Journals / Bozok Veterinary Sciences / 2026 / Sayı: 2026

Surgical Diseases, Anesthetic Management, and Pharmacological Treatment Strategies in Laboratory Rodents: Rats, Mice, and Hamsters – A Comprehensive Review

Laboratuvar Hayvanlarda Cerrahi Hastalıklar, Anestezik Yönetim ve Farmakolojik Tedavi Stratejileri: Rat, Fare ve Hamsterlerde Kapsamlı Bir Derleme

Nimet Kılıç(Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Aydın Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu)0000-0003-2149-388X
Nuh Kılıç(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8452-161X
Seren Yiğit(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0007-2581-7227
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review is intended to provide clinicians and researchers with a practical and evidence-based resource for the diagnosis and management of surgical diseases in laboratory rodents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Laboratory rodents, particularly rats, mice, and hamsters, are among the most commonly used experimental animals worldwide and are increasingly maintained as companion animals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Surgical diseases in small rodents present significant challenges for veterinarians because of their small body size, high metabolic rates, rapid physiological changes, and sensitivity to stress and anesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review is intended to provide clinicians and researchers with a practical and evidence-based resource for the diagnosis and management of surgical diseases in laboratory rodents.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:analjezi · anestezi · antimkrobiyel tedavi

Abstract

Laboratory rodents, particularly rats, mice, and hamsters, are among the most commonly used experimental animals worldwide and are increasingly maintained as companion animals. Due to their unique anatomical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics, these species require specialized clinical and surgical approaches. Surgical diseases in small rodents present significant challenges for veterinarians because of their small body size, high metabolic rates, rapid physiological changes, and sensitivity to stress and anesthesia. The present review aims to summarize the most frequently encountered surgical diseases in laboratory rodents, with particular emphasis on rats, mice, and hamsters. Important anatomical and physiological characteristics relevant to surgical practice are discussed together with restraint techniques, sample collection methods, anesthesia and analgesia protocols, and perioperative management. In addition, commonly encountered ophthalmic, dental, gastrointestinal, dermatological, reproductive, thoracic, and orthopedic disorders are comprehensively reviewed. Current diagnostic approaches and treatment options, including both medical and surgical interventions, are evaluated in light of contemporary veterinary literature. This review is intended to provide clinicians and researchers with a practical and evidence-based resource for the diagnosis and management of surgical diseases in laboratory rodents.

Özet

Laboratuvar hayvanları, özellikle rat, fare ve hamsterler, hem biyomedikal araştırmalarda deneysel model olarak yaygın kullanılmaları hem de evcil hayvan olarak giderek daha fazla tercih edilmeleri nedeniyle veteriner hekimlikte önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu türlerin anatomik, fizyolojik ve davranışsal özellikleri; tanı, anestezi, cerrahi girişim ve postoperatif bakım süreçlerinde özel yaklaşımlar gerektirmektedir. Küçük vücut yapıları, yüksek metabolizma hızları, sınırlı kan hacimleri ve strese duyarlılıkları nedeniyle cerrahi uygulamalar sırasında komplikasyon gelişme riski yüksektir. Bu derlemede rat, fare ve hamsterlerde sık karşılaşılan cerrahi hastalıklar ile güncel tedavi seçenekleri kapsamlı şekilde değerlendirilmiştir. Türlere özgü anatomi ve fizyolojik özellikler, tutma ve muayene teknikleri, örnek toplama yöntemleri, hematolojik ve biyokimyasal değerlendirmeler ayrıntılı olarak ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca inhalasyon ve enjeksiyon anestezisi, multimodal analjezi, perioperatif destek uygulamaları ve kemirgenlerde farmakolojik tedavi stratejileri ayrıntılı biçimde incelenmiştir. Özellikle antibiyotik kullanımı, kemirgen türleri arasındaki gastrointestinal flora farklılıkları ve enterotoksemi riskleri açısından değerlendirilmiş; güvenli ve kontrendike antibiyotikler, doz aralıkları, endikasyonlar ve olası advers etkiler detaylı olarak açıklanmıştır. Oftalmolojik hastalıklar, diş hastalıkları, apseler, prolapsuslar, deri tümörleri, ürogenital hastalıklar ve ortopedik olgular gibi sık görülen cerrahi patolojiler için tanısal ve terapötik yaklaşımlar güncel literatür ışığında sunulmuştur. Bu derlemenin, laboratuvar hayvanları ve egzotik hayvan hekimliği alanında çalışan veteriner hekimler, araştırmacılar ve lisansüstü öğrenciler için kapsamlı bir kaynak oluşturması amaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılıç, N., Kılıç, N., Yiğit, S. (2026). Surgical Diseases, Anesthetic Management, and Pharmacological Treatment Strategies in Laboratory Rodents: Rats, Mice, and Hamsters – A Comprehensive Review. Bozok Veterinary Sciences, Sayı: 2026. https://doi.org/10.58833/bozokvetsci.1950312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (71)

