SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Siyaset Bilimleri Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 23

INNOVATIONS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

YAPAY ZEKÂ VE FİNANSAL RİSK YÖNETİMİNDE YENİLİKLER

Sezin Dargınoğlu(MANİSA CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-3782-3145
Doğan Uysal(MANİSA CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9406-0757
Pages
1–17
Publication Date
2026-06-21
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that AI-based models improve predictive accuracy, enable real-time data use, and capture nonlinear risk dynamics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the transformation of financial risk management driven by artificial intelligence–based methods within a conceptual framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Traditional risk management approaches, built on linear assumptions and limited data-processing capacity, have become inadequate amid the growing complexity of financial markets.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that AI-based models improve predictive accuracy, enable real-time data use, and capture nonlinear risk dynamics.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapay zekâ · finansal risk yönetimi · makine öğrenmesi

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of financial risk management driven by artificial intelligence–based methods within a conceptual framework. Traditional risk management approaches, built on linear assumptions and limited data-processing capacity, have become inadequate amid the growing complexity of financial markets. Accordingly, the article analyzes the role of machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing techniques in managing credit, market, liquidity, and operational risks, and their impact on existing risk management frameworks. The study adopts a qualitative methodology based on a systematic review of recent academic literature, without employing econometric analysis. The findings indicate that AI-based models improve predictive accuracy, enable real-time data use, and capture nonlinear risk dynamics. However, they also introduce challenges related to model transparency, explainability, and algorithmic bias. Therefore, the study highlights the importance of strengthening governance mechanisms and regulatory alignment to ensure the effective and sustainable use of artificial intelligence in financial risk management.

Özet

Bu çalışma, yapay zekâ temelli yöntemlerin finansal risk yönetiminde yarattığı dönüşümü kavramsal bir çerçevede incelemektedir. Geleneksel risk yönetimi yaklaşımlarının doğrusal varsayımlara ve sınırlı veri işleme kapasitesine dayanması, finansal piyasaların artan karmaşıklığı karşısında yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu bağlamda makale, makine öğrenmesi, derin öğrenme ve doğal dil işleme uygulamalarının kredi, piyasa, likidite ve operasyonel risklerin yönetiminde nasıl konumlandığını ve mevcut risk yönetimi mimarisini hangi açılardan dönüştürdüğünü ele almaktadır. Çalışma, ekonometrik analiz içermeyen, güncel literatürün sistematik değerlendirilmesine dayalı nitel bir yöntem benimsemektedir. Bulgular, yapay zekâ tabanlı modellerin tahmin gücünü artırdığını, gerçek zamanlı veri kullanımını mümkün kıldığını ve doğrusal olmayan risk dinamiklerini yakalayabildiğini göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte, model şeffaflığı, açıklanabilirlik ve algoritmik önyargı gibi yeni risk alanları da ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda çalışma, yapay zekânın etkin ve sürdürülebilir kullanımı için yönetişim ve düzenleyici uyumun güçlendirilmesine yönelik politika çıkarımları sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dargınoğlu, S., Uysal, D. (2026). INNOVATIONS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Siyaset Bilimleri Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 23, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.58202/joecopol.1884263

