Journals / Turkish Journal of Kinesiology / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 4

Psychophysiological and technical responses to single vs. double hoop 3-a-side small-sided games in young basketball players

Şafak Özdemir(Institute of the Graduate Education, University of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa, Tokat, Türkiye.)0009-0005-9130-4994
Yağmur Gök(Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa, Tokat, Türkiye.)0000-0003-4208-4516
Erşan Arslan(Faculty of Sports Sciences, University of Tokat Gaziosmanpasa, Tokat, Türkiye.)0000-0002-2933-6937
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Coaches can utilize these results in their training plans to enhance both the physiological and technical development of young basketball players.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to compare the psychophysiological and technical responses in young basketball players on a half-court during single (S) and double (D) hoop of 3-a-side small-sided games (SSG).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twelve amateur male basketball players (age: 16.6 ± 0.5 years; height: 177.6 ± 4.0 cm; body mass: 61.7 ± 2.4 kg; body mass index: 19.6 ± 0.7 kg/m2) played of 3-a-side SSG with S or D hoop at 2-day intervals in a within-participant repeated-measures design.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Coaches can utilize these results in their training plans to enhance both the physiological and technical development of young basketball players.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Basketball · enjoyment · game-based training

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the psychophysiological and technical responses in young basketball players on a half-court during single (S) and double (D) hoop of 3-a-side small-sided games (SSG). Twelve amateur male basketball players (age: 16.6 ± 0.5 years; height: 177.6 ± 4.0 cm; body mass: 61.7 ± 2.4 kg; body mass index: 19.6 ± 0.7 kg/m2) played of 3-a-side SSG with S or D hoop at 2-day intervals in a within-participant repeated-measures design. These games consisted of 4 min, 4 bouts of 3-a-side with 2 min rest periods. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE), internal training load (ITL), and the physical enjoyment scores (PES) were determined at the end of each game. Heart rate (HR) and total distance (TD) responses were continuously recorded during 3-a-side SSG with S or D hoop. 3-a-side SSG with D hoop induced higher RPE, ITL, PES, HR, and TD responses (p ≤ 0.05, d values from 1.47 to 5.29 [from large to very large effect size]) compared to 3-a-side SSG with S hoop. Furthermore, 3-a-side SSG with D hoops also induced higher technical responses such as unsuccessful shoot (USS), successful pass (SP), unsuccessful pass (USP), total pass (TP) and lost ball (LB) (p ≤ 0.05, d values ranging from 0.61 to 1.33 [moderate to large effect size]) compared to 3-a-side SSG with S hoop. The results of this study show that 3-a-side SSG with D hoop has an enhancing effect not only on psychophysiological responses but also on technical actions. Coaches can utilize these results in their training plans to enhance both the physiological and technical development of young basketball players.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdemir, Ş., Gök, Y., Arslan, E. (2026). Psychophysiological and technical responses to single vs. double hoop 3-a-side small-sided games in young basketball players. Turkish Journal of Kinesiology, Volume: 12 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.31459/turkjkin.1868855

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Abade, E., Figueira, B., Coutinho, D., Folgado, H., Moreira, C., & Gonçalves, B. (2025). Impact of offensive-reward rules on young basketball players’ performance during small-sided games. PloS One, 20(1), e0313656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313656
  2. Arslan, E., Chmura, P., Soylu, Y., & Kilit, B. (2025). Effects of two combined training protocols on the psychophysiological, performance and technical responses in young basketball players: Comparison of one vs. two changes of direction. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 21(1), 329-340. doi: 10.1177/17479541251359990
  3. Arslan, E., Kilit, B., Clemente, F. M., Murawska-Ciałowicz, E., Soylu, Y., Sogut, M., Akca, F., Gokkaya, M., & Silva, A. F. (2022). Effects of small-sided games training versus high-intensity interval training approaches in young basketball players. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(5), 2931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052931
