SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

PHYSICAL, THERMAL, AND BIODEGRADABILITY CHARACTERISATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE AND COCONUT SHELL REINFORCED EPOXY BIOCOMPOSITES FOR COMPOSTABLE PACKAGING APPLICATIONS

Stephen Idowu Durowaye(University of Lagos)0000-0003-4787-5675
Olusola Emmanuel Ojo(Federal Institute of Industrial Research)0000-0001-5342-776X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate enhanced char-formation and improved filler–matrix interaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Natural fillers offer a sustainable alternative for reinforcing polymer matrix composites due to their adequate strength, low cost, biodegradability, and environmental compatibility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated the development of compostable hybrid biocomposites using a thermosetting epoxy resin matrix reinforced with 3-18 wt. % sugarcane bagasse and coconut shell particles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate enhanced char-formation and improved filler–matrix interaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Natural fillers · Hybrid polymer biocomposites · Physical and thermal properties

Abstract

Natural fillers offer a sustainable alternative for reinforcing polymer matrix composites due to their adequate strength, low cost, biodegradability, and environmental compatibility. This study investigated the development of compostable hybrid biocomposites using a thermosetting epoxy resin matrix reinforced with 3-18 wt. % sugarcane bagasse and coconut shell particles. The biocomposites were fabricated via stir casting, and their microstructural, physical, thermal, and biodegradability properties were systematically evaluated. SEM analysis of the unreinforced epoxy resin revealed a dense, cross-linked structure characteristic of thermosetting polymers. The SEM image of the hybrid polymer-matrix biocomposite indicated good dispersion of bagasse and coconut shell particles within the matrix, signifying strong interfacial bonding. Among the formulations, the hybrid biocomposite containing 12 wt. % filler (6 wt. % sugarcane bagasse + 6 wt. % coconut shell) demonstrated optimal performance, exhibiting a density of 0.97 g/cm³, the lowest water absorption (0.15 %), and the highest thermal resistance, retaining 18 % of its mass at 700 °C. These results indicate enhanced char-formation and improved filler–matrix interaction. Biodegradability testing showed that this hybrid biocomposite demonstrated the highest degradation rate, with a weight loss of 18.5 %. The improved thermal resistance and reduced hydrophilicity confirmed the composite’s strong potential for compostable packaging applications, where both thermal durability and environmental degradability are essential.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durowaye, S. I., Ojo, O. E. (2026). PHYSICAL, THERMAL, AND BIODEGRADABILITY CHARACTERISATION OF SUGARCANE BAGASSE AND COCONUT SHELL REINFORCED EPOXY BIOCOMPOSITES FOR COMPOSTABLE PACKAGING APPLICATIONS. Usak University Journal of Engineering Sciences, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.47137/uujes.1870787

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (47)

