SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Littera Turca Journal of Turkish Language and Literature / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING THEORIES/APPROACHES

Fahritdin Şanal
Pages
220–225
Publication Date
2017-05-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Behaviorism, for instance, has its base on stimuli-response associations.  To shed light on this topic, this study, which was carried out by means of literature review model, gives detailed information aboutforeign language teaching and learningtheories/approaches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Language learning is a complicated procedure that needs to be understood better.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These principles are used to choose the suitable learning tools and strategies in learning process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Behaviorism, for instance, has its base on stimuli-response associations.  To shed light on this topic, this study, which was carried out by means of literature review model, gives detailed information aboutforeign language teaching and learningtheories/approaches.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:learning procedure · theories · approaches

Özet

Language learning is a complicated procedure that needs to be understood better. In order to get the hang of this procedure and understanding how people learn languages, there have been many theories of learning with principles. These principles are used to choose the suitable learning tools and strategies in learning process. Each theory has its own principles. Behaviorism, for instance, has its base on stimuli-response associations.  To shed light on this topic, this study, which was carried out by means of literature review model, gives detailed information aboutforeign language teaching and learningtheories/approaches.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şanal, F. (2017). FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING THEORIES/APPROACHES. Littera Turca Journal of Turkish Language and Literature, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 220–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/1595643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Balcı, Ö. (2016). Eğitimde öğrenmeyi etkileyen duyuşsal özellikler ve yabancı dile eğitimindeki yansımaları.In E. Yılmaz, M. Çalışkan& S. A. Sulak (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinden Yansımalar (115-126). Konya: ÇizgiKitabevi.
  2. Balcı, Ö. (2017). “An Investigation of the Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Learning Styles in Turkish Freshman Students”. Retrieved on March 18, 2017 from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/66819/36263
  3. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman. Durak Üğüten, S. (2009).The Use of Writing Portfolio in Preparatory Writing Classes to Foster Learner Autonomy.Unpublished PhD thesis, Çukurova University, Adana. Durak Üğüten, S. (2015).Ögrenen Özerklıgı (Learner Autonomy).Dıl Ögretımı, Pegem,Editor:BEKLEYEN,NILÜFER, Page number 504, ISBN:6053182481, (Publish No: 2176284) DurakÜğüten, S. (2016).Yapılandırmacı öğrenme teorisi. In E. Yılmaz, M. Çalışkan& S. A. Sulak (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinden Yansımalar, 105-113, Konya: ÇizgiKitabevi Köse, N. (2006), “Effects of Portfolio Implementation and Assessment on Critical Reading and Learner Autonomy of ELT students”, PhD Thesis, Çukurova University, The Institute of Social Sciences, Adana. Skinner, B.F. (1974) “About Behaviorism”. Retrieved on March 26, 2017 from http://fitelson.org/prosem/skinner_2.pdf Pădurean, A. (2014). Usıng Multıple Intellıgence Theory In TEFL Classroom. Globalization and Intercultural Dialogue, Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Section: Education Sciences, ISBN 978-606-93691-3-5, 2014, p. 55-62
  4. Balcı, Ö. (2016). Eğitimde öğrenmeyi etkileyen duyuşsal özellikler ve yabancı dile eğitimindeki yansımaları.In E. Yılmaz, M. Çalışkan& S. A. Sulak (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinden Yansımalar (115-126). Konya: ÇizgiKitabevi.
  5. Balcı, Ö. (2017). “An Investigation of the Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Learning Styles in Turkish Freshman Students”. Retrieved on March 18, 2017 from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/66819/36263
  6. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman. Durak Üğüten, S. (2009).The Use of Writing Portfolio in Preparatory Writing Classes to Foster Learner Autonomy.Unpublished PhD thesis, Çukurova University, Adana. Durak Üğüten, S. (2015).Ögrenen Özerklıgı (Learner Autonomy).Dıl Ögretımı, Pegem,Editor:BEKLEYEN,NILÜFER, Page number 504, ISBN:6053182481, (Publish No: 2176284) DurakÜğüten, S. (2016).Yapılandırmacı öğrenme teorisi. In E. Yılmaz, M. Çalışkan& S. A. Sulak (Ed.), Eğitim Bilimlerinden Yansımalar, 105-113, Konya: ÇizgiKitabevi Köse, N. (2006), “Effects of Portfolio Implementation and Assessment on Critical Reading and Learner Autonomy of ELT students”, PhD Thesis, Çukurova University, The Institute of Social Sciences, Adana. Skinner, B.F. (1974) “About Behaviorism”. Retrieved on March 26, 2017 from http://fitelson.org/prosem/skinner_2.pdf Pădurean, A. (2014). Usıng Multıple Intellıgence Theory In TEFL Classroom. Globalization and Intercultural Dialogue, Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Section: Education Sciences, ISBN 978-606-93691-3-5, 2014, p. 55-62