SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

THEORY OF INTIMATION IN INTERPRETATION OF TESTAMENTS

VASİYETNAMELERİN YORUMUNDA İMA TEORİSİ

ÖZGE ÖNCÜ
Pages
307–374
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our study, it is aimed toclarify the theory of intimation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the interpretation of testaments, it is aimed to achieve the real will of thelegator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve the real will of the legator, the circumstances andconditions out of the testament should also be considered while interpreting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our study, it is aimed toclarify the theory of intimation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İma teorisi · vasiyetname · yorum

Abstract

In the interpretation of testaments, it is aimed to achieve the real will of thelegator. In order to achieve the real will of the legator, the circumstances andconditions out of the testament should also be considered while interpreting. Onthe other hand, testaments are formal legal transactions. Theory of intimation isa theory suggested mainly in order to associate those two circumstances. Implementation of theory of intimation in terms of testaments is adopted as ageneral in the doctrine, despite contrary opinions. In our study, it is aimed toclarify the theory of intimation.

Özet

Vasiyetnamelerin yorumunda, mirasbırakanın gerçek iradesine ulaşılması

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNCÜ, Ö. (2018). THEORY OF INTIMATION IN INTERPRETATION OF TESTAMENTS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 307–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/161289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Abt, Daniel: Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, Erbrecht Art.457- 640ZGB, Herausgeber: Peter Breitschmid-Alexandra Jungo, 3. Auflage, Zürich-Basel-Genf, 2016, Art. 469 ZGB (anılış: CHK/Abt). Aksoy Dursun, Sanem: “Ölüme Bağlı Tasarrufların Yorumuna Dair Bazı Düşünceler”, İÜHFM C.LXVI, S.2, 2008 (s. 311-326).
  2. Akyol, Şener: Sözleşmenin Yorumu, İstanbul, 2010.
  3. Albayrak, Hakan: Medeni Usul ve İcra İflas Hukukunda Yaklaşık İspat, Ankara, 2013.
  4. Antalya, O. Gökhan/Sağlam, İpek: Miras Hukuku, İstanbul, 2015.
  5. Atlı, Banu: Ölüme Bağlı Tasarrufların Hükümsüzlüğü ve Hükümden Düşmesi, Ankara, 2017.
  6. Aybay, Aydın: Miras Hukuku Dersleri, İstanbul, 2003.
  7. Bağcı, Ömer: “TMK’nun Miras Hukuku Hükümlerinin Zaman Bakımından Uygulanmasına ve Vasiyetnamelerin Yorumuna İlişkin Düşünceler”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.5, S.2, Yıl 2015 (s. 39-63).
  8. Baumann, Lorenz: “Von grauen und farbigen Brunnen: Die Rechtsfolgen unmöglicher Auflagen”, Successio, 2010 (s. 241-247).
  9. Baygın, Cem: “Ölüme Bağlı Tasarruflarda Yorum”, AÜEHFD, C.IV, S.1-2 (2000) (s. 567-594).
  10. Baysal, Başak: Sözleşmenin Uyarlanması, İstanbul, 2009.
  11. Beck, Alexander: Grundriss Des Schweizerischen Erbrechts, Bern, 1976.
  12. Biehl, Björn: “Grundsätze der Vertragsauslegung”, JuS 2010 (s. 195-200).
  13. Breitschmid, Peter: Formvorschriften im Testamentsrecht, Zurich, 1982 (anılış: Formvorschriften). Breitschmid, Peter: “Testament und Erbvertrag – Formprobleme”, Peter Bereitschmid: Gesammelte Schriften aus Anlass seines 60. Geburtstages In praeteritum non vivitur, 2014 (s. 273-316).
  14. Breitschmid, Peter: Basler Kommentar, Zivilgesetzbuch II, 4. Auflage, Herausgeber: Heinrich Honsell/Nedim Peter Vogt/Thomas Geiser, Basel, 2011, Art.469; Art.505 (anılış: BSK ZGB II/Breitschmid). Brox, Hans: “Der Bundesgerichtshof und die Andeutungstheorie”, JA 1984, Heft 10 (s. 549-557) (anılış: “Andeutungstheorie”). Brox, Hans/Walker, Wolf-Dietrich: Erbrecht, 24. Auflage, 2010.
  15. Busche, Jan: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Herausgegeben von: Franz Jürgen Säcker/Roland Rixecker/Hartmut Oetker/Bettina Limperg, 7. Auflage, München, 2015, BGB §133 (anılış: MüKoBGB/Busche). Czubayko, Ulrike: Erbrecht, Herausgeber: Wolfgang Burandt/Dieter Rojahn, 2. neubearbeitete Auflage, 2014, BGB § 2084 (anılış: Burandt/Rojahn/Czubayko). Dalcı Özdoğan, Nurcihan: “Sözleşmenin Yorumunda Gerçek İradenin Tespiti”, İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C.8, S.1, Y.2017 (s. 33-52).
  16. Demir, Şamil: “Ölüme Bağlı Tasarrufların Yorumu”,