Journals / Atlas Journal of Medicine / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: Özel Sayı 1 Özel Sayı

Breast Cancer and Surgical Treatment Options

Meme kanseri ve cerrahi tedavi seçenekleri

Pelin Basim(ISTANBUL MEDIPOL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9452-9276
Pages
7–11
Publication Date
2026-05-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the future, breast surgery should be aimed to be recognized as a subspecialty in medical education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women, and in its treatment process, a personalized approach should be adopted, considering the individual characteristics of patients, tumor stage, and biology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In suitable patients, breast-conserving therapy offers survival rates equivalent to mastectomy; however, in some cases, this treatment may not be appropriate, and neoadjuvant therapy could be explored as a solution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the future, breast surgery should be aimed to be recognized as a subspecialty in medical education.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meme kanseri · meme cerrahisi · lumpektomi

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women, and in its treatment process, a personalized approach should be adopted, considering the individual characteristics of patients, tumor stage, and biology. The evolution of surgery in breast cancer highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment options such as breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy) and mastectomy should be applied in a way that aligns with patients' aesthetic expectations. In suitable patients, breast-conserving therapy offers survival rates equivalent to mastectomy; however, in some cases, this treatment may not be appropriate, and neoadjuvant therapy could be explored as a solution. Oncoplastic surgery is an approach aimed at improving aesthetic outcomes, but the experience of the surgeon and proper patient selection are crucial. Moreover, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to increase the success rate of the treatment process. In Turkey, breast surgery faces various challenges, and it is of great importance to apply practices in line with scientific consensus. In the future, breast surgery should be aimed to be recognized as a subspecialty in medical education.

Özet

Meme kanseri, kadınlarda en sık görülen kanser türü olup, tedavi sürecinde hastaların bireysel özellikleri, tümör evresi ve biyolojisi göz önünde bulundurularak kişiye özel bir yaklaşım benimsenmelidir. Meme kanseri tedavisinde cerrahinin evrimi, multidisipliner bir yaklaşımın önemini vurgulamaktadır. Meme koruyucu cerrahi (lumpektomi) ve mastektomi gibi tedavi seçeneklerinin, hastaların estetik beklentileri ile uyumlu bir şekilde uygulanması gerekmektedir. Meme koruyucu tedavi, uygun hastalarda mastektomi ile eşdeğer sağkalım oranları sunmaktadır, ancak bazı durumlar bu tedaviye uygun olmayabilir ve neoadjuvan tedavi ile çözüm aranabilir. Onkoplastik cerrahi, estetik sonuçları iyileştirmeye yönelik bir yaklaşımdır ancak cerrahın deneyimi ve doğru hasta seçimi önemlidir. Ayrıca, multidisipliner bir yaklaşım, tedavi sürecinin başarı oranını artırmak için gereklidir. Türkiye'de meme cerrahisi, çeşitli zorluklarla karşı karşıya kalmakta olup, bilimsel konsensüsler doğrultusunda uygulama yapılması büyük önem taşımaktadır. Gelecekte meme cerrahisinin bir yan dal olarak eğitim alması hedeflenmelidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Basim, P. (2026). Breast Cancer and Surgical Treatment Options. Atlas Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 6 Sayı: Özel Sayı 1 Özel Sayı, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2026.116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
  2. Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, et al. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ. 2012 Apr 26;344:e2718. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2718.
  3. Agarwal S, Pappas L, Neumayer L, et al. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 2014 Mar;149(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3049.
  4. Bundred JR, Michael S, Stuart B, et al. Margin status and survival outcomes after breast cancer conservation surgery: prospectively registered systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022 Sep 21;378:e070346. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070346
  5. Pesce CE, Liederbach E, Czechura T, et al. Changing surgical trends in young patients with early stage breast cancer, 2003 to 2010: a report from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jul;219(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.043.
  6. Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, et al. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1375-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0792-y.
  7. Si M, Jiao Y, Xu L, et al. Long-term outcomes of skin-sparing mastectomy and nipple-sparing mastectomy versus traditional mastectomy in breast cancer: a case-control study based on preoperative ultrasound and clinical indicators. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2025;23(1), 1-13.