SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marine and Life Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Case-based HFACS analysis of Ro-Ro ship accidents

Ro-Ro gemi kazalarının vaka bazlı HFACS analizi

Eşref Can Demirci(İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DENİZCİLİK MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, DENİZCİLİK PROGRAMLARI BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-0841-6839
Seçil Gülmez(İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, BARBAROS HAYRETTİN GEMİ İNŞAATI VE DENİZCİLİK FAKÜLTESİ, DENİZCİLİK İŞLETMELERİ YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-4342-4386
Pages
105–114
Publication Date
2021-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this classification, human error rates that cause accidents were determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the types of marine accidents caused by human error on Ro-Ro Cargo ships and to analyze the usefulness of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) method in classifying these accidents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, 30 different Ro-Ro ship accident were examined and the human factors causing the accident were determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this classification, human error rates that cause accidents were determined.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Denizyolu taşımacılığı · Ro-Ro gemileri · gemi kazaları

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the types of marine accidents caused by human error on Ro-Ro Cargo ships and to analyze the usefulness of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) method in classifying these accidents. In this context, 30 different Ro-Ro ship accident were examined and the human factors causing the accident were determined. The causes of these accidents were evaluated with a focus group study which was held with 6 experts and coded according to levels and criteria of HFACS. With this classification, human error rates that cause accidents were determined.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Ro-Ro yük gemilerinde insan hatalarının sebep olduğu deniz kaza türlerinin tespiti ve bu kazaların sınıflandırılmasında İnsan Faktörleri Analiz ve Sınıflandırma Sistemi (Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-HFACS) yönteminin kullanışlılığının analiz edilmesidir. Bu kapsamda 30 farklı Ro-Ro gemi kazası incelenmiş, kazaya sebebiyet veren insan faktörleri tespit edilmiştir. Kaza sebepleri, 6 uzman ile birlikte gerçekleştirilen odak grup çalışması ile değerlendirilerek HFACS düzey ve kriterlerine göre kodlanmıştır. Yapılan bu sınıflanma ile birlikte kazalara sebebiyet veren insan hatalarına ait hata oranları tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirci, E. C., Gülmez, S. (2021). Case-based HFACS analysis of Ro-Ro ship accidents. Marine and Life Sciences, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.51756/marlife.1027858

