SavedAdd your journal

Journals / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2024 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Green Budgeting and Tax Policies from the Perspective of Sustainable Development

Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Perspektifinde Yeşil Bütçeleme ve Vergi Politikaları

Zübeyde Şentürk Ulucak(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4592-1853
Pages
478–493
Publication Date
2024-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ultimately, it is anticipated that green budgeting practices will be increasingly adopted to support sustainability goals on a broader scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to comprehensively examine green budgeting practices in the context of sustainable development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Strategies like effective communication, stakeholder engagement, international cooperation, and capacity building are considered vital in overcoming these challenges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ultimately, it is anticipated that green budgeting practices will be increasingly adopted to support sustainability goals on a broader scale.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil Bütçeleme · Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma · Yeşil Tahviller

Abstract

The aim of this study is to comprehensively examine green budgeting practices in the context of sustainable development. The study evaluates financial tools such as the integration of environmental goals into public budgets, environmental taxes, green bonds, and incentives. Although the literature on green budgeting is limited, existing research shows that these practices support not only environmental sustainability but also economic and social development. The study highlights that green budgeting and fiscal policies are critical tools for achieving sustainable development goals. However, the implementation of these policies involves challenges such as political resistance, economic impacts, and a lack of administrative capacity. Strategies like effective communication, stakeholder engagement, international cooperation, and capacity building are considered vital in overcoming these challenges. Ultimately, it is anticipated that green budgeting practices will be increasingly adopted to support sustainability goals on a broader scale.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilir kalkınma doğrultusunda yeşil bütçeleme uygulamalarını kapsamlı bir şekilde incelemektir. Çalışma, çevresel hedeflerin kamu bütçesine entegrasyonu, çevresel vergiler, yeşil tahviller ve teşvikler gibi mali araçları değerlendirmektedir. Literatürde yeşil bütçeleme üzerine yapılan çalışmalar sınırlı olsa da mevcut araştırmalar, bu uygulamaların yalnızca çevresel sürdürülebilirliği değil, aynı zamanda ekonomik ve sosyal kalkınmayı da desteklediğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, yeşil bütçeleme ve maliye politikalarının sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerine ulaşmada kritik bir araç olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, bu politikaların uygulaması, politik direnç, ekonomik etkiler ve yönetsel kapasite eksikliği gibi zorluklar barındırmaktadır. Etkili iletişim, paydaş katılımı, uluslararası iş birliği ve kapasite geliştirme gibi stratejilerin, bu zorlukların üstesinden gelmede önemli olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Sonuç olarak, yeşil bütçeleme uygulamalarının giderek daha geniş çapta benimsenerek sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerini destekleyeceği öngörülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ulucak, Z. Ş. (2024). Green Budgeting and Tax Policies from the Perspective of Sustainable Development. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 478–493. https://ajindex.com/articles/1504219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (81)

  1. Aktaş, E. E. (2023). Green Budgeting And Long-Term Fiscal Sustainability. Issues on Sustainability, Economics & History First Edition, November 2023 IJOPEC Publication No: 2023/04 ISBN: 978, 31.
  2. Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1-30.
  3. Armağan, A. (2023). YEŞİL BÜTÇELEME YAKLAŞIMI: TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ. Scientific Journal of Finance and Financial Law Studies, 3(1), 1-22.
  4. Aronsson, T., & Löfgren, K. G. (2001). Green accounting and green taxes in the global economy (pp. 12-35). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
  5. Astorg, J. (2021, July). Green Budgeting among low carbon policies: an international public policy transfer and interactions between actors in Costa Rica. In International Conference on Public Policy 2021.
  6. Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S., & Finnegan, J. J. (2021). The impact of strategic climate legislation: evidence from expert interviews on the UK Climate Change Act. Climate Policy, 21(2), 251-263.
  7. Begg, I., Kuusi, T., & Kylliäinen, O. (2023). Five countries, five models: A comparison of fiscal frameworks and lessons for Finland (No. 102). ETLA Working Papers.
