Journals / Communicata / 2026 / Sayı: 32

Anatomy of the Proto-Influencer: Exploring the Pre-Digital Influencer Marketing and Sales Funnel Relationship in Yüz Numaralı Adam

Proto-Influencer'ın Anatomisi: Dijital Öncesi Influencer Pazarlama ve Satış Hunisi İlişkisini Yüz Numaralı Adam ile Keşfedilmesi

Pages
30–42
Publication Date
2026-09-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that the protagonist, Şaban, functions as a “proto-influencer,” whose trajectory from an ordinary citizen to an advertising icon anticipates the logic of credibility, authenticity, and parasocial relationships that drive digital influencer culture today.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to analyze how Yüz Numaralı Adam anticipates and critically reflects the mechanisms of persuasion, mediated influence, and consumer behavior that underpin modern influencer marketing practices, by employing the conceptual frameworks of influencer marketing and the sales funnel model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study employs a qualitative thematic analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that the protagonist, Şaban, functions as a “proto-influencer,” whose trajectory from an ordinary citizen to an advertising icon anticipates the logic of credibility, authenticity, and parasocial relationships that drive digital influencer culture today.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Influencer Pazarlama · Satış Hunisi · Proto-Influencer

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze how Yüz Numaralı Adam anticipates and critically reflects the mechanisms of persuasion, mediated influence, and consumer behavior that underpin modern influencer marketing practices, by employing the conceptual frameworks of influencer marketing and the sales funnel model. The study employs a qualitative thematic analysis. The findings reveal that the protagonist, Şaban, functions as a “proto-influencer,” whose trajectory from an ordinary citizen to an advertising icon anticipates the logic of credibility, authenticity, and parasocial relationships that drive digital influencer culture today. The application of the sales funnel model exposes how the film satirizes the sequential process of consumer persuasion. Moreover, the film critiques the commodification of selfhood and dramatizes the fragility of trust. When the defective products lead to consumer disillusionment, the film models the reversal of the sales funnel via negative word-of-mouth. Şaban’s eventual ethical resistance and public confession highlight that moral accountability is the most precarious yet redemptive aspect of the influence economy. Ultimately, the film warns that persuasion is relational and fragile; when authenticity is commodified and trust is betrayed, ethical reflexivity retains the only sustainable foundation for credibility and long-term engagement.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı; influencer pazarlaması ve satış hunisi modeli kavramsal çerçevelerini kullanarak, Yüz Numaralı Adam filminin, modern influencer pazarlaması pratiklerinin temelini oluşturan ikna, medya aracılı etki ve tüketici davranışı mekanizmalarını nasıl öngördüğünü ve eleştirel bir biçimde yansıttığını analiz etmektir. Çalışmada nitel tematik analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, başkarakter Şaban’ın, sıradan bir vatandaştan reklam ikonuna uzanan dönüşüm yolculuğunun, günümüz dijital influencer kültürünü yönlendiren güvenilirlik, sahicilik (otantiklik) ve parasosyal ilişkiler mantığını öncelediği bir “proto-influencer” işlevi gördüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Satış hunisi modelinin uygulanması, filmin tüketicileri ikna etme sürecinin aşamalı yapısını nasıl hicvettiğini gözler önüne sermektedir. Ayrıca film, benliğin metalaştırılmasını eleştirmekte ve güvenin kırılganlığını dramatize etmektedir. Kusurlu ürünlerin tüketicide hayal kırıklığına yol açmasıyla film, satış hunisinin olumsuz ağızdan ağıza iletişim yoluyla tersine dönüşünü modellemektedir. Şaban’ın nihai etik direnişi ve kamusal itirafı, ahlaki hesap verebilirliğin etki ekonomisinin en hassas ama aynı zamanda en kurtarıcı yönü olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Sonuç olarak film, iknanın ilişkisel ve kırılgan olduğu; sahicilik metalaştırıldığında ve güvene ihanet edildiğinde, etik düşünümselliğin güvenilirlik ve uzun vadeli etkileşim için tek sürdürülebilir temel olarak kaldığı uyarısında bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başaran, D., Sargın, M. O. (2026). Anatomy of the Proto-Influencer: Exploring the Pre-Digital Influencer Marketing and Sales Funnel Relationship in Yüz Numaralı Adam. Communicata, Sayı: 32, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.32952/communicata.1923761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (70)

