SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Tarsus Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Dynamics of Green Growth in G7 Countries within a Heterogeneous Panel Data Framework: Empirical Findings Using the DCCE Estimator

HETEROJEN PANEL VERİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE G7 ÜLKELERİNDE YEŞİL BÜYÜME DİNAMİKLERİ: DCCE TAHMİNCİSİ İLE AMPİRİK BULGULAR

Mert Anıl Atamer(NEVŞEHİR HACI BEKTAŞ VELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1238-9020
Pages
1–18
Publication Date
2026-08-09
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Effective policies will support the green growth process with low carbon intensity at the global level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the determinants of green growth in G7 countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These relationships were examined using annual data from 1990 to 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Effective policies will support the green growth process with low carbon intensity at the global level.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Yeşil Büyüme · Çevresel Teknoloji · Yenilenebilir Enerji

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of green growth in G7 countries. In this context, energy efficiency, environmental technology, and renewable energy supply were used as independent variables. These relationships were examined using annual data from 1990 to 2023. Long-term coefficient estimates were calculated using the DCCE model. The findings vary by panel level and country level, and they also differ across countries. It was observed that environmental technologies are insignificant at the panel level and for each country. In contrast, it has been found that energy efficiency and renewable energy supply have a generally negative effect on green growth at both the panel and country levels. In this context, policy recommendations have been made to support green growth at the country level. Effective policies will support the green growth process with low carbon intensity at the global level.

