SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice / 2024 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Investigation of High School Students' Coping Strategies with Cyberbullying

Furkan Aydın(Cumhurbaşkanlığı İnsan Kaynakları Ofisi)0000-0003-2471-9725
Murat Topal(Sakarya Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5270-426X
Hüseyin Yaşar(Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi)0000-0001-8241-3375
Pages
130–141
Publication Date
2024-12-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the knowledge levels of students in coping strategies for cyberbullying showed a significant difference between girls and boys, particularly in the total score and the sub-dimensions of enhancing cognitive security and privacy, help-seeking, avoidance, and ignoring.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the knowledge levels of high school students regarding coping strategies for cyberbullying.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the study consists of 896 high school students from three different high schools in the Kahramanmaraş province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the knowledge levels of students in coping strategies for cyberbullying showed a significant difference between girls and boys, particularly in the total score and the sub-dimensions of enhancing cognitive security and privacy, help-seeking, avoidance, and ignoring.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cyberbullying · coping strategies · prevention

Abstract

This study aims to examine the knowledge levels of high school students regarding coping strategies for cyberbullying. The sample of the study consists of 896 high school students from three different high schools in the Kahramanmaraş province. The survey model is used in the research design. The Coping Strategies for Cyberbullying Scale, developed by Koç et al. (2016), was employed as the data collection tool. The Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were utilized for the analysis of the obtained data. It was found that the knowledge levels of students in coping strategies for cyberbullying showed a significant difference between girls and boys, particularly in the total score and the sub-dimensions of enhancing cognitive security and privacy, help-seeking, avoidance, and ignoring. In the sub-dimension of help-seeking, those without computers showed a significant difference, while in the dimensions of avoidance and ignoring, students with computers showed a significant difference compared to those without. Regarding coping strategies for cyberbullying, it was observed that students who were aware of the legal process they would face when engaging in cyberbullying significantly differed from those who were unaware, particularly in the sub-dimensions of cognitive security, increasing privacy, and seeking information. Lastly, the study revealed a significant difference in the sub-dimension of help-seeking based on the grade level. In the sub-dimension of help-seeking, the scores of 11th and 10th-grade students were found to be significantly higher than those of 9th-grade students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, F., Topal, M., Yaşar, H. (2024). Investigation of High School Students' Coping Strategies with Cyberbullying. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.47157/jietp.1494605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Alhajji, M., Bass, S., & Dai, T. (2019). Cyberbullying, mental health, and violence in adolescents and associations with sex and race: data from the 2015 youth risk behavior survey. Global Pediatric Health. 6, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19868887
  2. Arıcak, O. T. (2011). Siber Zorbalık: Gençlerimizi Bekleyen Yeni Tehlike. Kariyer Penceresi, 2(6), 10-12.
  3. Arıcak, T., Siyahhan, S., Uzunhasanoglu, A., Sarıbeyoglu, S., Çıplak, S., & Yılmaz, N. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
  4. Aydın, F. (2016). Sanal zorbalık eğitiminin 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin sanal zorbalık farkındalığına etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
  5. Aydın, F., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sanal zorbalıkla baş etme stratejileri üzerine bir inceleme. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(2), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.554675
  6. Aydın, F., Horzum, M. B. & Ayas, T. (2017, Nisan). Lise öğrencilerinin sanal zorbalık farkındalığı ve sanal zorbalıkla baş etme stratejileri bilgi düzeylerinin incelenmesi. VII. Uluslararası Eğitimde Araştırmalar Kongresi (ULEAD, 2017), Çanakkale, Türkiye.
  7. Belsey, B. (2005). Cyberbullying: An emerging threat to the “always on” generation. Recuperado el, 5(5).
  8. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2008). The relationship between cyberbullying and school bullying. The Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(2), 16-33. https://doi.org/10.21913/JSW.v1i2.172
  9. Bhnasawi, A., & Hasan, R. (2015). School bullying and its relationship to academic motivation among preparatory stage students. Journal of Education in Port Said, 17, 1-40.
  10. Biswas, T., Scott, J. G., Munir, K., Thomas, H. J., Huda, M. M., Hasan, M. M.,. & Mamun, A. A. (2020). Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. EClinicalMedicine, 20, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276