  1. Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177
  2. Ahmed, A., & Rathore, T. (2024). The evolution of influencer marketing. In S. Dutta, Á. Rocha, P. K. Dutta, P. Bhattacharya, & R. Singh (Eds.), Advances in data analytics for influencer marketing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 17–27). Springer Nature.
  3. Alabay, M. N. (2010). Geleneksel pazarlamadan yeni pazarlama yaklaşımlarına geçiş süreci. [The Process of transition from traditional marketing to a new one] Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 213–235.
  4. Aslaner, A. G., & Aslaner, D. A. (2020). Gelenekselden dijitale Türkiye’de reklamcılık [From traditional to digital: advertising in Turkey]. Yalova Journal of Social Sciences, 10(21), 17–30.
  5. Audrezet, A., De Kerviler, G., & Moulard, J. G. (2020). Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. Journal of Business Research, 117, 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.008
  6. Banerjee, M. (2022). Is AIDA an effective tool in measuring advertising/marketing campaigns? A literature review. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4261303
  7. Başaran, D. (2025). A taste of power: Class, consumerism, and gender dynamics in The Menu. Consumption Markets & Culture, 28(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2025.2545253
  8. Bishop, S. (2021). Influencer management tools: Algorithmic cultures, brand safety, and bias. Social Media + Society, 7(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211003066
  9. Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017). “This post is sponsored”: Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
  11. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  14. Brown, D., & Hayes, N. (2008). Influencer marketing. Routledge.
  15. Campbell, C., & Rapp Farrell, J. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
  16. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. Pearson.
  17. Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer.
  18. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate reputation review, 10(3), 163-176.
  19. Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O. J. (2009). The consumer decision journey. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 96–107.
  20. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035
  21. Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). “Instafamous”—Credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491
  22. Dönmez-Colin, G. (2008). Turkish cinema: Identity, distance and belonging. Reaktion Books.
  23. Duffy, B. E. (2016). The romance of work: Gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industries. International journal of cultural studies, 19(4), 441-457.
  24. Duffy, B. E., & Pooley, J. (2019). Idols of promotion: The triumph of self-branding in an age of precarity. Journal of Communication, 69(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy063
  25. Foucault, M. (2019). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Penguin Books.
  26. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. A. (2011). Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 90–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
  27. Freud, S. (2019). The ego and the id. Simon & Schuster.
  28. Gedik, A. (2024). Türkiye’de kültür endüstrisi: Medya ve siyaset. [Culture industry in Turkey: Media and politics] Van Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences – VJHSS, 8, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.62068/visbid.1579175
  29. Giroux, H. A. (2000). Brutalised bodies and emasculated politics: Fight Club, consumerism, and masculine violence. Third Text, 14(53), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820108576880
  30. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe–yöntem–analiz [Research methods in social sciences: Philosophy–method–analysis] (3rd ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  31. Hasan, S., Zahid, H., & Qayyum, A. (2024). Influencer authenticity and intention to co-create brand value: An investigation of central and peripheral pathways. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2393236
  32. Hearn, A., & Schoenhoff, S. (2016). From celebrity to influencer: Tracing the diffusion of celebrity value across the data stream. In P. D. Marshall & S. Redmond (Eds.), A companion to celebrity (pp. 194–212). Wiley Blackwell.
  33. Helmold, M. (2022). Performance excellence in marketing, sales and pricing. Springer Nature.
  34. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
  35. Jin, S. V., Muqaddam, A., & Ryu, E. (2019). Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 37(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2018-0375
  36. Karşu Cesur, D. (2022). Popüler kültürde reklamcı temsillerinin dönüşümü: Yüz Numaralı Adam (1978) ve Recep İvedik 2 (2009). [The Changing representation of The Advertisers in popular culture: “Yüz Numaralı Adam (1978)” and “Recep İvedik 2 (2009)”], idil (91), 319–335.
  37. Kaur, U., & Siddhey, P. K. (2024). Introduction to influencer marketing and data analytics. In S. Dutta, Á. Rocha, P. K. Dutta, P. Bhattacharya, & R. Singh (Eds.), Advances in data analytics for influencer marketing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 1–15). Springer Nature.
  38. Ki, C.-W. C., Cuevas, L. M. S., Chong, S. M., & Lim, H. (2020). Influencer marketing: Social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102133