  1. Fox JG, Andersen LC, Otto GM et al. Laboratory Animal Medicine. Third Edition. Academic Press, 2015.
  2. Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW. Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Fourth Edition. London: Elsevier, 2020. Doi:10.1016/C2015-0-05982-2
  3. Harkness JE, Wagner JE. Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents. Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 2010.
  4. Keeble E, Meredith A. eds. BSAVA Manual of Rodents and Ferrets. Gloucester: British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2009.
  5. Flecknell PA. Analgesia and post-operative care. In: Laboratory Animal Anaesthesia. Fourth Edition. Boston: Academic Press, 2016; pp.141-192.
  6. Fish RE, Danneman PJ, Brown M, Karas A. eds. Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. Second Edition. Academic Press/Elsevier, 2008.
  7. Capello V. Common surgical procedures in pet rodents. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 2011; 20: 294-307.
  8. Kilic N, Henke J, Erhardt W. Ketamine-medetomidine anaesthesia beim hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus): ein klinischer Vergleich zwischen subkutaner und intraperitonealer Applikation. Tieraerztliche Praxis Ausgabe Kleintiere Heimtiere 2004; 32: 384-388.
  9. Kilic N, Henke J, Pragst I, Erhardt W. Comparison of three different medetomidine/ketamine combinations in NMRI mice. Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia 2001; 28: 211-212.
  10. Erhardt W, Wohlrab S, Kilic N, Werner C, Henke J. Comparison of the anaesthesia combinations racemic-ketamine/medetomidine and S-ketamine-medetomidine in Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Journal of Veterinary Anaesthesia 2001; 28: 212-213.
  11. Phifer-Rixey M, Nachman MW. Insights into mammalian biology from the wild house mouse Mus musculus. eLife 2015; 4: e05959.
  12. Koolhaas JM, Korte SM, De Boer SF, Van Der Vegt BJ, Van Reenen CG, Hopster H, De Jong IC, Ruis MA, Blokhuis HJ. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):925-35. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3. PMID: 10580307.
  13. Greene EC. Anatomy of the Rat. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1963.
  14. Kohn DF, Barthold SW. Biology and Diseases of Rats. In: Laboratory Animal Medicine. 1984; pp.91-122. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-263620-2.50010-0.
  15. Vallon V. Micropuncturing the nephron. Pflugers Archiv 2009; 458: 189-201.
  16. de Arruda MS, Montenegro MR. The hamster cheek pouch: an immunologically privileged site suitable to the study of granulomatous infections. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo 1995; 37: 303-309. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46651995000400004.
  17. Takahashi M, Pour P, Althoff J, Donnelly T. The pancreas of the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). I. Anatomical study. Laboratory Animal Science 1977; 27: 336-343.
  18. Jarausch KH, Ullrich KJ. Technique of withdrawal of urine samples from single collecting tubules in mammalian kidney by means of polyethylene capillaries. Pflugers Archiv 1957; 264: 88-94.
  19. Wing T, Lin H. The fine structure of testicular interstitial cells in the adult golden hamster with special reference to seasonal changes. Cell and Tissue Research 1977; 157: 385-393.
  20. Turner PV, Brabb T, Pekow C, Vasbinder MA. Administration of substances to laboratory animals: routes of administration and factors to consider. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2011;
  21. Parasuraman S, Raveendran R, Kesavan R. (2010). Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 1:87–93. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72350.
  22. Kilic N, Henke J. Comparative studies on the effect of S(+)-ketamine-medetomidine and racemic ketamine-medetomidine in mouse. Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 2004; 15: 15-17.
  23. Payton AJ, Forsythe DB, Dixon D, Myers PH, Clark JA et al. Evaluation of ketamine-xylazine in Syrian hamsters. Cornell Veterinarian 1993; 83: 153-161.
  24. Sotocinal SG, Sorge RE, Zaloum A, Tuttle AH, Martin LJ et al. The Rat Grimace Scale: a partially automated method for quantifying pain in the laboratory rat via facial expressions. Molecular Pain 2011; 7: 55. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-7-55.
  25. Carpenter JW. Exotic Animal Formulary. Sixth Edition. Elsevier Saunders, 2022.
