SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4

TRANSLANGUAGING IN SIGHT TRANSLATION: A STUDY ON THINK-ALOUD PROCESSES OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETING STUDENTS

YAZILI METİNDEN SÖZLÜ ÇEVİRİDE DİLLER ARASI GEÇİŞ: MÜTERCİM VE TERCÜMANLIK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN YÜKSEK SESLE DÜŞÜNME SÜREÇLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Aylin Yardımcı(Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University)0000-0003-3238-4646
Pages
1738–1752
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study's findings indicated that individuals who are proficient in English, adequate for study at the Department of Translation and Interpreting, mostly employ their native language in cognitive processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Foreign language interactions are increasingly occurring in environments comprising individuals from a variety of language and cultural backgrounds, both domestically and internationally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were analyzed using the Categorization Model for Specific Purposes of Murphy and Roca de Larios (2010), and the processes by which students activated their mother tongue, Turkish, and the target language, English, while translating from a written text were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study's findings indicated that individuals who are proficient in English, adequate for study at the Department of Translation and Interpreting, mostly employ their native language in cognitive processes.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:uygulamalı dilbilim · iki dillilik · diller arası geçiş

Abstract

Foreign language interactions are increasingly occurring in environments comprising individuals from a variety of language and cultural backgrounds, both domestically and internationally. The fact that individuals who use foreign languages have one or more languages in their linguistic repertoires directly affects the process of activating their other languages while using one specific language. This study aims to investigate the translanguaging processes of higher education students studying in the department of Translation and Interpreting for making lexical searches while translating from written texts. The study data were collected using think-aloud protocols during the verbal translation of a short story from Turkish to English. Data were analyzed using the Categorization Model for Specific Purposes of Murphy and Roca de Larios (2010), and the processes by which students activated their mother tongue, Turkish, and the target language, English, while translating from a written text were examined. The study's findings indicated that individuals who are proficient in English, adequate for study at the Department of Translation and Interpreting, mostly employ their native language in cognitive processes. It was found that the participants predominantly utilized Turkish in their cognitive processes, self-dialogue, and internal reflections.

