Journals / Türk Fen ve Sağlık Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Midwifery Students’ Perceptions of Obstetric Violence: A Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye

Ebelik Öğrencilerinin Obstetrik Şiddet Algıları: Türkiye’de Yapılan Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

Özlem Doğan Yüksekol(YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1761-1479
Nazlı Baltacı(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8582-6300
Özlem Koç(Tarsus Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6751-1206
Pages
40–46
Publication Date
2026-01-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Education, Midwifery students, Obstetric violence, Perceptions, Türkiye

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To determine midwifery students’ perceptions of obstetric violence and related factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a state university in western Türkiye with 119 midwifery students in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Education, Midwifery students, Obstetric violence, Perceptions, Türkiye
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Eğitim · Ebelik öğrencileri · Obstetrik şiddet

Abstract

Purpose: To determine midwifery students’ perceptions of obstetric violence and related factors. Material and Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted at a state university in western Türkiye with 119 midwifery students in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years. Data were collected between February 10 and March 10, 2025, using a Personal Information Form and the Obstetric Violence Perception Scale (OVPS). The scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha=0.88). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results: The mean OVPS score was 99.61 ± 14.11, indicating above-moderate perception levels. Significant differences were found according to grade level (p=0.018), witnessing at least one birth (p=0.009), and belief that women are treated differently according to their economic status (p=0.044). Younger students showed higher perception scores (r=-0.283, p=0.002). Conclusion: Midwifery students’ perceptions of obstetric violence were above moderate levels and influenced by sociodemographic and experiential factors. Educational programs should integrate respectful maternity care, human rights, and trauma-informed approaches to strengthen students’ awareness and reduce obstetric violence in future clinical practice. Keywords: Education, Midwifery students, Obstetric violence, Perceptions, Türkiye

Özet

Amaç: Ebelik öğrencilerinin obstetrik şiddet algılarını ve ilişkili faktörleri belirlemek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel araştırma, Türkiye’nin batısında yer alan bir devlet üniversitesinde, 2., 3. ve 4. sınıfta öğrenim gören 119 ebelik öğrencisi ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler 10 Şubat–10 Mart 2025 tarihleri arasında Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Obstetrik Şiddet Algısı Ölçeği (OVPS) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Ölçek yüksek güvenirlik göstermiştir (Cronbach alfa=0.88). Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, bağımsız örneklem t-testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA) ve Tukey HSD post-hoc testi ile Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Ortalama OVPS puanı 99.61 ± 14.11 olup, öğrencilerin obstetrik şiddet algılarının orta düzeyin üzerinde olduğunu göstermektedir. Sınıf düzeyine (p=0.018), en az bir doğuma tanıklık etme durumuna (p=0.009) ve kadınların ekonomik durumlarına göre farklı muamele gördüklerine inanma değişkenine (p=0.044) göre anlamlı farklar saptanmıştır. Daha genç öğrencilerin algı puanları daha yüksek bulunmuştur (r=-0.283, p=0.002). Sonuç: Ebelik öğrencilerinin obstetrik şiddet algıları orta düzeyin üzerindedir ve sosyodemografik ile deneyimsel faktörlerden etkilenmektedir. Eğitim programlarına saygılı doğum bakımı, insan hakları ve travma bilgisi temelli yaklaşımların entegrasyonu, öğrencilerin farkındalığını güçlendirerek gelecekte obstetrik şiddetin azaltılmasına katkı sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yüksekol, Ö. D., Baltacı, N., Koç, Ö. (2026). Midwifery Students’ Perceptions of Obstetric Violence: A Cross-Sectional Study in Türkiye. Türk Fen ve Sağlık Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.51972/tfsd.1803279