Özet

Bu çalışma G7 ülkelerinde yeşil büyümenin belirleyicilerini araştırmaktadır. Bu kapsamda enerji verimliliği, çevresel teknoloji ve yenilenebilir enerji arzı bağımsız değişken olarak kullanılmıştır. 1990-2023 dönemi yıllık verileri ile bu ilişkiler araştırılmıştır. DCCE modeli ile uzun dönem katsayı tahmini yapılmıştır. Bulgular panel düzeyi ve ülke düzeyine göre farklılaşırken ülkelere göre de farklılık göstermektedir. Çevresel teknolojilerin panel düzeyinde ve her ülke için anlamsız olduğu gözlenmiştir. Buna karşın enerji verimliliği ve yenilenebilir enerji arzının hem panel hem de ülke düzeyinde genel olarak yeşil büyüme üzerinde olumsuz bir etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda ülke özelinde yeşil büyümeyi destekleyecek yönde politika önerilerinde bulunulmuştur. Etkin politikalar ile küresel düzeyde düşük karbon yoğunluğu ile yeşil büyüme süreci desteklenecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Atamer, M. A. (2026). Dynamics of Green Growth in G7 Countries within a Heterogeneous Panel Data Framework: Empirical Findings Using the DCCE Estimator. Tarsus Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.56400/tarsusiibfdergisi.1948881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Abro, A.A., Alam, N., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., Musah, M., ve Atikur Rahman, A.K.M. (2023). Drivers of green growth in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: can financial development promote environmentally sustainable economic growth?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 23764–23780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23867-z
  2. Adamowicz, M. (2022). Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14, 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105901
  3. Agan, B. ve Balcilar, M. (2023). Unraveling the green growth matrix: exploring the impact of green technology, climate change adaptation, and macroeconomic factors on sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(11), 8530.
  4. Anwar, A., Huong, N. T. T., Sharif, A., Kilinc‐Ata, N., Çitil, M., ve Demirtaş, F. (2024). Is a green world real or a dream? A look at green growth from green innovation and financial development: Evidence from fragile economies. Geological Journal, 59(1), 98-112.
  5. Breusch, T. S. ve Pagan, A. R. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239-253.
  6. Chen, R., Ramzan, M., Hafeez, M. ve Ullah, S. (2023). Green innovation-green growth nexus in BRICS: does financial globalization matter?. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100286.
  7. Chhabra, M., Agarwal, M. ve Giri, A. K. (2024). Does renewable energy promote green economic growth in emerging market economies?. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(6), 1836-1851.
  8. Chudik, A. ve Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of econometrics, 188(2), 393-420.
  9. Danish, D. ve Ulucak, R. (2020). How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136504.
  10. Deng, W., Kharuddin, S. ve Ashhari, Z. M. (2024). Green finance transforms developed countries green growth: Mediating effect of clean technology innovation and threshold effect of environmental tax. Journal of Cleaner Production, 448, 141642.
  11. Dong, K., Zhao, J. ve Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2023). Toward China’s green growth through boosting energy transition: the role of energy efficiency. Energy Efficiency, 16, 43.
  12. Dzwigol, H., Kwilinski, A., Lyulyov, O. ve Pimonenko, T. (2023). The role of environmental regulations, renewable energy, and energy efficiency in finding the path to green economic growth. Energies, 16(7), 3090.
  13. Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J. ve Hughes, M. (2021). Green growth versus economic growth: do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?. Business Strategy and The Environment, 30(4), 2021-2037.
  14. Gao, W., Ullah, S., Zafar, S. M. ve Usman, A. (2024). How does nuclear energy consumption contribute to or hinder green growth in major nuclear energy-consuming countries?. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 170, 105111.
  15. Gorji, A. A. ve Martek, I. (2023). The role of renewable energy as a ‘green growth’ strategy for the built environment. Buildings, 13(5), 1356.
  16. Hickel, J. ve Kallis, G. (2019). Is green growth possible?. New Political Economy, 25(7576), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
  17. Hussain, Z., Mehmood, B., Khan, M. K. ve Tsimisaraka, R. S. M. (2022). Green growth, green technology, and environmental health: evidence from high-gdp countries. front. Public Health, 9:816697. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.816697.
  18. Jiang, Y., Sharif, A., Anwar, A., Cong, P. T., Lelchumanan, B., Yen, V. T. ve Vinh, N. T. T. (2023). Does green growth in E-7 countries depend on economic policy uncertainty, institutional quality, and renewable energy? Evidence from quantile-based regression. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(6), 101652.
  19. Maiti, M. (2022). Does improvement in green growth influence the development of environmental related technology? Innovation and Green Development, 1(2), 100008.
  20. Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Dauda, L., Boamah, K. B., Salman, M., Appiah-Twum, F. ve Tachie, A. K. (2019). Technological innovation and green growth in the organization for economic cooperation and development economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118204.
  21. Murshed, M. (2024). Can renewable energy transition drive green growth? The role of good governance in promoting carbon emission-adjusted economic growth in next eleven countries, Innovation and Green Development, 3(2), 100123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2023.100123
  22. Neffati, M. ve Khemiri, I. (2025). Examining the factors enhancing green growth in BRICS economies: Interplay between economic globalization, renewable energy use, and government efficiency. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 15(2), 735-745.
  23. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2011). Towards green growth. Paris: OECD. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels: CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
  24. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
  25. Pesaran, M. H. ve Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
  26. Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., Ozturk, I. ve Afshan, S. (2023). Dynamic and threshold effects of energy transition and environmental governance on green growth in COP26 framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 179, 113296.
  27. Saqib, N., Usman, M., Ozturk, I. ve Sharif, A. (2024). Harnessing the synergistic impacts of environmental innovations, financial development, green growth, and ecological footprint through the lens of SDGs policies for countries exhibiting high ecological footprints. Energy Policy, 184, 113863.
  28. Smulders, S., Toman, M. ve Withagen, C. (2014). Growth theory and ‘green growth’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 423–446.
  29. Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Afshan, S., Sharif, A., Kasim, M. A. ve Hanafi, S. R. M. (2022). How does green technology innovation affect green growth in ASEAN-6 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Gondwana Research, 111, 165-173.
  30. Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica, 38(2), 311-323.
  31. Teklie, D. K. ve Yağmur, M. H. (2024). The role of green innovation, renewable energy, and institutional quality in promoting green growth: evidence from African countries. Sustainability, 16(14), 6166.
  32. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011). Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication – a synthesis for policy makers. Nairobi: UNEP.
  33. Wang, H., Peng, G., Luo, Y. ve Du, H. (2023). Asymmetric influence of renewable energy, ecological governance, and human development on green growth of BRICS countries. Renewable Energy, 206, 1007-1019.
  34. Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193-233.
  35. World Bank (2012). Inclusive green growth: The Pathway to sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  36. Xiaoping, C. ve Yanqiu, W. (2024). Cultivating green growth: The interplay of communication and resource efficiency in East Asia. Resources Policy, 90, 104776.
  37. Zhang, M., Jain, V., Qian, X., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Ali, S. A., Sharma, P.,. ve Shabbir, M. S. (2023). The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
  38. Zhang, M., Jain, V., Qian, X., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Ali, S. A., Sharma, P.,. ve Shabbir, M. S. (2023). The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.