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Akyuz, E. & Celik, M. (2014). Utilisation of cognitive map in modelling human error in marine accident analysis and prevention. Safety Science, 70: 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.004
  2. Akyuz, E. (2015). A decision-making model proposal on human reliability analysis onboard ships, Ph.D. thesis, Istanbul Technical University-Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology.
  3. Arslan, Ö., Zorba, Y. & Svetak, J.,(2018). Fault tree analysis of tanker accidents during loading and unloading operations at the tanker terminals. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 6(1): 3-16. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2018.29981
  4. Baker, C. C. & McCafferty, D. B. (2005). Accident database review of human element concerns: What do the results mean for classification. In Proc. Int Conf.‘Human Factors in Ship Design and Operation, RINA Feb.
  5. Batalden, B. M. & Sydnes, A. K. (2014). Maritime safety and the ISM Code: A study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 13(1): 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8
  6. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J. P. & Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 59: 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.006
  7. Chen, S. T., Wall, A., Davies, P., Yang, Z. L., Wang, J. & Chou, Y. H. (2013). A human and organisational factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS maritime accidents (HFACS-MA), Safety Science, 60: 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.009
  8. Chen, J., Bian, W., Wan, Z., Yang, Z., Zheng, H. & Wang, P. (2019). Identifying factors influencing total-loss marine accidents in the world: Analysis and evaluation based on ship types and sea regions. Ocean Engineering, 191: 106495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106495
  9. Chen, S. T. (2020). An approach of identifying the common human and organisational factors (HOFs) among a group of marine accidents using GRA and HFACS-MA. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 12(10): 1252-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2019.1583297
  10. Dönmez, K. & Uslu, S. (2018). Evaluation of the widespread use of human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) in literature. Journal of Aviation, 2(2): 156-176. https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.463607
  11. Eliopoulou, E., Papanikolaou, A. & Voulgarellis, M. (2016). Statistical analysis of ship accidents and review of safety level. Safety Science, 85: 282-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.02.001
  12. GISIS, (2020). Global Intergrated Shipping Information System. Retrieved on January 06, 2020 from https://gisis.imo.org/Public/Default.aspx.
  13. Hasanspahić, N., Vujičić, S., Frančić, V. & Čampara, L. (2021). The role of the human factor in marine accidents. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 9(3): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9030261
  14. Hollnagel, E., (2002). Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability. IEEE, 7th, Human Factors Meeting Scottsdale, Arizona.
  15. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D. & Leveson, N. G. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Company, Aldershot, Hampshire, England.
  16. IMO, (2000). Revised harmonized reporting procedures - Reports required under SOLAS regulation I/21 and MARPOL 73/78. Articles 8 and 12, United Kingdom, MSCMEPC. 3/Circ.1(1): 1-47.
  17. IMO, (2020). International Mritime Organization. Retrieved on April 01, 2020 from https://gisis.imo.org/Public/MCI/Search.aspx GISIS: Marine Casualties and Incidents.
  18. JTSB, (2020). Japan Transport Safety Board, Retrieved on April 01, 2020 from http://www.mlit.go.jp/jtsb/Investigation _Reports.html Investigation Reports.
  19. Kaptan, M., Uğurlu, Ö. & Wang, J. (2021). The effect of nonconformities encountered in the use of technology on the occurrence of collision, contact and grounding accidents. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 215: 107886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107886
  20. Mazaheri, A., Montewka, J., Nisula, J. & Kujala, P. (2015). Usability of accident and incident reports for evidence-based risk modeling-A case study on ship grounding reports. Safety Science, 76: 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.019
  21. MSC-MEPC, (2000). Reports on Marine Casualties and Incidents, International Maritime Organization, 1-45. Navas de Maya, B. & Kurt, R. E. (2020). Marine accident learning with fuzzy cognitive maps (MALFCMs). MethodsX, 7: 100940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.100940
  22. Qiao, W., Liu, Y., Ma, X. & Liu, Y. (2020). Human factors analysis for maritime accidents based on a dynamic fuzzy bayesian network. Risk Analysis, 40(5): 957-980. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13444
  23. Saatçıoğlu, Ö. Y., Göksu, B., Yüksel, O. & Gülmez, Y. (2017). Ship engine room casualty analysis by using decision tree method. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 5(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2017.27146
  24. Sarıalioğlu, S., Uğurlu, Ö., Aydın, M., Vardar, B. & Wang, J., (2020). A hybrid model for human-factor analysis of engine-room fires on ships: HFACS-PV&FFTA. Ocean Engineering, 217: 107992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107992
  25. Taylor, G., Easter, K. & Hegney, R. (2004). Enhancing occupational safety and health, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Great Britain.
  26. TSB, (2020). Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Retrieved on April 01, 2020 from http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/qui-about/index.asp
  27. Uğurlu, Ö., Yıldırım, U. & Başar, E. (2015). Analysis of grounding accidents caused by human error. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(5): 748-760. https://doi.org/10.6119/JMST-015-0615-1
  28. Uğurlu, Ö. (2016). Analysis of fire and explosion accidents occurring in tankers transporting hazardous cargoes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 55: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.06.006
  29. Uğurlu, Ö., Yıldız, S., Loughney, S. & Wang, J. (2018). Modified human factor analysis and classification system for passenger vessel accidents (HFACS-PV). Ocean Engineering, 161: 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.086
  30. Wang, Y. F., Xie, M., Chin, K. S. & Fu, X. J. (2013). Accident analysis model based on bayesian network and evidential reasoning approach, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(1): 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.08.001
  31. Wei, X. Y., Wang, Y., Yan, X. P., Wu, B. & Tian, Y. F. (2015). A human factors analysis method for marine accident Evolution using HFACS-EI model. ASME 34th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 56550: V007T06A049. https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2015-41858
  32. Wiegmann, D. & Shappell, S. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system, Ashgate Press, Aldershot.
  33. Yıldırım, U., (2016). Deniz kazalarının insan faktörleri analiz ve sınıflandırma sistemi (HFACS) ile incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Gemi İnşaatı ve Gemi Makineleri Mühendisliği, Trabzon/Türkiye.
  34. Yıldız, S. (2016). Application of the sea traffic management (STM) concept for fishing vessels, Master's Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Department of Nautical Engineering and Maritime Transport, Barcelona/Spain.