  1. Nkuna CN, Mhike W, Ojijo V, Shongwe MB, John MJ. Biocomposites and bionanocomposites from poly(lactide) and cellulosic materials – a review. Cellulose, 2024;31(8):4709-4732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05913-w
  2. Castro-Dominguez B, Gröls JR, Alkandari S, Perge L, Sierra-Avila C, et al. Biopolymers and biocomposites: a comprehensive review of feedstocks, functionalities, and advanced manufacturing techniques for sustainable applications. Biotechnology for Sustainable Materials, 2025;2(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44316-025-00029-y
  3. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA and Le TM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016;83:98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
  4. Srivastava VK and Verma A. Mechanical behaviour of copper and aluminium particles reinforced epoxy resin composites. American Journal of Materials Science, 2015;5(4):84-89. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.materials.20150504.02
  5. Fong AL, Khandoker NAN and Debnathet S. Development and characterization of sugarcane bagasse fiber and nano-silica reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018;344(012029):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757- 899X/344/1/012029
  6. Oladele OI, Akinwekomi AD and Aribo S. Mechanical performance and biodegradation behaviour of coconut shell ash and fiber-reinforced polylactic acid biocomposites. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2020;28(6):1678-1686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-020-01698-3
  7. Bam SA, Gundu DT and Onu FA. The effect of chemical treatments on the mechanical and physical properties of bagasse filler reinforced low-density polyethylene composite. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2019;8(3):168-175.
  8. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR and Zainudin ES. Development and characterization of sugar palm nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced sugar palm starch biopolymer nanocomposites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2018;108:1035-1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.091
  9. Dehury J, Mohanty JR, Biswas S and Bhagat V. Physical, mechanical and water absorption behavior of bi-directional jute/glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites. International Journal of Engineering Research, 2017;6(1):1-6
  10. Samanth M, Hiremath P, Deepak GD, Naik N, Shenoy HS and Shivamurthy, RC. Sustainable composites from sugarcane bagasse fibers and bio-based epoxy with insights into wear performance, thermal stability, and machine learning predictive modeling. Journal of Composites Science, 2025;9(3): 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs9030124
  11. Oladele IO, Falana SO, Akinbamiyorin M, Onuh LN, Taiwo AS and Adelani, SO. Cyclic thermal treatment parameters of bagasse particle reinforced epoxy bio-composites for sustainable applications. Discover Polymers, 2025;2: 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44347-025-00016-6
  12. Jayaraman R, Viknesh M and Girimurugan, R. Experimental investigations on mechanical and water absorption properties of epoxy resin matrix treated sugarcane and tamarind shell powder reinforced bio- composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023;74(4): 636–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.605
  13. Oladele IO, Taiwo AS, Bello LJ, Balogun SO, Sipho LS and Adelani SO. Fabrication of animal shell and sugarcane bagasse particulate hybrid reinforced epoxy composites for structural applications. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2024;32. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911231202183
  14. Lala SD, Deb P, Maradiya D, Vyas C and Chaudhary R. Development and characterization of coconut shell nano filler reinforced epoxy bio-composite. Discover Applied Sciences, 2026;8: 100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-08080-0
  15. Verma D, Okhawilai M, Goh KL and Sharma M. Thermomechanical analyses of alkali-treated coconut husk– bagasse fiber–calcium carbonate hybrid composites. Sustainability, 2023;15(2): 1686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021686
  16. George J, Sreekala MS and Thomas, S. A review on interface modification and characterization of natural fiber reinforced plastic composites. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2001;41(9):1471-1485. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.10846
  17. Sorrentino A, Gorrasi G and Vittoria, V. Potential perspectives of bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2007;18(2):84-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2006.09.004
  18. Ramleea NA, Jawaid M, Zainudinb ES and Yamani SAK. Tensile, physical and morphological properties of oil palm empty fruit bunch/sugarcane bagasse fibre reinforced phenolic hybrid composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019;8(4):3466-3474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.016
  19. Husseinsyah S and Mostapha, M. The effect of filler content on properties of coconut shell filled polyester composites. Malaysian Polymer Journal, 2011;6(1):87-97. https://doi.org/10.22336/mpj.v6i1.87
  20. ASTM International. ASTM D1106-21: Standard Test Method for Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. ASTM International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1106-21
  21. ASTM International. ASTM D1107-21: Standard Test Method for Ethanol-Toluene Solubility of Wood. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1107-21
  22. Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry (TAPPI). TAPPI T 222 om-02: Acid-Insoluble Lignin in Wood and Pulp. Atlanta, GA, USA: TAPPI Press, 2002
  23. ASTM D792-20. Standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of plastics by displacement. ASTM International. PA, USA. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0792-20