  4. Atlı, H., Köklü, Y., Alemdaroglu, U., & Koçak, F. Ü. (2013). A comparison of heart rate response and frequencies of technical actions between half-court and full-court 3-a-side games in high school female basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 27(2), 352-356. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182542674
  5. Bredt, S. D. G. T., Camargo, D. D. S., Torres, J. D. O., Praça, G. M., De Andrade, A. G. P., Paolucci, L. A., Da Costa, I. T., & Chagas, M. H. (2023). Multidimensional analysis of players’ responses in basketball small-sided games: The impact of changing game rules. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 18(5), 1501–1512. doi: 10.1177/1747954122111
  6. Clemente, F. M. (2016). Small-sided and conditioned games in basketball training: A review. Strength Cond J, 38(3), 49–58. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000225
  7. Clemente, F. M. (2025). The enjoyment of small-sided games: A narrative review. Human Movement, 26 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.5114/hm/197230
  8. Conte, D., Lukonaitiene, I., Matulaitis, K., Snieckus, A., Kniubaite, A., Kreivyte, R., & Kamandulis, S. (2023). Recreational 3× 3 basketball elicits higher heart rate, enjoyment, and physical activity intensities but lower blood lactate and perceived exertion compared to HIIT in active young adults. Biol Sport, 40(3), 889-898. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2023.122478
  9. Davids, K., Araújo, D., Correia, V., & Vilar, L. (2013). How small-sided and conditioned games enhance acquisition of movement and decision-making skills. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 41(3), 154–161. doi: 10.1097/JES.0b013e318292f3ec
  10. Ferioli, D., Schelling, X., Bosio, A., La Torre, A., Rucco, D., & Rampinini, E. (2020). Match activities in basketball games: Comparison between different competitive levels. J Strength Cond Res, 34(1), 172–182. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003039
  11. Figueira, B., Mateus, N., Esteves, P., Dadelienė, R., & Paulauskas, R. (2022). Physiological responses and technical-tactical performance of youth basketball players: A brief comparison between 3x3 and 5x5 basketball. J Sports Sci Med, 21(2), 332-340. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.332
  12. Foster, C., Boullosa, D., McGuigan, M., Fusco, A., Cortis, C., Arney, B. E., Orton, B., Dodge, C., Jaime, S., & Radtke, K. (2021). 25 years of session rating of perceived exertion: Historical perspective and development. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 16(5), 612–621. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0599
  13. Gök, Y., Soylu, Y., Süel, E., & Gök, U. (2025). The effect of different small-sided games on technical activity and psychophysiological responses in young female basketball players: experimental research. Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Sci, 17(2), 109–120. doi: 10.5336/sportsci.2024-107097
  14. Gök, Y., Süel, E., & Soylu, Y. (2023). Effects of different small-sided games on psychological responses and technical activities in young female basketball players. Acta Gymnica, 53, e2023.006. doi: 10.5507/ag.2023.006
  15. Henriksen, A., Johansson, J., Hartvigsen, G., Grimsgaard, S., & Hopstock, L. (2020). Measuring physical activity using triaxial wrist worn polar activity trackers: A systematic review. Int J Exerc Sci, 13(4), 438-454. doi: 10.70252/RPTD5267
  16. Herrán, A., Usabiaga, O., & Castellano, J. (2017). Physical profile comparison between 3x3 and 5x5 basketball training. International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport, 17(67), 435–447. doi: 10.15366/rimcafd2017.67.003
  17. Hopkins, W.G. (2002) A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics: A new view of statistics. http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
  18. İlbak, İ., Stojanović, S., Düz, S., Kurhan, C. O., Suva, M., & Cepicka, L. (2026). Acute effects of physical and mental fatigue on time perception in basketball players. Front Psychol, 17, 1759731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1759731
  19. Jarel, J. G., Montero-Seoane, A., Fernández, A. R., & Devesa, D. G. (2025). Shooting effectiveness after offensive rebound and its impact on team success in 3x3 basketball. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (62), 183–188.
