SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Denetim ve Güvence Hizmetleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Sustainability and Social Finance: A Research on Social Impact Bonds

Sürdürülebilirlik ve Sosyal Finans: Sosyal Etki Tahvilleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Fatih Konak(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6917-5082
Yasemin Demir0000-0001-7383-5541
Pages
11–35
Publication Date
2023-01-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is reasonable to describe this condition as striving toward the eradication of the requirements of the pandemic situation, the issues encountered in the area of supply, and the results of large-scale economic difficulties.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sustainability, which we could define as taking into account all of human activities collectively and the requirements of future generations rather than simply today's conditions or possibilities, also implies that for something to be sustainable, there must be continuity and renewability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Social and financial gains are integrated in sustainability and social finance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is reasonable to describe this condition as striving toward the eradication of the requirements of the pandemic situation, the issues encountered in the area of supply, and the results of large-scale economic difficulties.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sürdürülebilirlik · Sosyal Finans · Sosyal Etki Tahvilleri

Abstract

Sustainability, which we could define as taking into account all of human activities collectively and the requirements of future generations rather than simply today's conditions or possibilities, also implies that for something to be sustainable, there must be continuity and renewability. By concentrating on the challenges that occur in the areas of social and environmental need, social finance, which we may consider inside or in conjunction with this idea, refers to financial services that endeavor to provide funds to accomplish a social purpose. Social and financial gains are integrated in sustainability and social finance. In this context, the research's goals are to conceptually analyze social impact bonds in the context of sustainability and social finance, to thoroughly assess the current situation, particularly with regard to social impact bonds, and to establish a data set for the future decisions that will have to be taken. Throughout the examinations, it was observed that the idea of social finance, which has several application areas, has gained prominence subsequently. Particularly noticeable are the steady increases in the issuing of social impact bonds since 2013 and the jump in the COVID-19 pandemic period, particularly in 2021. It is reasonable to describe this condition as striving toward the eradication of the requirements of the pandemic situation, the issues encountered in the area of supply, and the results of large-scale economic difficulties.

Özet

Sadece bugünün koşullarını veya imkanlarını dikkate alıp hareket etmektense, gelecek nesillerin ihtiyaçlarını da düşünerek yaptığımız tüm fiilleri bir bütün halinde ele almak şeklinde tanımlayabileceğimiz sürdürülebilirlik, herhangi bir şeyin sürdürülebilir olması için devamlılığının ve yenilenebilirliğinin olması anlamına da gelmektedir. Bu kavram içerisinde veya paralelinde göz önüne alabileceğimiz sosyal finans ise, sosyal ve çevresel ihtiyaç duyulan alanlarda oluşan zorlukları odak noktasına koyarak sosyal bir amaca ulaşmak için fon sağlanmasını amaçlayan finansal hizmetlerdir. Sürdürülebilirlik ve sosyal finans hem finansal hem de sosyal getirileri bir araya getirmektedir. Bu çerçevede, araştırmanın amacı, sürdürülebilirlik ve sosyal finans bağlamında sosyal etki tahvilleri üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme yapmak ve var olan durumu, sosyal etki tahvilleri özelinde, detaylı şekilde tespit ederek geleceğe yönelik atılacak adımlara bilgi seti oluşturmaktır. Yapılan incelemeler neticesinde, farklı uygulama alanları olan sosyal finans kavramının, son yıllarda giderek yaygınlaştığı görülmüştür. Özellikle, sosyal etki tahvil ihracının 2013 yılında bu yana sürekli bir artış gösteriyor olması tespitinin yanında, COVID-19 sürecinde, spesifik olarak 2021 yılında, sıçrama yapışı dikkat çekmektedir. Bu durumu, salgın sürecinin ihtiyaçları, tedarik alanında yaşanan sıkıntılar ve küresel ölçekli ekonomik sorunların yaşattığı etkilerin giderilmesi amacına hizmet etmek olarak ifade etmek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Konak, F., Demir, Y. (2023). Sustainability and Social Finance: A Research on Social Impact Bonds. Denetim ve Güvence Hizmetleri Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 11–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/1611753

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (138)

  1. Abduh, M. (2019). The role of islamic social finance in achieving sdg number 2: end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 24, 185-206.
