SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Rekreasyon ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Athlete Identification Level Scale (Ails): Validity And Reliability Study

Sporcu Özdeşleşme Düzeyi Ölçeği (Södö): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Mehmet Kara(Mersin Üniversitesi)0000-0001-9454-5164
Murat Genç(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2596-8571
Mehmet Çağrı Çetın(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7667-2143
Pages
34–45
Publication Date
2024-12-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, conducted to determine the athlete-athlete identification levels of active athletes, revealed that the Athlete Identification Level Scale (AISL) is a valid and reliable scale according to the results obtained.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine the level of athlete-athlete identification by determining which features athletes consider when identifying with other athletes they bond with.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the expert opinions, the 68-item item pool was reduced to 66 items and applied to 930 active athletes with a 5-point Likert scale (5=Very important, ... 1=Not important at all) with a trial form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, conducted to determine the athlete-athlete identification levels of active athletes, revealed that the Athlete Identification Level Scale (AISL) is a valid and reliable scale according to the results obtained.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:özdeşleşme · idol alma · geçerlik

Abstract

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool to determine the level of athlete-athlete identification by determining which features athletes consider when identifying with other athletes they bond with. Within the scope of "qualitative steps", focus group interviews and essay writing; within the scope of "quantitative steps", assumption analyses and validity and reliability analyses were included for the form organized by the Lawshe technique and the test form of the scale. After the expert opinions, the 68-item item pool was reduced to 66 items and applied to 930 active athletes with a 5-point Likert scale (5=Very important, ... 1=Not important at all) with a trial form. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with the observations obtained, data were collected again with the 4-factor 26-item structure and Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with 813 observations. After factor naming with rational criteria, Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficients were calculated as .94 for the sub-dimension of "Athletic Identity" (n=12), .82 for the sub-dimension of "Image and Career Maturity" (n=6), .85 for the sub-dimension of "Social Values" (n=4), .70 for the sub-dimension of "Communication Skills" (n=4) and .90 for the whole scale. The explained variance rate is 56.95%. While the motivation of the study is that the scales in the literature are at the fan-athlete or fan-team level and the determination of athlete-athlete identification is seen as a deficiency, the goal of closing this gap reveals the importance of the study. This study, conducted to determine the athlete-athlete identification levels of active athletes, revealed that the Athlete Identification Level Scale (AISL) is a valid and reliable scale according to the results obtained.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı sporcuların bağ kurdukları diğer sporcular ile özdeşim kurarken hangi özellikleri göz önünde bulundurduklarını belirleyerek, sporcu-sporcu özdeşleşme düzeyini saptamak üzere geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme amacı geliştirmektir. Lawshe tekniğine uygun düzenlenen form ile ölçeğin aday formu için ‘’niteliksel adımlar’’ kapsamında; odak grup görüşmeleri ve kompozisyon yazdırma, ‘’niceliksel adımlar’’ kapsamında; sayıltı analizleri ile geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizlerine yer verilmiştir. Uzman görüşleri sonrası 68 maddelik madde havuzu 66 maddeye indirgenmiş 5’li likert olarak (5=Çok önemlidir, … 1=Hiç önemli değildir), denemelik form ile 930 aktif sporcuya uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen gözlemler ile Keşfedici faktör analizi (KFA) gerçekleştirmiş, ulaşılan 4 faktörlü 26 maddelik yapı ile tekrar veri toplanmış ve 813 gözleme ulaşılarak Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) işe koşulmuştur. Faktörlere ait standardize yük değerleri, model uyum iyiliği ölçütleri ve T değerleri incelenmiş, ölçeğe ait yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerlikleri ile birleştirici güvenirlik değerlerinin uygunluğu test edilmiştir. Rasyonel ölçütlerle faktör isimlendirme yapılması sonrası cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları; ‘’Atletik Kimlik’’ (n=12) alt boyutu için .94, ‘’İmaj ve Kariyer Olgunluğu’’ (n=6) alt boyutu için .82, ‘’Sosyal Değerler’’ (n=4) alt boyutu için .85 ve ‘’İletişim Becerileri’’ (n=4) alt boyutu için .70 , ölçeğin tamamı için ise .90 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Açıklanan varyans oranı %56,95’tir. Konu benzerinde alanyazında yer alan ölçeklerin, taraftar-sporcu ya da taraftar-takım düzeyinde olması ve sporcu-sporcu özdeşleşme tespitinin bir eksiklik olarak görülmesi çalışmanın motivasyonunu oluştururken, bu açığı kapatma hedefi çalışmanın önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Aktif sporcuların sporcu-sporcu idolleştirme düzeyini saptamak amacıyla gerçekleştirilen çalışmada, ulaşılan sonuçlara göre Sporcu Özdeşleşme Düzeyi Ölçeği (SÖDÖ) geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olarak ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kara, M., Genç, M., Çetın, M. Ç. (2024). Athlete Identification Level Scale (Ails): Validity And Reliability Study. Uluslararası Rekreasyon ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.1479136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Acuner, A. (2012). Comparing the individuals who performing different ways and examine them by comparing their self confidence and their self-sufficencies according to various variables [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversity.
