SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Servant Leadership on Organizational Empowerment: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling

Hizmetkar Liderliğin Örgütsel Güçlenmeye Etkisi: Çoklu Grup Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

Tevfik Aydın(İstanbul İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü)0009-0005-5920-7334
Hüseyin Serin(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ-CERRAHPAŞA)0000-0003-3002-8787
Pages
16–35
Publication Date
2026-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that teachers’ perceptions of servant leadership significantly and positively predicted their levels of organizational empowerment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explored the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of servant leadership and their levels of organizational empowerment, while examining whether gender serves as a moderating variable in this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample consisted of 632 high school teachers working in Istanbul districts with varying socio-economic characteristics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that teachers’ perceptions of servant leadership significantly and positively predicted their levels of organizational empowerment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hizmetkâr liderlik · öğretmen güçlenmesi · yapısal eşitlik modellemesi

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between teachers’ perceptions of servant leadership and their levels of organizational empowerment, while examining whether gender serves as a moderating variable in this relationship. The sample consisted of 632 high school teachers working in Istanbul districts with varying socio-economic characteristics. In this study, data were collected using three measurement tools: "Personal Information Form", "Servant Leadership Scale", and "Teacher Behavioral Empowerment Scale". Structural equation modeling was employed for data analysis. The findings indicated that teachers’ perceptions of servant leadership significantly and positively predicted their levels of organizational empowerment. Although the existing literature reported gender-based differences in leadership perceptions, multi-group structural equation modeling results revealed that gender did not moderate this relationship.

Özet

Bu çalışma, öğretmenlerin hizmetkar liderlik algıları ile örgütsel güçlenme düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi, cinsiyetin bu ilişkide düzenleyici bir değişken olarak rol oynayıp oynamadığını inceleyerek araştırmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemi, İstanbul'un farklı sosyo-ekonomik özelliklere sahip ilçelerinde görev yapan 632 lise öğretmeninden oluşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada veriler "Kişisel Bilgi Formu", “Hizmetkâr Liderlik Ölçeği” ve “Öğretmenlerin Davranışsal Güçlendirme Ölçeği” olmak üzere üç ölçüm aracı ile toplanmıştır. Veri analizinde yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, öğretmenlerin hizmetkar liderlik algılarının, örgütsel güçlenme düzeylerini anlamlı ve pozitif yönde yordadığını göstermiştir. Mevcut literatürde liderlik algılarına dayalı cinsiyet farklılıkları rapor edilmiş olmasına rağmen çoklu gruplu yapısal eşitlik modellemesi sonuçları, cinsiyetin bu ilişkiyi düzenlemediğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydın, T., Serin, H. (2026). The Effect of Servant Leadership on Organizational Empowerment: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Practice, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 16–35. https://doi.org/10.47157/jietp.1830931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (105)

  1. Abubakar, A., Inuwa, B. B., & Hamma, M. (2018). Principal leadership style towards teachers' motivation on secondary schools in Nigeria. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectuals' Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/icigr-17.2018.21
  2. Afaq, A., Sajid, M., Arshad, A., & Shaheen, I. (2017). Servant leadership and teachers' job satisfaction: The mediating role of teachers' empowerment. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 11(4), 306-320.
  3. Akın, Y. E. (2023). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı, iş doyumu ve hizmetkar liderlik [Unpublished master's thesis]. Kastamonu Üniversitesi.
  4. Alasadi, R., Muhammed, S., Abidi, O., & Dženopoljac, V. (2019). Impact of servant leadership on intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-09-2018-0337
  5. Alexander, N. H., Guta, H. A., & Poole, G. (2017). Gender differences of perceived leadership skills among saudi students. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 34, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v34.a115
  6. Allen, S., Winston, B. E., Tatone, G. R., & Crowson, H. M. (2018). Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21311
  7. Bakan, İ., & Doğan, İ. F. (2012). Hizmetkâr liderlik. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 1-12.
  8. Barmanpek, U. (2022). The role of servant leadership on employee motivation and job satisfaction: Evidence from healthcare organisations in Turkey. Bingöl University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 24, 200-208. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1123709
  9. Baykal, E., Zehir, C., & Köle, M. (2018). Effects of servant leadership on gratitude, empowerment, innovativeness and performance: Turkey example. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.26650/jecs390903
  10. Bekman, M. (2022). Quantitative research method in public relations: Relational survey model. Meriç Uluslararası Sosyal ve Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.54707/meric.1143322
  11. Beştaş Marakçı, D., & Boz, A. (2022). Öğretmen motivasyonunda hizmetkâr liderliğin yordayıcı rolü. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 21-35.
