SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Digital Well-Being and Technoference in Family: A Review in the Context of Social Work

Ailede Dijital İyi Oluş ve Teknoferans: Sosyal Hizmet Bağlamında Bir Değerlendirme

Hüseyin Zahid Kara(Sakarya Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4503-2703
Pages
1237–1265
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the study emphasizes the critical role of social workers in equipping families with digital literacy and boundary setting skills to ensure family digital welfare.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid integration of digital technologies into daily life is profoundly transforming family communication dynamics, roles, and interaction patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reviewed literature indicates that technoference reduces marital relationship satisfaction, increases conflict between partners, and, by fostering perceptions of neglect in parent–child relationships, adversely affects children’s psychosocial development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the study emphasizes the critical role of social workers in equipping families with digital literacy and boundary setting skills to ensure family digital welfare.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dijital iyi oluş · Aile · Teknoferans

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital technologies into daily life is profoundly transforming family communication dynamics, roles, and interaction patterns. Alongside the opportunities provided by technology, the risks posed by unconscious use have created a new area of inquiry for the modern family structure. The aim of this study is to examine the concept of "digital well-being," which refers to the healthy and balanced use of technology, and "technoference," defined as the interruption of social interactions due to technology use, and to evaluate these dynamics within the context of the social work discipline. In this review study, a descriptive conceptual framework was established by reviewing the relevant literature. The reviewed literature indicates that technoference reduces marital relationship satisfaction, increases conflict between partners, and, by fostering perceptions of neglect in parent–child relationships, adversely affects children’s psychosocial development. Furthermore, it has been determined that digital well-being is not merely an individual preference but a state of balance extending to the entire family system. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the critical role of social workers in equipping families with digital literacy and boundary setting skills to ensure family digital welfare. In this context, the importance of intervention strategies that encourage conscious and interaction oriented use, rather than prohibiting technology, has been highlighted.

Özet

Dijital teknolojilerin günlük yaşama hızla entegre olması, aile içi iletişim dinamiklerini, rollerini ve etkileşim biçimlerini köklü bir şekilde dönüştürmektedir. Teknolojinin sağladığı fırsatların yanı sıra, bilinçsiz kullanımın yarattığı riskler, modern aile yapısı için yeni bir inceleme alanı doğurmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı teknolojinin sağlıklı ve dengeli kullanımını ifade eden “dijital iyi oluş” kavramı ile teknoloji kullanımı nedeniyle sosyal etkileşimlerin kesintiye uğraması anlamına gelen “teknoferans” kavramını incelemek ve bu dinamikleri sosyal hizmet disiplini bağlamında değerlendirmektir. Geleneksel derleme olarak yapılandırılan bu çalışmada, ilgili literatür taranarak betimsel nitelikte kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturulmuştur. Ulaşılan literatür, teknoferansın eşler arası ilişki doyumunu azalttığını, çatışmaları artırdığını ve ebeveyn-çocuk ilişkisinde ihmal algısına yol açarak çocukların psikososyal gelişimini olumsuz etkilediğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca dijital iyi oluşun, sadece bireysel bir tercih değil, aile sisteminin bütününe yayılan bir denge hali olduğu öne çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, ailenin dijital iyi oluşunu sağlamak adına sosyal hizmet uzmanlarının, ailelere dijital okuryazarlık ve sınır koyma becerileri kazandırmada kritik bir role sahip olduğu vurgulanmıştır. Bu bağlamda, teknolojiyi yasaklayan değil, bilinçli ve etkile-şim odaklı kullanımı teşvik eden müdahale stratejilerinin önemi ortaya konulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kara, H. Z. (2026). Digital Well-Being and Technoference in Family: A Review in the Context of Social Work. Sinop Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 1237–1265. https://doi.org/10.30561/sinopusd.1835755

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (96)

  1. Abdullahi, S., Judith, O., & Okan, O. (2024). The integration of technology on family dynamics and communication pattern. ALSYSTECH Journal of Education Technology. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsystech.v3i1.3892
  2. Afrouz, R., & Lucas, J. (2023). A systematic review of technology-mediated social work practice: Benefits,uncertainties, and future directions. Journal of Social Work, 23, 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231165926
  3. Ahat, K. (2024). Geleneksel Ayakkabı Endüstrisi için Yeşil ve Dijital Dönüşüm Yetkinliklerinin Tespiti: Mesleki Yeterlik Kurumu (MYK) Meslek Tanımlarına Yönelik İçerik Analizi. International Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.52096/usbd.8.33.41.
