SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Qualitative examination of perceptions of electric vehicles: A study of academics

Elektrikli araçlara yönelik düşüncelerin nitel yöntemler ile incelenmesi: Akademisyenler üzerine bir araştırma

Şükran Karaca(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0268-1810
Caner Öniz(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7061-1518
Pages
342–379
Publication Date
2025-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Various recommendations have been made to stakeholders based on the results of the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to examine academics' perceptions of electric vehicles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the study, interviews were conducted with 12 academics who own electric vehicles at Sivas Cumhuriyet University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Various recommendations have been made to stakeholders based on the results of the study.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka Güveni · Çevre · Nitel veri analizi

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to examine academics' perceptions of electric vehicles. In this regard, the aim is to learn about electric vehicle users' experiences, perceptions, and opinions regarding environmental impact, user satisfaction, brand trust, vehicle prices, vehicle safety, and government financial incentives. Within the scope of the study, interviews were conducted with 12 academics who own electric vehicles at Sivas Cumhuriyet University. In line with the study's objective, the phenomenological approach, one of the qualitative analysis methods, was adopted. The interviews were analyzed using the MaxQDA qualitative data analysis program to visualize the data. According to the findings of the study, participants believe that electric vehicles have a positive impact on the environment. Electric vehicle users are generally satisfied with their vehicles, but they also stated that there are features that need to be improved. The majority of participants trust the electric vehicle brands they use. Although the majority of the group considers electric vehicle prices to be reasonable, there are also users who find the prices high. Regarding the safety of electric vehicles, users consider electric vehicles to be safe, but they have expressed concerns about future risks related to battery and waste safety. Additionally, users have stated that government incentives for electric vehicles have positively influenced their purchasing decisions, but they have also indicated that the incentives are insufficient. Various recommendations have been made to stakeholders based on the results of the study.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, akademisyenlerin elektrikli araçlara yönelik düşüncelerinin incelenmesidir. Bu doğrultuda elektrikli araç kullanıcılarının çevresel etki, kullanım memnuniyeti, marka güveni, araç fiyatları, araç güvenliği ve devletin mali teşvikleri konusundaki deneyim, düşünce ve algılarını öğrenmek amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesinde elektrikli araç sahibi olan 12 akademisyen ile mülakatlar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma amacı doğrultusunda nitel analiz yöntemlerinden biri olan fenomenolojik yaklaşım benimsenmiştir. Yapılan mülakatlar Maxqda nitel veri analiz programı kullanılarak veri görselleştirme işlemi yapılmıştır. Çalışma bulgularına göre; katılımcılar elektrikli araçların çevreye olumlu etkilerinin olduğunu düşünmektedir. Elektrikli araç kullanıcıları genel olarak araçlarından memnun olmakla birlikte geliştirilmesi gereken özelliklerinin de olduğu ifade etmişlerdir. Katılımcıların büyük bir kısmı kullandıkları elektrikli araç markalarına güvenmektedirler. Elektrikli araç fiyatlarını makul kabul eden grup çoğunlukta olmasına rağmen fiyatı yüksek bulan kullanıcılarında olduğu görülmüştür. Bir diğer konu olan elektrikli araçların güvenliği konusunda kullanıcılar elektrikli araçları güvenli bulurken, batarya ve atık güvenliği konusunda gelecekte oluşabilecek risklere karşı endişelerin olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Ayrıca kullanıcılar, elektrikli araçlara yönelik devlet teşviklerinin satın alma kararlarını olumlu etkilediğini belirtirken teşviklerin yeterli olmadığını da ifade etmişlerdir. Çalışma sonuçları doğrultusunda paydaşlara çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaca, Ş., Öniz, C. (2025). Qualitative examination of perceptions of electric vehicles: A study of academics. Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 342–379. https://doi.org/10.51177/kayusosder.1686339

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (112)

  1. Abu-Alkeir, N. I. (2020). Factors influencing consumers buying intentions towards electric cars: the Arab customers’ perspective. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 12(2), 127–127. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v12n2p127
  2. Afroz, R., Rahman, A., Masud, M. M., Akhtar, R., & Duasa, J. B. (2015). How individual values and attitude influence consumers’ purchase intention of electric vehicles—Some insights from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 6(2), 193-211.