  8. Bekhet, H. A., & Lojuntin, S. A. (2020). Does Government Expenditure Contribute to Malaysia Environmental Sustainability? A Dynamic Analysis. Global Business & Management Research, 12(4).
  9. Belianska, Anna, Nadja Bohme, Kaihao Cai, Yoro Diallo, Saanya Jain, Giovanni Melina, Pritha Mitra, Marcos Poplawski-Ribeiro, and Solo Zerbo. "Climate Change and Select Financial Instruments." (2022).
  10. Blazejczak, J., Braun, F. G., Edler, D., & Schill, W. P. (2014). Economic effects of renewable energy expansion: A model-based analysis for Germany. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 40, 1070-1080.
  11. Bova, E. (2021). How green is your budget? Green budgeting practices in the EU. SUERF Policy Briefs No, 140, 1-6.
  12. Boyd, J. (2003). Water pollution taxes: a good idea doomed to failure?. Public Finance and Management, 3(1), 34-66.
  13. Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2022). Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nature Climate Change, 12(1), 22-29.
  14. Brito Cedeno, R. C., & Wei, J. (2024). Untying green budgeting towards green economy and green environment in dominican republic: an impetus for a sustainable development. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-26.
  15. Caperchione, E. (2024). Green Budgeting. In Public Sector Financial Management for Sustainability and SDGs in Europe (pp. 27-43). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  16. Caselli, F., Lagerborg, A., & Medas, P. A. (2024). Green Fiscal Rules? Challenges and Policy Alternatives. IMF Working Paper No. 2024/125, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4890801
  17. Corfee-Morlot, J., Marchal, V., Kauffmann, C., Kennedy, C., Stewart, F., Kaminker, C., & Ang, G. (2012). Towards a green investment policy framework: The case of low-carbon, climate-resilient infrastructure. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/towards-a-green-investment-policy-framework_5k8zth7s6s6d-en
  18. DeWit, A., Djalante, R., & Shaw, R. (2020). Building holistic resilience: Tokyo’s 2050 strategy. The Asia-Pacific Journal| Japan Focus, 18(7), 1-15.
  19. Dwivedi, C. (2018, April). Influence of production and investment tax credit on renewable energy growth and power grid. In 2018 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech) (pp. 149-154). IEEE.
  20. Ekins, P., & Speck, S. (1999). Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environmental and resource economics, 13, 369-396.
  21. Ekins, P., Andersen, M. S., Vos, H., Gee, D., Schlegelmilch, K., & Wieringa, K. (1996). Environmental taxes: Implementation and environmental effectiveness. Publications Office of the European Union.
  22. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2018). The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics & catalysing action. Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications
  23. European Commission. (2020). The European Green Deal. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_enhttps://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_1835
  24. Ferhatoğlu, E. (2003). Avrupa Birliği’nde Ortak Çevre Politikasi Çerçevesinde Çevre Vergileri. e-yaklasim, Ekim, (3).
  25. Fischer, C. (2011). Green Competitiveness. In New Growth Models for Europe Annual Research Conference, Brussels.
  26. Göksu, G. G. (2022). A cross-country analysis of green public finance management and budgeting in supporting sustainable development. Sayıştay Dergisi, 33(126), 409-441.
  27. IMF. (2017). Fiscal Policies for Paris Climate Strategies—from Principle to Practice. International Monetary Fund.
  28. Kabayel, M. A. (2024). Sustainable Fiscal Policy Against the Global Climate Crisis: Green Fiscal Policy-Comparison of Policy Indicators of Selected Countries. Uluslararası Sosyal Siyasal ve Mali Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 59-69.
  29. Kaur, A., Jha, A. N., & Chakraborty, L. (2023). G20 and Climate Responsive Budgeting. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
  30. Kete, H. (2022). Green Budgeting: France and Italy Practices. Uluslararası Sosyal Siyasal ve Mali Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 102-115.
