SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF COLLECTOR GEOMETRY ON ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBER MORPHOLOGY AND POROSITY USING MULTIPLE POLYMERS

Fatma Kuru(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6132-7689
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results demonstrate that both the polymer type and the collector geometry play a decisive role in nanofiber formation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, nanofibers were produced via electrospinning using five different polymers – polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) – and the effects of three different collector geometries (flat aluminum foil, wire mesh, and bowl-shaped collector) on fiber morphology and porosity were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results demonstrate that both the polymer type and the collector geometry play a decisive role in nanofiber formation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This work highlights the importance of collector selection in the design of electrospun nanofiber mats and suggests new approaches for creating three-dimensional nanofiber architectures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Electrospinning · Nanofibers · Collector geometry

Abstract

In this study, nanofibers were produced via electrospinning using five different polymers – polyacrylonitrile (PAN), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP), and poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) – and the effects of three different collector geometries (flat aluminum foil, wire mesh, and bowl-shaped collector) on fiber morphology and porosity were investigated. Notably, using a bowl-shaped collector led to the formation of three-dimensional cotton-like nanofiber structures. Morphological analysis of the electrospun fibers was performed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and fiber diameter distributions and porosity were determined using ImageJ analysis of the SEM images. The results demonstrate that both the polymer type and the collector geometry play a decisive role in nanofiber formation. This work highlights the importance of collector selection in the design of electrospun nanofiber mats and suggests new approaches for creating three-dimensional nanofiber architectures.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kuru, F. (2025). COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF COLLECTOR GEOMETRY ON ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBER MORPHOLOGY AND POROSITY USING MULTIPLE POLYMERS. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1694511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sheikhi, A., Afewerki, S., Khademhosseini, A., & Oklu, R. (2024). Emerging biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers: From wound healing to organ regeneration. Advanced Functional Materials, 34(4), 2401245. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202401245
  2. Al-Abduljabbar, A., & Farooq, A. (2023). Influence of polymer solution properties on electrospun nanofiber morphology: A systematic review. Journal of Polymer Science, 61(5), 940–960. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.20230110
  3. Xiao, J., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). Three-dimensional electrospun scaffolds: Fabrication strategies and biomedical applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 112(2), 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37463
  4. Keirouz, A., Chung, P., Varghese, O. K., & Parameswaran, A. M. (2020). Design and performance of novel collector geometries for 3D electrospun nanofibers. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 109, 110568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110568
  5. Vaquette, C., & Cooper-White, J. J. (2011). Increasing pore size of electrospun scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, 7(8), 3306–3315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.001
  6. Viirsalu, M., Tamm, T., Saal, K., & Selli, D. (2022). Optimizing collector design for efficient nanofiber production in electrospinning. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 139(16), e52358. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.52358
  7. Persano, L., Camposeo, A., Tekmen, C., & Pisignano, D. (2013). Industrial upscaling of electrospinning and applications of polymer nanofibers: A review. Macromol. Mater. Eng., 298(5), 504–520.
  8. Li, D., Xia, Y. (2020). Electrospinning of Nanofibers: Reinventing the Wheel? Advanced Materials, 32(3), 1800588.
  9. Sill, T. J., von Recum, H. A. (2008). Electrospinning: Applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 29(13), 1989–2006.
  10. Ramakrishna, S., Fujihara, K., Teo, W. E., Lim, T. C., Ma, Z. (2005). An Introduction to Electrospinning and Nanofibers. World Scientific.
  11. Lu, P., et al. (2021). Engineering aligned nanofibers for tissue regeneration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 13(6), 7334–7343.
  12. Wang, X., Ding, B., Yu, J. (2019). Electrospun nanofibrous materials: a versatile medium for effective oil/water separation. Materials Today, 22(5), 168–185.
  13. Pham, Q. P., Sharma, U., Mikos, A. G. (2006). Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: A review. Tissue Engineering, 12(5), 1197–1211.
  14. Zhao, Y., Li, Z., Song, J., et al. (2022). 3D Electrospun Nanofiber Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 132, 112569.
  15. Huang, Z.-M., Zhang, Y. Z., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2003). A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology, 63(15), 2223–2253.