  3. Ahluwalia, I. B., & Singh, A. (2023). Factors affecting electric vehicle purchase intentions: An approach of the developing markets. Empirical Economics Letters, 22(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8349814
  4. Ajanovic, A., & Haas, R. (2016). Dissemination of electric vehicles in urban areas: Major factors for success. Energy, 115, 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.040
  5. Ajao, Q., Prio, M. H., & Sadeeq, L. (2025). Analysis of factors influencing electric vehicle adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa using a modified UTAUT framework. Discover Electronics, 2(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44291-025-00043-4
  6. Akbaba, Ö., & Gökkaya, S. (2023). Howard-Sheth modeli çerçevesinde tüketicilerin yeni nesil kahve işletmelerini tercihleri üzerine bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15 (3), 2429-2448. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2023.1724
  7. Akroush, M. N., Zuriekat, M. I., Jabali, H. I. Al, & Asfour, N. A. (2019). Determinants of purchasing intentions of energy-efficient products: The roles of energy awareness and perceived benefits. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 13(1), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2018-0009
  8. Aksoy, A., Yalçın, S., Küçükoğlu, İ., & Öztürk, N. (2018). Elektrikli kamyonlar için açık uçlu rotalama optimizasyonu. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 23(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17482/uumfd.454071
  9. Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: Benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Applied Sciences, 13(10), 6016. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016
  10. Alkan, T., Atiz, Ö., & Durduran, S. (2022). Konya’da elektrikli araç şarj istasyonlarının CBS tabanlı AHP yöntemi ile uygun yer seçimi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(1), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1189242
  11. Alzahrani, K., Hall-Phillips, A., & Zeng, A. Z. (2019). Applying the theory of reasoned action to understanding consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles in Saudi Arabia. Transportation, 46, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9801-3
  12. Ambler, T. (2000). Marketing metrics. Business Strategy Review, 11(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00138
  13. Arora, N. K., Nair, M. K. C., Gulati, S., Deshmukh, V., Mohapatra, A., Mishra, D.,. & Vajaratkar, V. (2018). Neurodevelopmental disorders in children aged 2–9 years: Population-based burden estimates across five regions in India. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002615
  14. Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Abdullah, R., Mahmoud, M., Alkinani, M. H., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 124474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474
  15. Aslan, H. (2021). İŞGEM’in KOSGEB girişimcilerine sağlamış olduğu hizmetlerin hizmetlerden yararlanan işletmeler açısından MAXQDA ile değerlendirilmesi: Osmaniye İŞGEM örneği. Türk Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 115–129. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1914222
  16. Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2013). Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want?. Energy Policy, 61, 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.122
  17. Barbosa, V. (2016). Nissan revela o 1º carro do mundo movido a óxido sólido. Revista Exame. https://exame.com/tecnologia/nissan-revela-o-1o-carro-do-mundo-movido-a-oxido-solido/
  18. Bozkurt, M. E. (2024). The effect of environmental awareness, knowledge level, price perception, battery charging power on electric vehicle purchasing intention: A quantitative research. Ekonomi, İşletme ve Bilişim Dergisi, 1(1), 21-43.
  19. Cahyadi, F. C., & Tunjungsari, H. K. (2023). The influence of brand interactivity, involvement, social media CBE on loyalty: Trust as a mediation variable. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, 1(3), 1749-1757. https://doi.org/1010.24912/ijaeb.v1i3.1749-1757
  20. Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255
  21. Chen, C.-H., Huang, Y.-H., Wu, J.-H., & Lin, H. (2023). Assessing the cross-sectoral economic–energy–environmental impacts of electric-vehicle promotion in Taiwan. Sustainability, 15(19), 14135. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914135
  22. Cleland J.A. (2017). The qualitative orientation in medical education research. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 29(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2017.53
  23. Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., & Wee, S. (2015). Factors affecting EV adoption: A literature review and EV forecast for Hawaii. Electric Vehicle Transportation Center, (April 2015), 1-36. https://evtc.fsec.ucf.edu/publications/documents/HNEI-04-15.pdf.