  2. Akoğlu, H., Ayyıldız, E., & Sunay, H. (2019). Investigation of Moral Disengagement in Sport and Sportspersonship Behavior of Athletes Participating in International Sport Organizations. Journal of Sports and Education Science, 6(2).
  3. Archer, A. (2017). Sporting supererogation and why it matters. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 44(3), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2017.1368393
  4. Aytaç, K. Y., Yetiş, Ü., & Öz, K. A. (2022). Investigation of Self-Efficacy Levels of Sports High School Students According to Some Variables. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 5(Spescial issue 2), 953-965.
  5. Azar, A. (2010). N-Service and Pre-Service Secondary Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs About Science Teaching. Zonguldak Karaelmas University Journal of Social Sciences, 2010, 6(12).
  6. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychology, 44(9), 1175–1184.
  7. Cherry, H., L. (2005). Psychometric Analysis of an Inventory Assessing Mental Toughness. [Published Master's Thesis]. University of Tennessee.
  8. Cosma, G. A., Chiracu, A., Stepan, A. R., Gatzel, R., Iancu, A., & Cosma, A. (2021). Sportsmanship and basic psychological needs in sports students. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity, 13(6), 5.
  9. Çağlayan, B., Coşkun, S., & Yılmaz, B. (2021). Relationship Between Sportsmanship Behavior and Communication Skills: A Study on University Student-Athletes. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 5(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.982984
  10. Ebrahim Razaghi, M., Mehrabi, G., & Jalali Farahani, M. (2015). Factor analysis demographic related of sporsmanship in professional and champion athletes. Organizational Behavior Management In Sport Studies, 2(1), 65-72.
  11. Elik, T. (2017). Sportsmen who play football as an amatör their sportsmensip trends and empathic tendencies in The Southeast Anatolia region. [Published Master Thesis]. Istanbul Gelişim University.
  12. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
  13. Gümüş, H. (2019). Sportspersonship Orientation in X Generation. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 738-755.
  14. Gümüş, H., Saracli, S., Yagmur, R., Isik, O., & Ersoz, Y. (2020). The investigation of sportsmanship behaviors of university students. Revista de Psicología del Deporte -Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(1), 13–20.
  15. Kahwa, H., Gargalianos, D., & Yfantidou, G. (2021). Sport as a Tool for International Relations: Case Study of Ugandan Sport Leaders. International Journal of Recreation and Sports Science, 5(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.853864
  16. Koçak, Ç. V. (2019). Investıgatıon of The Coaching Self-Efficacy Levels of Coach Candidates. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 17(1), 55-62.
  17. Kusan, M., Yilmaz, S., & Cankaya, S. (2024). The effect of moral disengagement in sports on sportsmanship behavior in boxers. Journal of ROL Sport Sciences, 5(1), 125-138.
  18. Mclaughlin M. (2020). American Recreation: Sportsmanship and the New Nationalism, 1900–1910. Journal of American Studies. 54(5), 839-869. doi:10.1017/S0021875819000057
  19. Nas, H. (2019). Examination of the relationship between sportsmanship, self-efficacy and psychological resilience of high school students [Unpublished Master's Thesis]. Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University.
  20. Ouyang, Y., Wang, K., Zhang, T., Peng, L., Song, G., & Luo, J. (2020). The influence of sports participation on body image, self-efficacy, and self-esteem in college students. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 499087.
  21. Öcel, H. (2002). The Role of Self Efficacy Collective Efficacy Beliefs and Cohesiveness in Predicting Players Evaluations of Their Teams Past Present Performance and Future Performance Expentancies.[Unpublished Master Thesis]. Hacettepe university.
