We propose that Turkey-Russia relations can best be defined around the concepts of ‘smart alignment’ and ‘flexible competition.’ Their bilateral relations cannot be considered black or white in the abstract, but rather take place in the ‘gray zone.’ Alternative scenarios for the future of bilateral relations are presented in the conclusion.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Evaluating Turkey-Russia relations is a dilemma, as the two countries fluctuate between perceptions of mutual historical hostility and strategic partnership.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main purpose of this study is to explain the common aspects of the grand strategies of Turkey and Russia within the framework of the pattern and to evaluate the policies of both countries in Syria, Libya, and the South Caucasus where the interests of both intersect and occasional conflict.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We propose that Turkey-Russia relations can best be defined around the concepts of ‘smart alignment’ and ‘flexible competition.’ Their bilateral relations cannot be considered black or white in the abstract, but rather take place in the ‘gray zone.’ Alternative scenarios for the future of bilateral relations are presented in the conclusion.
🔬Design:Görüntü Sunumu
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turkey-Russia Relations · Grand Strategy · Smart Alignment
Abstract
Evaluating Turkey-Russia relations is a dilemma, as the two countries fluctuate between perceptions of mutual historical hostility and strategic partnership. An alternative perspective is needed to get beyond the impasse of this dilemma. The main purpose of this study is to explain the common aspects of the grand strategies of Turkey and Russia within the framework of the pattern and to evaluate the policies of both countries in Syria, Libya, and the South Caucasus where the interests of both intersect and occasional conflict. We propose that Turkey-Russia relations can best be defined around the concepts of ‘smart alignment’ and ‘flexible competition.’ Their bilateral relations cannot be considered black or white in the abstract, but rather take place in the ‘gray zone.’ Alternative scenarios for the future of bilateral relations are presented in the conclusion.
Zengin, A. K., Topsakal, İ. (2022). The Intersection of Grand Strategies in Turkey-Russia Relations: Smart Alignment and Flexible Competition. Rouya Türkiyyah, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 95–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/1599967
John L. Gaddis, On Grand Strategy, (New York: Penguin Press, 2018), p. 21.
Layton, “Grand Strategy?”
William Martel, Grand Strategy in Theory and Practice: The Need for an Effective American Foreign Policy, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) p. 5.
Barry R. Posen, The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars, (New York: Cornell University Press, 1984), p. 13.
Barry R. Posen, Restraint: A New Foundation for U.S. Grand Strategy, (London: Cornell University Press, 2014), p. 1.
Dennis M. Drew and Donald M. Snow, Making Twenty-First Century Strategy: A Introduction to Modern National Security Processes and Problems, (Alabama: Air University Press, 2006) pp. 17-18.
Paul Kennedy, Grand Strategies in War and Peace, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991), pp. 1-10. Layton, “Grand Strategy?” Güngör Şahin and Cem Oğultürk, Jeopolitik Düşünce: Büyük Güçler ve Türkiye, (İstanbul: Yeditepe, 2020), p. 62.
Colin S. Gray, “Geography and Grand Strategy,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 10, No. 4 (September 2007), p. 311.
Each state emphasis here can be understood as a demonstration of its military power, in particular.
Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, (California: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1979), pp. 105-109.
Mustafa Aydın, “Uluslararası İlişkilerin ‘Gerçekçi’ Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsamı, Kritiği,” Uluslararası İlişkiler, Vol. 1, No.1 (Spring 2004), p. 38.
Geoffrey Hosking, Rusya ve Ruslar: Erken Dönemden 21. Yüzyıla, translated by Kezban Acar, (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2015), p. 13.
Alperen Kürşad Zengin, “Rusya Federasyonu’nun Ulusal Güvenlik Politikalarına Yön Veren Belgeler ve Etki Eden Güvenlik Yaklaşımları,” Unpublished Master Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sürçü İmam University, 2019, p. 42.
President of Russia, “National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation to 2020, Approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation,” No. 537 (May 12, 2009), retrieved November 25, 2020, from https://www.prlib.ru/en/node/353849.
Mustafa Aydın, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik Kavramsallaştırması,” in Mustafa Aydın et al., (eds.) Uluslararası İlişkilerde Çatışmadan Güvenliğe, (İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2015), p. 492.
Şahin and Oğultürk, “Jeopolitik Düşünce,” p. 289.
Murat Yeşiltaş and Ferhat Pirinççi, Küresel Dönüşüm Sürecinde Türkiye’nin Büyük Stratejisi, (İstanbul: SETA, 2020), p. 63.
Haluk Özdemir, “Türkiye’nin ‘Sınır-Ülke Niteliği’: Farklı Stratejik Kültürler Arasında Türk Dış Politikası,” Avrasya Etüdleri, Vol. 33, No. 1 (2008), p. 22.
