Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

TÜRKİYE'DEKİ KONTEYNER LİMANLARINDA YOĞUNLAŞMA VE REKABET: İSTATİSTİKSEL BİR ANALİZ

CONCENTRATION AND COMPETITION OF CONTAINER PORTS IN TURKEY: A STATISTICAL ANALYSIS*

Pages
91–110
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the continuous improvements in the port policy and regulatory framework are required for using the competitive advantage of the newcomers to the sector as a future advantage for Turkey's global competitiveness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Literature implies that in developing countries, the level and nature of public investments should be adjusted to stimulate private investments for economic growth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, for the post-privatization performance, macro-economic and institutional factors are influential.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the continuous improvements in the port policy and regulatory framework are required for using the competitive advantage of the newcomers to the sector as a future advantage for Turkey's global competitiveness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Literature implies that in developing countries, the level and nature of public investments should be adjusted to stimulate private investments for economic growth. This study aims to assess the outcome of Turkey's recent privatization process by analyzing the industry concentration and competition in the specific context of container ports. For this purpose, the concentration dynamics of Turkish container ports are examined by applying statistical measures of market concentration and competition throughout the port privatization period. The statistical findings of this study suggest that the recent port privatizations have been successful in stimulating private investments and competition. However, for the post-privatization performance, macro-economic and institutional factors are influential. Therefore, the continuous improvements in the port policy and regulatory framework are required for using the competitive advantage of the newcomers to the sector as a future advantage for Turkey's global competitiveness.

Özet

Araştırmalara göre, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ekonomik büyümenin sağlanması için, kamu yatırımlarının mahiyeti, özel sektör yatırımlarını teşvik edecek şekilde ayarlanmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'deki güncel özelleştirme sürecini, konteyner limanları açısından değerlendirmektir. Bu amaçla, Türkiye'deki konteyner limanlarındaki yoğunlaşma eğilimleri ve rekabet şartları, özelleştirme dönemi boyunca, istatistiksel ölçütler ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, Türkiye'deki limanların özelleştirilmesi süreci, özel sektör yatırımlarının teşviki açısından başarılıdır. Ancak, özelleştirme sonrası liman performansında makroekonomik ve kurumsal faktörler önemlidir. Bu nedenle, sektöre yeni giren yatırımcıların rekabet avantajlarının Türkiye için küresel bir rekabet gücüne dönüşebilmesinde liman politikaları ve sektörel düzenlemelerin sürekli gelişimi gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

VARAN, S., CERİT, A. G. (2014). TÜRKİYE'DEKİ KONTEYNER LİMANLARINDA YOĞUNLAŞMA VE REKABET: İSTATİSTİKSEL BİR ANALİZ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 91–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/156593

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. BIKKER, J.A., HAAF, K. (2002)
  2. Competition, Concentration and Their Relationship: An Empirical Analysis of the Banking Industry, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 26, pp. 2191-2214.
  3. BOUBAKRI, N., COSSET, J., GUEDMANI, O. (2005)
  4. Liberalization, Corporate Governance, and the Performance of Newly Privatized Firms, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 11, pp.767-790.
  5. CHEN, S., LIAO, C. (2011) Are Foreign Banks more Profitable than Domestic Banks? Home- and Host-country Effects of Banking Market Structure, Governance, and Supervision, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35, pp. 819-839.
  6. CULLINANE, K., SONG, D.W. (2002)
  7. Port Privatization and Practice, Transport Reviews, Vol. 22, No.1, pp. 55-75.
  8. ÇAĞLAR, V., ESMER, S., ORAL, E. Z. (2010) Özelleştirme ve Özelleştirme Aşamasında Olan Limanların Sektörel İncelenmesi, 8. Türkiye'nin Kıyı ve Deniz Alanları Ulusal Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, pp. 925-935.
  9. DJANKOV, S., MURRELL, P. (2002) Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: a Quantitative Survey, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 40, pp.739-792.
  10. D'SOUZA, J., MEGGINSON, W.L., NASH, R.C. (2005) Why do Privatized Firms Improve Performance? Evidence from Developed Countries, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 11, pp.747-766.
  11. ESTACHE, A., GONZALES, M., TRUJILLO, L. (2002) Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico, World Development, Vol. 30, pp. 545-560.
  12. FAGEDA, X. (2011) Load Centers in the Mediterranenen Port Range: Ports Hub and Ports Gateway. 40th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Barselona. FLEMING, D., BAIRD, A. (1999) Comment. Some Reflections on Port Competition in the United States and Western Europe, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 26, pp. 383-394.
  13. HARALAMBIDES, H. E. (2002)
  14. Competition, Excess Capacity and the Pricing of Port Infrastructure, International Journal of Maritime Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 323-347.
  15. HEAVER, T. (1995) The Implications of Increased Competition among Ports for Port Policy and Management, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 27, pp. 125-133.
  16. HEAVER, T., MEERSMAN, H., Van De Voorde, E. (2001) Cooperation and Competition in International Container Transport: Strategies for Ports, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 28, pp. 293-305.
  17. JIMENEZ, G., SALAZ, V., SAURINA, J. (2006)
  18. Determinants of Collateral, Journal of Financial Economic, Vol. 81, pp. 255-281.
  19. KHAN, M., KUMAR, M.S. (1997) Public and Private Investment and the Growth Process in Developing Countries