SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Fe Dergi / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Justice, Inclusiveness and Fair Equality of Opportunity in Education

Adalet, Kapsayıcılık ve Eğitimde Hakkaniyetli Fırsat Eşitliği

RAŞİT ÇELİK
Journal
Fe Dergi
Pages
17–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then the study provides a discussion on the idea of fair equality of opportunity in education

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Inclusiveness is an important concept in the discussions concerning social justice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The idea of an inclusive society has a central place in these discussions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then the study provides a discussion on the idea of fair equality of opportunity in education
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kapsayıcı Eğitim · Adalet · Eşitlik

Abstract

Inclusiveness is an important concept in the discussions concerning social justice. The idea of an inclusive society has a central place in these discussions. An inclusive education without excluding anyone based on phsical feautes, gender or any other reasons is considered a powerful instrument in achieving an inclusive society. In this study, the concepts of inclusiveness and inclusive education are examined based on the theory of justice as fairness and capabilities approach. Then the study provides a discussion on the idea of fair equality of opportunity in education

Özet

Kapsayıcılık kavramı toplumsal adalet tartışmalarında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Kapsayıcı bir toplum oluşturma hedefi bu tartışmaların merkezi konuları arasındadır. Bu doğrultuda bedensel özellikler, cinsiyet ya da herhangi başka bir nedene dayanmaksızın herkesi kapsayıcı bir eğitim anlayışı, kapsayıcı toplum oluşturma hedefinin önemli bir unsuru olarak görülür. Bu ideal bağlamında, bu çalışma öncelikle çağdaş siyaset felsefesinde son derece etkili olan hakkaniyet olarak adalet teorisi ve kabiliyetler yaklaşımı çerçevesinde kapsayıcılık ve kapsayıcı eğitim kavramlarını inceliyor. Ardından, yine bu çerçevede eğitimde hakkaniyetli fırsat eşitliği düşüncesi üzerine bir tartışma sunuyor

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, R. (2017). Justice, Inclusiveness and Fair Equality of Opportunity in Education. Fe Dergi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 17–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/161684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Beckley, Harlan. “Capability as Opportunity: How Amartya Sen Revises Equal Opportunity,” Journal of Religious Ethics 30, no. 1 (2002): 107-135.
  2. Brighouse, Harry. Adalet çev. Raşit Çelik (Ankara: Epos, 2016).
  3. Brighouse, Harry ve Ingrid Robeyns. Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities (New York:Cambridge University Press, 2010).
  4. Bull, Barry. “A Sketch of Politically Liberal Principles of Social Justice in Higher Education,” Philosophical Studies in Education 43 (2012): 26-38.
  5. Callan, Eamonn. “Political Liberalism and Political Education,” The Review of Politics 58, no. 1 (1996): 5-33.
  6. Cohen, Gerald Allan. “Equality of What?: On Welfare, Goods, and Capabilities,” The Quality of Life ed. Martha Nussbaum ve Amartya Sen (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), 9-29.
  7. Costa, Victoria. “Rawlsian Civic Education: Political not Minimal,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21, no. 1 (2004): 1- 14. Çelik, Raşit. “Adalet Ölçütü Olarak İki Önemli Yaklaşım: Birincil Değerler ve Kabiliyetler,” Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi 2, no. 3(2015): 83-96.
  8. Çelik, Raşit. “Curriculum Elements of a Politically Liberal Education in a Developing Democracy,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48, no. 14 (2016a): 1464-1474.
  9. Çelik, Raşit. “Kapsamlı Liberalizmden Siyasal Liberalizme: Adaletin Siyasal Alan İçerisinde Gerekçelendirilmesi,” FLSF 22 (2016b): 83-98.
  10. Fowler, Tim. “The Limits of Civic Education: The Divergent Implications of Political and Comprehensive Liberalism,” Theory and Research in Education 9, no. 1 (2011): 87-100.
  11. Nussbaum, Martha. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).
  12. Öztürk, Armağan. “II. Rawls Dönemi: Biçimsel Aklın Çözülüşü mü?” Toplumsal Üzerine Yeni Perspektifler derl. Armağan Öztürk (Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları, 2008), 9-30.
  13. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).
  14. Rawls, John. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, no. 3 (1985): 223- 251. Rawls, John. Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
  15. Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement ed. Erin Kelly (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001).
  16. Reindal, S. Magnus. “What is the Purpose? Reflections on Inclusion and Special Education from a Capability Perspective,” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25, no. 1 (2010): 1-12.
  17. Robeyns, Ingrid. “The Capability Approach in Practice,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 3 (2006): 351- 376.