  39. Kilgour, M., Sasser, S. L., & Larke, R. (2015). The social media transformation process: Curating content into strategy. Corporate Communications, 20(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2014-0046
  40. Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021). Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research, 134, 223–232.
  41. Kim, J., & Song, H. (2016). Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
  42. Kıran, E. (2019). Turkey’s experience of modern consumer culture. In D. J. Burns (Ed.), Multifaceted explorations of consumer culture and its impact on individuals and society (pp. 211–222). IGI Global.
  43. Koay, K. Y., & Lim, W. M. (2025). Congruence effects in social media influencer marketing: The moderating role of wishful identification in online impulse buying intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 34(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2023-4709
  44. Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.
  45. Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003
  46. Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits (B. Fink, Trans.). Norton.
  47. Ladhari, R. (2007). The effect of consumption emotions on satisfaction and word‐of‐mouth communications. Psychology & Marketing, 24(12), 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20195
  48. Liao, J., & Chen, J. (2024). The authenticity advantage: How influencer authenticity management strategies shape digital engagement with sponsored videos. Journal of Business Research, 185, 114937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114937
  49. Liu, X., & Zheng, X. (2024). The persuasive power of social media influencers in brand credibility and purchase intention. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–12.
  50. Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501
  51. Malmelin, N. (2010). What is advertising literacy? Exploring the dimensions of advertising literacy. Journal of Visual Literacy, 29(2), 129–142.
  52. Martínez-López, F. J., Anaya-Sánchez, R., Esteban-Millat, I., Torrez-Meruvia, H., D’Alessandro, S., & Miles, M. (2020). Influencer marketing: Brand control, commercial orientation and post credibility. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(17–18), 1805–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1806906
  53. Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Qualitative Research, A Guide to Design and Implementation] (S. Turan, Trans.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  54. Metz, C. (1981). The imaginary signifier: Psychoanalysis and the cinema. Indiana University Press.
  55. Mulvey, L. (2013). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In M. Merck (Ed.), The sexual subject (pp. 22–34). Routledge Öncü, A. (1999). Istanbulites and others: The cultural cosmology of being middle class in the era of globalism. In Ç. Keyder (Ed.), Istanbul: Between the global and the local (pp. 95–119). Rowman & Littlefield.
  56. Özden, A. T. (2018). Pazarlama kanunları [Rules of Marketing] (2nd ed.). Gazi Kitabevi.
  57. Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). Sage.
  58. Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., & Verspaget, M. (2021). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product–endorser fit. In S. Yoon, Y. K. Choi, & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Leveraged marketing communications (pp. 208–231). Routledge.
  59. Seden, F. O. (1978). Yüz Numaralı Adam [Film]. Fanatik Film.
  60. Strong, E. K. (1925). Theories of selling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070123
  61. Sudha, M., & Sheena, K. (2017). Impact of influencers in consumer decision process: The fashion industry. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 14(3), 14–30.
  62. Suner, A. (2010). New Turkish cinema: Belonging, identity and memory. I. B. Tauris.
  63. Sweeney, E., Lawlor, M., & Brady, M. (2022). Teenagers’ moral advertising literacy in an influencer marketing context. International Journal of Advertising, 41(1), 54–77.
  64. Ünalmış, E., Dirsehan, T., & Erdoğmuş, İ. E. (2024). Consequences of influencer-created content on influencers’ authenticity in the beauty and personal care industry. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1–27.
  65. Varul, M. Z. (2018). The cultural tragedy of production and the expropriation of the brickolariat: The Lego Movie as consumer-capitalist myth. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(6), 724–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417718208
  66. Wenger, S. (2025). Successful lead management: Nothing’s gonna stop us now. In U. Seebacher (Ed.), B2B marketing guidebook – Vol. 1 (pp. 533–556). Springer.
  67. Wilson, M., Obilo, O. O., & Mills, A. J. (2024). Brand responses to influencer scandals: An action plan for managers. Business Horizons 69 (1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.12.002
  68. Yakın, M. (2025). Advertising literacy from traditional media to digital media. In M. Özel (Ed.), Digital literacy as a catalyst for critical thinking (pp. 135–154). Springer.
  69. Yavuz, Ş. (2006). Reklamlar ve reklamcılık sektörü açısından 1980’lerde Türkiye panoraması. [Advertising and the Advertising Industry a Panorama of Turkey in the 1980s] Galatasaray Üniversitesi Journal of Communication, 5, 157–182.
  70. Yüz Numaralı Adam (1978). YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7oLqdR2zIA Date of Access: 05.08.2026.