SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Communicata / 2026 / Sayı: 32

Parasocial Bonds in Influencer Comments: A Qualitative Analysis of Follower Comments on YouTube

Influencer Yorumlarında Parasosyal Bağlar: YouTube'daki Takipçi Yorumlarının Nitel Analizi

Fulya Akbuğa(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0324-8952
Pages
64–74
Publication Date
2026-09-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that followers frequently position influencers as emotionally close figures through metaphors of familiarity and family membership, “safe space” narratives and expressions of everyday companionship.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the expansion of digital media, social media platforms have transformed not only communication technologies but also the relational dynamics between content producers and audiences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The dataset consists of approximately 500 publicly available comments posted under 25 videos produced by five Turkish YouTube influencers focusing on personal development, everyday life and subjective experiences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that followers frequently position influencers as emotionally close figures through metaphors of familiarity and family membership, “safe space” narratives and expressions of everyday companionship.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:parasosyal etkileşim · parasosyal ilişki · influencerlar

Abstract

With the expansion of digital media, social media platforms have transformed not only communication technologies but also the relational dynamics between content producers and audiences. Among these platforms, YouTube provides an interaction environment that is both continuous and visible through its video-based narrative structure and comment sections. Drawing on the concepts of parasocial interaction and parasocial identification, this study aims to examine how parasocial relationships are discursively constructed in follower comments on influencer videos. The research adopts a qualitative interpretive content analysis. The dataset consists of approximately 500 publicly available comments posted under 25 videos produced by five Turkish YouTube influencers focusing on personal development, everyday life and subjective experiences. The findings indicate that followers frequently position influencers as emotionally close figures through metaphors of familiarity and family membership, “safe space” narratives and expressions of everyday companionship. In addition, parasocial identification is constructed through role model attribution, perceived similarity and narratives of behavioral change. The results demonstrate that YouTube comment sections function not merely as feedback mechanisms but as multi-layered interaction spaces where emotional attachment, identification, guidance seeking and critical negotiation are simultaneously produced. In this respect, the study contributes to the reconceptualization of parasocial relationships as relational practices that are collectively constructed and made visible within digital discourse, beyond individual-level experiences.

Özet

Dijital iletişim teknolojilerinin ve dijital mecraların yaygınlaşmasıyla birlikte sosyal medya platformları yalnızca iletişim teknolojilerini değil, içerik üreticileri ile izleyiciler arasındaki ilişkisel dinamikleri de dönüştürmüştür. Bu platformlar arasında YouTube, video temelli anlatım yapısı ve yorum alanları aracılığıyla içerik üreticileri ile takipçiler arasında süreklilik arz eden ve görünür kılınan bir etkileşim ortamı sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, parasosyal etkileşim ve parasosyal özdeşleşme kavramlarından hareketle, influencer videolarına yapılan takipçi yorumlarında parasosyal ilişkilerin söylemsel olarak nasıl kurulduğunu incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada, nitel yorumlayıcı içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmakta; veri seti, kişisel gelişim, gündelik yaşam ve öznel deneyimlere odaklanan beş Türk YouTube influencer’ının 25 videosu altında yer alan yaklaşık 500 kamuya açık yorumdan oluşmaktadır. Bulgular, takipçilerin influencer’ları sıklıkla tanıdıklık ve aile üyeliği metaforları, “güvenli alan” söylemleri ve gündelik eşlik anlatıları aracılığıyla duygusal olarak yakın figürler şeklinde konumlandırdığını göstermektedir. Bunun yanı sıra, parasosyal özdeşleşmenin rol model atfetme, benzerlik vurgusu ve davranış değişimi anlatıları üzerinden kurulduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, YouTube yorum alanlarının yalnızca geri bildirim mekanizmaları değil; duygusal bağ, özdeşleşme, rehberlik arayışı ve eleştirel müzakerenin eş zamanlı olarak üretildiği çok katmanlı etkileşim alanları olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu yönüyle çalışma, parasosyal ilişkileri bireysel deneyimlerin ötesinde, dijital söylem içinde kolektif olarak inşa edilen ve görünür kılınan ilişkisel pratikler olarak yeniden kavramsallaştırmaya katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akbuğa, F. (2026). Parasocial Bonds in Influencer Comments: A Qualitative Analysis of Follower Comments on YouTube. Communicata, Sayı: 32, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.32952/communicata.1967380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116641342
  2. Branch, S. E., Wilson, K. M., & Agnew, C. R. (2013). Committed to Oprah, Homer or House: Using the investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030938
  3. Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Polity Press.
  4. Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology and Marketing, 34(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001
  5. Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  6. Cunningham, S. & Craig, D. (2019). Social media entertainment: The new intersection of Hollywood and Silicon Valley, NYU Press.
  7. Djafarova, E., & Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities’ Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009
  8. Elagina, D. (2025). Leading countries based on YouTube audience size as of October 2025. Statista Web Site. Retrieved February 2, 2026, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/280685/number-of-monthly-unique-youtube-users/
  9. Giles, D. C. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology, 4(3),279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04
  10. Hartmann, T. (2017). Parasocial interaction, parasocial relationships, and well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 131–144). Routledge.
  11. Hoffner, C. A., & Bond, B. J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306
  12. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  13. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.
  14. Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T., & Schramm, H. (2011). Parasocial interactions and relationships. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 291–314). Routledge.
  15. Lange, P. G. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x
  16. Maltby, J., Houran, J., Lange, R., Ashe, D., & McCutcheon, L. E. (2004). Personality and coping: A context for examining celebrity worship and mental health. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 411–428.
  17. Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity and self-branding in web 2.0. Yale University Press.
  18. Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856510394539
  19. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
  20. McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity worship. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162454
  21. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. O’Reilly Media. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
  22. Oyman, M., & Akıncı, S. (2019). Vloggers as social media influencers: Investigation of vloggers in terms of para-social relationship, ıntention to buy and Youtube behaviour on generation Z. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 441–464. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.620050
  23. Pimienta, J. (2023). Towards an integrated and systematic theory of parasocial relationships: PSR as an attachment process. Communication Research Trends, 42(1), 4–20. https://scholarcommons.scu.edu/crt/vol42/iss1/1
  24. Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
  25. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12, 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
  26. Schiappa, E., Gregg, P. B., & Hewes, D. E. (2005). The parasocial contact hypothesis. Communication Monographs, 72(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775052000342544
  27. Schmid, H., & Klimmt, C. (2011). A magically nice guy: Parasocial relationships with Harry Potter across different cultures. The International Communication Gazette. 73(3), 252-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510393658
  28. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage Publications.
  29. Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
  30. Stever, G. S. (2011). Fan behavior and lifespan development theory: Explaining para-social and social attachment to celebrities. Journal of Adult Development, 18(1), 1–7.