SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Vakanüvis - Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Intelligence as Covert Statecraft: The OSS, CIA’s Predecessor, in Neutral Turkey, 1939-1945

Dış Politika Aracı Olarak İstihbarat: İkinci Dünya Savaşı Döneminde Tarafsız Türkiye’de CIA’nın Öncülü OSS’nin Operasyonları

Murat Toman(HİTİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4698-7520
Pages
752–782
Publication Date
2026-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings therefore support a bounded causal claim: OSS activity did not by itself determine Turkey's late-war realignment, but it increased Allied leverage at decisive moments and formed part of a broader repertoire of wartime statecraft.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the Second World War, the U.S.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Office of Strategic Services (OSS) operated in neutral Turkey within a wider Allied effort to monitor Axis activity, limit German access to strategic materials, and influence Ankara's wartime choices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings therefore support a bounded causal claim: OSS activity did not by itself determine Turkey's late-war realignment, but it increased Allied leverage at decisive moments and formed part of a broader repertoire of wartime statecraft.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:CIA · İkinci Dünya Savaşı · Aktif Tarafsızlık

Abstract

During the Second World War, the U.S. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) operated in neutral Turkey within a wider Allied effort to monitor Axis activity, limit German access to strategic materials, and influence Ankara's wartime choices. This article examines how OSS collection, liaison, and covert action interacted with diplomacy and economic warfare between 1942 and 1945. Methodologically, it uses a qualitative historical case study that process-traces two critical episodes, the DOGWOOD network and the May 1944 Evros sabotage, and triangulates OSS files, Foreign Relations of the United States volumes, British parliamentary debates, and Turkish newspapers. The article argues that intelligence in wartime Turkey was not merely ancillary to diplomacy. Rather, it supplied decision-relevant information on German-Turkish bargaining, sharpened Allied pressure over chrome exports and transport corridors, and, in limited instances, complemented diplomatic coercion through deniable operations. Turkish officials, however, cooperated selectively and instrumentally, using liaison to preserve formal neutrality and widen Ankara's bargaining room. The findings therefore support a bounded causal claim: OSS activity did not by itself determine Turkey's late-war realignment, but it increased Allied leverage at decisive moments and formed part of a broader repertoire of wartime statecraft.

Özet

İkinci Dünya Savaşı sırasında ABD Stratejik Servisler Ofisi (OSS), tarafsız Türkiye’de Mihver faaliyetlerini izlemek, Almanya’nın stratejik hammaddelere erişimini sınırlamak ve Ankara’nın savaş dönemi tercihlerine etki etmek amacıyla daha geniş Müttefik stratejisinin bir parçası olarak faaliyet gösterdi. Bu makale, 1942-1945 arasında OSS’nin istihbarat toplama, irtibat ve örtülü operasyon faaliyetlerinin diplomasi ve ekonomik savaş ile nasıl kesiştiğini inceler. Yöntem olarak çalışma, DOGWOOD ağı ile Mayıs 1944 Evros/Meriç köprü sabotajını süreç izleme yoluyla inceleyen ve OSS kayıtlarını, FRUS ciltlerini, İngiliz parlamento tutanaklarını ve dönemin Türk gazetelerini karşılaştıran nitel bir tarihsel vaka incelemesine dayanır. Bulgular, istihbaratın savaş dönemi Türkiye’sinde diplomasiye yalnızca eşlik eden tali bir unsur olmadığını göstermektedir. OSS raporlaması Alman-Türk pazarlığına ilişkin Müttefik bilgisini güçlendirmiş, krom ihracatı ve ulaşım hatları üzerindeki baskıyı keskinleştirmiş ve sınırlı durumlarda inkâr edilebilir operasyonlarla diplomatik baskıyı tamamlamıştır. Bununla birlikte Türk karar alıcılar Müttefik istihbaratıyla seçici ve araçsal biçimde iş birliği yaparak resmî tarafsızlığı korumaya ve pazarlık alanını genişletmeye çalışmıştır. Çalışma, OSS faaliyetlerinin Türkiye’nin geç savaş dönemi yönelişini tek başına belirlemediği, ancak kritik anlarda Müttefik kaldıraç gücünü artırdığı yönünde sınırlı bir nedensel iddiayı desteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Toman, M. (2026). Intelligence as Covert Statecraft: The OSS, CIA’s Predecessor, in Neutral Turkey, 1939-1945. Vakanüvis - Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 752–782. https://doi.org/10.24186/vakanuvis.1794582