  31. Kissinger, G., Gupta, A., Mulder, I., & Unterstell, N. (2019). Climate financing needs in the land sector under the Paris Agreement: An assessment of developing country perspectives. Land use policy, 83, 256-269.
  32. Kovancılar, B. (2001). Küresel Isınma Sorununun Çözümünde Karbon Vergisi ve Etkinliği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 8(2), 7-20.
  33. Lehr, U., Nitsch, J., Kratzat, M., Lutz, C., & Edler, D. (2008). Renewable energy and employment in Germany. Energy policy, 36(1), 108-117.
  34. Liobikienė, G., Butkus, M., & Matuzevičiūtė, K. (2019). The contribution of energy taxes to climate change policy in the European Union (EU). Resources, 8(2), 63.
  35. Liyanage, T., & Gooneratne, T. (2021). From'Traditional'Budgeting to'Better'Budgeting: Navigating through'Stability'and'Change'. Management Accounting Frontiers, 4, 27-50.
  36. Määttä, K. (2006). Environmental taxes: an introductory analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  37. Maltais, A., & Nykvist, B. (2020). Understanding the role of green bonds in advancing sustainability. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 1-20.
  38. Manes, F., Brusca, I., Caperchione, E., & Cohen, S. (2024). The Sustainability Puzzle and the Pieces. Public Sector Financial Management for Sustainability and SDGs in Europe.
  39. Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2023). The European Union Emission Trading System and its role for green budgeting development—The case of EU member states. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101390.
  40. Marinheiro, C. F., do Rosário e Sousa, A., & Pinheiro, A. (2024). The climate dimension of fiscal policy sustainability: best practices in Green Budgeting and lessons for Portugal. In Sustainable Finances and the Law: Between Public and Private Solutions (pp. 195-218). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  41. Martin, A., & Scott, I. (2003). The effectiveness of the UK landfill tax. Journal of environmental planning and management, 46(5), 673-689.
  42. Maxim, M., & Zander, K. (2019). Can a green tax reform entail employment double dividend in European and non-European countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(3), 218-228.
  43. Medarova-Bergstrom, K., Volkery, A., Schiellerup, P., Withana, S., & Baldock, D. (2011). Strategies and instruments for climate proofing the EU budget. IEEP, Brussels.
  44. Metcalf, G. E. (2021). Carbon taxes in theory and practice. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 13(1), 245-265.
  45. Mitsi, Dimitra. "Fiscal Rules and Green Growth In Europe." (2024).
  46. Mpofu, F. Y. (2022). Green Taxes in Africa: opportunities and challenges for environmental protection, sustainability, and the attainment of sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(16), 10239.
  47. Nelson, K., Lindh, A., & Dalén, P. (2023). Social sustainability in the decarbonized welfare state: Social policy as a buffer against poverty related to environmental taxes. Global Social Policy, 14680181231217659.
  48. OECD. (2024). Green Budgeting in OECD Countries 2024, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9aea61f0-en.
  49. Palmer, K., & Walls, M. (1997). Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies, and standards. Journal of Public Economics, 65(2), 193-205.
  50. Partridge, C. C. (2019). Green Municipal Bonds and the Financing of Green Infrastructure in the United States (Doctoral dissertation, UCL (University College London)).
  51. Peimani, H. (2018). Financial barriers to development of renewable and green energy projects in Asia (No. 862). ADBI Working Paper.
  52. Peters, B. G. (2023). Good governance. In The Elgar Companion to the OECD (pp. 256-265). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  53. Petrie, M., & Petrie, M. (2021). The evolution of green budgeting. Environmental Governance and Greening Fiscal Policy: Government Accountability for Environmental Stewardship, 61-108.
  54. Pindiriri, C., & Kwaramba, M. (2024). Climate finance in developing countries: green budget tagging and resource mobilization. Climate Policy, 1-15.
