artifacts into a unified framework, this review bridges the gap between fragmented educational resources and contemporary forensic practice. The study provides a comprehensive reference for researchers, students, and digital forensic practitioners while highlighting emerging challenges and future directions in digital forensic investigations.

🔖

Cite This Article

Selim, A., Ali, İ. (2026). A Comprehensive Study of Data Storage Technologies and Forensic Imaging. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, Issue: 6. https://doi.org/10.57020/ject.1954843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (44)

  1. Adams, D. (2024). Oracle XML DB Developer's Guide, 11g Release 2 (11.2) E16659-03.
  2. Ali, İ., Selim, A., & Skender, F. (2026). Leveraging OCR and AI Tools: A Comparative Guide to Enhancing Data Processing and Decision-Making Efficiency in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 10(1), 129-142.
  3. Ali, M., Ismail, A., Elgohary, H., Darwish, S., & Mesbah, S. (2022). A procedure for tracing chain of custody in digital image forensics: A paradigm based on grey hash and blockchain. Symmetry, 14(2), 334.
  4. Amoruso, E. (2024). Privacy and Security of the Windows Registry.
  5. Breitinger. (2014). Towards a process model for hash functions in digital forensics. In Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, LNICST (Vol. 132, pp. 170–186). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14289-0_12
  6. Cao, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Ext4: The Next Generation of Ext2/3 Filesystem. LSF. Retrieved from https://www.usenix.org/events/lsf07/tech/cao_m.pdf
  7. Casey, E. (2011). Digital evidence and computer crime: Forensic science, computers, and the internet. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books
  8. Cortada, J. (2000). Before the computer: IBM, NCR, Burroughs, and Remington Rand and the industry they created, 1865-1956. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/
  9. Dutra, A. (2021). Forensic acquisition of file systems with parallel processing of digital artifacts to generate an early case assessment report.
  10. Gen, P. (2018). Surveillance HDD. Seagate. Retrieved from https://www.seagate.com/
  11. Ghazinour, K., Vakharia, D., & Kannaji, K. (2017). A study on digital forensic tools. International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering. doi:10.1109/ICPCSI.2017.8392304
  12. Glisson, W., Storer, T., Blyth, A., Grispos, G., & Campbell, M. (2016). In the wild residual data research and privacy.
  13. Gonzales, A., Schofield, R., & Schmitt, G. (n.d.). Test Results for Hardware Write Block Device: Digital Intelligence. Ojp.Gov. Retrieved from https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/212961.pdf
  14. Gu, D., Petkov, P., & Konstantinov, M. (2005). Robust control of a hard disk drive. In Robust Control Design with MATLAB®. Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/1-84628-091-5_10.pdf
  15. Hansen, K., & Toolan, F. (2017). Decoding the APFS file system. Digital Investigation, 22, 107-132.
  16. Hipson, P., Forys, M., & Loobkoff, S. (2002). Mastering windows xp registry. Sybex.
  17. Kang, S., & Leblebici, Y. (2003). CMOS digital integrated circuits. Retrieved from https://ece222-fall19-01.courses.soe.ucsc.edu
  18. Kennedy, I., & Day, E. (2016). Digital Forensic Analysis. In Policing Digital Crime (pp. 161-186). Routledge.
  19. Khan, A., Shaikh, A., & Forensics, A. (2010). Digital forensics and cyber forensics investigation: security challenges, limitations, open issues, and future direction. Inderscienceonline.Com.
  20. Kim, Y., & Hong, D. (2008). Windows registry and hiding suspects' secret in registry. 2008 International Conference on Information Security and Assurance (isa 2008) (pp. 393-398). IEEE.
  21. Kozierok, C. (2001). The PC Guide.
  22. Linev Innovations. (2022). Forensic Imaging: A Powerful Tool in Modern Forensic Investigation.
  23. Magnet Forensics. (2024). Digital Forensics Tools: The Ultimate Guide. https://www.magnetforensics.com/blog/digital-forensics-tools-the-ultimate-guide-2024/
  24. Min, C., Kashyap, S., Lee, B., Song, C., & Kim, T. (2015). Computer Forensics Tool Testing. Nist.Gov, 361-377.
  25. Moreb, M. (2017). Practical Forensic Analysis of Artifacts on iOS and Android Devices.
  26. Morville, P., & Rosenfeld, L. (2006). Information architecture for the World Wide Web: Designing large-scale web sites. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  27. Peng, Y., Wang, M., & Kaszynski, D. (2005). An overview of the Blu-ray disc application format for HD-movie distribution. Symposium on Optical Storage, 5966, pp. 59661-59662.
  28. Pittalia, P. (2019). A comparative study of hash algorithms in cryptography. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 8(6), 147-152.
  29. Professional Development Digital Forensics Program. (n.d.). File Systems: FAT, NTFS, EXT, HFS+, APFS.
  30. Rabaey, J., Chandrakasan, A., & Nikolic, B. (2002). Digital integrated circuits.
  31. Salama, U., Varadharajan, V., & Hitchens, M. (2012). Metadata based forensic analysis of digital information in the web. Annual Symposium on Information Assurance & Secure Knowledge Management, 7, pp. 9-15.
  32. Saracevic, M. H., Selimi, A., & Pepić, S. (2022). Implementation of Encryption and Data Hiding in E-Health Application. In Research Anthology on Securing Medical Systems and Records (pp. 644-661). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  33. Saračević, M., Selimi, A., & Plojović, Š. (2019). Some Specific Examples of Attacks on Information Systems and Smart Cities Applications. In Cybersecurity and Secure Information Systems: Challenges and Solutions in Smart Environments (pp. 205-226). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  34. Seagate. (2011). Understanding 4K Sector Hard Drives.
  35. Selim, A. (2024). Teoriden Pratiğe Veri Madenciliği. Gostivar: International Vision University.
  36. Selim, A., & Ali, I. (2024). The Role of Digital Forensic Analysis in Modern Investigations. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, 4(1), 1-5.
  37. Selim, A., & Ali, İ. (2024). The Role of Digital Forensic Analysis in Modern Investigations. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies, 4(1), 1-5.
  38. Selim, A., & Ali, I. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning Environments. International Scientific Journal Vision, 10(1), 9-22.
  39. Selim, A., Ali, I., & Skender, F. (2025). Data-Driven Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Insights from University Information System. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Applied Internet and Information Technologies (AIIT 2025), (pp. 275-283).
  40. Selim, A., Milošević, M., & Milošević, D. (2025). A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Approach for Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to Smart City Development. AlfaTech, 1(3), 13-21.
  41. SYSTEM, T. (2024). System T: Next-generation networked broadcast production. Solid State Logic. Oxford, Engliand. https://eu1.download.solidstatelogic.com/System%20T/System%20T%20brochure%20June%2024_web.pdf
  42. Tsai, C. (2008). Real-time video recording on Blu-ray discs for UPnP streaming. Conference on Consumer Electronics.
  43. Tsalis, N., Mylonas, A., Nisioti, A., Gritzalis, D., & Katos, V. (2017). Exploring the protection of private browsing in desktop browsers. Computers & Security, 67, 181-197.
  44. Wahyudi, E., Riadi, I., & Prayudi, Y. (2018). Virtual machine forensic analysis and recovery method for recovery and analysis digital evidence. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 16.