SavedAdd your journal

Journals / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: Special Issue

Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Financial Risk Dynamics in Turkish Companies Listed on Borsa Istanbul

Borsa İstanbul'da İşlem Gören Türk Şirketlerinin Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk Performansı ve Finansal Risk Dinamikleri

Erdoğan Ceylan(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-6890-9673
Salih Mutlu(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8162-6774
Rasim Şimşek(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES)0009-0007-0130-4179
Pages
104–119
Publication Date
2024-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings suggest the risk-mitigating potential of robust CSR practices, addressing the gap regarding the impact of the social responsibility performance of the Turkish-listed companies to accounting and market-based assessments of risk.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The focus of this investigation is to analyse the link between the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and the adoption of risk-taking behaviours within Turkish-listed companies on the Borsa Istanbul from 2010 to 2022.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Employing OLS regression in a panel data structure, the findings underscore a negative relationship between CSR performance proxied by ESG and its individual pillars which are environmental, social, and governance and financial risk level of the companies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings suggest the risk-mitigating potential of robust CSR practices, addressing the gap regarding the impact of the social responsibility performance of the Turkish-listed companies to accounting and market-based assessments of risk.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk · ESG · Sürdürülebilirlik

Abstract

The focus of this investigation is to analyse the link between the extent of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and the adoption of risk-taking behaviours within Turkish-listed companies on the Borsa Istanbul from 2010 to 2022. Employing OLS regression in a panel data structure, the findings underscore a negative relationship between CSR performance proxied by ESG and its individual pillars which are environmental, social, and governance and financial risk level of the companies. Across diverse market and accounting risk measures, companies with higher CSR performance showcase consistently reduced levels of Idiosyncratic Risk, Total Risk, Asset Return Risk, and Default Risk. These findings suggest the risk-mitigating potential of robust CSR practices, addressing the gap regarding the impact of the social responsibility performance of the Turkish-listed companies to accounting and market-based assessments of risk.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 2010-2022 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul'da işlem gören Türk şirketleri arasındaki kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk (KSS) performansı ile risk alma davranışları arasındaki etkileşimi araştırmaktadır. Panel veri yapısında OLS regresyonu kullanılarak elde edilen bulgular, KSS performansının ölçümünde kullanılan ESG ve ESG’nin alt dalları olan çevresel, sosyal ve yönetişim boyutlarının skoru ile firma riski arasında güçlü bir negatif ilişkiyi vurgulamaktadır. Farklı piyasa ve muhasebe temelli risk ölçütleri üzerinden, daha yüksek KSS performansına sahip şirketler, tutarlı bir şekilde daha düşük seviyelerde Sistematik Olmayan Risk, Toplam Risk, Varlık Getirisi Riski ve Temerrüt Riski sergilemektedir. Bu bulgular, etkili KSS uygulamalarının ve performansının riskleri hafifletme potansiyelini öne sürerken, şirketlerin KSS performansının hem muhasebe temelli hem de piyasa temelli risk değerlendirmelerindeki etkisini kapatmada bir köprü oluşturabileceğini göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ceylan, E., Mutlu, S., Şimşek, R. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Financial Risk Dynamics in Turkish Companies Listed on Borsa Istanbul. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 9 Sayı: Special Issue, 104–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/1504230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (109)