  4. Akbağ, M., & Sayiner, B. (2021). Dijital teknolojinin yansımaları: Ebeveyn teknoferansı ve sosyotelizmi. Humanistic Perspective. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.996220
  5. Al-Mansoori, R., Al-Thani, D., & Ali, R. (2023). Designing for digital wellbeing: From theory to practice a scoping review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9924029
  6. Anisti, A., Tambunan, R., Sidharta, V., Sampean, S., & Syatir, S. (2023). Family communication patterns in the era digital technology. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2225
  7. Annisa, N., Ismail, R., Manurung, R., Saladin, I., & Sihotang, D. (2024). Technoference and the power of family in using cell-phones by college students in Medan, Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development.https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i1.1864
  8. Apanasionok, M., Paris, A., Griffin, J., Hastings, R., Finch, E., Austin, D., & Flynn, S. (2025). Digital psychological wellbeing interventions for family carers of children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.70081
  9. Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7395–7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5
  10. Bărbuță, A., Ghețău, C., & Iovu, M. (2023). Digital technology and family dynamics. Intersections.https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v9i1.1049
  11. Beerbaum, J., Robens, S., Fehring, L., Mortsiefer, A., & Meister, S. (2025). Impact of patients' personality traits on digital health adoption strategies for family practices. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 198, 105880.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105880
  12. Benis, A., Tamburis, O., Chronaki, C., & Moen, A. (2021). One digital health: A unified framework for future health ecosystems. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23. https://doi.org/10.2196/22189
  13. Burr, C., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2019). The ethics of digital well-being: A thematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2313–2343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00175-8
  14. Büchi, M. (2020). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media & Society, 26, 172–189.https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211056851
  15. Byrne, S., Rodríguez, G., Álvarez, M., Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, N., Rodrigo, M., Padilla, S., & Martín, J. (2024).Professionals’ digital competences and user profiles in social agencies and their impact on professional practice, family autonomy and wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363444
  16. Cao, S., & Li, H. (2023). A scoping review of digital well-being in early childhood: Definitions, measurements,contributors, and interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043510
  17. Chen, S., Ebrahimi, O., & Cheng, C. (2025). New perspective on digital well-being by distinguishing digital competency from dependency: Network approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27.https://doi.org/10.2196/70483
  18. Chen, Y., Law, R., & Zhao, X. (2025). Digital well-being in hospitality: Epistemology, scope, aggregation, and specification. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2024-0785
  19. Choy, Y., Lau, E., & Wu, D. (2024). Digital parenting and its impact on early childhood development: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22147 - 22187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12643-w.