  12. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers' organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289.
  13. Burke, S. & Collins, K. M. (2001). Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Women in Management Review, 16(5), 244-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420110395728
  14. Bush, T. (2006). Theories of educational management. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 1(2), 1-25.
  15. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0601_1
  16. Cerit, Y. (2009). The effects of servant leadership behaviours of school principals on teachers' job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9(3), 1207-1216.
  17. Cerit, Y. (2010). The effects of servant leadership on teachers' organizational commitment in primary schools in Turkey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13, 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2010.496933
  18. Crippen, C. & Willows, J. (2019). Connecting teacher leadership and servant leadership: a synergistic partnership. Journal of Leadership Education, 18(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.12806/v18/i2/t4
  19. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
  20. Davis, H. (2017). Discerning the servant's path: Applying pre-committal questioning to Greenleaf's servant leadership. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.102.1190
  21. Dierendonck, D. v. (2010). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
  22. Doğan, Ü. & Aslan, H. (2024). Investigation of the relationship between school principals' toxic leadership behaviors and teachers' perceptions of organizational gossip. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 11(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2024.11.2.1307
  23. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
  24. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 61-94.
  25. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  26. Geary, D. C. (2021). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000181-000 George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Pearson.
  27. Georgolopoulos, V., Papaloi, E., & Loukorou, K. (2018). Servant leadership as a predictive factor of teachers job satisfaction. European Journal of Education, 1(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v1i2.p15-28
  28. Ghavifekr, S., Radwan, O., & Velarde, J. M. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership roles and practices (persepsi guru terhadap peranan dan amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(02). https://doi.org/10.17576/jpen-2019-44.02-08
  29. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The servant as leader. Robert K. Greenleaf Center.
  30. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
  31. Gultekin, H., & Dougherty, M. (2021). The relationship between servant leadership characteristics of school teachers and students' academic achievement. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJECS/698
  32. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  33. Hallinger, P., Li, D., & Wang, W. (2016). Gender differences in instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 567-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x16638430
  34. Hammad, W., Sawalhi, R., Al-Harthi, A. S. A., Alamri, F. F., & Morad, H. (2023). Perceptions of teacher leadership in the arab region: a comparative analysis of three countries. Educational Management Administration &Amp; Leadership, 53(2), 258-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231166888
  35. Hasan, S. (2022). Principals and teachers as a change agent. Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 13(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.46568/pjass.v13i2.673
  36. Hikmah, K., Subyantoro, A., Puspitaningrum, D. A., & Nasrulloh, R. S. (2024). Participative leadership VS servant leadership on innovative work behavior: Role of psychological empowerment as mediator. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(7), 3748–3760. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4497
  37. Hoven, A. G. V. d., Mahembe, B., & Hamman-Fisher, D. (2021). The influence of servant leadership on psychological empowerment and organisational citizenship on a sample of teachers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1395
  38. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  39. Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers' work? Power and accountability in America's schools. Harvard University Press.
  40. Innocenti, F., Candel, M., Tan, F., & Van Breukelen, G. (2020). Optimal two-stage sampling for mean estimation in multilevel populations when cluster size is informative. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 30, 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280220952833
  41. Irfan, M., Salameh, A., Saleem, H., Naveed, R., Dalain, A., & Shahid, R. (2022). Impact of servant leadership on organization excellence through employees' competence: Exploring a cross- cultural perspective. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.985436
  42. Jiang, Y., Li, P., Wang, J., & Li, H. (2019). Relationships between kindergarten teachers' empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational climate: A Chinese model. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 33, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1577773
  43. Kahya, O., & Sağlam, A. Ç. (2019). The effect of psychological empowerment on organizational silence behaviors of education faculty lecturers. Eğitimde Kuram Ve Uygulama, 15(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.467026
  44. Kainde, S., & Mandagi, D. (2023). A systematic review of servant leadership outcomes in education context. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i2.627
  45. Kamil, N. L. M., Abukhalifa, A. M. S., Eliyana, A., & Pratama, A. S. (2024). Unlocking organisational citizenship and innovation: A servant leadership approach for psychological empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 46(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2023-0433
  46. Karasar, N. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (35. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  47. Katıtaş, S., Doğan, S., & Yıldız, S. (2022). The effect of servant leadership behaviors of school principals on teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of Education and Recreation Patterns, 3(2), 01-20. https://doi.org/10.53016/jerp.v3i2.48
  48. Kazimi, A., Khan, S., & Shorish, I. (2023). Effect of servant leadership style on teachers job satisfaction. American Journal of Economics and Business, 2(3), 32–43. Innovation. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajebi.v2i3.1908
  49. Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Islam, T., Rehman, A., Ahmed, S. S., Khan, E., & Sohail, F. (2021). How servant leadership triggers innovative work behavior: Exploring the sequential mediating role of psychological empowerment and job crafting. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 1037-1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2020-0367
  50. Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2016). On the relationship between psychological empowerment, trust, and Iranian EFL teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 24, 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714565362
  51. Kıral, B. (2015). Lise yöneticilerinin öğretmenleri güçlendirmesi ve öğretmenlerin kayıtsızlık (sinizm) davranışı ile ilişkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
  52. Kıral, E. (2021). Hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeği geliştirme çalışması: Öğretmenler üzerinde bir uygulama. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(3), 83-99.
