SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1

Anlamayı İzlemeyi Nasıl Değerlendirebiliriz? Anlamayı İzleme Testi

Kasım Yıldırım(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1406-709X
Seçkin Gök(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6095-9828
Pages
35–46
Publication Date
2024-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Geliştirilen anlamayı izleme testinin ilkokul düzeyinde anlama becerisi ile ilişkili bilişsel yapıları daha nitelikli bir şekilde değerlendirilebilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir test olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bu çalışmada ilkokul 3. sınıf düzeyinde anlamayı izleme testinin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Aydın ili Nazilli ilçesinde bulunan iki devlet okulunun yedi 3. sınıf şubesi (N=204) oluşturmuştur.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Geliştirilen anlamayı izleme testinin ilkokul düzeyinde anlama becerisi ile ilişkili bilişsel yapıları daha nitelikli bir şekilde değerlendirilebilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir test olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anlamayı izleme · bilişsel beceriler · dinlediğini anlama

Özet

Bu çalışmada ilkokul 3. sınıf düzeyinde anlamayı izleme testinin geliştirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu nedenle araştırma bir test geliştirme çalışması olarak desenlenmiş ve yürütülmüştür. Testin geliştirilme sürecinde test maddelerinin yazılması, pilot uygulamalar yapılması, madde analizi, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları işlem basamakları olarak takip edilmiştir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Aydın ili Nazilli ilçesinde bulunan iki devlet okulunun yedi 3. sınıf şubesi (N=204) oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada veri toplama aracı olarak anlamayı izleme testi kullanılmıştır. Bu test, dört tutarlı, beş tutarsız ve 3 eksik bilgi içeren metin olmak üzere toplam 12 metinden (maddeden) oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler önce Microsoft Excel programına girilmiştir. Daha sonra veriler IBM SPSS programına aktarılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler üzerinde madde ve güvenirlilik analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yapılan madde güçlük ve ayırt edicilik indekslerine ilişkin hesaplamalar ve güvenirlik analizleri sonucunda, testten dört madde çıkarılmış ve teste son hali verilmiştir. Geliştirilen anlamayı izleme testinin ilkokul düzeyinde anlama becerisi ile ilişkili bilişsel yapıları daha nitelikli bir şekilde değerlendirilebilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir test olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırım, K., Gök, S. (2024). Anlamayı İzlemeyi Nasıl Değerlendirebiliriz? Anlamayı İzleme Testi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 35–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/1574086