  24. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir, Çev. Ed.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
  25. Çetin, M., Karakaya, B., & Gençoğlu, M. (2021). Elektrikli araçlar için lityum iyon bataryaların modellenmesi. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 33(2), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.953296
  26. Çıldır, Ç. (2020). Marka güveni. Marka külliyatı. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  27. Dawar, N. (1996). Extensions of broad brands: The role of retrieval in evaluations of fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0502_05
  28. Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100203
  29. Duan, J., Tang, X., Dai, H., Yang, Y., Wu, W., Wei, X., & Huang, Y. (2020). Building safe lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: A review. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 3, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-019-00060-4
  30. Efendioğlu, İ. (2024). Elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini etkileyen faktörler. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1124491
  31. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
  32. Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Jayaraman, K. (2010). The examination on the drivers for green purchasing adoption among EMS 14001 certified companies in Malaysia. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(2), 206–225. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381011014378
  33. Erdem, M. (2020). Elektrikli araçla periyodik teknisyen rotalama ve istasyon yeri seçim problemi. European Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.818352
  34. Erdoğan, E. C., Tengilimoğlu, D., Bilgin, P., & Reyhanoğlu, İ. (2024). Elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi: Ankara ili örneği. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(3), 2043–2061. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2024.1901
  35. Feng, R., Guo, W., Zhang, C., Nie, Y., & Li, J. (2025). Comparative study on environmental ımpact of electric vehicle batteries from a regional and energy perspective. Batteries, 11(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11010023
  36. Foley, G., & Timonen, V. (2015). Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Services Research, 50(4), 1195–1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
  37. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2): 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311
  38. Gallagher, K., & Muehlegger, E., (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1), 1–15. doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.004
  39. Gatersleben, B. (2011). The car as a material possession: Exploring the link between materialism and car ownership and use. In K. Lucas, E. Blumenberg, & R. Weinberger (Eds.), Auto motives: Understanding car use behaviours, 37–148. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857242341-007
  40. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Kumar, N. (1998). Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(98)00002-0
  41. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
  42. Gulzari, A., Wang, Y., & Prybutok, V. (2022). A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102877
  43. Gülcan, C. (2024). Maxqda programının nitel araştırma analizlerinde kullanımı: Temsili bir çalışma. Topkapi Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.15659/tjss.2025.003
  44. Güler, A., & Polatgil, M. (2024). Investigation of the effect of expert's opinions on multi-criteria decision making techniques in electric vehicle selection. European Transport, 99(3). https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2024.99.3
  45. Günaslan, S., Nalbur, B., & Cindoruk, S. (2023). Otomotiv endüstrisinde döngüsel ekonomi ve elektrikli araçlar için yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesinin incelenmesi. International Journal of Advanced Natural Sciences and Engineering Researches, 7(4), 313-318. https://doi.org/10.59287/ijanser.722
  46. Hackbarth A., & Madlener R. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for alternative fuel vehicle characteristics: A stated choice study for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.005
  47. Han, S., Zhang, B., Sun, X., Han, S., & Höök, M. (2017). China’s energy transition in the power and transport sectors from a substitution perspective. Energies, 10(5), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10050600
  48. Hao, Y., Dong, X.Y., Deng, Y.X., Li, L.X., & Ma, Y. (2016). What influences personal purchases of new energy vehicles in China? An empirical study based on A survey of Chinese citizens. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 8(6), 065904, https://doi.org10.1063/1.4966908
  49. Hidrue, M.K., Parsons, G.R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M.P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 686–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.02.002
  50. Higueras-Castillo, E., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & García-Maroto, I. (2019). Evaluating consumer attitudes toward electromobility and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.07.001
  51. Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing: An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
  52. IEA, (2017). Global ev outlook. Two million and counting. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2017
  53. IEA, (2023). Global ev outlook. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023
  54. IEA, (2024). World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, https://www.gensed.org/assets/attachments/dosyalar/WorldEnergyOutlook2024.pdf
  55. IEA, (2025). World energy outlook. International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025/trends-in-electric-car-markets-2
  56. James, M.X., Hu, Z., & Leonce, T.E. (2019). Predictors of organic tea purchase intentions by Chinese consumers: Attitudes, subjective norms and demographic factors. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 9, 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
  57. Janquera, B., Moreno, B., & Álvarez, R. (2016). Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
  58. Jensen, A.F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S.L. (2011) On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
  59. Karunanayake, R. T., & Wanninayake, W. M. C. B. (2015). Impact of key purchasing determinants on purchase intention of hybrid vehicle brands in Sri Lanka, an empirical study. Journal of Marketing Management, 3(1), 40–52.