  53. Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers' perceptions of principal's and immediate supervisor's empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work- related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 67-79.
  54. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
  55. Ma, Y., Faraz, N. A., Ahmed, F., & Raza, A. (2020). How does servant leadership foster employees' voluntary green behavior? A sequential mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051792
  56. Mapacpac, G., & Yango, A. (2023). Workplace empowerment, job satisfaction, and teaching performance of public senior high school teachers' in city schools division in the province of Laguna. Technium Social Sciences Journal. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8924
  57. Masry-Herzallah, A. & Arar, K. (2019). Gender, school leadership and teachers’ motivations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1395-1410. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-02-2019-0054
  58. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2023). Millî eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2023. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2023_09/29151106_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_ 2022_2023.pdf
  59. Murari, K., & Gupta, K. (2012). Impact of servant leadership on employee empowerment. 1, 28-37.
  60. Newman, A., Schwarz, G., Cooper, B., & Sendjaya, S. (2015). How servant leadership influences organizational citizenship behavior: The roles of LMX, empowerment, and proactive personality. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2827-6
  61. Nikmah, U. (2024). Servant leadership dalam meningkatkan prestasi dan loyalitas siswa. Al-Abshar: Journal of Islamic Education Management. https://doi.org/10.58223/al-abshar.v3i1.222
  62. Noland, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Servant teaching: An exploration of teacher servant leadership on student outcomes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15, 16-38. https://doi.org/10.14434/JOSOTL.V15I6.13928
  63. Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
  64. Öner, Z. H. (2012). Servant leadership and paternalistic leadership styles in the Turkish business context. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(3), 300-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731211216489
  65. Özer, M., & Suna, H. (2023). The professional development of teachers in Türkiye: First-year outputs of the new approach by the Ministry of National Education. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1275022
  66. Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(3), 377-393.
  67. Palta, A. (2019). Examination of teachers’ perceptions about servant leadership and organizational commitment. International Education Studies, 12(4), 36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n4p36
  68. Polatcan, M. (2020). The effect of servant leadership on teacher alienation: the mediating role of supportive school culture. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2020.03.005
  69. Qiu, S., & Dooley, L. (2019). Servant leadership: Development and validation of a multidimensional measure in the Chinese hospitality industry. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2018-0148
  70. Rachmawatia, A. W., & Lantu, D. C. (2014). Servant leadership theory development & measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 387-393.
  71. Ram, S., Daud, M., & Anwar, H. (2024). The effect of servant leadership on teacher performance and organizational citizenship behavior as mediation variables. ITM Web of Conferences, 58, 01007. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20245801007
  72. Rofcanın, Y., Heras, M. L., Bosch, M. J., Berber, A., Mughal, F., & Öztürk, M. B. (2021). Servant leadership and family supportiveness: Looking into employees' work and family outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 128, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.052
  73. Saleem, A., Aslam, S., Yin, H., & Rao, C. (2020). Principal leadership styles and teacher job performance: Viewpoint of middle management. Sustainability, 12(8), 3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083390
  74. Sapta, I., Wiadnyana, D., & Wijana, I. (2023). The role of motivation and servant leadership on organizational commitment and employee performance in the investment and one-stop services office, Gianyar Regency. International Journal of Management and Economics Invention. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmei/v9i10.01
  75. Sendjaya, S., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). Servant leadership: Its origin, development, and application in organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 57-64.
  76. Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951-960.
  77. Spears, L. (1996). Reflections on Robert K. Greenleaf and servant-leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17, 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610148367
  78. Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1(1), 25-30.
