This commentary proposes a historical examination of the debates and also aims to present a clear perspective on the nature of the present ground of debate over the presidential system
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Debates over presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary government systems have continued unabated in Turkey for almost 50 years; however, the future of Turkey’s system of government no longer constitutes a ground for theoretical argument, but, rather, is a political reality shaping the agenda of the country.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Debates over presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary government systems have continued unabated in Turkey for almost 50 years; however, the future of Turkey’s system of government no longer constitutes a ground for theoretical argument, but, rather, is a political reality shaping the agenda of the country.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This commentary proposes a historical examination of the debates and also aims to present a clear perspective on the nature of the present ground of debate over the presidential system
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Debates over presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary government systems have continued unabated in Turkey for almost 50 years; however, the future of Turkey’s system of government no longer constitutes a ground for theoretical argument, but, rather, is a political reality shaping the agenda of the country. This commentary proposes a historical examination of the debates and also aims to present a clear perspective on the nature of the present ground of debate over the presidential system
🔖
Cite This Article
İyimaya, A. (2017). النظام الرئاسي المقترح لتركيا: تقييم السياق والانتقادات. Rouya Türkiyyah, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 9–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/1600170