  22. Özdemir, C. (2015). Determination to self efficacy beliefs of primary education teacher candidates related to teaching of first reading and writing. [Published Master Thesis]. Karadeniz Technical University.
  23. Özer, T. (2015). An Analysis Of Self-Efficacy Perceptions of Physical Education and Sport Teacher Candidates and other Teacher Candidates on Teaching Profession. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Dumlupınar Üniversity.
  24. Pan, Y., Yu, X., & Yue, Y. (2024). Anxiety and Sportsmanship in Adolescent Athletes: The Multiple Mediating Effects of Athlete Burnout and Exercise Cognition. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-16.
  25. Pehlivan Z, Konukman F. Fa Sport in Schools for Improvıng The Concept; Fair-Play. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 2(2): 49–53.
  26. Riggs, M. L., Warka, J., Babasa, B., Betancourt, R., & Hooker, S. (1994). Development and Validation of Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy Scales for Job-Related Applications. Educational and psychological measurement, 54(3), 793-802.
  27. Sabırlı, L. (2024). The effect of the fear of negative evaluation and empathic tendency levels on the sportsmanship orientation of students studying in the faculty of sports sciences. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]. 19 May University.
  28. Sáenz Ibáñez, A., Aguado San José, B., & Lanchas Sánchez, I. (2013). Sport as a Means to Promote Sportsmanship: an Educational Program for Schools in Álava. Apunts. Educación Física y Deportes, 111, 55-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.es.(2013/1).111.05
  29. Sánchez-Alcaraz, B. J., Bejerano-Urrea, A., Valero-Valenzuela, A., Gómez-Mármol, A., & Courel-Ibáñez, J. (2018). Deportividad, disfrute y actitudes hacia la Educación Física de los estudiantes de Educación Secundaria. Ágora Para La Educación Física Y El Deporte, 20(2-3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.24197/aefd.2-3.2018.319-340
  30. Sağ, S., Yağdı, M. F. ve Güçlü, M. (2024). Psychological Flexibility in Sports: Connections with General Self-Efficacy and Self-Esteem. Bozok International Journal of Sport Sciences, 5(1), 214-232.
  31. Senemoğlu, N. (2007). Development, learning and teaching: From theory to practice. Gönül Publishing. Sevinç, K., & Kapçak, V. (2021). Investigation of Sports Participation Motivation and Self-Efficacy Levels of Sports Sciences Faculty Students. International Journal of Exercise Psychology, 3(2), 68-78.
  32. Sharpe, T., Brown, M. and Crider, K. (1995), The effects of a sportsmanship curriculum intervention on generalized positive social behavior of urban elementary school students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28: 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-401
  33. Sülün, F., Susuz, Y. E., Varol, Y. K., & Çolakoğlu, F. F. (2021). Investigation of Relationship Between Judo Trainers' Sportsmanship Orientation and Personality Characteristics. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 15(2), 285-300.
  34. Şen, Ü. (2009). An Evaluation about Turkish Teacher Candidates’ Critical Thinking Attitude’s in Terms of Difference Variable. Journal of World of Turks., 2, 84.
  35. Tel M. (2014). Fairplay in Turkish Social Life. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport, 2(Special Issue 1), pp. 694–704.
  36. Tırpan, M. (2016). Investigation of the relationship between innovative and general self-efficacy of students of the School of Physical Education and Sports. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Ege University.
  37. Toçoğlu, S. (2020). The effect of sports science students 'self-efficacy and psychological health on life satisfaction [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Sakarya University of Applied Sciences
  38. Tsai, E., & Fung, L. (2005). Sportspersonship in youth basketball and volleyball players. Athletic Insight, 7(2), 37-46.
  39. Turan, S. (2020). The predisposition to physical education of high school students attending to school sports and investigation of their sportsmanship behaviors in physical education course [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Sakarya University of Applied Sciences
  40. Woodman, T. ve Hardy, L. (2003). The relative impact of cognitive anxiety and selfconfidence upon sport performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(6), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000101809.
  41. Yalçın, Y. G., Tek, T., & Çetin, M. Ç. (2020). Examine the Sportsmanship Orientation of University Students Who Play Sports as Amateurs. The Journal of Turkish Sport Sciences, 3(1), 29-34.
  42. Yıldıran, İ. (2005). The Role of Physical Education in Fair Play. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Science, 5 (1), s.3-16.