Özet

Yabancı dil etkileşimleri, hem ulusal hem de küresel ölçekte, giderek daha fazla farklı dilsel ve kültürel geçmişlere sahip kişilerin bulunduğu ortamlarda gerçekleşmektedir. Yabancı dil kullanan bireylerin dil dağarcıklarında bir veya birden fazla dilin bulunması, belirli bir dili kullanırken diğer dillerin de aktif hale gelme sürecini doğrudan etkilemektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Mütercim ve Tercümanlık Bölümü’nde öğrenim gören yükseköğrenim öğrencilerinin yazılı metinlerden sözlü çeviri yaparken sözcüksel arama amaçlı diller arası geçiş süreçlerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın verileri, bir kısa öykünün Türkçeden İngilizceye sözlü çevirisi sırasında sesli düşünme protokolleri kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Veriler Murphy ve Roca de Larios'un (2010) Belirli Amaçlar için Kategorizasyon Modeli kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve öğrencilerin yazılı bir metinden çeviri yaparken ana dillerini ve hedef dil olan İngilizceyi nasıl etkinleştirdikleri incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, İngilizce diline hâkim, Mütercim ve Tercümanlık Bölümü’nde öğrenim görebilecek yeterlilikte olan bireylerin bilişsel süreçlerinde çoğunlukla ana dillerini kullandıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Katılımcıların bilişsel süreçlerinde, kendi kendine diyaloglarında ve içsel yansıtmalarında ağırlıklı olarak Türkçeyi kullandıkları görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yardımcı, A. (2025). TRANSLANGUAGING IN SIGHT TRANSLATION: A STUDY ON THINK-ALOUD PROCESSES OF TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETING STUDENTS. Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 4, 1738–1752. https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1735045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Akbarian, I. H., Rafiei, Z. & Jalilzadeh, K. (2024). EFL learners’ lexical availability: Effect of L1 background and prompt. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241257565
  2. Alan, C. (2020). Processing Garden-Path Sentences in Sight Translation: An Experimental Study. Çeviribilim ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, (29), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37599/ceviri.839986
  3. Bailey, L. M., Lockary, K., & Higby, E. (2024). Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence for ubiquitous facilitation and context-dependent interference effects on lexical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 27 (3), 495-514. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728923000597
  4. Baxter, K., Courage, C., & Caine, K. (2015). Understanding your users: a practical guide to user research methods. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800232-2.00007-9
  5. Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). The place of world Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College composition and communication, 586-619. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20065061
  6. Čeňková, I. (2010). Sight translation. In Handbook of Translation Studies: Volume 1 (pp. 320-323). John Benjamins Publishing Company. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.sig1
  7. Cenoz, J., Hufeisen, B., & Jessner, U. (Eds.). (2003). The multilingual lexicon. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  8. Collischonn, L. (2024). Translanguaging, Literary Multilingualism and Exophony in Translation. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 12(1), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.31273/eirj.v12i1.1154
  9. Creese, A., Blackledge, A., & Hu, R. (2018). Translanguaging and translation: The construction of social difference across city spaces. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21 (7), 841-852. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1323445
  10. García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. Social justice through multilingual education, 140-158. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691910-011
  11. García, O. (2011). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. John Wiley Sons.
  12. García, O., Aponte, G. Y., & Le, K. (2019). Primary bilingual classrooms: Translations and translanguaging. In The Routledge handbook of translation and education (pp. 81-94). Routledge.
  13. Genc, E., Yuksel, D., & Curle, S. (2023). Lecturers’ translanguaging practices in English-taught lectures in Turkey. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 4(1), 8-31. https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.23945
  14. Havnen, R. (2019). Multimodal and interactional aspects of sight translation–A critical review. FITISPos International Journal, 6(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2019.6.1.206
  15. Ho, C. E. (2022). Sight interpreting/translation. In Encyclopedia of Translation and Interpreting. Iberian Association of Translation and Interpreting Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6370682
  16. Hult, F. M. (2012). Ecology and multilingual education. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0354
  17. Kırkgöz, Y., & Küçük, C. (2021). Investigating translanguaging practices in an English medium higher education context in Turkey: A case of two lecturers. In Multilingual perspectives from Europe and beyond on language policy and practice (pp. 135-155). Routledge.
  18. Kokanova, E. S., Lyutyanskaya, M. M., & Cherkasova, A. S. (2018). Eye tracking study of reading and sight translation. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 50, p. 01080). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001080
  19. Laviosa, S. (Ed.). (2018). Translation and translanguaging in multilingual contexts. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.8.1?locatt=mode:legacy
  20. Lee, Y., Jang, E., & Choi, W. (2018). L2-L1 translation priming effects in a lexical decision task: evidence from low proficient Korean-English bilinguals. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00267
  21. Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Origins and development from school to street and beyond. Educational research and evaluation, 18(7), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718488
  22. Li, S., Hauer, B., Shi, N., & Kondrak, G. (2024, August). Translation-based Lexicalization Generation and Lexical Gap Detection: Application to Kinship Terms. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) (pp. 6891-6900). https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.372.pdf
  23. Murphy, L., & de Larios, J. R. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.02.001
  24. Odlin, T. (2003). Cross‐linguistic influence. The handbook of second language acquisition, 436-486.
  25. Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent?. Studies in second language acquisition, 18(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014662
  26. North, K., & Zampieri, M. (2023). Features of lexical complexity: insights from L1 and L2 speakers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1236963. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1236963
  27. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42, 533-544. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10488-013-0528
  28. Sato, E., & García, O. (2023). Translanguaging, Translation and Interpreting studies, and bilingualism. In The Routledge handbook of translation, interpreting and bilingualism (pp. 328-345). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003109020-27
  29. Susini, M., & Ana, I. W. (2024). Back-Translation as a Tool for Identifying Language. Change. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(4), 1178-1188. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1504.15
  30. Şulha, P. (2014). A study on the problems encountered in sight translation. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbusos.76558
  31. Taş, T., & Mirici, İ. H. (2025). Examining Translanguaging Tendencies of Turkish Prospective Teachers of English Through Self-Reported Language Mixing Practices. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 15(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.15.10.14
  32. Ulum, Ö. G. (2024). Empowering voices: A deep dive into translanguaging perceptions among Turkish high school and university language learners. Heliyon, 10(20). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39557
  33. Vogel, S., & García, O. (2017). Translanguaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.181
  34. Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive systems research, 11(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.08.003
  35. Yasar Yuzlu, M., & Dikilitas, K. (2022). Translanguaging in the development of EFL learners’ foreign language skills in Turkish context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1892698
  36. Yue, Z., & Jansem, A. (2022). An Empirical Study of Translanguaging Practice in Interpreters' Note-Taking. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.10