  2. Akbulak, Y. (2021). Yeşil tahviller ve yeşil tahvil ilkeleri. Erişim adresi: https://legal.com.tr/blog/genel/yesil-tahviller-ve-yesil-tahvil-ilkeleri/?ysclid=l9okdz26tv129683887#_ftn2
  3. Aksu, C. (2011). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve çevre. Güney Ege Kalkınma Ajansı, Erişim adresi: sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Çevre.pdf (duzce.edu.tr)
  4. Andrikopoulos, A. (2020). Social finance: an outline. International Review of Financial Analysis, 70, 1-11. doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101519
  5. Arena, M., Bengo, I., Calderini, M. ve Chiodo, M. (2016). Social impact bonds: blockbuster or flash in a pan?. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 1-13. doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1057852
  6. Aydın, O. (2017). Sosyal etki tahvilleri: sosyal sorunların menkul kıymetleştirilmesi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(4), 916-931. DOI:10.20491/isarder.2017.365
  7. Barajas, A., Barajas, L., Burt, K., Harper, T., Johnson, P. Jr., Larsen, E., … Yeh, C. (2014), Social impact bonds, a new tool for social financing, Princeton University Domestic Policy Workshop Raporu. Erişim adresi:https://docplayer.net/5739651-Social-impact-bonds-a-new-tool-for-social-financing.html
  8. Barigozzi, F. ve Tedeschi, P. (2015). Credit markets with ethical banks and motivated borrowers. European Finance Review, 19(3), 1281–1313. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1928503
  9. Baumli, K. ve Jamasb, T. (2020). Assessing private investment in African renewable energy infrastructure: a multi-criteria decision analysis approach. Sustainability, 12(22), 9425. DOI: 10.3390/su12229425 Bayraktutan, Y. ve Akatay, M. (2012). Kentsel yoksulluk ve mikro finansman: Kocaeli örneği, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24, 1 – 34.
  10. Benedikter, R. (2011). Social banking and social finance. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248388393_Social_Banking_and_Social_Finance_Answers_to_the_Economic_Crisis
  11. Biancone, P. P. ve Radwan, M. (2018). Social finance and unconventional financing alternatives: an overview. European Journal of Islamic Finance, (10). doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/2818
  12. Birevim (2022). Sosyal Finans. Erişim adresi: https://www.birevim.com/sosyal-finans/
  13. Brand, M. W, Quesnel Seipp, K., Saksa, P., Ulibarri, N., Bomblies, A., Mandle, L., Allaire, M., Wing, O., Tobin-de la Puente, J. ve E A Parker, E. A. (2021). Environmental impact bonds: a common framework and looking ahead. Environ. Res.: Infrastruct. Sustain. 1, 023001. DOI: 10.1088/2634-4505/ac0b2c
  14. Brookings (2022). Social and development impact bonds by the numbers. Erişim adresi: https://www.brookings.edu/research/social-and-development-impact-bonds-by-the-numbers/
  15. Burand, D. (2013). Globalizing social finance: how social impact bonds and social impact performance guarantees can scale development. N. Y. U. J. L. & Bus. 9, 447-502.
  16. Büyükmıhçı, G. ve Kılıç, A. (2015). Tarihi dokuda yeni yapı uygulamaları; yasal ve eylemsel sınırlar. 9th.International Sinan Symposium, BOUND-ARY, 125-132.
  17. Callanan, L., Law, J. ve Mendonca, L. (2012). From potential to action: bringing social impact bonds to the US, McKinsey & Company. Erişim adresi: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/public%20and%20social%20sector/our%20insights/from%20potential%20to%20action%20bringing%20social%20impact%20bonds%20to%20the%20us/from%20potential%20to%20action%20bringing%20social%20impact%20bonds%20to%20the%20us.pdf
  18. Care, R. (2021). Developing social impact bonds to tackle emerging social needs and promote social welfare. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351125482_Developing_Social_Impact_Bonds_to_Tackle_Emerging_Social_Needs_and_Promote_Social_Welfare
  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). An introduction to impact investing in public health. Erişim adresi: https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/pdfs/impact-investing-public-health.pdf
  20. Chase, M. (2021). Simplifying sustainable finance – explaining green bonds, green loans, sustainability-linked loans and bonds and more. Erişim adresi: https://www.sustainalytics.com/esg-research/resource/corporate-esg-blog/simplifying-sustainable-finance-green-loans-vs-green-bonds-vs-sustainability-linked-loan-and-more
  21. Chen, J. (2022). Social impact bond (SIB). Erişim adresi: Social Impact Bond (SIB) Definition (investopedia.com)
  22. Chertok, M., Hamaoui, J. ve Jamison, E. (2008). The funding gap. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 44–51. https://silo.tips/download/the-funding-gap-by-michael-chertok-jeff-hamaoui-and-eliot-jamison-stanford-socia
  23. Climate Bonds Initiative (2022). Sustainable debt market summary Q1. Erişim adresi: https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/cbi_susdebtsum_q12022_01f.pdf
  24. Cochu, A., Glenting, C., Hogg, D., Georgiev, I., Skolina, J., Eisinger, F., Jespersen, M., Agster, R., Fawkes, S. ve Chowdhury, T. (2016). Study on the Potential of green bond finance for resource-efficient investments, European Commission Report.