  60. Khan, I., Hollebeek, L., Fatma, M., Islam, J., & Rahman, Z. (2019). Brand engagement and experience in online services. Journal of Services Marketing, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2019-0106
  61. Kılıç, E. (2019). Da-da yükselten dönüştürücü ile elektrikli̇ araç batarya şarj cihazı tasarımı. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(4), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.17780/ksujes.652998
  62. Kırmızıgül, İ. E. ve Baykal, B. (2023). Elektrikli araç tercihinde tüketici motivasyonu, Sosyal Bilimler Metinleri, (2), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.56337/sbm.1352994
  63. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, 69, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.016
  64. Kim, S., Choi, J., Yi, Y., & Kim, H. (2022). Analysis of ınfluencing factors in purchasing electric vehicles using a structural equation model: Focused on Suwon city. Sustainability, 14(8), 4744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084744
  65. Klabi, F., & Binzafrah, F. (2023). Exploring the relationships between Islam, some personal values, environmental concern, and electric vehicle purchase intention: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(2), 366–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2020-0170
  66. Lane, B., & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude-action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.026
  67. Lau, G. T., & Lee, S. H. (1999). Consumers' trust in a brand and the link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market Focused Management, 4, 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009886520142
  68. Lee, H. S., Won, J. P., Lim, T. K., Jeon, H. B., Cho, K. C., Park, Y. C., & Kim, Y. C. (2017). Experimental study on performance characteristics of the triple fluids heat exchanger with two kinds of coolants in electric-driven air conditioning system for fuel cell electric vehicles. Energy Procedia, 113, 209-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2016.9.5.21
  69. Li, W., Long, R., & Chen, H. (2016). Consumers’ evaluation of national new energy vehicle policy in China: An analysis based on a four paradigm model. Energy Policy, 99, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.050
  70. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  71. Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
  72. Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001
  73. Liu, Y., Zhao, X., Lu, D., & Li, X. (2023). Impact of policy incentives on the adoption of electric vehicle in China. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, 176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103801
  74. Malik, M.A.I., Kalam, M.A., Ikram, A., Zeeshan, S., & Zahidi, S. Q. R. (2025). Energy transition towards electric vehicle technology: Recent advancements, Energy Reports, 13, 2958–2996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.02.029
  75. Malviya, S., Saluja, M. S., & Singh Thakur, A. (2013). A study on the factors influencing consumer's purchase decision towards smartphones in Indore. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2374621
  76. Maxqda.com (2025). Açık uçlu anket sorularının MAXQDA proje dosyasına aktarılması. https://www.maxqda.com/maxdays/2024/handouts/A%C3%A7%C4%B1k_U%C3%A7lu_Anket_Sorular%C4%B1n%C4%B1n_Analizi_Varol.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 24.03.2025.
  77. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Nitel Veri Analizi: Genişletilmiş Bir Kaynak Kitap. (1. Baskı). S. Akbaba Altun & A. Ersoy (Çev. Eds). Pegem Akademi.
  78. Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Ferguson, M. & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Identifying and characterizing potential electric vehicle adopters in Canada: A two-stage modelling approach, Transport Pol., 52, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006
  79. Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 1: Introduction. European Journal of General Practice, 23(1), 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375093
  80. Nascimento, V. N. A. (2021). Análise da tendência de adoção dos veículos elétrico em Portugal: o papel dos atributos instrumentais e simbólicos (Unpublished master's thesis). https://research.ulusofona.pt/pt/studentTheses/an%C3%A1lise-da-tend%C3%AAncia-de-ado%C3%A7%C3%A3o-dos-ve%C3%ADculos-el%C3%A9trico-em-portugal--5
  81. Phuthong, T., Borisuth, T., Yang, Z., & Jarumaneeroj, P. (2024). Identifying factors influencing electric vehicle adoption in an emerging market: The case of Thailand. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 27, 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101229
  82. Ponsree, K., Gebsombut, N., Paiyasen, V., Archariyapibal, T., Srichiangwang, S., Nee, S., & Naruetharadhol, P. (2020). Environmental awareness and adoption intention of electric cars in young adult. In Modern Management Based on Big Data I, 165-174. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200649
  83. Rehman,S. U., Bresciani, S., Yahiaoui, D., & Kliestik, T. (2024). Customer satisfaction leading the intention to adopt battery electric vehicles with the moderating role of government support and status symbol, Journal of Cleaner Production, 456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142371
  84. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. https://teddykw2.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/everett-m-rogers-diffusion-of-innovations.pdf
  85. Sahloul, M., Deniz, A. & Hocaoğlu, F. (2022). İzolesiz bir off-grid pv destekli elektrikli araç şarj istasyonu tasarımı ve performansının değerlendirilmesi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1128466.
  86. Sang, Y. N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.045
  87. Sasongko, T. W., Ciptomulyono, U., Wirjodirdjo, B., & Prastawa, A. (2024). Identification of electric vehicle adoption and production factors based on an ecosystem perspective in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2332497. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2332497
  88. Saxton, T. (2011). Understanding Electric Vehicle Charging. Retrieved from, http://www.pluginamerica.org/drivers-seat/understanding-electric-vehiclecharging.