  24. Aigbodion VS, Agunsoye JO, Kalu V, Asuke F and Ola S. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ceramic composites. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2010;9(6):527-538. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2010.96037
  25. Olabisi AI, Adam AN and Okechukwu OM. Development and assessment of composite brake pad using pulverized cocoa beans shells filler. International Journal of Materials Science and Applications, 2016;5(2):66-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijmsa.20160502.16
  26. ASTM D570-98. Standard test method for water absorption of plastics. ASTM International, PA. USA. 2018. https://www.astm.org/d0570-98r18.html
  27. ASTM E1131-20. Standard test method for compositional analysis by thermogravimetry. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1131-20
  28. ASTM D5988-18. Standard test method for determining aerobic biodegradation of plastic materials in soil. ASTM International. PA. USA. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5988-18
  29. Kaewpirom S and Worrarat C. Preparation and properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced poly(lactic acid) green composites. Fibers and Polymers, 2014;15(7):1469-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1469-0
  30. Balaji A, Karthikeyan B and Swaminathan J. Comparative mechanical, thermal, and morphological study of untreated and NaOH-treated bagasse fiber-reinforced cardanol green composites. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, 2019;2:125-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-019-00079-7
  31. Praveena BA, Santhosh N, Buradi A, Srikanth HV, Shankar G, Ramesha K, Manjunath N, Karthik SN, Naik MR and Kumar SP. Experimental investigation on density and volume fraction of void and mechanical characteristics of areca nut leaf sheath fiber-reinforced polymer composites. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2022;Article ID 6445022:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6445022
  32. Abdullah AH and Sujan D. Mechanical performance of cockleshell particles (CSP) and oil palm fibre (OPF) reinforced epoxy composite. International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture, 2017;2(3):58-66. https://doi.org/10.26776/ijemm.02.03.2017.03
  33. Ferede, E. Evaluation of mechanical and water absorption properties of alkaline-treated sawdust- reinforced polypropylene composite. Journal of Engineering, 2020;Article ID 3706176:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3706176
  34. Durowaye S, Kanu D, Awotunde O and Alao S. Effect of particulate of mild steel and aluminium dross on the physical and mechanical properties of epoxy-resin matrix composites. Scientific Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Techno-Science, 2022;5(1):1–8.
  35. Nurazzi NM, Asyraf MRM, Rayung M, Norrrahim MNF, Shazleen SS, Rani MSA and Abdan K. Thermogravimetric analysis properties of cellulosic natural fiber polymer composites: A review on influence of chemical treatments. Polymers, 2021;13(16):Article2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13162710
  36. Kabir MM, Wang H, Lau KT and Cardona F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2012;43(7):2883-2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.053
  37. Ali M, Jawaid M and Ismail N. Effect of chemical treatments on natural fiber-based biodegradable composites for packaging: A review. Polymer Composites, 2019;(S2):E1470-E1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25034
  38. Kumar R and Ray D. Properties of chemically treated jute/poly(lactic acid) composites for packaging applications. Cellulose, 2017;24:4853-4867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1441-7
  39. Wali FH, Abubakar H, Yakubu A and Muhammed A. Biodegradable polymer composites enhanced via chemical treatment for packaging applications. Solid State Science and Technology, 2025;33(1):1-13.
  40. Oladele IO and Omotosho OA. Chemical modification of agro-waste fillers for enhanced performance in polymer matrix composites. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021;14:2203-2214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.031
  41. Ni Z, Shi J, Li M, Lei W and Yu W FDM 3D printing and soil-burial-degradation behaviors of residue of Astragalus particles/thermoplastic starch/poly(lactic acid) biocomposites. Polymers, 2023;15(10):2382. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102382
  42. Furgier V, Root A, Heinmaa I, Zamani A and Åkesson D. Development and characterisation of composites prepared from PHBV compounded with organic waste reinforcements, and their soil biodegradation. Materials, 2024;17(3):768. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17030768
  43. Yetiş F, Liu X, Sampson WW and Gong RH. Biodegradation of composites of polylactic acid and micro fibrillated lignocellulose. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2023;31:698–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-022-02583-2
  44. Prabhakaran S, Krishnaraj V, Golla H and Senthilkumar M. Biodegradation behaviour of green composite sandwich made of flax and agglomerated cork. Journal of Bio-based Materials and Bioenergy, 2022;16(3):315-328. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2022.2214
  45. Nourbakhsh A and Ashori, A. Wood plastic composites from agro-waste materials: Analysis of mechanical properties. Bioresource Technology, 2010;101(7):2525-2528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.040
  46. Kamaruddin SH, Rayung M, Abu F, Ahmad S, Fadil F, Karim AA, Norizan MN, Sarifuddin N, Mat-Desa MS and Mohd-Basri MS. A review on antimicrobial packaging from biodegradable polymer composites. Polymers, 2022;14(1): Article 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14010174
  47. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Avérous L, Njuguna J and Nassiopoulos E. Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: A review. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2011;Article ID 837875:1-35. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/837875