SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

DEMOCRACY AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) RELATIONSHIP: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM BANGLADESH (1975-2015)

Demokrasi ve Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırım (DYY) İlişkisi: Bangladeş'ten Ampirik Kanıtlar (1975-2015)

Zobayer Ahmed(Selcuk University)0000-0002-3168-6055
Md Omor Hossen(Jahangirnagar University)
Md Mostafa Faısal(ANKASAM)0000-0002-0066-6721
Tasnima Jahan Suraıya(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9767-6271
Pages
517–540
Publication Date
2023-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study showed that the relationship between democracy and FDI is statistically insignificant in the long run.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study investigates the relationship between democratic practice and foreign direct investment (FDI) in Bangladesh.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study used time series data from 1975 to 2015 for Bangladesh and estimated suitable econometric models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study showed that the relationship between democracy and FDI is statistically insignificant in the long run.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bangladeş · Demokrasi · DYY

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between democratic practice and foreign direct investment (FDI) in Bangladesh. There is an ongoing debate in academia regarding the effect of democracy on FDI inflow. Historically, FDI depends on stable democracy apart from many other relevant factors. This study used time series data from 1975 to 2015 for Bangladesh and estimated suitable econometric models. This study showed that the relationship between democracy and FDI is statistically insignificant in the long run.

Özet

Bu çalışma Bangladeş'te demokratik uygulama ile doğrudan yabancı yatırım (DYY) arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmaktadır. Demokrasinin doğrudan yabancı yatırım akışı üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin akademik çevrede süregelen bir tartışma var. Tarihsel olarak doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar diğer birçok ilgili faktörün yanı sıra istikrarlı demokrasiye de bağlıdır. Bu çalışmada Bangladeş için 1975'ten 2015'e kadar olan zaman serisi verileri kullanılmış ve uygun ekonometrik modeller tahmin edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, demokrasi ile doğrudan yabancı yatırım arasındaki ilişkinin uzun vadede istatistiksel olarak anlamsız olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ahmed, Z., Hossen, M. O., Faısal, M. M., Suraıya, T. J. (2023). DEMOCRACY AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT (FDI) RELATIONSHIP: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM BANGLADESH (1975-2015). Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 517–540. https://ajindex.com/articles/1569406

