SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Eğitim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Examination of Public Personnel's Attitudes Towards Sports Technologies in Terms of Various Variables

Kamu Personelinin Spor Teknolojilerine Yönelik Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Özgür Hamza Küçük(ARDAHAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0005-5152-9590
Pages
69–83
Publication Date
2026-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, it was found that Student Dormitories Services had lower sectoral attitude and shopping attitude scores compared to Sports Services and Youth Services, and that Student Dormitories Services had lower career attitude and facility attitude scores compared to Sports Services.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this research is to examine the attitudes of public personnel towards sports technologies in terms of various demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The research group consisted of a total of 200 volunteer public personnel working in different positions in the city center and districts of Ardahan-Kars-Artvin Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, it was found that Student Dormitories Services had lower sectoral attitude and shopping attitude scores compared to Sports Services and Youth Services, and that Student Dormitories Services had lower career attitude and facility attitude scores compared to Sports Services.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Spor Teknolojisi · Teknoloji · Tutum

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research is to examine the attitudes of public personnel towards sports technologies in terms of various demographic variables. A general survey model, a quantitative research design, was used in the study. Method: The research group consisted of a total of 200 volunteer public personnel working in different positions in the city center and districts of Ardahan-Kars-Artvin Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports. The "Sports Technologies Attitude Scale" was used as the data collection tool. To examine the attitude levels of public personnel toward sports technologies, arithmetic mean and standard deviation, independent t-test, and one-way ANOVA analyses were performed. Results: As a result of the research, it was determined that public personnel had high attitude scores towards sports technologies. Furthermore, it was determined that male public employees had higher shopping attitude scores than female employees, and that public employees aged 18-25 had higher shopping attitude scores than those aged 46 and over. Additionally, it was found that Student Dormitories Services had lower sectoral attitude and shopping attitude scores compared to Sports Services and Youth Services, and that Student Dormitories Services had lower career attitude and facility attitude scores compared to Sports Services. Finally, no significant differences were found in public employees' sports technology attitude scores based on education level, length of service, and monthly income. Conclusion: The results highlight the need to provide perceived benefits, ease of use, and personnel training in sports technologies to promote the successful integration of sports technologies in public sector organizations.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, kamu personelinin spor teknolojilerine yönelik tutumlarını çeşitli demografik değişkenler açısından incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmada nicel araştırma desenlerinden genel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma grubunu Ardahan-Kars-Artvin Gençlik ve Spor İl Müdürlüğü bünyesinde il merkezi ve ilçelerde farklı görevlerde çalışan toplam 200 gönüllü kamu personeli oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak “Spor Teknolojileri Tutum Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Kamu personelinin spor teknolojileri tutum düzeylerini incelemek için aritmetik ortalama ve standart sapma, bağımsız t testi ve One-way ANOVA analizleri yapılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda, kamu personelinin spor teknolojileri tutum puanlarının yüksek düzeyde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca erkek kamu personelinin kadın personele göre daha yüksek alışveriş tutum puanlarına sahip olduğu, 18-25 yaş arası kamu personelinin alışveriş tutum puanlarının 46 yaş ve üstü personele göre daha yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ek olarak, Kredi Yurt Hizmetleri'nin Spor Hizmetleri ve Gençlik Hizmetleri'ne kıyasla daha düşük sektörel tutum ve alışveriş tutumu puanlarına sahip olduğu, Kredi Yurt Hizmetleri'nin Spor Hizmetleri'ne kıyasla daha düşük kariyer tutumu ve tesis tutumu puanlarına sahip olduğu da belirlenmiştir. Son olarak, kamu personelinin spor teknolojileri tutum puanlarında eğitim durumu, çalışma süresi ve aylık gelir durumuna göre herhangi anlamlı bir farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Sonuç: Sonuçlar, kamu sektörü kuruluşlarında spor teknolojilerinin başarılı bir şekilde entegrasyonunu teşvik etmek için spor teknolojilerinde algılanan fayda, kullanım kolaylığı ve personel eğitimi sağlanmasının gerekliliğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Küçük, Ö. H. (2026). Examination of Public Personnel's Attitudes Towards Sports Technologies in Terms of Various Variables. Spor Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.55238/seder.1886253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Aktaş, N., ve Karcıoğlu, F. (2022). Technological leadership competences of public administrators. International Journal of Economics, Politics, Humanities & Social Sciences, 5 (1), 1-16.
  2. Andrés-Sanchez, J. D., Torres-Burgos, F. D., ve Arias-Oliva, M. (2023). Why disruptive sport competition technologies are used by amateur athletes? An analysis of Nike Vaporfly shoes. Journal of Sport and Health Research, 15 (1), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.58727/jshr.89629
  3. Bayrakdaroğlu, Y., Türker, Ü., Ayhan, M., ve Kaplan, M. (2024). The relationship between artificial ıntelligence attitudes and openness to organizational change in field hockey referees. International Journal of Sport Exercise & Training Sciences 10 (4), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.1524511
  4. Cha, H., Choi, S., Jung, I., Kim, H., Shin, H. J., Yoo, J., ve Yoon, C. (2007). Retos: Resilient, expandable, and threaded operating system for wireless sensor networks. In Sixth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks Information, IPSN 2007 (pp. 148–157). April 25-27, 2007, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
  5. Chin, J., Do, C., ve Kim, M. (2022). How to ıncrease sport facility users’ ıntention to Use AI fitness services: Based on the technology adoption model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (21), 14453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114453
  6. Cojean, S., ve Martin, N. (2022). Acceptability of technology involving artificial intelligence among future teachers. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.). 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2292-2296). 27-20, July, 2022. Toronto, Canada.