  1. Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Risk in Islamic banking. Review of Finance, 17(6), 2035–2096. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs041
  2. Acharya, V. V., Amihud, Y., & Litov, L. (2011). Creditor rights and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.04.001
  3. Acharya, V., & Naqvi, H. (2012). The seeds of a crisis: A theory of bank liquidity and risk taking over the business cycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.014
  4. Açıkgöz, T. (2022) sürdürülebilirlik raporlamasının piyasa riski ve volatilite yayılmaları üzerinde etkisi. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 24(4), 936-958. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.1054238
  5. Ahmad, H., Yaqub, M. & Lee, S. H. (2024). Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: A scientometric review of global trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 2965–2987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x
  6. Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., Kolade, N., & Gerged, A. M. (2020). ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(3), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108
  7. Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
  8. Altman, E.I. (1993) Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  9. Arslan, Z., & Yağcılar, G. G. (2023). Sürdürülebilir finans kapsamında çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim (ESG) ile banka karlılığı arasındaki ilişki üzerine uluslararası bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 14(40), 1236–1263. https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.1218886
  10. Atasel, O. Y., & Güneysu, Y. (2023). ESG performansı ile borç maliyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 16(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.1196945
  11. Bahadori, N., Kaymak, T., & Seraj, M. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance factors in emerging markets: The impact on firm performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(4), 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.167
  12. Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country-and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3139-1
  13. Bargeron, L. L., Lehn, K. M., & Zutter, C. J. (2010). Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1–2), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.05.001
  14. Bassen, A., & Senkl, D. (2011). ESG-environmental, social, governance issues. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(5), 506.
  15. Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
  16. Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3285-5
  17. Borak, M., & Doğukanlı, H. (2022). Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve firma riski: Borsa İstanbul’da bir uygulama. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 16(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.1095681
  18. Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(4), 1258–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.004
  19. Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’Zali, B. (2018). Social performance and firm risk: Impact of the financial crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 643–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3017-x
  20. Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2009). Corporate governance and firm operating performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 32, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-007-0082-3
  21. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252190
  22. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850
  23. Chang, K., Kim, I., & Li, Y. (2014). The heterogeneous impact of corporate social responsibility activities that target different stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 125, 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1895-8
  24. Chen, C. R., Steiner, T. L., & Whyte, A. M. (2006). Does stock option-based executive compensation induce risk-taking? An analysis of the banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(3), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.06.004
  25. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131
  26. Cheng, S. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
  27. Chollet, P., & Sandwidi, B. W. (2018). CSR engagement and financial risk: A virtuous circle? International evidence. Global Finance Journal, 38, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2018.03.004
  28. Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38, 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-010-0089-0
  29. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
  30. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.013
  31. Clément, A., Robinot, É. and Trespeuch, L. (2023). The use of ESG scores in academic literature: a systematic literature review. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2022-0147
  32. Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
  33. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665543
  34. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
  35. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
  36. Düzer, M. & Önce, S. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik performans göstergelerine ilişkin açiklamalarin finansal performans üzerine etkisi: BIST’te bir uygulama. Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları Dergisi, 11(1), 93-117. https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.372882
  37. Düzer, M. (2023). Muhasebe ihtiyatlılığı ve sürdürülebilirlik: BIST 100’de bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 100, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1319728
  38. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and The Environment, 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
  39. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176
  40. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  41. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C. Y., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
  42. Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line: Sustainability’s accountants. In Russo M. V., ed., Environmental Management: Readings and Cases, 2nd edn., 49-66. SAGE, Los Angeles.
  43. Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3601–3641. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr065
  44. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
  45. Ferreira, M. A., & Laux, P. A. (2007). Corporate governance, idiosyncratic risk, and information flow. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 951–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01228.x
  46. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549-2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
  47. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman.
  48. Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
  49. Gompers, P. A., Ishii, J. L., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-155. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
  50. Gramlich, D., & Finster, N. (2013). Corporate sustainability and risk. Journal of Business Economics, 83(6), 631–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0666-4
  51. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996
  52. Güneysu, Y. (2023). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetim faaliyetlerinin nakit bulundurma politikasındaki rolü: BIST sürdürülebilirlik endeksi örneği. Muhasebe Enstitüsü Dergisi, 69, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.26650/med.1314375
  53. Hahn, T., Figge, F., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2017). Advancing research on corporate sustainability: Off to pastures new or back to the roots? Business & Society, 56(2), 155-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576152
  54. He, F., Qin, S., Liu, Y., & Wu, J. (2022). CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure. Finance Research Letters, 49, 102936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102936
  55. Höck, A., Bauckloh, T., Dumrose, M., & Klein, C. (2023). ESG criteria and the credit risk of corporate bond portfolios. Journal of Asset Management, 24, 572-580. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-023-00337-w
  56. Horn, M. (2023). The influence of ESG ratings on idiosyncratic stock risk: The unrated, the good, the bad, and the sinners. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75, 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-023-00155-1