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. ADAM, A., & FILIPPAIOS, F. (2007). Foreign direct investment and civil liberties: A new perspective. European journal of political economy, 23(4), 1038-1052.
  2. AHUJA, H. L. (2016). Modern Economics–An Analytical Study. S. Chand Publishing.
  3. ASIEDU, E., & LIEN, D. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment and natural resources. Journal of international economics, 84(1), 99-111.
  4. BAUM, C. F. (2006). An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. Stata press.
  5. BLANTON, S. L., & BLANTON, R. G. (2006). Human rights and foreign direct investment: A two-stage analysis. Business & society, 45(4), 464-485.
  6. BURKHART, R. E., & DE SOYSA, I. (Eds.). (2003). Open Borders, Open Regimes? Testing Causal Direction Between Globalization And Democracy, 1970-2000. Https://Doi.Org/10.22004/Ag.Econ.18729
  7. BUSSE, M. (2003). Democracy and FDI. Available at SSRN 384480.
  8. BUSSE, M. (2004). Transnational corporations and repression of political rights and civil liberties: An empirical analysis. Kyklos, 57(1), 45-65.
  9. BUSSE, M., & HEFEKER, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European journal of political economy, 23(2), 397-415.
  10. BÜTHE, T., & MILNER, H. V. (2008). The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: increasing FDI through international trade agreements? American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 741-762.
  11. CHAN, S., & MASON, M. (1992). Foreign direct investment and host country conditions: Looking from the other side now. International Interactions, 17(3), 215-232.
  12. DUPASQUIER, C., & OSAKWE, P. N. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: Performance, challenges, and responsibilities. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2005.07.002
  13. EICHENGREEN, B. (2001). The Market and the Marshall Plan. In M. Schain (Ed.), The Marshall Plan: Fifty Years After (pp. 131–145). Palgrave Macmillan US.
  14. FENG, Y. (2001). Political freedom, political instability, and policy uncertainty: A study of political institutions and private investment in developing countries. International Studies Quarterly, 45(2), 271-294.
  15. FREEDOM-HOUSE. (2016). Freedom in the World 2016, Anxious Dictators, Wavering Democracies: Global Freedom under Pressure. Washington, DC http://freedomhouse. org/report/freedom-world/2016/russia (accessed March 16, 2016).
  16. GOLDGEIER, J. M., & MCFAUL, M. (1992). A tale of two worlds: Core and periphery in the post-cold war era. International Organization, 46(2), 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788
  17. GOSWAMI, G. G., & HAIDER, S. (2014). Does political risk deter FDI inflow?: An analytical approach using panel data and factor analysis. Journal of Economic Studies, 41(2), 233-252. doi:10.1108/JES-03-2012-0041
  18. HANIF, A., et. al., (2023). Military Expenditure and Unemployment Nexus in Bangladesh. Revista Finanzas Y Política Económica, 15(1), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v15.n1.2023.7
  19. HARMS, P., & URSPRUNG, H. W. (2002). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 651-663.
  20. HENISZ, W. J., & WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1999). Comparative economic organization—within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1(3), 261-278.
  21. HOSSAIN, M. A. (2013). Democracy in Bangladesh: Problems & Prospects, Rajshahi University, Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228771011_Democracy_in_Bangladesh_Problems_Prospects
  22. ISLAM, M. S., et. al, (2021). Financial Development, International Trade and Economic Growth Nexus (1971-2016): Examining Bangladesh Perspective. Bangladesh Journal of Integrated Thoughts, 17(2).
  23. JAKOBSEN, J., & DE SOYSA, I. (2006). Do foreign investors punish democracy? Theory and empirics, 1984–2001. Kyklos, 59(3), 383-410.
  24. JENSEN, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International organization, 57(03), 587-616.
  25. KNACK, S., & KEEFER, P. (1997). Does inequality harm growth only in democracies? A replication and extension. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 323-332.
  26. LI, Q. (2006). Democracy, autocracy, and tax incentives to foreign direct investors: A cross-national analysis. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 62-74.
  27. LI, Q., & RESNICK, A. (2003). Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries. International Organization, 57(1), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303571077
  28. LI, Q., & REUVENY, R. (2003). Economic globalization and democracy: An empirical analysis. British journal of political science, 33(01), 29-54.
  29. LILY, J., ET. AL (2014). Exchange rate movement and foreign direct investment in ASEAN economies. Economics Research International.
  30. MACKINNON, J. G., et al., (1999). Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 563-577.
  31. MATHUR, A., & SINGH, K. (2013). Foreign direct investment, corruption and democracy. Applied Economics, 45(8), 991-1002.
  32. MENCINGER, J. (2003). Does Foreign Direct Investment Always Enhance Economic Growth? Kyklos, 56(4), 491-508. doi:10.1046/j.0023-5962.2003.00235.x
  33. MENGISTU, A. A., & ADHIKARY, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381003755765
  34. MEYER, W. H. (1998). Human rights and international political economy in third world nations: multinational corporations, foreign aid, and repression: Praeger Publishers.
  35. Nishat, S. A., et. al.,(2022). International Trade, FDI, Inflation and Growth Nexus: Bangladesh Perspective (1971-2016). JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 7(2), 334-351.
  36. O'DONNELL, G. (1978). Reflections on the patterns of change in the bureaucratic-authoritarian state. Latin American Research Review, 13(1), 3-38.
  37. OLSON, M. (1993). Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736
  38. ONEAL, J. R. (1994). The affinity of foreign investors for authoritarian regimes. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 565-588.
  39. SHARIF, T., & ABDULLAH, J. A. S. (2013). Human Resource Development and Economic Growth in Bangladesh: An Econometric Analysis. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(7), 133-144.
  40. SOBEL, A. C. (2002). State institutions, private incentives, global capital: University of Michigan Press [book].
  41. VASILIEVA, E., ET. AL., (2018). Development of the third sector: Social activity management. Journal of Social Sciences Research, (Special Issue 3), 364-368. doi:10.32861/jssr.spi3.364.368
  42. WHEELER, D., & MODY, A. (1992). International investment location decisions: The case of US firms. Journal of international economics, 33(1-2), 57-76.
  43. WorldBank. (2016). "World Development Indicators of world bank ". Retrieved from: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=BD