  25. Daily, G. ve Ehrlich, P. R. (1996). Socioeconomic equity, sustainability and earth’s carrying capacity. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 991-1001. DOI: 10.2307/2269582
  26. Davies, R. (2014). Social impact bonds: private finance that generates social returns. European Parliamentary Research Service, 1-8.
  27. Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H. ve Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrep. Theory Pract. 34(4), 681–703. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x
  28. Disley, E., Rubin, J., Scraggs, E., Burrowes, N ve Culley, D. (2011). Lessons learned from the planning and early implementation of the social impact bond at HMP Peterborough. London: Rand Europe.
  29. Dorsett, R. (2017). HMP Peterborough social impact bond - learning exercise. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Erişim adresi: HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond - learning exercise: WestminsterResearch
  30. Denoël, N. (2013). Developing social impact bonds in belgium (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi), Erişim adresi: http://www.philosophie-management.com/docs/2014/Nicolas _Denoel_UCL_Developing_S_IBs_in_Belgium.pdf
  31. Edmiston, D. ve Nicholls, A. (2017). Social impact bonds: the role of private capital in outcome-based commissioning. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000125
  32. Environmental Finance (2021). Sustainable bonds insight 2022. Erişim adresi: https://www.environmental-finance.com/assets/files/research/sustainable-bond-insight-2022.pdf
  33. Environmental Finance Data (2022). Latest bonds.Erişim adresi: https://efdata.org/
  34. Ergen, Z. ve Durak, B. (2016). Bazı sosyal problemlerin çözümünde alternatif bir finansman kaynağı: sosyal etkili tahvil programları. Hukuk ve İktisat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 36-54.
  35. Euronewsport (2021). Sürdürülebilir finans. Erişim adresi: http://euronewsport.com/surdurulebilir-finans/
  36. Faia, E. (2014). Frontiers of sustainable finance in Europe: The social impact bond, SAFE Policy Letters 24, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
  37. Financial Services Agency (2021). Social bond guidelines. Erişim adresi: 001.pdf (fsa.go.jp)
  38. Finance Management (2022). Blue bonds–meaning, challenges, and uses. Erişim adresi: https://efinancemanagement.com/sources-of-finance/blue-bonds
  39. Fischer, R. L., ve Richter, F. G. C. (2017). SROI in the pay for success context: are they at odds? Evaluation and Program Planning, 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.11.012
  40. Fox, C. ve Albertson, K. (2011), Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: new challenges fort he concept of evidence-based policy? http://crj.sagepub.com/content/11/5/395.full.pdf+html
  41. Fraser, A., Tan, S., Lagarde, M. ve Mays, N. (2016). Narratives of promise, narratives of caution: a review of the literature on social impact bonds. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12260
  42. Gazibey, Y., Keser, A. ve Gökmen, Y. (2014). Türkiye’de illerin sürdürülebilirlik boyutları açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 69(3), 511-541. DOI: 10.16987/ausbf.93938
  43. Giráldez, J. ve Fontana, S. (2022). Sustainability-linked bonds: the next frontier in sovereign financing. Capital Markets Law Journal, 17(1), 8-19. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3829946
  44. González, J. (2020). What are blue bonds?. Erişim adresi: https://www.bbva.ch/en/news/what-are-blue-bonds/
  45. Griffiths, A. ve Meinicke, C. (2014). Introduction to social impact bonds and early intervention. Erişim adresi: https://www.eif.org.uk/files/pdf/introduction-to-social-impact-bonds-and-early-intervention.pdf
  46. Gundry, L. K., Kickul, J. R., Griffiths, M. D. ve Bacq, S. C. (2011). Creating social change out of nothing: the role of entrepreneurial bricolage in social entrepreneurs’ catalytic ınnovations. Adv. Entrep. Firm Emerg. Growth, 13, 1–24. doi.org/10.1108/S1074-7540(2011)0000013005
  47. Gür, B. (2012). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve Türkiye’de mikro finansman uygulamaları. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(21), 87-106.