  26. Williams DL. Ocular disease in rats: a review. Veterinary Ophthalmology 2002; 5: 183-191. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-5224.2002.00251.x.
  27. Bennett RA. Rodent Soft Tissue Surgery. Bennett RA, Pye GW. eds. In: Surgery of Exotic Animals. Wiley, 2021; pp.231-248.
  28. Meredith A. BSAVA Small Animal Formulary: Part B Exotic Pets. British Small Animal Veterinary Association, 2015.
  29. McClure JT, Rosin E. Comparison of amikacin dosing regimens in neutropenic guinea pigs with Escherichia coli infection. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1998; 59: 750-755.
  30. Melo ME, Silva CA, de Souza Gomes WD et al. Immediate tooth replantation in rats: effect of systemic antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin and tetracycline. Clinical Oral Investigations 2016; 20: 523-532.
  31. Adamcak A, Otten B. Rodent therapeutics. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 2000; 3: 221-237. doi: 10.1016/S1094-9194(17)30102-0.
  32. Marx JO, Vudathala D, Murphy L et al. Antibiotic administration in the drinking water of mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2014; 53: 301-306.
  33. Visser C, Wijnbergen A, Bleich A. Maeuse und Ratten. Fehr M, Sassenburg L, Zwart P. eds. In: Krankheiten der Heimtiere. Hannover: Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015; pp.129-182.
  34. Fehr M, Sassenburg L, Zwart P. Krankheiten der Heimtiere. Eighth Edition. Hannover: Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015.
  35. Carrascosa A, Pena A, Gutierrez L, Sumano H. Serum pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations of a new recrystallized enrofloxacin hydrochloride dihydrate in hamsters. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2015; 39: 650-656. doi: 10.3906/vet-1504-104.
  36. Tamura Y. Current approach to rodents as patients. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 2010; 19: 36-55. doi: 10.1053/j.jepm.2010.01.014.
  37. Burgmann P, Percy DH. Antimicrobial drug use in rodents and rabbits. John FP. ed. In: Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. Second Edition. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1993.
  38. Lau C, Ranasinghe MG, Shiels I et al. Plasma pharmacokinetics of alfaxalone after a single intraperitoneal or intravenous injection of Alfaxan in rats. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2013; 36: 516-520.
  39. Higuchi S, Yamada R, Hashimoto A et al. Evaluation of a combination of alfaxalone with medetomidine and butorphanol for inducing surgical anesthesia in laboratory mice. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research 2016; 64: 131-139.
  40. Siriarchavatana P, Ayers JD, Kendall LV. Anesthetic activity of alfaxalone compared with ketamine in mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016; 55: 426-430.
  41. Aguiar J, Mogridge G, Hall J. Femoral fracture repair and sciatic and femoral nerve blocks in a guinea pig. Journal of Small Animal Practice 2014; 55: 635-639.
  42. Huerkamp M. Anesthesia and postoperative management of rabbits and pocket pets. In: Current Veterinary Therapy XII: Small Animal Practice. 1995; pp.1322-1327.
  43. Mitchell MA, Tully TN. eds. Manual of Exotic Pet Practice. Saunders/Elsevier, 2009.
  44. Quesenberry K, Orcutt C, Mans C, Carpenter JW. Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Fourth Edition. Elsevier Inc., 2020.
  45. Kirihara Y, Takechi M, Kurosaki K et al. Effects of an anesthetic mixture of medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol in rats-strain difference and antagonism by atipamezole. Experimental Animals 2016; 65: 27-36.
  46. Kawai S, Takagi Y, Kaneko S et al. Effect of three types of mixed anesthetic agents alternate to ketamine in mice. Experimental Animals 2011; 60: 481-487.
  47. Albrecht M, Henke J, Tacke S et al. Effects of isoflurane, ketamine-xylazine and a combination of medetomidine, midazolam and fentanyl on physiological variables continuously measured by telemetry in Wistar rats. BMC Veterinary Research 2014; 10: 198.
  48. Struck MB, Andrutis KA, Ramirez HE et al. Effect of a short-term fast on ketamine-xylazine anesthesia in rats. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2011; 50: 344-348.
  49. Erhardt W, Hebestedt A, Aschenbrenner G, Pichotka B, Blumel G. A comparative study with various anesthetics in mice (pentobarbitone, ketamine-xylazine, carfentanyl-etomidate). Research in Experimental Medicine 1984; 184: 159-169.
