Journals / Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

THE SIGNATURE OF A MURDEREE: DEMYTHOLOGISING FASHION, LOVE, AND TRAGEDY IN THE DRIVER’S SEAT (1970)

KURBANIN İMZASI: SÜRÜCÜ KOLTUĞU’NDA (1970) MODA, AŞK VE TRAJEDİYİ MİTLERDEN ARINDIRMAK

Kağan Kaya(Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi)0000-0001-9251-0267
Pages
899–913
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The essay concludes that Spark draws on some Barthesian myths in her narrative and that Spark and Barthes share a similar wit and critical consciousness in their analyses of mass culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Roland Barthes employs myth for a distinct analytical purpose.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He thinks there are hidden meanings within the artefacts of mass culture, and it is important to liberate man from the tyranny of mass-produced consciousness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The essay concludes that Spark draws on some Barthesian myths in her narrative and that Spark and Barthes share a similar wit and critical consciousness in their analyses of mass culture.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Muriel Spark · mit · roman

Abstract

Roland Barthes employs myth for a distinct analytical purpose. In Barthes’s semiotic world, myth functions as a process of signification through which the historical and ideological are presented as natural and inevitable. He thinks there are hidden meanings within the artefacts of mass culture, and it is important to liberate man from the tyranny of mass-produced consciousness. This essay argues that the British novelist Muriel Spark’s The Driver’s Seat (1970) can be examined through Barthesian semiotic analysis around his idea of mythology. It analyses the meanings underlying the protagonist Lise’s obsession with fashion by drawing attention to Barthes’s ‘plastic’ myth. The essay finds new forms of signification on which Spark focuses, such as the colours demonstrated in the novel. This approach offers an alternative standpoint on the author’s literary strategy. The essay first describes Spark’s literary world. Then, it presents Barthes’s discourse in Mythologies, in the background, incorporating the views of some thinkers such as Jean Baudrillard. Finally, the text is subjected to close reading within the framework of Barthes’s theorisation of myth. The essay concludes that Spark draws on some Barthesian myths in her narrative and that Spark and Barthes share a similar wit and critical consciousness in their analyses of mass culture.

Özet

Roland Barthes, miti farklı bir analitik amaçla kullanır. Barthes’ın gösterge-bilimi dünyasında, mit, tarihsel ve ideolojik olanın doğal ve kaçınılmazmış gibi sunulduğu bir anlamlandırma süreci olarak işlev görür. Barthes kitle kültürünün eserlerinde gizli anlamların bulunduğunu ve insanı kitle üretimi bilincinin tiranlığından kurtarmanın önemli olduğunu düşünür. Bu makale, Britanyalı romancı Muriel Spark’ın romanı Sürücü Koltuğu’nun Barthes’ın mitoloji fikri çerçevesinde gösterge-bilimsel analiz yoluyla incelenebileceğini savunur. Romanın başkişisi Lise’in moda takıntısının altında yatan anlamları, Barthes’ın ‘plastik’ mitine dikkat çekerek analiz eder. Makale, Spark’ın odaklandığı yeni anlamlandırma biçimlerini bulur; örneğin, romanda gösterilen renkler... Bu yaklaşım, yazarın edebi stratejisine alternatif bir bakış açısı getirir. Makale, ilk olarak, Spark’ın edebi dünyasını tanımlar. Ardından, Barthes’ın Mitolojiler’deki söylemini, Jean Baudrillard gibi düşünürlerin görüşlerini de arka plana ekleyerek sunar. Son olarak, metin, Barthes’ın mit kuramlaştırması bağlamında yakın okumayla incelenir. Makale, Spark’ın anlatısında bazı Barthesçı mitleri kullandığı ve Spark ile Barthes’ın kitle kültürü analizlerinde benzer bir nükteli dili ve eleştirel bilinci paylaştığı sonucuna varır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kaya, K. (2026). THE SIGNATURE OF A MURDEREE: DEMYTHOLOGISING FASHION, LOVE, AND TRAGEDY IN THE DRIVER’S SEAT (1970). Uluslararası Dil Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1924967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (41)