  48. Hall, D, Lindsay. S. ve Judd, S. (2017). Permanent forest bonds: a pioneering environmental impact bond for Aotearoa New Zealand, Instıtute For Governance And Policy Studies Working Paper.
  49. Hangl, C. (2014). A literature review about the landscape of social fiınance. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 3(4), 64-98.
  50. Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic principles of sustainable development. Global Development and Environment Institute Workıng Paper 00-04 Tufts University. Erişim adresi: https://sites.tufts.edu/gdae/files/2019/10/00-04Harris-BasicPrinciplesSD.pdf
  51. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı (2021). Kamu borç yönetimi raporu. Erişim adresi: https://ms.hmb.gov.tr/uploads/2021/09/2021-KBYR-Turkce-20210901.pdf
  52. Huybrechts, B. ve Nicholls, A. (2012). Social entrepreneurship: definitions, drivers and challenges. In Social Entrepreneurship and Social Business; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg.
  53. Impact Invest Lab (2018). Social bonds: the social bond market: towards a new asset class?. Erişim adresi: https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-Bonds/Public-research-resources/II-LAB2019-02Social-Bonds-130219.pdf
  54. International Capital Markets Association (2018). Green & social bond market update. Erişim adresi: 2018-02-06 BMCG Green and Social Bond Market update (europa.eu)
  55. International Capital Markets Association (2021), Green bond principles. Erişim adresi: https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/green-bond-principles-gbp/
  56. Jackson, E.T. (2013) Evaluating social impact bonds: questions, challenges, ınnovations, and possibilities in measuring outcomes in impact ınvesting. Community Development, 44(5), 608-616. doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2013.854258
  57. Jolliffe, D. ve Hedderman, C. (2014). Peterborough social impact bond: final report on cohort 1 analysis. Report prepared for the Ministry of Justice, University of Leicester.
  58. Jones, J. F. (2010). Social finance: commerce and community in developing countries. International Journal of Social Economics, 37(6), 415-428. doi.org/10.1108/03068291011042300
  59. Joy, M. ve Shields, J. (2013). Social impact bonds: the next phase of third sector marketization?. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 4(2), 39-55. doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2013v4n2a148
  60. Jun, M., Kaminker, C., Kidney, S. ve Pfaff, N., “Green bonds: country experiences, barriers and options”, G20 green finance study group report. Erişim adresi: https://www.oecd.org/environment/cc/Green_Bonds_Country_Experiences_Barriers_and_Options.pdf
  61. Kandır, S. Y. ve Yakar, S. (2017). Yeşil tahvil piyasaları: Türkiye’de yeşil tahvil piyasasının geliştirilebilmesi için öneriler. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26(2), 159-175.
  62. Kim, W. C. ve Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business School Press Boston, Massachusetts.
  63. Liebman, J. B. (2011). Social impact bonds: a promising new financing model to accelerate social innovation and improve government performance. Center for American Progress. Erişim adresi: social_impact_bonds.pdf (americanprogress.org)
  64. Lehner, O. M. ve Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: a public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271-286. doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2014.925305
  65. Kaeufer, K. (2010) Banking as a Vehicle for socio-economic development and change: case studies of socially responsible and green banks. Cambridge, MA: Presencing Institute.
  66. Kayıkçı, P., Armağan, K. ve Dal, N. E. (2019). Sürdürülebilir pazarlama: kavramsal bir çalışma. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(1), 77-93.
  67. Kaypak, Ş. (2010). Ekolojik turizmin sürdürülebilirliği. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi (e-dergi). 2(2), 93-114.
  68. Kocabaşoğlu, Ö. (2021). Dünya ve Türkiyede yeşil tahvil uygulaması. Erişim adresi: https://www.erdem-erdem.av.tr/bilgi-bankasi/dunya-ve-turkiyede-yesil-tahvil-uygulamasi
  69. Korslund, D. (2013). Real banking for the real economy: comparing sustainable bank performance with the largest banks in the world. Zeist: Global Alliance for Banking on Values.
