Journals / EKEV Akademi Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 0

In today's competitive conditions, it is important that employees perform more effort than necessary. However, employees who using of all the energy that physiologically and psychologically, this cause burnout after a while. Is it possible to overcome this negative situation by psychological capital

İŞKOLİZM VE TÜKENMİŞLİK İLİŞKİSİNDE PSİKOLOJİK SERMAYENİN ARACI ROLÜ

Pages
233–244
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of the study revealed that, worklolism had a negative effect and psychological capital had a mediating role on the relationship between worklolism and burnout.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today's competitive conditions, it is important that employees perform more effort than necessary.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this aim, a survey was conducted with two bank’s 201 employees who have high working hours and standard operating conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the study revealed that, worklolism had a negative effect and psychological capital had a mediating role on the relationship between worklolism and burnout.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In today's competitive conditions, it is important that employees perform more effort than necessary. However, employees who using of all the energy that physiologically and psychologically, this cause burnout after a while. Is it possible to overcome this negative situation by psychological capital which focusing on the positive aspects of the emloyees?The aim of this research is to examine the mediating role of psychological capital on the relationship between workolism and burnout. For this aim, a survey was conducted with two bank’s 201 employees who have high working hours and standard operating conditions. The results of the study revealed that, worklolism had a negative effect and psychological capital had a mediating role on the relationship between worklolism and burnout.

Özet

Günümüz rekabet koşullarında, çalışanların gerekenden fazla performans göstermesi önemlidir. Ancak çalışanların tüm enerjisini gerekenden fazla kullanması bir süre sonra tükenme durumuna neden olmaktadır. Tükenmişlik, kişiyi “fizyolojik ve psikolojik” olarak etkilemektedir. Bu olumsuz durumun aşılması, kişinin olumlu yönlerine odaklanan psikolojik sermaye ile mümkün müdür? Araştırmanın amacı, işkolizm ve tükenmişlik ilişkisinde psikolojik sermayenin aracı rolünün incelenmesidir. Bu nedenle yoğun mesai saatleri olan ve standart çalışma koşullarına sahip iki bankanın 201 çalışanıyla anket yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, işkolikliğin tükenmişliği negatif olarak etkilediğini ve psikolojik sermayenin de işkoliklik ile tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolüne sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

PELENK, S. E., ACARAY, A. (2019). In today's competitive conditions, it is important that employees perform more effort than necessary. However, employees who using of all the energy that physiologically and psychologically, this cause burnout after a while. Is it possible to overcome this negative situation by psychological capital. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 233–244. https://ajindex.com/articles/153834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bardakçı, B. ve Baloğlu, M., (2012). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan okul yöneticilerinin işkoliklik eğilimleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 37 (164). Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  2. Dougherty, S. (1989). Analysis of a selected of female workaholics. (Doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50 (06)/1642. Edelwich, J. ve Brodsky, A. (1980). Burnout: Stages of disillusionment in the helping proffessions. New York: Human Sciences Press.
  3. Erkuş, A. ve Afacan-Fındıklı, K. (2013). Psikolojik sermayenin iş tatmini, iş performansı ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkisine yönelik bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 42(2), 302-318.
  4. Field, A. P. (2000). Discovering statistics using spss for Windows. London: Sage Publications. Gorgievski, M. J., Bakker A. B. ve Schaufeli W. B. (2010). Work engagement and workaholism: comparing the self-employed and salaried employees. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 83–96.
  5. Kalaycı, Ş. (2008). Spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. (3. Basım). Ankara:
  6. Asil Yayın Dağıtım. Leiter, M. P. ve Maslach, C. (1999). Six areas of worklife: A model of the organizational context of burnout. Jhhsa Spring, 472-489.
  7. Leıter, M. P. (2003). Areas of worklife survey manual. Third edition. Centre For Organizational Research and Development, Wolfville, Ns, Canada. Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W. ve Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: beyond human and social capital. Business Horizons, 47(1), 45-50.
  8. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M. ve Avolıo, B.J. (2007). Psychological Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Machlowitz, M. (1980). Workaholics: Living with tehem, working with them. Addison Wesley: Reading, M.A. Maslach, C. ve Jackson, S.E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout, Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 2, 99-113.
  10. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B. ve Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job burnout. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 397-422.
  11. Naughton, T.J. (1987). A conceptual view of workaholism and ımplications for career counseling and research. The Career Development Quarterly, 35, 180-187.
  12. Oates, W. (1971). Confessions of a workaholic: the facts about work addiction. New York: World. Ocak, M. ve Güler, M. (2017). Psikolojik sermayenin t