  79. Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
  80. Stone, A. G., Russell, R. F., & Patterson, K. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: A difference in focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361.
  81. Şensin, C., & Can, D. (2024). Ministerial touch on teachers' professional development: A hands-on model as PLCs. Pedagogical Perspective. https://doi.org/10.29329/pedper.2024.34
  82. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
  83. Tripathi, D., Priyadarshi, P., Kumar, P., & Kumar, S. (2020). Does servant leadership affect work role performance via knowledge sharing and psychological empowerment?. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(5), 792-812. https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-10-2019-0159
  84. Türkmen, F., & Gül, İ. (2017). The effects of secondary school administrators' servant leadership behaviors on teachers' organizational commitment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 110. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2713
  85. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). (2023). İstatistiklerle Türkiye 2023. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/istatistiklerle_turkiye.pdf
  86. Udin, U., Chanthes, S., & Dananjoyo, R. (2025). Servant leadership, work engagement and affective commitment in social exchange perspective: A mediation-moderation framework. Human Systems Management, 44(1), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-240077
  87. Uluç, M. S. (2023). Okul yöneticilerinin hizmetkâr liderlik davranışı ile öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişkide iş doyumunun aracı rolü [Unpublished master's thesis]. Siirt Üniversitesi.
  88. Ulutürk, B. (2023). How servant leadership influences street-level bureaucrats' work engagement: The mediating roles of motivating language and perceived organizational support. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(3), 562-594. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189231219708
  89. Uygur, K., & Arabacı, İ. (2019). Lise öğretmenlerinin personel güçlendirme algıları ile örgütsel güven algıları arasındaki ilişki: Elazığ ili örneği. Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.23891/EFDYYU.2019.140
  90. Van Der Hoven, A., Mahembe, B., & Hamman-Fisher, D. (2021). The influence of servant leadership on psychological empowerment and organisational citizenship on a sample of teachers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJHRM.V19I0.1395
  91. Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261.
  92. Villanueva, D. (2024). A narrative review: The impact of servant leadership on educational leadership practices and teacher empowerment. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0013
  93. Vrcelj, N., Bevanda, V., & Bevanda, N. (2022). Servant leadership: Influence of job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2022.0009
  94. Winkle, B. V., Allen, S., DeVore, D. O., & Winston, B. E. (2014). The relationship between the servant leadership behaviors of immediate supervisors and followers' perceptions of being empowered in the context of small business. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(3), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.12806/v13/i3/rf5
  95. Yalçınkaya, M. (2002). Çağdaş okulda etkili liderlik. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 1(2), 109-119.
  96. Yang, S., & Eunjoo Oh. (2024). Study on the development and influencing factors of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 4(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v4n3.23
  97. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS uygulamalı bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Detay Yayıncılık.
  98. Yıldırım, A. (2022). Evaluation of professional development of teachers and school administrators according to the 2023 vision of the Ministry National Education in Turkey. Cherkasy University Bulletin: Pedagogical Sciences, (2), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.31651/2524-2660-2022-2-34-40
  99. Yirci, R. & Kurtulmus, O. F. (2018). Just a leader or servant leader: how do teachers perceive their school principals?. Üniversitepark Bülten, 7(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.22521/unibulletin.2018.71.4
  100. Yue, C. A., & Thelen, P. D. (2023). What drives perceived internal reputation? Empirical evidence from Chile. Journal of Communication Management, 27(4), 471-492. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-09-2022-0106
  101. Yunus, M., Sukarno, S., & Rosadi, K. I. (2021). Teacher empowerment strategy in improving the quality of education. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(1), 32-36.
  102. Yoshida, D. T., Sendjaya, S., Hirst, G., & Cooper, B. (2014). Does servant leadership foster creativity and innovation?: A multi-level mediation study of job autonomy and organizational ownership. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1395-1404.
  103. Zada, S., Khan, J., Zada, M., Saeed, I., & Jun, Z. (2023). Does servant leadership enhance employee creativity and performance?. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.321656
  104. Zehir, C., Akyuz, B., Eren, M., & Turhan, G. (2013). The indirect effects of servant leadership behavior on organizational citizenship behavior and job performance: Organizational justice as a mediator. International Journal of Research In Business and Social Science, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.20525/IJRBS.V2I3.68
  105. Zeng, J., Lai, J., & Liu, X. (2022). How servant leadership motivates young university teachers’ workplace well-being: the role of occupational commitment and risk perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996497 Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: The moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 371-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9639-z