  70. Kuduz, N. (2011). Yeşil pazarlama faaliyetlerinin tüketicilerin satın alma davranışlarına etkilerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  71. Kumar, S. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik arayışı (sürdürülebilirlik primi): sürdürülebilir tahvillerin gözden geçirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansal Araştırmalar Akademisi Dergisi, 26(3), 1-18.
  72. Maclaren, V. W. (1999). Urban sustainability reporting. Journal of American Planning Association, 66(2), 184-202. doi:10.1080/01944369608975684
  73. Maino, A.G. ve Felow, A. (2022). Financing the energy transition: the role, opportunities and challenges of green bonds (The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, OIES paper ET07). Erişim adresi: https://a9w7k6q9.stackpathcdn.com/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Financing-the-Energy-Transition-The-Role-Opportunities-and-Challenges-of-Green-Bonds-ET07.pdf
  74. Martin, M. (2013). Impact economy. status of the social impact investing market: a primer. Erişim adresi: https://www. impacteconomy.com/papers/IE_PRIMER_JUNE2013_EN (accessed on 10 November 2020).
  75. Mathew, S. ve Sivaprasad, S. (2022). Sustainable bonds. Erişim adresi: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4180848
  76. McDermott, D. (2021). What are social bonds? How they work, what’s available and who ınvests in them. Erişim adresi: What are social bonds? How they work, what's available and who invests in them (inews.co.uk)
  77. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. ve Behrens_III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: a report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York. Erişim adresi:The Limits to growth; a report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind: Meadows, Donella H: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming: Internet Archive
  78. Meehan, W. F., Kilmer, D. ve O’Flanagan, M. (2004). Investing in society. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1, 34–43. Erişim adresi: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/investing_in_society#
  79. Menteşe, B. (2021). Yeşil tahvilin gelişimi ve Türkiye’deki uygulamaları. Muhasebe ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(1), 94-116.
  80. Memorandum, A. (2020). Social bonds in response to the COVID-19 crisis: a guide for issuers. Erişim adresi: social-bonds-in-response-to-the-covid-19-crisis (clearygottlieb.com)
  81. Monitor Institute (2009). Investing for social and environmental impact. Cambridge, MA: Monitor Institute.
  82. Moore, M. L., Westley, F. R. ve Nicholls, A. (2012). The social finance and social innovation nexus. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 115-132. doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2012.725824
  83. Mulgan, G., Reeder, N., Aylott, M., ve Bo’sher, L. (2011). Social impact investment: the challenge and opportunity of social impact bonds. Erişim adresi: http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Impact-Investment-The-opportunity-and-challenge-of-Social-Impact-Bonds-March-2011.pdf
  84. Munasınghe, M. (2009). Sustainable development in practice: sustainomics methodology and applications, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Muscoe, M. (1995). A sustainable community profile. Places, 9(3), 30-37. Erişim adresi: https://placesjournal.org/assets/legacy/pdfs/chestnut-hill-a-sustainable-community-profile.pdf
  86. Nazari Chamaki, F., Jenkins, G. P. ve Hashemi, M. (2018). Social impact bonds: implementation, evaluation, and monitoring. International Journal of Public Administration. doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1433206
  87. Nicola D. J. (2013). Environmental impact bonds. Case I3 Working Paper# 1 (Durham, NC: Duke University).
  88. Nicholls, A. ve Pharoah, C. (2007). The landscape of social investment: a holistic topology of opportunities and challenges. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
  89. Nicholls, A. (2010a). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrep. Theory Pract. 34, 611–633. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
  90. Nicholls, A. (2010b). The institutionalization of Social ınvestment: the interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. J. Soc. Entrep. 1, 70–100. doi.org/10.1080/19420671003701257
  91. Nicholls, A. ve Tomkinson, E. (2013), The Peterborough pilot social impact bond, University of Oxford Erişim adresi: https://emmatomkinson.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/casestudy-the-peterborough-pilot-social-impact-bond-oct-2013.pdf
  92. Oçak, Z. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik iletişimi: sürdürülebilirliğin ekonomi politiği ve markalar. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayınları.