  55. Pojar, S. (2022). Environmental Assessments within Green Budgeting (No. 175). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  56. Pojar, S. (2023). How Green Budgeting is Embedded in National Budget Processes (No. 196). Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  57. Price, R. (2020). Climate adaptation: lessons and insights for governance, budgeting, and accountability. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/articles/report/Climate_Adaptation_Lessons_and_Insights_for_Governance_Budgeting_and_Accountability/26430646?file=48182644
  58. Remling, E. (2018). Depoliticizing adaptation: a critical analysis of EU climate adaptation policy. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 477-497.
  59. Reston Filho, J. C., & Dwivedi, C. (2018, February). Influence of renewable energy tax credit on growth and impact in ERCOT market. In 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
  60. Russel, D., & Benson, D. (2014). Green budgeting in an age of austerity: a transatlantic comparative perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(2), 243-262.
  61. Savcı, M., & Yıldırım, K. (2024). İklim Değişikliği ve Çevresel Maliyetler: Kirleten Öder İlkesi Çerçevesinde Bir Değerlendirme. Fiscaoeconomia, 8(2), 862-886.
  62. Schokker, J., Kamilaris, A., & Karatsiolis, S. (2021). A Review on Key Performance Indicators for Climate Change. Environmental Informatics, 273-292.
  63. Shafi, M., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Jain, V., Salman, A., Kamal, M., Shabbir, M. S., & Rehman, M. U. (2023). The dynamic relationship between green tax incentives and environmental protection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32184-32192.
  64. Silva, S., Soares, I., & Afonso, O. (2021). Assessing the double dividend of a third-generation environmental tax reform with resource substitution. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(10), 15145-15156.
  65. Song, M., Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2020). Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120849.
  66. Sousa, S., Henriques, C., & Viseu, C. (2023, October). Are Green Taxes Efficient? An Exploratory Study of the EU Reality. In International Conference on Energy and Environment Research (pp. 265-279). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  67. Spinesi, L. (2022). The environmental tax: effects on inequality and growth. Environmental and Resource Economics, 82(3), 529-572.
  68. Sterner, T., & Löwgren, M. (1994). Environmental taxes: a cautious start in Sweden. In Economic policies for sustainable development (pp. 46-67). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  69. Steurer, R., & Martinuzzi, A. (2007). From environmental plans to sustainable development strategies. European Environment, 17(3), 147-151.
  70. Štreimikienė, D., Samusevych, Y., Bilan, Y., Vysochyna, A., & Sergi, B. S. (2022). Multiplexing efficiency of environmental taxes in ensuring environmental, energy, and economic security. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-19.
  71. Thiri, M. A., Villamayor-Tomás, S., Scheidel, A., & Demaria, F. (2022). How social movements contribute to staying within the global carbon budget: Evidence from a qualitative meta-analysis of case studies. Ecological Economics, 195, 107356.
  72. Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2019). Green bonds for the Paris agreement and sustainable development goals. Environmental Research Letters, 14(6), 064009.
  73. U.S. Department of Energy. (2021). Renewable Electricity Production Tax Credit (PTC). Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/savings/renewable-electricity-production-tax-credit-ptc
  74. UNEP. (2020). United Nations Environment Programme Annual Report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme.
  75. Wang, Z., Zhu, N., Wang, J., Hu, Y., & Nkana, M. (2022). The impact of environmental taxes on economic benefits and technology innovation input of heavily polluting industries in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 959939.
  76. Wesseh Jr, P. K., & Lin, B. (2016). Optimal emission taxes for full internalization of environmental externalities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 871-877.
  77. Westin, R. A. (1992). Understanding environmental taxes. Tax Law., 46, 327.
  78. World Bank. (2018). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018. World Bank Group.
  79. Yang, H. Y. (2000). Carbon-reducing taxes and income inequality: general equilibrium evaluation of alternative energy taxation in Taiwan. Applied Economics, 32(9), 1213-1221.
  80. Yilmaz, O., & Hotunluoğlu, H. (2015). Yenilenebilir enerjiye yönelik teşvikler ve Türkiye. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 74-97.
  81. Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2022). Environmental regulation and high-quality economic growth: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(56), 85389-85401.