  57. Hughes, J. P., Mester, L. J., & Moon, C.-G. (2001). Are scale economies in banking elusive or illusive? Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(12), 2169-2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(01)00190-x
  58. Jepperson, R. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: Powell, W.W. and Di Maggio, P.J., ed., The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 143-163.
  59. Jia, Y., Gao, X. & Julian, S. (2020). Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment, Strategic Management Journal, 41(2), 290-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3107
  60. Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1492-2
  61. John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679–1728. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01372.x
  62. Jones, M. (2005). The transnational corporation, corporate social responsibility and the 'outsourcing' debate. Journal of the American Academy of Business, 6(2), 91-97.
  63. Kalemci, R. A., & Tüzün, İ. K. (2008). Örgütsel alanda meşruiyet kavramının açılımı: Kurumsal ve stratejik meşruiyet. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 403-413.
  64. Karyağdı, N. G., & Şit, A. (2023). İşletmelerin ESG performanslarının sermaye maliyeti ve finansal performansına etkisi: BIST sürdürebilirlik-25 endeksi üzerine bir uygulama. Bucak İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.38057/bifd.1362050
  65. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 43(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
  66. Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.004
  67. Liu, D., Gu, K., & Hu, W. (2023). ESG performance and stock idiosyncratic volatility. Finance Research Letters, 58(B), 104393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104393
  68. Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
  69. Lueg, K., Krastev, B. & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.379
  70. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.198
  71. Maquieira, C. P., Arias, J. T., & Espinosa-Méndez, C. (2024). The impact of ESG on the default risk of family firms: International evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 67(A), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102136
  72. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659
  73. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872. https://doi.org/10.2307/256342
  74. Meyer, J.W. & Scott, W.R. (1983). Organizational Environments - Rituals and Rationality. Sage, Beverly Hills-CA.
  75. Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
  76. Mohammad, W. M. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, 100015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100015
  77. Mollah, S., Hassan, M. K., Al Farooque, O., & Mobarek, A. (2017). The governance, risk-taking, and performance of Islamic banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 51, 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-016-0245-2
  78. Mosca, F., & Civera, C. (2017). The evolution of CSR: An integrated approach. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.03mosca.civera
  79. Muhammad, N., Scrimgeour, F., Reddy, K., & Abidin, S. (2015). The impact of corporate environmental performance on market risk: The Australian industry case. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 347-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2324-3
  80. Murphy, D., & McGrath, D. (2016). Australian class actions as a potential motivator for environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting. Research Gate, 1–14
  81. Nakano, M., & Nguyen, P. (2012). Board size and corporate risk taking: Further evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00924.x
  82. Nguyen, P. (2012). The impact of foreign investors on the risk-taking of Japanese firms. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 26(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2012.03.001
  83. Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2012). The impact of corporate social performance on financial risk and utility: A longitudinal analysis. Financial Management, 41(2), 483–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01190.x
  84. Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. (2001). Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40(4), 369-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000402
  85. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  86. Öcek, C., Ünlübulduk, S. N., & Karadeniz, E. (2021) Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ve finansal başarısızlık riski: Borsa İstanbul’da işlem gören konaklama işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 92, 21-46. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.941581
  87. Pathan, S. (2009). Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(7), 1340–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.02.001
  88. Pathan, S., Haq, M., & Williams, B. (2016). Does skin in the game help? Bank franchise value, managerial incentives and ‘going for broke’. Australian Journal of Management, 41(2), 271-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896214539818
  89. Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518-1541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335188
  90. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166151
  91. Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
  92. Sahabi, A. M. (2023). Sürdürülebilirlik performansının pay getirileri ile oynaklık üzerindeki etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’dan kanıtlar. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1205759
  93. Şahin, A., & Acar, E. (2023). ESG skorunun firmaya özgü belirleyicileri, Borsa İstanbul örneği. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış Dergisi, 70, 111-128. https://doi.org/10.55322/mdbakis.1238294
  94. Salama, A., Anderson, K., & Toms, J. S. (2011). Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994–2006. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 20(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01617.x
  95. Sassen, R., Hinze, A.-K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 867–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3
  96. Sciarelli, M., Landi, G., Turriziani, L., & Prisco, A. (2023). Does corporate sustainability mitigate firm risk? An empirical analysis on S&P 500 controversial companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0388
  97. Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.678
  98. Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003
  99. Şişman, M. E., & Çankaya, S. (2021). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yönetişim (ESG) verilerinin firmaların finansal performansına etkisi: Hava yolu sektörü üzerine bir çalışma. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.51945/cuiibfd.880468
  100. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
  101. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/257057
  102. Vallascas, F., Mollah, S., & Keasey, K. (2017). Does the impact of board independence on large bank risks change after the global financial crisis? Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.011
  103. Van Beurden, P., & Gössling, T. (2008). The worth of values – A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9894-x
  104. Vermeulen, W. J., & Witjes, S. (2016). On addressing the dual and embedded nature of business and the route towards corporate sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(4), 2822-2832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.132
  105. Vivel-Búa, M., Lado-Sestayo, R., Martínez-Salgueiro, A., & Díaz-Ballesteros, M. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance perfomance and default risk in the eurozone. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00702-4
  106. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4 3.0.CO;2-G
  107. Wang, S., Li, J. ve Zhao, D. (2018). institutional pressures and environmental management practices: The moderating effects of environmental commitment and resource availability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1983
  108. Yıkılmaz, A. (2022). Çevresel, sosyal ve kurumsal yöneti̇şi̇m (Esg) skorları ve kar payı kararları arasında i̇li̇şki̇ni̇n i̇ncelenmesi̇. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(4), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1209238
  109. Zhu, D., Gao, X., Luo, Z. & Xu, W. (2022), Environmental performance and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 74, 101811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101811