  93. Odaro, E. D., Mignano, K. ve Peeters, S. (2020). Social bonds illustrative use-of-proceeds case studies: coronavirus, international finance corparation. Erişim adresi: SOCIAL BONDS (icmagroup.org)
  94. Odaro, D. (2021). What you need to know about IFC’s green bonds. Erişim adresi: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2021/12/08/what-you-need-to-know-about-ifc-s-green-bonds
  95. Olson, J. ve Phillips, A. (2013), Rikers island: the first social impact bond in the United States. Community Development Investment Review, 9(1), 97-101.
  96. One, A. (2022). What are social bonds? understand here!. Erişim adresi: What are Social Bonds? Understand Here! | Angel One by Angel Broking
  97. Özbakır, M. ve Nurtanış Velioğlu, M. (2010). Pazarlamaya sürdürülebilirlik çerçevesinden bakış ve bir örnek olay analizi. Tüketici ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 71-101.
  98. Özkaraca, N. ve Halaç, H. H. (2022). Tarihi çevrede sürdürülebilirlik konulu lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kent Akademisi, 15(1), 203-222. doi.org/10.35674/kent.988202
  99. Para Analiz (2022). BM: Pandemi etkisiyle sürdürülebilir tahvil ihracı ikiye katlandı. Erişim adresi: https://www.paraanaliz.com/2022/dunya-ekonomisi/bm-pandemi-etkisiyle-surdurulebilir-tahvil-ihraci-ikiye-katlandi-g-30981/
  100. Peeters, S., Schmitt, M. ve Volk, A. (2020). Social Bonds Can Help Mitigate the Economic and Social Effects of the COVID-19 Crisis. Erişim adresi: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/34853/Social-Bonds-Can-Help-Mitigate-the-Economic-and-Social-Effects-of-the-COVID-19-Crisis.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  101. Radwan, M. ve Biancone, P. P. (2019). Social finance and financing social enterprises: an islamic finance prospective. European Journal of Islamic Finance. doi.org/10.13135/2421-2172/3176
  102. Ratiu, D. E. (2013). Creative cities and/or sustainable cities: discoursesand practices. City, Culture and Society, 4, 125-135. doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2013.04.002
  103. Rhyne, E. (2009). Microfinance for bankers and investors. New York: McGraw Hill.
  104. Saraç, B. ve Alptekin, N. (2017). Türkiye’de İllerin sürdürülebilir kalkınma göstergelerine göre değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(1), 1-28. doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.20173126261
  105. Rizzi, F., Pellegrini, C., ve Battaglia, M. (2017). The structuring of social finance: emerging approaches for supporting environmentally and socially impactful projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 805-817. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.167
  106. Rosenman, E. (2017). The geographies of social finance: poverty regulation through the ‘invisible heart’ of markets. Progress in Human Geography, 43(3), 1-22. doi.org/10.1177/0309132517739142
  107. Schinckus, C. (2015a). The Valuation of social impact bonds: an introductory perspective with The Peterborough SIB. Research in International Business and Finance, 1-13. doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.04.001
  108. Schinckus, C. (2015b). Financial innovation as a potential force for a positive social change: the challenging future of social impact bonds. Research in International Business and Finance, 727-736. doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.11.004
  109. Schoenmaker, D. (2017). Investing for the common good: a sustainable finance framework. Bruegel Essay And Lecture Series
  110. Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., Petricean, D. ve Chmet, F. (2021). Social finance and banking research as a driver for sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 13(1), 330. doi.org/10.3390/su13010330
  111. Segal, T. (2022). Green bond. Erişim adresi: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/green-bond.asp
  112. Social Finance (2022). Peterborough. Erişim adresi: https://www.socialfinance.org.uk/peterborough-social-impact-bond
  113. Social Finance (2022). Social impact bonds: investing in positive social outcomes. Erişim adresi: https://socialfinance.org/social-impact-bonds/
  114. Şimşek, O ve Tunalı, H. (2022). Yeşil Finansman uygulamalarının sürdürülebilir kalkınma üzerindeki rolü: Türkiye projeksiyonu. Journal of Economics and Financial Researches, 4(1), 16-45.
  115. Tabletalk (2016). Public plowing works: CUPE 500 uses hotline, expert evidence to tackle contracting out. CUPE’s Bargaining Resource, 1-4.
  116. Taraktaş, A. (2015). Yerel yönetimlerin sosyal projelerinde yenilikçi bir finansman aracı olarak sosyal etkili tahviller. Türkiye İçin Öneriler. Maliye Dergisi, 168, 31-48.