  7. Crespo, M., Botella-Carrubí, D., Vivas, J. M. J., ve Simón-Moya, V. (2022). Innovation strategies in sports management: COVID-19 and the Latin American tennis federations. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 35 (2), 239. https://doi.org/10.1108/arla-07-2021-0136
  8. Çamiçi, F., Ünlü, Ç., Çeviker, A., Ceylan, T., ve Eser, Ö. (2025). Investigating the attitudes of physical education and sport teacher candidates towards technology and the self-efficacy of specific teaching methods. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16 (3), 860-871.
  9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  10. Dithurbide, L., Neyedli, H. F., Swinimer, J., ve MacFarlane, J. (2021). Automation use and dis-use in golf: The impact of distance measuring devices on trust in technology and confidence in determining distance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655387
  11. Dukić, D., Kozina, G., ve Bodražić, B. (2022). Perceived Importance and Barriers to ICT Integration into Sport Management. TEM Journal, 11 (3), 1213-1222. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem113-29
  12. Düking, P., Pietro, P. D., Camomilla, V., Gastaldi, L., ve Sperlich, B. (2023). Editorial: Highlights in sports science, technology and engineering 2021/22. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1117803
  13. Gayretli, Z., Zengin, S., ÇELİK, A., & Özmutlu, İ. (2023). Sporcuların giyilebilir teknolojik spor ürünlerini kullanım algı düzeylerinin incelenmesi. ÇOMÜ Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 6 (3), 136-146.
  14. Gómez, R. J. S., Cedillo, J. A. Á., Castellanos-Sanchez, E. I., Sánchez, T., ve Perez-Garcia, R. (2023). Development of a technological innovation and social entrepreneurship training program to generate services in a Mexican public entity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6, 74. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289753
  15. González-Anleo, J. M., Delbello, L., Martínez-Gonzálo, J. M., ve Oviedo-Gómez, A. (2024). Sociodemographic impact on the adoption of emerging technologies. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 34 (2), 42-50. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.122089
  16. Hansen, R. E., Couchouron, C., Elbæk, L., Rasmussen, A., ve Andersen, R. V. (2021). Sportstech innovation in football from a Danish perspective. (1. Ed.) Syddansk Universitet. Institut for Idræt og Biomekanik. https://issuu.com/learningtalentinsport/docs/evalueringprojektnextgeneration-rapport-web
  17. Karasar, N. (2020). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Nobel: Ankara.
  18. Liu, S., Wu, C., Xiao, S. H. P. B. S., Liu, Y., ve Song, Y. (2024). Optimizing young tennis players’ development: Exploring the impact of emerging technologies on training effectiveness and technical skills acquisition. PLoS ONE, 19 (8), e0307882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307882
  19. Majrashi, K. (2024). Determinants of public sector managers’ intentions to adopt AI in the workplace. International. Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 11 (1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpada.342849
  20. Matei, A., ve Cocoşatu, M. (2024). Artificial internet of things, sensor-based digital twin urban computing vision algorithms, and blockchain cloud networks in sustainable smart city administration. Sustainability, 16 (16), 6749. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166749
  21. Offerman, J., Fristedt, S., Schmidt, S., Löfqvist, C., ve Iwarsson, S. (2023). Attitudes related to technology for active and healthy aging in a national multigenerational survey. Nature Aging, 3 (5), 617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-023-00392-3
  22. Qi, Y., Sajadi, S. M., Baghaei, S., Rezaei, R., ve Li, W. (2024). Digital technologies in sports: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for safeguarding athlete wellbeing and competitive integrity in the digital era. Technology in Society, 77, 102496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102496
  23. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.
  24. Ren, L., Yang, F., Gu, C., Sun, J., ve Liu, Y. (2022). A study of factors influencing Chinese college students’ intention of using metaverse technology for basketball learning: Extending the technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049972
  25. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  26. Sánchez, S. A., García‐Fernández, J., ve Puyana, M. G. (2023). A systematic review of intention to use fitness apps (2020–2023). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10 (1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02011-3
  27. Sangwan, N., Rathee, R., ve Chahal, P. (2023). The technological revolution in sport and exercise science: Impacts on performance. Sports Science & Health Advances, 1 (2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.60081/ssha.1.2.2023.104-111
  28. Smolianov, P., Schoen, C., Norberg, J., Dion, S., Smith, J., ve Calpino, K. (2018). Innovative technology for high performance and mass participation sport. In the use of technology in sport- Emerging challenges (pp. 9-29). InTechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79415
  29. Stegmann, P., ve Lang, G. (2025). Digital transformation in voluntary sports organizations: A scoping review on multi-level drivers, promoting factors, forms and consequences. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 10 (2), 053. https://doi.org/10.36950/2025.2ciss053
  30. Şimşek, A., ve Devecioğlu, A. (2024). Spor teknolojileri tutum ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18 (2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.61962/bsd.1412297
  31. Tabachnick, B., ve Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th International edition cover edn). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks: NY.
  32. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  33. Villaseñor R. A. (2024). The public service digitalization in the philippines towards a national program to capacitate digital frontliners. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 14 (2), 164 https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v14i2.22106
  34. Xiao, X., Tan, F. T. C., Lim, E. T. K., Henningsson, S., Vatrapu, R., Hedman, J., Tan, C. W., Clemenson, T., Mukkamala, R. R., ve Hillegersberg, J. van. (2017). Sports digitalization: an overview and a research agenda. In ICIS 2017 Proceedings Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=icis2017
  35. Yılmaz, B., Hacıcaferoğlu, S., ve Hacicaferoglu, B. (2025). Teknoloji destekli spor eğitimi ve yönetimi; dijital dönüşüm. ÇOMÜ Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 8 (2), 126-143. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/comusbd/issue/94960/1703345
  36. Zhang, C., ve Villanueva, L. E. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence Preparedness and Technological Competence. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 11 (2), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i2.13753