Journals / Marine and Life Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Growth, daily age, and hatching phenology of Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in the shallow nursery grounds of Gökçeada Island (Northern Aegean Sea)

Gökçeada (Kuzey Ege Denizi) Sığ Sularında Barbun (Mullus barbatus)'nın Büyüme, Günlük Yaş ve Yumurtadan Çıkma Frekansları

Hakan Ayyıldız(Department of Marine Technology Engineering)0000-0002-6442-0421
Aytaç Altın(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Faculty of Çanakkale Applied Sciences, Department of Fishery Technology)0000-0002-0327-6665
Pages
21–27
Publication Date
2026-06-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the findings are consistent with previously reported growth rates and phenology patterns for M. barbatus in the Mediterranean and provide a solid basis for future monitoring and management of local stocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Understanding the early life history, growth dynamics, and hatching phenology of the red mullet ( Mullus barbatus ) within nursery habitats is essential for developing effective fisheries management strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, daily age structure, individual growth rates, and hatching patterns were determined using otolith daily age measurements of 60 out of 63 juvenile fish collected from Gökçeada Island (North Aegean Sea) between July and November 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the findings are consistent with previously reported growth rates and phenology patterns for M. barbatus in the Mediterranean and provide a solid basis for future monitoring and management of local stocks.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mullus barbatus · otolit mikroyapısı · günlük yaş

Abstract

Understanding the early life history, growth dynamics, and hatching phenology of the red mullet ( Mullus barbatus ) within nursery habitats is essential for developing effective fisheries management strategies. In this study, daily age structure, individual growth rates, and hatching patterns were determined using otolith daily age measurements of 60 out of 63 juvenile fish collected from Gökçeada Island (North Aegean Sea) between July and November 2013. Otolith microstructure readings indicated that individuals ranged from 71 to 198 days old, corresponding to total lengths of 4.7-9.2 cm. Growth patterns were best described by a linear model, yielding a mean daily growth rate of 0.37 mm·day -1 (R 2 = 0.91). Estimated hatching dates showed a clear spring concentration, with the majority of individuals (85%) hatching between March and May, and peak hatching occurring during March-April (67%). Overall, the findings are consistent with previously reported growth rates and phenology patterns for M. barbatus in the Mediterranean and provide a solid basis for future monitoring and management of local stocks.

Özet

Barbun, Mullus barbatus 'un erken yaşam tarihi, büyüme oranları ve yumurtadan çıkış dinamiklerinin beslenme habitatlarında anlaşılması, etkili balıkçılık yönetimi için gereklidir. Gökçeada (Kuzey Ege Denizi)'ndan Temmuz-Kasım 2013 tarihleri arasında toplanan 60 juvenil bireyin otolit günlük yaş okumalarından yararlanılarak, günlük yaş yapısı, bireysel büyüme oranları ve yumurtadan çıkış paterni belirlenmiştir. Otolit halka analizi, 71 ile 200 gün arasında değişen yaşları ve 4,7 ile 13,2 cm arasında vücut boylarını ortaya koymuştur. Büyüme, en iyi lineer model ile tanımlanmıştır (ortalama günlük büyüme oranı: 0,64 mm·gün⁻¹, R² = 0,87). Tahmin edilen yumurtadan çıkış tarihleri, ilkbaharda (Mart-Nisan) belirgin bir yoğunlaşma göstermiş ve bu durum senkronize üremenin ve beslenme habitatlarında hızlı juvenil büyümenin göstergesi olmuştur. Burada geliştirilen yaş-boy anahtarı, arazide basit boy ölçümlerinden yaş yapısının tahmin edilmesini mümkün kılmaktadır. Bu bulgular, Akdeniz'de M. barbatus için yayınlanmış üreme ve büyüme oranları ile uyumludur ve yerel stokların gelecekteki izlenmesi ve yönetimi için sağlam bir temel sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayyıldız, H., Altın, A. (2026). Growth, daily age, and hatching phenology of Red mullet (Mullus barbatus) in the shallow nursery grounds of Gökçeada Island (Northern Aegean Sea). Marine and Life Sciences, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.51756/marlife.1834416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Anderson, J. T. (1988). A review of size dependent survival during pre-recruit stages of fishes in relation to recruitment. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 8, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v8.a6
  2. Ayyildiz, H., & Altin, A. (2018). Age and growth rates at the early life stages of common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) based on analysis of otolith microstructure. Fishery Bulletin, 116(2), 183-189. https://doi.org/10.7755/FB.116.2.7
  3. Ayyıldız, H., & Altın, A. (2020). Hatching time and early growth of Diplodus sargus sargus inhabiting a coastal area of Gökçeada Island, Turkey. Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences, 36(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-019-00185-9
  4. Ayyildiz, H., Ozen, O., & Altin, A. (2014). Growth, mortality and hatch-date distributions of striped sea bream Lithognathus mormyrus inhabiting the Çanakkale Strait, Turkey. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 94(3), 607-613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315413001768
  5. Beamish, R. J., & Fournier, D. A. (1981). A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38(8), 982-983. https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-132
  6. Beck, M. W., Heck, K. L., Able, K. W., Childers, D. L., Eggleston, D. B., Gillanders, B. M., Halpern, B., Hays, C. G., Hoshino, K., Minello, T. J., Orth, R. J., Sheridan, P. F., & Weinstein, M. P. (2001). The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience, 51(8), 633-641. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2
  7. Campana, S. E. (2001). Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology, 59(2), 197-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb00127.x
  8. Campana, S. E., & Jones, C. M. (1992). Analysis of otolith microstructure data. In D. K. Stevenson & S. E. Campana (Eds.), Otolith microstructure examination and analysis (pp. 73-100). Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 117.
  9. Campana, S. E., & Neilson, J. D. (1985). Microstructure of fish otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42(5), 1014-1032. https://doi.org/10.1139/f85-127
  10. Campana, S. E., & Thorrold, S. R. (2001). Otoliths, increments, and elements: Keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1139/f00-177
  11. Chang, W. Y. B. (1982). A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39(8), 1208-1210. https://doi.org/10.1139/f82-158
  12. Cushing, D. H. (1982). Climate and fisheries. Academic Press.
  13. Cushing, D. H. (1990). Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: An update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. Advances in Marine Biology, 26, 249-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60202-3
  14. Hjort, J. (1914). Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe viewed in the light of biological research. Rapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 20, 1-228.
  15. Houde, E. D. (1987). Fish early life dynamics and recruitment variability. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 2, 17-29.
  16. Houde, E. D. (1989). Comparative growth, mortality, and energetics of marine fish larvae: Temperature and implied latitudinal effects. Fishery Bulletin, 87(3), 471-495.
  17. Houde, E. D. (2008). Emerging from Hjort's shadow. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 41, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v41.m634
  18. Jennings, S., & Kaiser, M. J. (1998). The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 34, 201-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60212-6
  19. Kimura, D. K. (1977). Statistical assessment of the age-length key. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 34(3), 317-324. https://doi.org/10.1139/f77-048
  20. Le Cren, E. D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 20(2), 201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540
  21. Pannella, G. (1971). Fish otoliths: Daily growth layers and periodical patterns. Science, 173(3002), 1124-1127. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3002.1124
  22. Secor, D. H., Dean, J. M., & Laban, E. H. (1991). Manual for otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. Electric Power Research Institute and the Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research, Technical Publication 1991-01.
  23. Sogard, S. M. (1997). Size-selective mortality in the juvenile stage of teleost fishes: A review. Bulletin of Marine Science, 60(3), 1129-1157.
  24. Wootton, R. J. (1990). Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0829-1
  25. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.