  117. Topkaraoğlu, N. M. (2021). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefleri çerçevesinde Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı’na bağlı halk kütüphanelerinin faaliyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 35(1), 99-115. DOI: 10.24146/tk.836304
  118. Torre, M. L., Trotta, A., Chiappini, H. ve Rizzello, A. (2019). Business models for sustainable finance: the case study of social impact bonds. Sustainability, 11(7), 1887. DOI: 10.3390/su11071887
  119. Turguttopbaş, N. (2020). Sürdürülebilirlik, yeşil finans ve ilk türk yeşil tahvil ihracı. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 12(22), 267-283. DOI: 10.14784/marufacd.688425
  120. Türkiye Sermaye Piyasaları Birliği (2021). Gösterge. Erişim adresi: https://www.tspb.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gosterge_Yaz_2021.pdf
  121. Uplifers (2021). Sürdürülebilirlik nedir: sürdürülebilir yaşam ve sürdürülebilirliğin geleceği. Erişim adresi: https://www.uplifers.com/surdurulebilirlik-nedir-surdurulebilir-yasam-ve-surdurulebilirligin-gelecegi/
  122. United Nations. (1982). World charter for nature, the general assembly. Erişim adresi: https://placesjournal.org/assets/legacy/pdfs/chestnut-hill-a-sustainable-community-profile.pdf
  123. Urmanaviciene, A. ve Arachchi, U. S. (2020). The effective methods and practices for accelerating social entrepreneurship through corporate social responsibility. Eur. J. Soc. Impact Circ. Econ. 1, 27–47. doi.org/10.13135/2704-9906/5085
  124. Ünlü, D. E. (2016). Türkiye'nin ilk yeşil tahvili TSKB’ den. Erişim adresi: https://www.dunya.com/surdurulebilir-dunya/turkiye039nin-ilk-yesil-tahvili-tskbden-haberi-316877
  125. Warner, M. E. (2013). Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), 303-319. doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2013.835727
  126. Weber, O. (2011). Mission and profitability of social banks. Erişim adresi: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1957637
  127. Weber, O. ve Remer, S. (2011). Social banking: introduction. (Ed. Olaf Weber and Sven Remer). Social banks and the future of sustainable finance. London: Routledge.
  128. Weber, O., Remer, S. Weber, O. ve Duan, Y. (2012). Social finance and banking (Ed. H. Kent Baker and John R. Nofsinger). JohnWiley & Sons.
  129. Weber, O. (2014). Social banking: concept, definitions and practice. Global Social Policy, 14(2), 265-267. doi.org/10.1177/1468018114539864
  130. Wikipedia (2022). Sosyal finans - socialist alternative future (Czech Republic). Erişim adresi: https://tr2tr.wiki/wiki/Social_finance?ysclid=lar5s3sz7e234543095
  131. Yapıkredi (2022). Sürdürülebilir ekonomide yeşil tahvil. Erişim adresi: https://www.yapikredi.com.tr/blog/surdurulebilirlik/finansal-okuryazarlik/detay/surdurulebilir-ekonomide-yesil-tahvil
  132. Yazar, K. H. (2006). Sürdürülebilir kentsel gelişme çerçevesinde orta ölçekli kentlere dönük kent planlama yöntem önerisi, Doktora tezi, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  133. Yeni, O. (2014). Sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma: bir yazın taraması. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 181-208.
  134. Yıldırım, Z. ve Akkaya, M. A. (2020). Kütüphaneler ve sürdürülebilirlik ilişkisi: genel bir değerlendirme. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Karatekin Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 18-46.
  135. Zhou, X ve Cui, Y. (2019). Green bonds, corporate performance, and corporate social responsibility. Sustainability. 11(23), 6881. doi.org/10.3390/su11236881
  136. Dorsett, R. (2017). HMP Peterborough social impact bond - learning exercise. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research. Erişim adresi: HMP Peterborough Social Impact Bond - learning exercise: WestminsterResearch
  137. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. ve Behrens_III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: a report for the club of rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York. Erişim adresi:The Limits to growth; a report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind: Meadows, Donella H: Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming: Internet Archive
  138. Yıldırım, Z. ve Akkaya, M. A. (2020). Kütüphaneler ve sürdürülebilirlik ilişkisi: genel bir değerlendirme. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Karatekin Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 18-46.