  11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E. Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (14. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  12. Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34(6), 613-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034313479698
  13. Can, A. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  14. Chen, J. (2018). Cyberbullying among secondary school students in Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Journal of Social Work, 52(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219246218000050
  15. Chen, Q., & Zhu, Y. (2022). Cyberbullying victimisation among adolescents in China: Coping strategies and the role of self‐compassion. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), e677-e686. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13438
  16. Çetin, B., Peker, A., Eroğlu, Y. & Çitemel, N. (2011). Siber zorbalığın ve mağduriyetin bir yordayıcısı olarak ilişkilerle ilgili bilişsel çarpıtmalar: Ergenler için bir ön çalışma. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3, 1064-1080.
  17. Dilmaç, B. (2009). Sanal zorbalığı yordayan psikolojik ihtiyaçlar: Lisans öğrencileri için bir ön çalışma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 9(3), 1291-1325.
  18. Efe, Y. S., Erdem, E., & Vural, B. (2021). Lise öğrencilerinde siber zorbalık ve internet bağımlılığı. Bağımlılık Dergisi, 22(4), 465-473. https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.936930
  19. Ekşi, F. (2012). Narsistik kişilik özelliklerinin internet bağımlılığı ve siber zorbalığı yordama düzeylerinin yol analizi ile incelenmesi. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12, 1694-1706.
  20. Evangelio, C., Rodriguez-Gonzalez, P., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Gonzalez-Villora, S. (2022). Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 176, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356
  21. Gülen, H. & Peker, A. (2018). Ergenlerin problem çözme becerileri ve siber zorbalıkla başa çıkma davranışları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(26), 385-404.
  22. Juvonen, J. & Gross, E.F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x
  23. Koç, M., Horzum, M. B., Ayas, T., Aydın, F., Özbay, A., Uğur, E., & Çolak, S. (2016). Sanal zorbalıkla baş etme ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 6(3), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.281376
  24. Kowalski, R.M. & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Offical publication of the Society for Adolescent. Medicine, 41(6), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
  25. Makanin, H., Younis, N., & Hayari, G. (2017). Cyber bullying in a sample of behavioral and emotional disturbed students in Zarqa. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, Sultan Qaboos University, 12(1), 179-197.
  26. McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect size statistic. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 361-365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.361
  27. Patchin, J. W. (2023). Cyberbullying continues to rise among youth in the United States. Cyberbullying Research Center. https://cyberbullying.org/cyberbullying-continues-to-rise-among-youth-in-the-united-states-2023
  28. Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288
  29. Shariff, S. (2005). Cyber-dilemmas in the new millennium: School obligations to provide student safety in a virtual school environment. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill, 40(3), 457-477. https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/586
  30. Slonje, R. & Smith, P.K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00611.x
  31. Taştekin, E. (2016). Ergenlerin arkadaşlık ilişkileri ve benlik saygısı ile siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyet arasındaki ilişkiler (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  32. Taylan, H. H., Aydın, F., & Topal, M. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin sanal zorba olma durumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Sakarya ili örneği. Online Journal of Technology Addiction & Cyberbullying,4(1), 41-59.
  33. Vandebosch, H. & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New media & society, 11(8), 1349-1371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341263
  34. Vieira, C. C., Matos, A., Amado, J., Freire, I., & Veiga Simão, A. (2016). Boys’ and girls’ cyberbullying behaviours in Portugal: exploring sex differences in adolescence using gender lenses. Ex aequo, (34), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2016.34.10
  35. Vollink, T., Bolman, C. W., Dehue, F. & Jacobs, N. C. L. (2013). Coping with cyberbullying: Differences between victims, bully-victims, and children not involved in bullying. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2142
  36. Biswas, T., Scott, J. G., Munir, K., Thomas, H. J., Huda, M. M., Hasan, M. M.,. & Mamun, A. A. (2020). Global variation in the prevalence of bullying victimisation amongst adolescents: Role of peer and parental supports. EClinicalMedicine, 20, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100276