  50. Curl JL, Peters LL. Ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride anaesthesia in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Laboratory Animals 1983; 17: 290-293.
  51. Harkness JE. Anaesthesia of animals for biomedical research. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1993; 71: 885-894.
  52. Hauptman K, Jekl V, Knotek Z. Use of medetomidine for sedation in the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus). Acta Veterinaria Brno 2003; 72: 583-591.
  53. Bellini L, Banzato T, Contiero B et al. Evaluation of three medetomidine-based protocols for chemical restraint and sedation for non-painful procedures in companion rats (Rattus norvegicus). Veterinary Journal 2014; 200: 456-458.
  54. Wenger S. Anesthesia and analgesia in rabbits and rodents. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine 2012; 21: 7-16.
  55. Albrecht M, Henke J, Tacke S et al. Effects of isoflurane, ketamine-xylazine and a combination of medetomidine, midazolam and fentanyl on physiological variables continuously measured by telemetry in Wistar rats. BMC Veterinary Research 2014; 10: 1.
  56. Foley P et al. Clinical management of pain in rodents. Comparative Medicine 2019; 69: 468-489. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-19-000048.
  57. Miller AL, Richardson CA. Rodent analgesia. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 2011; 14: 81-92.
  58. Roughan JV, Flecknell PA. Behaviour-based assessment of the duration of laparotomy-induced abdominal pain and the analgesic effects of carprofen and buprenorphine in rats. Behavioural Pharmacology 2004; 15: 461-472.
  59. Johnson RA. Voluntary running-wheel activity, arterial blood gases, and thermal antinociception in rats after 3 buprenorphine formulations. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016; 55: 306-311.
  60. Kendall LV, Wegenast DJ, Smith BJ et al. Efficacy of sustained-release buprenorphine in an experimental laparotomy model in female mice. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016; 55: 66-73.
  61. Seymour TL, Adams SC, Felt SA et al. Postoperative analgesia due to sustained-release buprenorphine, sustained-release meloxicam, and carprofen gel in a model of incisional pain in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2016; 55: 300-305.
  62. Millecamps M, Jourdan D, Leger S et al. Circadian pattern of spontaneous behavior in monarthritic rats: a novel global approach to evaluation of chronic pain and treatment effectiveness. Arthritis and Rheumatism 2005; 52: 3470-3478.
  63. Gaertner DJ, Hallman TM, Hankenson FC et al. Anesthesia and analgesia for laboratory rodents. Brown MJ, Danneman PJ, Karas AZ. eds. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals. Second Edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008; pp.239-297.
  64. Meert TF, Vermeirsch HA. A preclinical comparison between different opioids: antinociceptive versus adverse effects. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 2005; 80: 309-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.12.002.
  65. Jones CK, Peters SC, Shannon HE. Efficacy of duloxetine, a potent and balanced serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor, in inflammatory and acute pain models in rodents. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2005; 312: 726-732.
  66. Smith LJ, Valenzuela JR, Krugner-Higby LA et al. A single dose of liposome-encapsulated hydromorphone provides extended analgesia in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Comparative Medicine 2006; 56: 487-492.
  67. Cary CD, Lukovsky-Akhsanov NL, Gallardo-Romero NF, Tansey CM, Ostergaard SD et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of meloxicam and sustained-release buprenorphine in prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 2017; 56: 160-165.
  68. Ewringmann A, Gloeckner B. Medikamentelle Therapie beim Heimtier. In: Leitsymptome bei Kaninchen: Diagnostischer Leitfaden und Therapie. Enke, 2007; pp.200-205.
  69. Allweiler SI. How to improve anesthesia and analgesia in small mammals. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 2016; 19: 361-377.
  70. Abreu M, Aguado D, Benito J et al. Reduction of the sevoflurane minimum alveolar concentration induced by methadone, tramadol, butorphanol and morphine in rats. Laboratory Animals 2012; 46: 200-206.
  71. van Zutphen LFM, Baumans V, Beynen AC. eds. Principles of Laboratory Animal Science. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001.