  20. Copson, R., Murphy, A., Cook, L., Neil, E., & Sorensen, P. (2022). Relationship-based practice and digital technology in child and family social work: Learning from practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Developmental Child Welfare, 4, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25161032221079325
  21. Dixon, D., Sharp, C., Hughes, K., & Hughes, J. (2023). Parental technoference and adolescents’ mental health and violent behaviour: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16850-x
  22. Gandarillas, M., Elvira-Zorzo, M., Pica-Miranda, G., & Correa-Concha, B. (2024). The impact of family factors and digital technologies on mental health in university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 15.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1433725
  23. Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
  24. He, C., Shi, R., Wen, H., & Chu, J. (2025). Impact of digital literacy on rural residents’ subjective well-being: An empirical study in China. Agriculture, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060586
  25. Hmidan, A., Seguin, D., & Duerden, E. (2023). Media screen time use and mental health in school aged children during the pandemic. BMC Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01240-0
  26. Holmarsdottir, H., Seland, I., Zinoveva, L., Barbovschi, M., Bărbuță, A., Parsanoglou, D., & Symeonaki, M. (2025). An integrative review on children's perceived and experienced subjective digital well-being. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7.https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1410609
  27. Kaye, L., Orben, A., Ellis, D., Hunter, S., & Houghton, S. (2020). The conceptual and methodological mayhem of “screen time.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103661
  28. Kollárová, S. (2025). Novodobé digitálne fenomény, ktoré narúšajú vzťah rodič-dieťa. Disputationes Scientificae Universitatis Catholicae in Ružomberok, 25, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.54937/dspt.2025.25.1.21-32
  29. Komanchuk, J., Toews, A., Marshall, S., Mackay, L., Hayden, K., Cameron, J., Duffett-Leger, L., & Letourneau, N.(2023). Impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and child health and developmental outcomes:A scoping review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.0278
  30. Kopecka-Piech, K. (2025). Imaginings of digital disconnectivity: How emerging adults envision mobile applications for technology self-regulation. Digital Creativity, 36, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2025.2456289
  31. Kostkova, P. (2015). Grand challenges in digital health. Frontiers in Public Health, 3.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00134
  32. Kyalo, J. (2024). The impact of communication technology on family dynamics. Journal of Communication.https://doi.org/10.47941/jcomm.1981
  33. Lafton, T., Wilhelmsen, J., & Holmarsdottir, H. (2024). Parental mediation and children’s digital well-being in family life in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 18, 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2299956
  34. Li, H., & Yang, Z. (2024). The impact of digital literacy on personal health: Evidence from the China family panel study. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3816
  35. Lissak, G. (2018). Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents:Literature review and case study. Environmental Research, 164, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.01.015
  36. Lokmanoğlu, E., & Bora, Ö. (2024). Dijital dönüşüm sürecinde alternatif uyuşmazlık çözüm yollarında yeni yaklaşımlar. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v12i4.2460.
  37. Lopez-Peláez, A., Erro-Garcés, A., & Ciriano, E. (2020). Young people, social workers and social work education: The role of digital skills. Social Work Education, 39, 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1795110
  38. López-Peláez, A., Vávrová, S., Gojová, A., Erro-Garcés, A., & Valentín, R. (2024). Digital social work. International Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728241267804
  39. Lupton, D. (2022). From human-centric digital health to digital One Health: Crucial new directions for mutual flourishing. Digital Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221129103
  40. Lyngs, U., Willadsen, H., Møller-Jensen, M., & Lukoff, K. (2024). Digital self-control in Danish high schools: A pilot intervention study. Adjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.https://doi.org/10.1145/3677045.3685423
  41. Mallawaarachchi, S., Cliff, D., Neilsen-Hewett, C., White, S., Radesky, J., Horwood, S., Johnson, D., Kervin, L., & Howard, S. (2025). Effects of persuasive app design and self-regulation on young children’s digital disengagement.Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/8187768
  42. Martínez-Bravo, M., Chalezquer, C., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2022). Dimensions of digital literacy in the 21st century competency frameworks. Sustainability, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031867
  43. Mathiyazhagan, S. (2021). Field practice, emerging technologies, and human rights: The emergence of tech social workers. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 7, 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-021-00190-0
  44. Mayiwar, L., Asutay, E., Tinghög, G., Västfjäll, D., & Barrafrem, K. (2024). Determinants of digital well-being. AI & Society, 40, 3063–3073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02071-2
  45. McDaniel, B., & Coyne, S. (2016). Technoference: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 85–98.https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
  46. McDaniel, B., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being.Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027
  47. McDaniel, B., Galovan, A., Cravens, J., & Drouin, M. (2018). Technoference and implications for mothers' and fathers' couple and coparenting relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 303–313.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.019
  48. Merzlyakova, S., & Kayumova, E. (2024). Family adaptation as a predictor of family self-determination of digital generation students. The Education and Science Journal, 3, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2024-3-123-148
  49. Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2020). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 1-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7.
