SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Science and Technology / 2018 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Calculation of Optimum Insulation Thickness and Energy Savings for Different Climatic Regions of Turkey

Ebru Kavak Akpınar
İbrahim Halil Demir
Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-09-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that insulation thicknesses varied between 0.002–0.049 m, with the amount of life-cycle energy saving as 0.629–21.047 $/m2 and a payback period of 0.3–6.5 years depending on the type of fuel, insulation material and wall-type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the optimum insulation thickness, energy savings and payback periods were calculated based on life-cycle cost analysis for the cities of Balıkesir, Kayseri, Malatya, Mersin, Muğla, Şanlıurfa and Trabzon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The calculations were carried out for coal as energy source, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) as insulation materials on two types of walls: (1) sandwich and (2) externally insulated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that insulation thicknesses varied between 0.002–0.049 m, with the amount of life-cycle energy saving as 0.629–21.047 $/m2 and a payback period of 0.3–6.5 years depending on the type of fuel, insulation material and wall-type.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Degree-Day Method · Energy saving · Optimum insulation thickness

Abstract

In this study, the optimum insulation thickness, energy savings and payback periods were calculated based on life-cycle cost analysis for the cities of Balıkesir, Kayseri, Malatya, Mersin, Muğla, Şanlıurfa and Trabzon. These cities were selected from Turkey’s four climate zones. The calculations were carried out for coal as energy source, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) as insulation materials on two types of walls: (1) sandwich and (2) externally insulated. Results indicated that insulation thicknesses varied between 0.002–0.049 m, with the amount of life-cycle energy saving as 0.629–21.047 $/m2 and a payback period of 0.3–6.5 years depending on the type of fuel, insulation material and wall-type. In this study, the optimum insulation thickness, energy savings and payback periods were calculated based on life-cycle cost analysis for the cities of Balıkesir, Kayseri, Malatya, Mersin, Muğla, Şanlıurfa and Trabzon. These cities were selected from Turkey’s four climate zones. The calculations were carried out for coal as energy source, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) as insulation materials on two types of walls: (1) sandwich and (2) externally insulated. Results indicated that insulation thicknesses varied between 0.002–0.049 m, with the amount of   life-cycle energy saving as 0.629–21.047 $/m 2 and a payback period of 0.3–6.5 years depending on the type of fuel, insulation material and wall-type.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akpınar, E. K., Demir, İ. H. (2018). Calculation of Optimum Insulation Thickness and Energy Savings for Different Climatic Regions of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1557890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Kurt, H. (2011). The Usage of Air Gap in the Composite Wall For Energy Saving and Air Pollution. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 30, 450–458
  2. Bolatturk, A. (2006). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness For Building Walls With Respect to Various Fuels And Climate Zones in Turkey. Applied Thermal Energy, 26, 1301–1309
  3. Çay, Y, Gürel, A.T. (2013). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness, Energy Savings, And Environmental Impact For Different Climatic Regions Of Turkey. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 32 (2), 365-372
  4. Kaynaklı, O. (2012). A review of the Economical And Optimum Thermal Insulation Thickness for Building Applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 415– 425
  5. Ekici, B.B., Gulten, A.A., and Aksoy, U.T. (2012). A study on the Optimum Insulation Thicknesses of Various Types of External Walls with Respect To Different Materials, Fuels and Climate Zones in Turkey. Applied Energy, 92, 211–217
  6. Comakli, K., Yuksel, B. (2003). Optimum Insulation Thickness of External Walls for Energy Saving. Applied Thermal Engineering, 23(4), 473–479
  7. Comakli, K, Yuksel, B. (2004). Environmental impact of Thermal Insulation Thickness in Buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering, 24 (2), 933–940
  8. Dombayci, O.A. (2007). The environmental impact of Optimum Insulation Thickness for External Walls of Buildings. Building and Environment, 42 (11), 3855–3859
  9. Durmayaz, A., Kadioglu, M., and Sen, Z. (2000). An Application of the Degree-Hours Method to Estimate the Residential Heating Energy Requirement and Fuel Consumption in Istanbul. Energy, 25 (12): 1245–1256
  10. Hasan, A. (1999). Optimizing Insulation Thickness for Buildings Using Life Cycle Cost. Applied Energy, 63, 115–124
  11. Ozkan, D.B., Onan, C. (2011). Optimization of Insulation Thickness for Different Glazing Areas in Buildings for Various Climatic Regions in Turkey. Applied Energy, 88 (4), 1331–1342
  12. Sundarama, S., Bhaskaranb, A. (2014). Optimum Insulation Thickness of Walls for Energy-Saving in Hot Regions of India. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 33 (1), 213–226
  13. Büyükalaca, O., Bulut, H., Yılmaz, T. (2001). Analysis of Variable-Base Heating And Cooling Degree-Days for Turkey. Applied Energy, 69, 269–283
  14. Fertelli, A. (2013). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness for Different Building Walls in Turkey. Transactions of Famena, XXXVII-2, ISSN 1333-1124, 103-113
  15. Ucar A., Balo F. (2010). Determination of the Energy Savings and the Optimum Insulation Thickness in the Four Different Insulated Exterior Walls. Renewable Energy, 35, 88-94
  16. TSE (Turkish Standards Institution). (1998). TS 825: Thermal Insulation in Buildings
  17. Dagsoz, A.K. (1995). Degree Day Values in Turkey, National Energy Saving Policy. Heat Insulation in Buildings. Izocam, Istanbul (in Turkish)
  18. Sisman, N., Kahyab, E., Aras, N., Aras, H. (2007). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thicknesses of The External Walls And Roof (Ceiling) for Turkey’s Different Degree-Day Regions. Energy Policy, 35, 5151–5155
  19. Baskerville, G.L., Emin, P. (1969). Rapid Estimation of Heat Accumulation from Maximum and Minimum Temperatures. Ecology; 50, 514–517
  20. Floyd, R.B., Braddock, R.D. (1984). A Simple Method for Fitting Averaging Diurnal Temperature Curves. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 32, 107–119
  21. Yang, S., Logan, J., Coffey D.L. (1995). Mathematical Formulae for Calculating the Based Temperature for Growing Degree Days. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 74, 61–74
  22. Matzarakis, A., Balafoutis, C. (2004). Heating Degree-Days Over Greece As an Index of Energy Consumption. Int. J. Climatol., 24, 1817–1828
  23. Demir, I.H. (2014). Determination of Optimum Insulation Thickness for Building Exterior Walls and Cost Analysis (Bina dış duvarları için optimum yalıtım kalınlığının belirlenmesi ve maliyet analizi). MSc Thesis, Firat University, (in Turkish).