Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

THE MOST SUITABLE FACTORY LOCATION SELECTION FOR TURKEY'S DOMESTIC AUTOMOBILE WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD

BULANIK TOPSIS YÖNTEMİYLE TÜRKİYE’NİN YERLİ OTOMOBİLİ İÇİN EN UYGUN FABRİKA YERİNİN SEÇİMİ

Pages
1427–1445
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, Bursa-Gemlik, which has the highest closeness coefficient, was determined as the most suitable facility location for domestic automobile.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For entrepreneurs, in addition to which sector they operate it is also important suitable selection of facility location.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it is aimed to select most suitable facility location for the domestic automobile production which has a strategic importance for Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, Bursa-Gemlik, which has the highest closeness coefficient, was determined as the most suitable facility location for domestic automobile.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

For entrepreneurs, in addition to which sector they operate it is also important suitable selection of facility location. Because the selection of an unsuitable facility location after a wrong decision can cause problems such as high costs and inability to reach enough customers. The facility location problem is a decision problem, which contains many criteria and uncertainty and therefore exhibits a fuzzy behavior. In solving such decision problems, the use of scientific methods such as Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) provides convenience to decision makers. In this study, it is aimed to select most suitable facility location for the domestic automobile production which has a strategic importance for Turkey. For this purpose, fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method was used to facilitate decision making in fuzzy environments. Seven alternative location (Kocaeli, Bursa-Gemlik, Sakarya, Konya, Izmir-Aliaga, Adana and Eskisehir) have been evaluated according to five different criteria (economic, geographical location, infrastructure, technical and social characteristics) as a result of literature review. At the end of the study, Bursa-Gemlik, which has the highest closeness coefficient, was determined as the most suitable facility location for domestic automobile.

Özet

Girişimciler için, hangi sektörde faaliyet göstermelerinin yanı sıra işletmeyi nereye kuracakları da önemlidir. Çünkü yanlış bir karardan dolayı uygun olmayan bir yere işletmenin kurulması yüksek maliyetlere, nitelikli işgücüne sahip olamama ve yeterli sayıda müşteriye ulaşamama gibi sorunlara sebep olabilir. Yer seçimi problemi, içerisinde birçok kriteri ve belirsizliği barındıran, bundan dolayı da bulanık bir davranış sergileyen bir karar problemidir. Bu gibi karar problemlerinin çözümünde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) gibi bilimsel yöntemlerin kullanılması karar vericilere kolaylık sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye için stratejik bir öneme sahip yerli otomobil üretimi için en uygun yerin seçilmesi amaçlanmış ve bu amaç için bulanık ortamlarda karar vermeyi kolaylaştıran bulanık TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Yedi alternatif yer (Kocaeli, Bursa-Gemlik, Sakarya, Konya, İzmir-Aliağa, Adana ve Eskişehir) literatür taraması neticesinde belirlenen beş ayrı kritere göre (ekonomik, coğrafi konum, altyapı, teknik ve sosyal özellik) değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışma sonunda yakınlık katsayısı en yüksek olan Bursa-Gemlik alternatifi, yerli otomobil için en uygun fabrika yeri olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, A., DEMİR, Y. (2019). THE MOST SUITABLE FACTORY LOCATION SELECTION FOR TURKEY'S DOMESTIC AUTOMOBILE WITH FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 1427–1445. https://ajindex.com/articles/159297

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alimoradi, A. Yussuf, R. M., & Zulkifli, N. (2011). A hybrid model for remanufacturing facility location problem in a closed-loop supply chain. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 4(01), 16-23.
  2. Amindoust, A. Ahmed, S. & Saghafinia, A. (2012). Location decision of supply chain management in the auto motive industry. International Journal of Engineering, 1(2), 2305-8269.
  3. Aruldoss, M. Lakshmi, T. M. & Venkatesan, V. P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1(1), 31-43.
  4. Athawale, V. M. & Chakraborty, S. (2010, January). Facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. In Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management (pp. 9-10).
  5. Bangladesh Dhaka. Bhatia, M. S. Dora, M. & Jakhar, S. K. (2019). Appropriate location for remanufacturing plant towards sustainable supply chain. Annals of Operations Research, 1-22.
  6. Bolturk, E. & Kahraman, C. (2018). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method and its application to wave energy facility location selection problem. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint), 1-13.
  7. Boran, F. (2011). An integrated intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria decision making method for facility location selection. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 16(2), 487-496.
  8. Chang, H. S. & Liao, C. H. (2015). Planning emergency shelter locations based on evacuation behavior. Natural Hazards, 76(3), 1551-1571.
  9. Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy sets and systems, 114(1), 1-9.
  10. Chen, J. Wang, J. Baležentis, T. Zagurskaitė, F. Streimikiene, D. & Makutėnienė, D. (2018). Multicriteria approach towards the sustainable selection of a teahouse location with sensitivity analysis. Sustainability, 10(8), 2926. Demirel, T. Demirel, N. Ç. & Kahraman, C. (2010). Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3943-3952.
  11. Deveci, M. Akyurt, I. Z. & Yavuz, S. (2018). A GIS-based interval type-2 fuzzy set for public bread factory site selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(6), 820-847.
  12. Ertuğrul, İ. (2011). Fuzzy group decision making for the selection of facility location. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20(6), 725-740.
  13. Ervural, B. C. Zaim, S. Demirel, O. F. Aydin, Z. & Delen, D. (2018). An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy pl