  1. Apostolou, F. (2001). Tetas: The seduction of the text in Muriel Spark’s work. Critical Survey, 13(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/10.3167/001115701782483660
  2. Bailey, J. (2021). ‘A study, in a way, of self-destruction’: The Driver’s Seat and the impotent gaze. In Muriel Spark’s early fiction: Literary subversion and experiments with form (pp. 142–170). Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctv1hm8hjt.8
  3. Barrett, W. (1962). Irrational man. Doubleday Anchor Books.
  4. Barthes, R. (1981). Theory of the text (I. McLeod, Trans.). In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 31-47). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  5. Barthes, R. (1982). From work to text (S. Heath, Trans.). In Image–music–text (pp. 155–165). Fontana.
  6. Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux. (Original work published 1957)
  7. Barthes, R. (2006). The language of fashion (A. Stafford, Trans.; A. Stafford & M. Carter, Eds.). Bloomsbury. (Original work published 1967)
  8. Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society: Myths and structures. Sage Publications.
  9. Becker, E. (1999). Image as reality in ten novels by Muriel Spark [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation], Southern Illinois University.
  10. Bozkurt, B. R. (Ed.). (1977). Literary terms: A companion to the study of literature. Hacettepe University.
  11. Cixous, H. (2002). Grimacing Catholicism: Muriel Spark’s macabre farce. In M. McQuillan (Ed.), Theorizing Muriel Spark: Gender, race, deconstruction (pp. 204–207). Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Craig, C. (1999). Dialect and dialectics. In The modern Scottish novel: Narrative and the national imagination (pp. 75–116). Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrffx.6
  13. Craig, C. (2019). Muriel Spark, existentialism and the art of death. Edinburgh University Press.
  14. Culler, J. (2001). Barthes: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
  15. Dallenbach, L. (1989). The mirror in the text (J. Whiteley & E. Hughes, Trans.). Polity Press.
  16. Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Zone Books.
  17. Goble, M. (2010). Beautiful circuits: Modernism and the mediated life. Columbia University Press.
  18. Herman, D. (2008). Introduction: A salutary scar: Muriel Spark’s desegregated art in the twenty-first century. Modern Fiction Studies, 54(3), 473–486. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26286978
  19. Hosmer, R. (2005). An interview with Dame Muriel Spark. Salmagundi, (146/147), 127–158. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40549783
  20. Hynes, S. (1962, February 23). In the great tradition: The prime of Muriel Spark. Commonweal, 75.
  21. Hynes, J. (1974). After Maribor: Reading Forster, Robbe-Grillet, Spark. The Iowa Review, 5(1), 120–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20158193
  22. Jakobson, R. (1990) On Language (eds. Linda R. Waugh and Monique Monville-Burston). Current issues of general linguistics, pp. 49–55, Harvard University Press.
  23. Karl, F. R. (1972). A reader’s guide to the contemporary English novel (Rev. ed.). Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
  24. Kemp, J. (2008). “Her lips are slightly parted”: The ineffability of erotic sociality in Muriel Spark’s “The Driver’s Seat”. Modern Fiction Studies, 54(3), 544–557. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26286982
  25. Lodge, D. (1977). Postmodernist fiction. In B. Nicol (Ed.), Postmodernism and the contemporary novel: A reader (pp. 250–277). Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvxcrmf5.26
  26. MacKay, M. (2008). Muriel Spark and the meaning of treason. Modern Fiction Studies, 54(3), 505–522. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26286980
  27. Malkoff, K. (1968). Muriel Spark. Columbia University Press.
  28. Marlowe, C. (2005). Doctor Faustus (J. D. Jump, Ed.). Taylor & Francis.
  29. Mayer, J. P. (1998). “Foreword” in The consumer society: Myths and structures. Sage Publications.
  30. Mayne, R. (1992). Fiery particle? On Muriel Spark. In J. Hynes (Ed.), Critical essays on Muriel Spark (pp. 47–54). G. K. Hall.
  31. McQuillan, M. (2002). “The same informed air”: An interview with Muriel Spark. In M. McQuillan (Ed.), Theorizing Muriel Spark (pp. 210–229). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504264_14
  32. Pearlman, M. (1986). Re-inventing reality: Patterns and characters in the novels of Muriel Spark [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation], City University of New York.
  33. Rankin, I. (1985). Surface and structure: Reading Muriel Spark’s The Driver’s Seat. The Journal of Narrative Technique, 15(2), 146–155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30225122
  34. Saussure, F. de. (2013). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic.
  35. Sevinç Kayahan, M. (2025). Fiction as rebellion: anarchy, power and narrative control in Muriel Spark’s The Ballad of Peckham Rye (1960), The Driver’s Seat (1970) and A Far Cry from Kensington (1988). Uluslararası Dil, Edebiyat ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi (UDEKAD) 8 (2), 687-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37999/udekad.1664686
  36. Showalter, E. (1981). Rethinking the seventies: Women writers and violence. The Antioch Review, 39(2), 156–170. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4638424
  37. Spark, M. (1961). My conversion. Twentieth Century
  38. Spark, M. (1962, August 10). Edinburgh-born. New Statesman, pp. 23-24.
  39. Spark, M. (1970). The driver’s seat. Alfred A. Knopf.
  40. Toynbee, P. (1971, November 7). Interview with author: Twenty years after. The Observer Colour Magazine.
  41. Updike, J. (1961, September 30). Creatures of the air. The New Yorker, 37.