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. British House of Commons Debates (Hansard). Parliamentary Debates (5th series). Debate “Turkish Chrome Ore (Exports),” 18 April 1944, vol. 399, cols. 7–8; and 25 April 1944, vol. 399.
  2. Coleman, Archibald F. “Narrative Account of the Organization and Activities of the DOGWOOD Project.” Report dated 2 November 1944. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency FOIA Electronic Reading Room (Doc. 0000493983).
  3. Cumhuriyet [Istanbul]. “Trakya’da Bir Tren Köprüsü Yıkıldı” [A Railway Bridge Was Destroyed in Thrace]. 2 June 1944.
  4. Cumhuriyet [Istanbul]. “Krom İhracatımız ve İngiliz Basını” [Our Chrome Exports and the British Press]. 9 Nisan 1944.
  5. Cumhuriyet [Istanbul]. “Krom İhracatımız” [Our Chrome Exports]. 14 Nisan 1944
  6. Cumhuriyet [Istanbul]. “Krom Hakkında Verdiğimiz Karar” [The Decision We Made About Chrome]. 21 Nisan 1944.
  7. Donovan, William J. Memorandum to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, 18 June 1944. Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library (President’s Secretary’s File, Box 4).
  8. Imperial War Museum (UK). Photograph K 8889, “Turkey Enters the War” (Turkish Parliament in session, 23 Feb 1945).
  9. National Archives and Records Administration (USA). Record Group 226: Records of the Office of Strategic Services, Entries 99 and 210 (OSS Istanbul station and Cairo reports, 1943–44). College Park, MD.
  10. The National Archives (UK). HW 19/321, Use of ISOS by Section V during Second World War (MI6 Section V wartime files).
  11. United Kingdom Parliament. House of Commons Parliamentary Debates. See Hansard entries (18 Apr 1944; 25 Apr 1944) regarding Turkish chrome exports.
  12. United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1940, Vol. III. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1958.
  13. United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1943, Vol. IV (The Near East and Africa). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.
  14. United States Department of State. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1944, Vol. V (The Near East, South Asia, and Africa; The Far East). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965.
  15. Yad Vashem Digital Archives. “OSS documents on the ‘Dogwood’ operation.” (Collection of declassified OSS documents related to Operation DOGWOOD, accessed via Yad Vashem Archives website).
  16. Aldrich, Richard J. The Hidden Hand: Britain, America and Cold War Secret Intelligence. London: John Murray, 2001.
  17. Aldrich, Richard J. “Transatlantic Intelligence and Security Cooperation.” International Affairs 80, no. 4 (2004): 731-753.
  18. Anderson, Scott. The Quiet Americans: Four CIA Spies at the Dawn of the Cold War- A Tragedy in Three Acts. New York: Doubleday, 2020.
  19. Andrew, Christopher M. The Secret World: A History of Intelligence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.
  20. Andrew, Christopher M. “Intelligence, International Relations and ‘Under-Theorization’.” In Understanding Intelligence in the Twenty-First Century: Journeys in Shadows, edited by Peter Jackson and Len Scott, 170–184. London: Routledge, 2004.
  21. Andrew, Christopher M., and David Dilks, eds. The Missing Dimension: Governments and Intelligence Communities in the Twentieth Century. London: Macmillan, 1984.
  22. Baker Fox, Annette. The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in World War II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.
  23. Baldwin, David A. Economic Statecraft. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
  24. Bezci, Egemen B. Turkish Intelligence and the Cold War: The Turkish Secret Service, the US and the UK. London: I.B. Tauris, 2019.
  25. Bezci, Egemen B. “Turkey’s Intelligence Diplomacy during the Second World War.” Journal of Intelligence History 15, no. 1 (2016): 1–12.
  26. Caruana, Leonard, and Hugh Rockoff. “A Wolfram in Sheep’s Clothing: U.S. Economic Warfare in Spain, 1940–1944.” NBER Working Paper No. H-132, January 2001.
  27. Carey, Mac. “How Did Turkey, Completely Surrounded by Warring Powers, Remain Neutral During Most of World War II?” HistoryNet, August 15, 2023.