  50. Nair, R., Mengi, N., & Jose, S. (2024). Domestication of information and communication technologies into family systems: A conceptual framework evaluating family health. Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swae033
  51. Neeraj, M., Nirmala, B., Janardhana, N., & Sharma, M. (2024). Family system and problematic technology usage.Archives of Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.4103/amh.amh_116_24
  52. Nguyen, L., & Habók, A. (2023). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Journal of Computers in Education, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5
  53. Nurhaliza, N., & Savandha, S. (2025). The transformation of social values in the digital era: A study on changing family relations among the middle class. Journal of Social Science (JoSS), 4, 450.https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v4i3.450
  54. Oswald, T., Rumbold, A., Kedzior, S., & Moore, V. (2020). Psychological impacts of screen time and green time for children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review. PLoS ONE, 15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237725
  55. Özcan, M., & Keskin, B. (2020). Dijitalizasyon Bağlamında Sosyal Dönüşüm. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.775748.
  56. Pink, S., Ferguson, H., & Kelly, L. (2020). Child protection social work in COVID-19. Anthropology in Action, 27, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2020.270306
  57. Qi, J., Yan, Y., & Yin, H. (2023). Screen time among school-aged children of aged 6–14: A systematic review. Global Health Research and Policy, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00297-z
  58. Qian, Y., & Hu, Y. (2024). The digitalization of family life: A multilevel conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12983
  59. Rahimah, R. (2021). Children's Social Emotional Relationship to Digital Parenting. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i2.136.
  60. Rahman, M., Salamzadeh, A., Dana, L., & Braga, V. (2024). Work–family balance, digital leadership skills, and family social support as the predictors of subjective well-being of Y-generation managers. Strategic Change.https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2628
  61. Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., & Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4), e14878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14878
  62. Reis, J., & Melão, N. (2023). Digital transformation: A meta-review and guidelines for future research. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12834.
  63. Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Yang, J. (2022). The SES-based difference of adolescents' digital skills and usages: An explanation from family cultural capital. Comput. Educ., 177, 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104382.
  64. Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2021). Designing technology that promotes users' digital wellbeing. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, 28, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3481823
  65. Roffarello, A., & De Russis, L. (2022). Achieving digital wellbeing through digital self-control tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30, 1–66.https://doi.org/10.1145/3571810
  66. S., N., Nirmala, B., Janardhana, N., & Sharma, M. (2024). Connected or disconnected? Exploring technoference and its impact on interpersonal relationships among youth. International Review of Psychiatry, 37, 59–66.https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2024.2442410
  67. Santos, R., De Alcântara Ventura, S., De Almeida Nogueira, Y., Mendes, C., De Paula, J., Miranda, D., & Romano-Silva, M. (2024). The associations between screen time and mental health in adults: A systematic review. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-024-00398-7
  68. Santos, R., Mendes, C., Bressani, G., De Alcantara Ventura, S., De Almeida Nogueira, Y., De Miranda, D., & Romano-Silva, M. (2023). The associations between screen time and mental health in adolescents: A systematic review. BMC Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01166-7
  69. Shahid, A., & Tasgheer, A. (2021). Overview of impacts of technology and digitalization on family dynamics: An Islamic perspective. The Scholar Islamic Academic Research Journal, 7(2), 20–35.
  70. Shankardass, K., Robertson, C., Shaughnessy, K., Sykora, M., & Feick, R. (2019). A unified ecological framework for studying effects of digital places on well-being. Social Science & Medicine, 227, 119–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.022
  71. Sikandar, B. J. (2021). Digital parenting: Issues, challenges and nursing implications. Journal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing, 10(3), 100-104.