  20. Mikołajec, K., Gabryś, T., Gryko, K., Prończuk, M., Krzysztofik, M., Trybek, G., & Maszczyk, A. (2023). Relationship among the change of direction ability, sprinting, jumping performance, aerobic power and anaerobic speed reserve: a cross-sectional study in elite 3x3 basketball players. J Hum Kinet, 85, 105-113. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0114
  21. Montgomery, P. G., & Maloney, B. D. (2018a). 3x3 basketball: Performance characteristics and changes during elite tournament competition. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 13(10), 1349–1356. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0011
  22. Montgomery, P. G., & Maloney, B. D. (2018b). Three-by-three basketball: Inertial movement and physiological demands during elite games. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 13(9), 1169–1174. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0031
  23. Nowak, M., Skalik, M., Więckowski, J., Ciejpa, R., Stolarczyk, A., & Oleksy, Ł. (2025). Winners’ strategies: Comprehensive analysis and optimization of 2-point shots in 3x3 basketball using multi-criteria decision support analysis, on the example of two Olympic National Teams. PLoS One, 20(4), e0322024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322024
  24. Paulauskas, R., Kamarauskas, P., Gonçalves, B., & Figueira, B. (2025). Training load and post-exercise recovery following varied game intervals in 3x3 basketball. J Hum Kinet, 96(Spec Issue), 247-261. doi: 10.5114/jhk/203324
  25. Piedra, A., Peña, J., & Caparrós, T. (2021). Monitoring training loads in basketball: A narrative review and practical guide for coaches and practitioners. Strength Cond J, 43(5), 12–35. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000620
  26. Sansone, P., Conte, D., Tessitore, A., Rampinini, E., & Ferioli, D. (2023). A systematic review on the physical, physiological, perceptual, and technical–tactical demands of official 3\times 3 basketball games. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 18(11), 1233–1245. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2023-0104
  27. Sgrò, F., Bracco, S., Pignato, S., & Lipoma, M. (2018). Small-sided games and technical skills in soccer training: Systematic review and implications for sport and physical education practitioners. Journal of Sports Science, 6(1), 9–19. doi: 10.17265/2332-7839/2018.01.002
  28. Sosa Marín, C., Alonso-Pérez-Chao, E., Schelling, X., & Lorenzo, A. (2026). Do you train like you compete? a comparison of training tasks and competition in elite basketball based on biomechanical and external physiological load. Appl Sci, 16(2), 997. doi: 10.3390/app16020997.
  29. Sosa Marín, C., Alonso-Pérez-Chao, E., Ribas, C., Schelling, X., & Lorenzo, A. (2025). Description and Classification of Training Drills, Based on Biomechanical and Physiological Load, in Elite Basketball. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 25(1), 262. doi: 10.3390/s25010262
  30. Soylu, Y., Arslan, E., & Kilit, B. (2023). Exercise and enjoyment: a scale adaptation study for adolescents and adults athletes. Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 21(1), 93–104. DOI: 10.33689/spormetre.1183236
  31. Soylu, Y., Arslan, E., Kilit, B., & Lane, A. M. (2024). Effects of coach encouragement on psychophysiological responses and technical actions in different small-sided soccer games. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol, 22(9), 2169–2181. doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2023.2273274
  32. Torres-Ronda, L., Ric, A., Llabres-Torres, I., de Las Heras, B., & i del Alcazar, X. S. (2016). Position-dependent cardiovascular response and time-motion analysis during training drills and friendly matches in elite male basketball players. J Strength Cond Res, 30(1), 60-70. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001043
  33. Yılmaz, O., Jahrami, H., Batalik, L., Trabelsi, K., Ammar, A., & Soylu, Y. (2025). Verbal encouragement in coaching: Enhancing small-sided game performance in youth basketball players. Front Psychol, 16, 1512803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1512803