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Baker, L. (1984). Children's effective use of multiple standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 588-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.588
  2. Baker, L. (1996) Social influence on metacognitive development in reading. C. Cornoldi ve J. Oakhill (Ed.), Reading comprehension difficulties içinde (s. 331-351). Dordrecht: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Baker, L., Zeliger-Kandasamy, A. ve DeWyngaert, L. U. (2014). Neuroimaging evidence of comprehension monitoring. Psihologijske Teme, 23(1), 167-187.
  4. Cain, K. ve Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X67610
  5. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. ve Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
  6. Can, A. (2022). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  7. Connor, C. M., Radach, R., Vorstius, C., Day, S. L., McLean, L. ve Morrison, F. J. (2015). Individual differences in fifth graders’ literacy and academic language predict comprehension monitoring development: An eye-movement study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(2), 114-134.
  8. Cromley, J.G. ve Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
  9. Currie, N. K., Francey, G., Davies, R., Gray, S., Bridges, M. S., Restrepo, M. A., Thompson, M. S., Ciraolo, M. F., Hu, J. ve
  10. Cain, K. (2021). The process and product of coherence monitoring in young readers: Effects of reader and text characteristics. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
  11. Florit, E. ve Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
  12. Florit, E., Cain, K. ve Mason, L. (2020). Going beyond children's single‐text comprehension: The role of fundamental and higher‐level skills in 4th graders’ multiple‐document comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12288
  13. Florit, E., Roch, M., Altoè, G. ve Levorato, M. C. (2009). Listening comprehension in preschoolers: The role of memory. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 935-951. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X397189
  14. Francis, D. J., Kulesz, P. A. ve Benoit, J. S. (2018). Extending the simple view of reading to account for variation within readers and across texts: The complete view of reading (CVR i). Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518772904
  15. Gambrell, L. B. ve Bales, R. J. (1986). Mental imagery and the comprehension-monitoring performance of fourth-and fifth-grade poor readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 454-464.
  16. Hoover, W. A. ve Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160.
  17. Joshi, R. M. ve Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428
  18. Kim, Y. S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293
  19. Kim, Y. S. G. (2016). Direct and mediated effects of language and cognitive skills on comprehension of oral narrative texts (listening comprehension) for children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141(1), 101-120. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.08.003
  20. Kim, Y. S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
  21. Kim, Y. S. G. (2020a). Hierarchical and dynamic relations of language and cognitive skills to reading comprehension: Testing the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER). Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 667. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000407
  22. Kim, Y. S. G. (2020b). Toward integrative reading science: The direct and indirect effects model of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(6), 469-491.
  23. Kim, Y. S. G. (2023). Oral discourse skills: Dimensionality of comprehension and retell of narrative and expository texts, and the relations of language and cognitive skills to identified dimensions. Child Development, 94(5), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13935
  24. Kim, Y. S. G. ve Wagner, R. K. (2015). Text (oral) reading fluency as a construct in reading development: An investigation of its mediating role for children from grades 1 to 4. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 224-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1007375
  25. Kim, Y. S. G., Vorstius, C. ve Radach, R. (2018). Does online comprehension monitoring make a unique contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers? Evidence from eye movements. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(5), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1457680
  26. Kim, Y. S. ve Phillips, B. (2014). Cognitive correlates of listening comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(3), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.74
  27. Kim, Y. S. G. ve Phillips, B. (2016). 5 minutes a day: An exploratory study of improving comprehension monitoring for prekindergartners from low income families. Topics in Language Disorder, 36(4), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000103
  28. Kinnunen, R. ve Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high-and low-achieving primary school children's reading. Learning and Instruction, 5(2), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R
  29. Kinnunen, R., Marja, V. ve Pekka N. (1998). Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(4), 353-375.
  30. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  31. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. Krenca, K., Cain, K., Marinova-Todd, S. ve Chen, X. (2023). The role of comprehension monitoring in predicting reading comprehension among French immersion children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(6), 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2196022
  32. LaBerge, D. ve Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
  33. Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48(3), 986-992.
  34. Mier, M. (1984). ERIC/RCS: Comprehension monitoring in the elementary classroom. The Reading Teacher, 37(8), 770-774.
  35. Morrison, L. (2004). Comprehension monitoring in first and second language reading. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 77-107. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.61.1.77
  36. Oakhill, J. V. ve Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
  37. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. ve Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 443-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000008
  38. Oakhill, J., Hartt, J. ve Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11145-005-3355-z
  39. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu: SPSS ile adım adım veri analizi (S. Balcı & B. Ahi, Çev.), (3. Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  40. Paris, S. G. ve Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 13(1), 5–22.
  41. Perfetti, C. ve Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
  42. Pitts, M. M. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: Definition and practice. Journal of Reading, 26(6), 516-523.
  43. Potocki, A., Ecalle, J. ve Magnan, A. (2013). Effects of computer-assisted comprehension training in less skilled comprehenders in second grade: A one-year follow-up study. Computers & Education, 63, 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.011
  44. Roberts, V. (1999). Children's concept of understanding, its role in comprehension monitoring (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  45. Robinson, E.J. ve Robinson, W.P. (1977). Children's explanation of communication failure and the inadequacy of the misunderstood message. Developmental Psychology, 13(2), 156-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.13.2.156
  46. Snow, C. E. (2018). Simple and not-so-simple views of reading. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 313-316.
  47. Strasser, K. ve Río, F. D. (2014). The role of comprehension monitoring, theory of mind, and vocabulary depth in predicting story comprehension and recall of kindergarten children. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 169-187.
  48. Tibken, C., Richter, T., Wannagat, W., Schmiedeler, S., von der Linden, N. ve Schneider, W. (2022). Measuring comprehension monitoring with the inconsistency task in adolescents: stability, associations with reading comprehension skills, and differences between grade levels. Discourse Processes, 59(5-6), 439-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2073736
  49. Tighe, E. L., Kaldes, G., Talwar, A., Crossley, S. A., Greenberg, D. ve Skalicky, S. (2023). Do struggling adult readers monitor their reading? Understanding the role of online and offline comprehension monitoring processes during reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(1), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221081473
  50. van Dijk, T. A. ve Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  51. Wagoner, S. A. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(3), 328-346.
  52. Winograd, P. ve Johnston, P. (1982). Comprehension monitoring and the error detection paradigm. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(1), 61-76.
  53. Wolf, M. C., Muijselaar, M. M., Boonstra, A. M. ve de Bree, E. H. (2019). The relationship between reading and listening comprehension: shared and modality-specific components. Reading and Writing, 32(7), 1747-1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-99248
  54. Yeomans-Maldonado, G. (2017). Development of comprehension monitoring in beginner readers. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 2039-2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9765-x
  55. Zargar, E., Adams, A. M. ve Connor, C. M. (2020). The relations between children's comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: an eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 511-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3
  56. Zhao, A., Guo, Y., Sun, S., Lai, M. H., Breit, A. ve Li, M. (2021). The contributions of language skills and comprehension monitoring to Chinese reading comprehension: A longitudinal investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.625555