  72. Sklar, A. (2017). Sound, smart, and safe: A plea for teaching good digital hygiene. Learnland, 10, 39–43.https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v10i2.799
  73. Stiglic, N., & Viner, R. (2019). Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191
  74. Stockdale, L., Coyne, S., & Padilla-Walker, L. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes: A nationally representative study of 10- to 20-year-old adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.034
  75. Storer, H., Scott, C., Eggleston, M., Shulruff, T., & Rodriguez, M. (2023). Reimagining social work’s digital future: The critical role of interdisciplinary tech partnerships. Journal of Social Work Education, 59, S105–S120.https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2186994
  76. Sundqvist, A., Heimann, M., & Koch, F. (2020). Relationship between family technoference and behavior problems in children aged 4–5 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0512
  77. Syahril, R., Priatna, P., Hutomo, A., & Wulandari, S. (2024). The impact of technology on family communication.Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 754. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.754
  78. Syukur, Y., Putra, A., Ardi, Z., Zahri, T., & Putri, J. (2024). Global perspectives on digital parenting: Challenges and opportunities in improving family well-being. E3S Web of Conferences, 568, 04014.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202456804014
  79. Tayiz, V., Vangölü, M., Özok, H., & Tanhan, F. (2025). Concept of digital well-being. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar – Current Approaches in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1544897
  80. Thomas, P., Liu, H., & Umberson, D. (2017). Family relationships and well-being. Innovation in Aging, 1.https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx025
  81. Tınmaz, H., Lee, Y., Fanea-Ivanovici, M., & Baber, H. (2022). A systematic review on digital literacy. Smart Learning Environments, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00204-y
  82. Tooth, L., Moss, K., & Mishra, G. (2021). Screen time and child behaviour and health-related quality of life: Effect of family context. Preventive Medicine, 106795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106795
  83. Uddin, H., & Hasan, M. (2023). Family resilience and neighborhood factors affect the association between digital media use and mental health among children: Does sleep mediate the association? European Journal of Pediatrics, 182,2521–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-023-04898-1
  84. Vanden Abeele, M. (2020). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory.https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ymtaf
  85. Vlasov, M., Polbitsyn, S., Olumekor, M., Haddad, H., & Al-Ramahi, N. (2024). Socio-Cultural Factors and Components of the Digital Economy in Ethnic Minority Regions. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093825.
  86. Wang, H., Ge, C., Du, X., Feng, Y., & Wang, W. (2024). Does digital literacy reduce intergenerational income dependency? International Review of Financial Analysis, 103389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103389
  87. Welsh, E., Cloud, Z., Boyd, J., & McIntosh, J. (2025). Essential design principles for a family digital mental health intervention: A Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70045
  88. Xu, J., Yan, P., Liu, Z., Zhang, T., Liu, L., & Gu, C. (2025). Moderating effects of screen time on the relationship between family functioning and negative emotions in Chinese children with cancer. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 81,83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2025.01.019
  89. Yang, J., Shen, Q., Tong, X., & Mukhopadhaya, P. (2025). The impact of digital literacy in enhancing individuals’ health in China. BMC Public Health, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21454-8
  90. Yavuz, M., & Karaman, S. (2023). Dijital Dönüşüm ve Yükseköğretimde Dijital Dönüşümün Bileşenleri: Kavramsal Çerçeve Önerisi. Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1332639.
  91. Yıldız, E., Keşşafoğlu, D., Altundal, M., Akel, G., & Uzundağ, B. A. (2025). Navigating the digital age: Children’s self-regulatory skills and technoference in parent–child interactions. Family Relations.https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.13179
  92. Yuen, A., Park, J., Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2017). Digital equity in cultural context: exploring the influence of Confucian heritage culture on Hong Kong families. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 481 - 501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9515-4.
  93. Zangogianni, P., & Kavakli, E. (2025). From digital era to digital wellbeing era. SHS Web of Conferences, 210, 03004.https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521003004
  94. Zayia, D., Parris, L., McDaniel, B., Braswell, G., & Zimmerman, C. (2021). Social learning in the digital age:Associations between technoference, mother–child attachment, and child social skills. Journal of School Psychology, 87, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2021.06.002
  95. Zhang, J., Wang, D., Ji, M., Yu, K., Qi, M., & Wang, H. (2024). Digital literacy, relative poverty, and common prosperity for rural households: Evidence from Chinese Family Panel Survey (CFPS) 2018. International Review of Financial Analysis, 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103739
  96. Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Jiang, F., Ip, P., Ho, F., Zhang, Y., & Huang, H. (2018). Excessive screen time and psychosocial well-being: The mediating role of body mass index, sleep duration, and parent–child interaction. The Journal of Pediatrics, 202, 157–162.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.06.029