Journals / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Bethesda system classification and postoperative cytology of thyroid nodules: A single center experience

Pages
443–448
Publication Date
2019-09-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aim of this study is to compare the preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and postoperative pathology results in a single institution in the era of the Bethesda System for Reporting thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Recent American Thyroid Association Guideline emphasizes that identifying the institutional malignancy risks for each Bethesda category is mandatory to achieve more accurate preoperative diagnosis in thyroid nodules.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: Recent American Thyroid Association Guideline emphasizes that identifying the institutional malignancy risks for each Bethesda category is mandatory to achieve more accurate preoperative diagnosis in thyroid nodules.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Aim of this study is to compare the preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and postoperative pathology results in a single institution in the era of the Bethesda System for Reporting thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC).
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Goiter · Bethesda classification

Özet

Objective: Recent American Thyroid Association Guideline emphasizes that identifying the institutional malignancy risks for each Bethesda category is mandatory to achieve more accurate preoperative diagnosis in thyroid nodules. Aim of this study is to compare the preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and postoperative pathology results in a single institution in the era of the Bethesda System for Reporting thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC).

🔖

Cite This Article

Ozdenkaya, Y., Ersavas, C., Olmuscelik, O., Basim, P., Ozover, İ., Seker, M., Arslan, N. C. (2019). Comparison of the Bethesda system classification and postoperative cytology of thyroid nodules: A single center experience. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 3, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.620391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Dean DS, Gharib H. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 22: 901- 911. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2008.09.019.
  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010; 60: 277-300. doi:10.3322/caac.20073.
  3. Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, et all. Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer. 2007; 111: 508-516. doi:10.1002/cncr.23116.
  4. Bongiovanni, A. Spitale, W. C. Faquin, L. Mazzucchelli, and Z. W. Baloch, “The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: A meta-analysis,” Acta Cytologica. 2017; 61: 172.
  5. Patrizia S, Diana RE, Tommaso B, et all. A meta-analytic review of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Has the rate of malignancy in indeterminate lesions been underestimated? Cancer Cytopathol. 2015. doi:10.1002/cncy.21605.
  6. D. Ozdemir, N. Bestepe, S. Faki, et all. “Comparison of thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy results before and after implementation of Bethesda classification,” Cytopathology, 2017 Oct; 28: 400-6.
  7. P. S. Sullivan, S. L. Hirschowitz, P. C. Fung, and S. K. Apple, “The impact of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance and repeat fine-needle aspiration: 5 years before and after implementation of the Bethesda System,” Cancer Cytopathol., 2014 Dec; 122: 866-72.
  8. E. Machała, J. Sopiński, I. Iavorska, and K. Kołomecki, “Correlation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Thyroid Gland with Histopathological Results,” Polish J. Surg., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1–5, 2018.
  9. H. Her-Juing Wu, C. Rose, and T. M. Elsheikh, “The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: An experience of 1,382 cases in a community practice setting with the implication for risk of neoplasm and risk of malignancy,” Diagn. Cytopathol., 2012 May; 40: 399-403.
  10. E. S. Cibas and S. Z. Ali, “The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology,” J. Am. Soc. Cytopathol., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 217–222, 2017.
  11. R. L. Ferris, Z. Baloch, V. Bernet, et all. “American Thyroid Association Statement on Surgical Application of Molecular Profiling for Thyroid Nodules: Current Impact on Perioperative Decision Making,” Thyroid, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 760–768, 2015.
  12. B. Haugen, E. K. Alexander, K. C. Bible, et all, “2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer,” The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, 2016 Jan; 26: 1-133.
  13. Her-Juing Wu H, Rose C, Elsheikh TM. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: An experience of 1,382 cases in a community practice setting with the implication for risk of neoplasm and risk of malignancy. DiagnCytopathol. 2012. doi:10.1002/dc.21754.
  14. Medina Chamorro FM, Calle JA, Stein JE, et all. Experience of the Implementation of Rapid On-Site Evaluation in Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Thyroid Nodules.CurrProblDiagnRadiol. 2018; 47: 220-4. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.06.009.
  15. Kim Y-Y, Han K, Kim E-K, et all. Validation of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules With Benign Cytologic Findings in the Era of the Bethesda System. Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 210: 629-34. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18507.
  16. Layfield LJ, Morton MJ, Cramer HM, Hirschowitz S. Implications of the proposed thyroid fine-needle aspiration category of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance”: A five-year multi-institutional analysis. DiagnCytopathol. 2009; 37: 710- 4. doi:10.1002/dc.21093.
  17. Isik A, Firat D, Yilmaz I et al. A survey of current approaches to thyroid nodules and thyroid operations. Int J Surg. 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A): 100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.037