  89. Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., Noel, L. & Rubens, G. Z. (2019). Are electric vehicles masculinized? Gender, identity and environmental values in Nordic transport practices and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) preferences, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 72, 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.013
  90. Štilić, A., Puška, A., DJurić, A., & Božanić, D. (2022). Electric vehicles selection based on Brčko District Taxi service demands, a multi-criteria approach. Urban Science, 6(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6040073
  91. Taşdemirci, Ç., & Özkan, A. (2021). Ultra kapasitör kullan elektrikli araç ve şarj istasyonu tasarımı ve efektif durumunun araştırılması. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(2), 712-722. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.840542
  92. Tekin, A. (2006). Vergi teşvikleri ve ekonomik etkileri. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (16). 301-316. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/55390
  93. Tenny S, Brannan JM., & Brannan GD. (2022). Qualitative Study. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470395/
  94. Tepe, S. (2021). The ınterval-valued spherical fuzzy based methodology and its application to electric car selection. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(5), 1970–1983. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.885954
  95. Tu, J.-C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability, 11(14), 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
  96. TUİK, (2022). Motorlu kara taşıtları Aralık 2022. Erişim Linki: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Aralik-2022-49436, Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2025
  97. TUİK, (2024). Motorlu kara taşıtları Aralık 2024. Erişim Linki: hhttps://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Aralik-2024-53463, Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2025
  98. TUİK, (2025). Motorlu kara taşıtları Mayıs 2022. Erişim Linki: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Mayis-2025-54041, Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2025
  99. Utami, M. W. D., Yuniaristanto, Y., & Sutopo, W. (2020). Adoption intention model of electric vehicle in Indonesia. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 19(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v19.n1.p70-81.2020
  100. Valente, T. W., & Pumpuang, P. (2007). Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Education & Behavior, 34(6), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297855
  101. Vallejo-Morales, D., Higueras-Castillo, E., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2021). Exploring the key buying factors for electric scooters. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 13(2), 173-193. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2021.10041353
  102. Van Manen, M. (2007). Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice. 1(1), 11-30. https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19803
  103. Vidyanandan, K. V. (2018). Overview of electric and hybrid vehicles. Energy Scan, 3, 7-14.
  104. Wolff, S. & Madlener, R. (2019). Driven by change: Commercial drivers' acceptance and efficiency perceptions of light-duty electric vehicle usage in Germany, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105 (2019), 262-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.017
  105. Wu, Y. A., Ng, A. W., Yu, Z., Huang, J., Meng, K., & Dong, Z. Y. (2021). A review of evolutionary policy incentives for sustainable development of electric vehicles in China: Strategic implications. Energy Policy, 148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111983
  106. Xia, Z., Wu, D., & Zhang, L. (2022). Economic, functional, and social factors influencing electric vehicles’ adoption: An empirical study based on the diffusion of innovation theory. Sustainability, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106283.
  107. Zhang, X., Xie, J., Rao, R., & Liang, Y. (2014). Policy incentives for the adoption of electric vehicles across countries. Sustainability, 6(11), 8056–8078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6118056
  108. Zheng, S., Liu, H., Guan, W., Yang, Y., Li, J., Fahad, S., & Li, B. (2022). Identifying intention-based factors influencing consumers’ willingness to pay for electric vehicles: A sustainable consumption paradigm. Sustainability, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416831
  109. Ziraatbank.com.tr. (2025). Bireysel krediler taşıt Togg taşıt kredisi. Erişim Linki: https://www.ziraatbank.com.tr/tr/bireysel/krediler/tasit/togg-tasit-kredisi Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2025.
  110. Arora, N. K., Nair, M. K. C., Gulati, S., Deshmukh, V., Mohapatra, A., Mishra, D.,. & Vajaratkar, V. (2018). Neurodevelopmental disorders in children aged 2–9 years: Population-based burden estimates across five regions in India. PLoS Medicine, 15(7), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002615
  111. Malik, M.A.I., Kalam, M.A., Ikram, A., Zeeshan, S., & Zahidi, S. Q. R. (2025). Energy transition towards electric vehicle technology: Recent advancements, Energy Reports, 13, 2958–2996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.02.029
  112. TUİK, (2024). Motorlu kara taşıtları Aralık 2024. Erişim Linki: hhttps://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Aralik-2024-53463, Erişim Tarihi: 10.07.2025