Aydın, “Türkiye’de Güvenlik Kavramsallaştırması,” p. 498.
Haluk Özdemir, “Tasarlanmış ve Beliren Üst Stratejiler: Türkiye ve Diğer Orta Büyüklükteki Devletler için Alternatifler,” in Ali Karaosmanoğlu and Ersel Aydınlı (eds.), Strateji Düşüncesi: Kuram, Paradoks, Uygulama, (İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2020), p. 43.
Yeşiltaş and Pirinççi, Küresel Dönüşüm Sürecinde Türkiye’nin Büyük Stratejisi, pp. 61-62.
İlyas Topsakal, “Tarihi Süreçte Türkiye Rusya İlişkileri,” Marmara Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 2 (2020), pp. 33-53.
“One state knows that it will not harm another state, or at least that it will not do so intentionally, but as the other state can never be sure of your intentions, you can never be sure of the other state’s intentions regarding you.” Herbet Butterfield, History and Human Relations, (New York: Collins, 1951), pp. 20-21.
İlyas Topsakal, “Turkey-Russia Relations: Harmony of National Interests,” Russia and Turkey Bilateral Relations in International Context International Conference October 19-20, 2018, (İstanbul: TDBB, 2020), p. 215.
Mitat Çelikpala, “Viewing Present as History: The State and Future of Turkey-Russian Relations,” EDAM, (April 2019), pp. 25-28.
Mustafa Kibaroğlu, “Paradigma Yokluğunda Küresel ve Bölgesel Politikalar Belirlemek,” Stratejist, No. 23 (June/July, 2019), pp. 22-25.
Alperen Kürşad Zengin, “Paradigmasız Uluslararası Sistem ABD’nin Kontrollü Geri Çekilişinin Bir Sonucu Olabilir,” Asya-Avrupa, Vol. 5, No. 50 (April 2020), p. 57.
John Ikenberry, “The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism after America,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 90, No. 3 (2011), pp. 56-62.
Fareed Zakaria, The Post-American World, (New York: W.W. Norton, 2008), pp. 123-129.
Yeşiltaş and Pirinççi, Küresel Dönüşüm Sürecinde Türkiye’nin Büyük Stratejisi, pp. 13-14.
Ziya Öniş and Mustafa Kutlay, “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICS,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 8 (2013), p. 1410.
Henry Kissenger, Dünya Düzeni, (İstanbul: Boyner Yayınları, 2016) pp. 398-399.
Özdemir, “Tasarlanmış ve Beliren Üst Stratejiler,” p. 45.
Ali Karaosmanoğlu, “Büyük Stratejinin Anlamı ve İşleyişi,” in Karaosmanoğlu and Aydınlı (eds.), Strateji Düşüncesi: Kuram, Paradoks, Uygulama, p. 39.
Hasan Basri Yalçın, “Stratejik Silah Kapasitesi,” in Abdullah Erboğa (ed.), Türkiye’nin Stratejik Silah Kapasitesi, (İstanbul: SETA, 2019), p. 24.
For an important study in which Turkey’s purchase of S-400s from Russia is evaluated in detail, see: Mustafa Kibaroğlu, “On Turkey’s Missile Defense Strategy: The Four Faces of the S-400 Deal between Turkey and Russia,” Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 2 (December 2019), pp. 159-175.
Abdullah Erboğa, “Türkiye’nin Stratejik Silah Kapasitesi ve Silahlanma Stratejisi,” in Erboğa (ed.), Türkiye’nin Stratejik Silah Kapasitesi, p. 75
For sources that integrate with the work of Arda Mevlutoğlu and contain important analyses related to the Turkish defense industry, including Turkey’s UAV technology, retrieved from: https://www.siyahgribeyaz.com/.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Yeni Türkiye Vizyonu: Dünya 5’ten Büyüktür, (Ankara: Cumhurbaşkanlığı Yayınları 2017), p. 13.
President of Russia, “Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy,” Kremlin, (February 10, 2007), retrieved December 11, 2020, fromhttp://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034.
Glenn H. Snyder, The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics, World Politics, Vol. 36, No. 3 (July 1984), pp. 466-468.
Thomas J. Christensen and Jack L. Snyder, “Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Spring 1990), pp. 140-143.
Ali Bilgiç, “Güvenlik İkilemi’ni Yeniden Düşünmek Güvenlik Çalışmalarında Yeni Bir Perspektif,” Uluslararası İlişkiler, Vol. 8, No. 29 (2011), p. 132.
Alexander Baunov, “Why Russia Is Biding Its Time on Nagorno-Karabakh,” Carnegie Moscow Center, (October 9, 2020), retrieved December 31, 2020, from https://carnegie.ru/commentary/82933.