  28. Cossaboom, Robert, and Gary Leiser. “Adana Station 1943–45: Prelude to the Post-War American Military Presence in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 1 (1998): 73-86.
  29. Crowden, Robert E. “A Pioneering Experiment: OSS Double-Agent Operations in World War II.” Studies in Intelligence 58, no. 2 (2014): 65-75.
  30. Deringil, Selim. Denge Oyunu: İkinci Dünya Savaşı’nda Türk Dış Politikası [The Balancing Game: Turkey’s Foreign Policy during the Second World War]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1994.
  31. Fenyvesi, Charles. “Official Enemies, Secret Allies, Part III.” Hungarian Review (December 7, 2011).
  32. Gill, Peter, and Mark Phythian. Intelligence in National Security: A Critical Introduction. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2018.
  33. Goodman, Michael S. The Official History of the Joint Intelligence Committee, Volume I: From the Approach of the Second World War to the Suez Crisis. London: Routledge, 2014.
  34. Herman, Michael. Intelligence Power in Peace and War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  35. Jeffery, Keith. MI6: The History of the Secret Intelligence Service, 1909–1949. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.
  36. Len Scott. “Secret Intelligence, Covert Action and Clandestine Diplomacy.” Intelligence and National Security 19, no. 2 (2004): 322–341.
  37. Lowenthal, Mark M. Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. 8th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press, 2019.
  38. Mancini, John. “Bringing Down the Bridges.” Warfare History Network, 2018. (Online article).
  39. Mattingly, Robert E. Herringbone Cloak – GI Dagger: Marines of the OSS. Quantico, VA: USMC Command and Staff College, 1979.
  40. Medlicott, W. N. The Economic Blockade, Vol. II: 1942–1945. London: HMSO, 1959.
  41. Mulder, Nicholas. The Economic Weapon: The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2022.
  42. Önsoy, Murat. The World War Two Allied Economic Warfare: The Case of Turkish Chrome Sales. PhD diss., University of Erlangen–Nürnberg, 2009.
  43. Öztekin, Hülya. “1944 Irkçılık-Turancılık Davası ve Basındaki Tartışmalar” [“The 1944 Racism-Turanism Trial and Debates in the Press”]. Selçuk İletişim 11, no. 1 (2018): 212–236.
  44. Pasquini, Elaine. “Remembering U.S. Presence in Istanbul’s Beyoğlu Neighborhood.” Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, July 18, 2018.
  45. Prados, John. Safe for Democracy: The Secret Wars of the CIA. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2006.
  46. Rid, Thomas. Active Measures: The Secret History of Disinformation and Political Warfare. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2020.
  47. Rubin, Barry. Istanbul Intrigues: Espionage, Sabotage, and Diplomatic Treachery in the Spy Capital of World War II. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
  48. Seydi, Süleyman. “The Intelligence War in Turkey During the Second World War: A Nazi Spy on British Premises in Istanbul.” Middle Eastern Studies 40, no. 3 (2004): 75–85.
  49. Scherner, Jonas. “Bericht zur deutschen Wirtschaftslage 1943/44” [“Report on the German Economic Situation 1943/44”]. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 55, no. 3 (2007): 527–556.
  50. Tamkin, Nicholas. Britain, Turkey and the Soviet Union, 1940–45: Strategy, Diplomacy and Intelligence in the Eastern Mediterranean. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
  51. Walsh, James I. The International Politics of Intelligence Sharing. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.
  52. Warner, Michael. “A Matter of Trust: Covert Action Reconsidered.” Studies in Intelligence 63, no. 4 (2019): 33-46.
  53. Weisband, Edward. Turkish Foreign Policy, 1943–1945: Small State Diplomacy and Great Power Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.
  54. Weber, Frank G. The Evasive Neutral: Germany, Britain, and the Quest for a Turkish Alliance in the Second World War. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1979.
  55. Westerfield, H. Bradford. “America and the World of Intelligence Liaison.” Intelligence and National Security 11, no. 3 (1996): 523–60.
  56. Wires, Richard. The Cicero Spy Affair: German Access to British Secrets in World War II. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.