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Arias Fuentes, F. F., Arteaga, E., & San Sebastián, M. (2022). Social inequalities in women exposed to obstetric and gyneco-obstetric violence in Ecuador: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health, 22(1), 419. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01998-2
  2. Asci, O., & Bal, M. D. (2023). The prevalence of obstetric violence experienced by women during childbirth care and its associated factors in Türkiye: A cross-sectional study. Midwifery, 124, 103766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103766
  3. Bailey, J. E., Gurgol, C., Pan, E., et al. (2021). Early patientcentered outcomes research experience with the use of telehealth to address disparities: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e28503. https://doi.org/10.2196/28503
  4. Bal, S., Koç, E., & Öztürk, O. (2022). Investigating the relationship between midwifery students’ view on traditional/complementary medicine and health perception: A descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences Journal, 2(3), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.53713/nhs.v2i3.149
  5. Bohren, M. A., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., Aguiar, C., Coneglian, F. S., Araújo Diniz, A. L., Tunçalp, Ö., … Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2015). The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PLOS Medicine, 12(6), e1001847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847
  6. Chervenak, F. A., McLeod-Sordjan, R., Pollet, S. L., De Four Jones, M., Gordon, M. R., Combs, A., Bornstein, E., Lewis, D., Katz, A., Warman, A., & Grünebaum, A. (2024). Obstetric violence is a misnomer. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 230(3), S1138– S1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.003
  7. Dağlar, Ö. Ş., & Acar, Z. (2024). Obstetric violence from the perspectives of midwifery and nursing students. GÜSBD, 13(3), 1099–1111.
  8. Di Giacomo, P., Cavallo, A., Bagnasco, A., Sartini, M., & Sasso, L. (2017). Violence against women: Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of nurses and midwives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(15–16), 2382–2390. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13616
  9. Doubova, S. V., Martinez-Vega, I. P., Infante-Castañeda, C., Aranda-Flores, C. E., Knaul, F. M., & Pérez-Cuevas, R. (2021). Social inequalities in supportive care needs and quality of patient-centered care of cancer patients in Mexico. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29, 1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05617-w
  10. Erbil, E., Akın-Yamak, Ö., & Boyraz-Yanık, H. G. (2025). The relationship between nursing students’ perception of obstetric violence, pre-pregnancy fear of childbirth, and moral sensitivity: A cross-sectional study. Depression and Anxiety, 2025, 4843962. https://doi.org/10.1155/da/4843962
  11. Ferrão, A. C. C., Sim-Sim, M., de Almeida, V. S. R., Bilro, P. C. V., & Zangão, M. O. B. (2025). Analysis of the concept of obstetric violence: A combination of scoping review and Rodgers conceptual analysis methodologies. Sci, 7, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7030097
  12. Garrido, A. B., Birigidi, S., & Mena-Tudela, D. (2023). Percepción de estudiantes de ciencias de la salud sobre la violencia obstétrica: Perception of health sciences and feminist medicine students about obstetric violence. Enfermería Clínica, 33(3), 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2022.05.006
  13. Gökçek, A. İ., Beyazgül, S., & Günaydın, S. (2025). Ebelerin obstetrik şiddete yönelik bilgilerinin incelenmesi: Kesitsel bir çalışma. Atlas Journal of Medicine, 5(12), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.54270/atljm.2025.74
  14. Gönenç, İ. M., Yılmaz Sezer, N., & Topuz, Ş. (2023, September). Öğrencilerde Obstetrik Şiddet Algısı Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. 6. Uluslararası, 7. Ulusal Ebelik Kongresi, Ankara, Türkiye. Oral presentation.
  15. Hakimi, S., Allahqoli, L., Alizadeh, M., Ozdemir, M., Soori, H., Çeber-Tufan, E., Soğukpınar, N., & Alkatout, İ. (2025). Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 169, 1012–1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15730
  16. Küçük, E., Yeşilçiçek, K., & Çınar-Çalık, S. (2025). Assessing nursing students' perceptions of obstetric violence: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 152, 106757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106757
  17. Küçükkaya, B. (2025). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin obstetrik şiddet algıları ile şiddete yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişki: Kesitsel bir çalışma. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.46413/boneyusbad.1525879
  18. Lansky, S., Souza, K. V. D., Peixoto, M., Oliveira, B. J., Diniz, G., & Vieira, N. F. (2019). Obstetric violence: Influences of the senses of birth exhibition in pregnant women childbirth experience. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 24, 2811–2824. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413- 81232018248.30102017
  19. Mohamoud, Y. A., Cassidy, E., Fuchs, E., Womack, L. S., Romero, L., Kipling, L., Oza-Frank, R., Baca, K., Galang, R. R., Stewart, A., Carrigan, S., Mullen, J., Busacker, A., Behm, B., Hollier, L. M., … Cox, S. (2023). Vital Signs: Maternity Care Experiences — United States, April 2023. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(35), 961–967. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7235e1
  20. Martínez-Galiano, J. M., Martinez-Vazquez, S., Rodríguez- Almagro, J., & Hernández-Martinez, A. (2021). The magnitude of the problem of obstetric violence and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study. Women and Birth, 34(5), e526–e536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.10.002
  21. Martínez-Galiano, J. M., Rodríguez-Almagro, J., RubioÁlvarez, A., Ortiz-Esquinas, I., Ballesta-Castillejos, A., & Hernández-Martínez, A. (2023). Obstetric violence from a midwife perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4930. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064930
  22. Mena-Tudela, D., Cervera-Gasch, A., Andreu-Pejo, L., Alemany Anchel, M. J., Valero-Chilleron, M. J., Peris- Ferrando, E., Mahiques-Llopis, J. M., & Chorda- Gonzales, V. M. (2022). Perception of obstetric violence in a sample of Spanish health sciences students: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 110, 105266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105266
  23. Molla, W., Wudneh, A., & Tilahun, R. (2022). Obstetric violence and associated factors among women during facility based childbirth at Gedeo Zone, South Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 565. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04895-6
  24. Van der Pijl, M. S., Verhoeven, C. J., Verweij, R., van der Linden, T., Kingma, E., Hollander, M. H., & De Jonge, A. (2022). Disrespect and abuse during labour and birth amongst 12,239 women in the Netherlands: A national survey. Reproductive Health, 19(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-022-01460-4
  25. World Health Organization. (2014). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facilitybased childbirth (Report No: WHO/RHR/14.23). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR- 14.23
  26. Yalley, A. A., Abioye, D., Appiah, S. C. Y., & Hoeffler, A. (2023). Abuse and humiliation in the delivery room: Prevalence and associated factors of obstetric violence in Ghana. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 988961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.988961