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. Acharya, V. V. (2017). Financial stability and the regulation of financial institutions. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 5(1), 1–20.
  2. Agarwal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: The ambiguous labor market impact of automating prediction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.31
  3. Agarwal, V., & Dhar, V. (2014). Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for finance. Financial Analysts Journal, 70(5), 6–9.
  4. Aldasoro, I., Gambacorta, L., Giudici, P., & Leach, T. (2020). The drivers of cyber risk. Journal of Financial Stability, 47, 100761.
  5. Allen, F., Gu, X., & Jagtiani, J. (2022). A survey of fintech research and policy discussion. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11(2), 259–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfac001
  6. Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Schreiber, A., & Shemer, J. (2023). Machine learning versus economic restrictions: Evidence from stock return predictability. Journal of Financial Economics, 147(3), 699–726.
  7. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2017). Measuring investor sentiment. Journal of Finance, 72(2), 419–456.
  8. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2020). Investor sentiment and the cross‐section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 65(4), 1645–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01594.x
  9. Bank for International Settlements. (2022). Machine learning in central banking.
  10. Barakakou, E., & Zafeiriou, E. (2021). Regulation of AI in financial services: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(4), 567–588.
  11. Barredo Arrieta, A., et al. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
  12. Bazarbash, M. (2019). FinTech in financial inclusion: Machine learning applications in assessing credit risk. IMF Working Papers, 19/109.
  13. Begenau, J., Farboodi, M., & Veldkamp, L. (2018). Big data in finance and the growth of large firms. Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, 71–87.
  14. Berg, T., Burg, V., Gombović, A., & Puri, M. (2020). On the rise of fintechs: Credit scoring using digital footprints. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 2845–2897.
  15. Bholat, D., Hansen, S., Santos, P., & Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2021). Text mining for central banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 52, 100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100861
  16. Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–255.
  17. Bouri, E., Gupta, R., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in finance: Applications and challenges in emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 47, 100756.
  18. Brynjolfsson, E., & McElheran, K. (2016). The rapid adoption of data-driven decision-making. American Economic Review, 106(5), 133–139.
  19. Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., & Elhadad, N. (2015). Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital readmission. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(1), 1–37.
  20. Claessens, S., Frost, J., Turner, G., & Zhu, F. (2021). Fintech credit markets around the world: Size, drivers and policy issues. Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100861
  21. Danielsson, J., James, K. R., Valenzuela, M., & Zer, I. (2021). Model risk of risk models. Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100869
  22. Farboodi, M., Mihet, R., Philippon, T., & Veldkamp, L. (2019). Big data and firm dynamics. American Economic Review, 109(1), 38–63.
  23. Feng, G., He, X., & Polson, N. (2019). Deep learning in asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(3), 553–571.
  24. Financial Stability Board. (2022). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services. Journal of Financial Regulation, 8(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/jfr/fjac012
  25. Gârleanu, N., & Pedersen, L. H. (2017). Efficiently inefficient markets for assets and asset management. Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1663–1712.
  26. Goldfarb, A., Taska, B., & Teodoridis, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product reallocation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 37(2), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.37.2.67
  27. Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), 2223–2273.
  28. Heaton, J., Polson, N., & Witte, J. (2017). Deep learning in finance. Journal of Financial Data Science, 1(1), 1–15.
  29. Heimer, R. Z., Huang, J., & Hu, J. (2021). Machine learning and dynamic portfolio optimization: The role of AI in shaping risk perceptions. Journal of Investment Management, 19(4), 23–41.
  30. Huang, X., Zhou, H., & Zhu, H. (2019). Machine learning in systemic risk analysis: Predicting financial distress and contagion. Journal of Financial Stability, 43, 100681.
  31. International Monetary Fund & G20. (2021). Policy Responses to AI in the Financial Sector: Promoting Coordination and Standards.
  32. Kahn, R. N., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (2021). Machine learning in quantitative finance. Journal of Financial Data Science, 3(1), 10–36.
  33. Kelly, B., Pruitt, S., & Su, Y. (2019). Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return. Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2961–2996.
  34. Khandani, A. E., Kim, A. J., & Lo, A. W. (2010). Consumer credit-risk models via machine-learning algorithms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(11), 2767–2787.
  35. Kou, G., Yang, P., Peng, Y., Xiao, F., & Chen, Y. (2021). Evaluation of feature selection methods for credit risk assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(1), 252–267.
  36. Kritzman, M., Page, S., & Turkington, D. (2019). In search of the holy grail: A benchmark for portfolio risk models. Journal of Investment Management, 17(2), 1–22.
  37. Larsson, S., Verikas, A., & Tikka, S. (2019). Assistive and autonomous machine learning for trustworthy AI. Journal of Trust Management, 6(1), 1–22.
  38. Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H. V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 124–136.
  39. Lettau, M., Ludvigson, S. C., & Wachter, J. A. (2020). Reconciling the return predictability evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 33(4), 1485–1527.
  40. López de Prado, M. (2018). The 10 reasons most machine learning funds fail. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 44(6), 120–133.
  41. Menkveld, A. J. (2016). The economics of high-frequency trading: Taking stock. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 8, 1–24.
  42. Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(1), 1–77.
  43. Nguyen, T., & Kleimeier, S. (2021). Fintech, AI adoption, and capital inflows: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 72, 101324.
  44. OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and financial markets.
  45. OECD. (2023). Artificial intelligence in finance: Policy and regulatory implications.
  46. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215.
  47. Sirignano, J., & Cont, R. (2019). Universal features of price formation in financial markets. Quantitative Finance, 19(9), 1449–1459.
  48. Weller, A. (2017). Challenges for transparency. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1041–1047.