SavedAdd your journal

Journals / JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Green Inclusive Leadership Scale: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

Yeşil Kapsayıcı Liderlik Ölçeği: Türkçe Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Bilgen Gaye Yalpa(OSMANİYE KORKUT ATA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7308-3597
Pages
292–308
Publication Date
2026-06-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the Turkish version of the GIL Scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt the Green Inclusive Leadership (GIL) Scale into Turkish and to conduct validity and reliability analyses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the EFA results, the single-factor structure explained 75.17% of the total variance, with an eigenvalue of 2.255.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the Turkish version of the GIL Scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeşil kapsayıcı liderlik · ölçek uyarlama · çalışan sesliliği

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Green Inclusive Leadership (GIL) Scale into Turkish and to conduct validity and reliability analyses. The research was carried out within the framework of a quantitative survey design. To examine construct validity, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed. According to the EFA results, the single-factor structure explained 75.17% of the total variance, with an eigenvalue of 2.255. In CFA, the three-item model yielded high factor loadings (0.856–0.882) and low error variances (0.221–0.268), indicating strong consistency with the theoretical construct. Convergent validity was supported by a Composite Reliability (CR) value of 0.901 and an Average Variance Extracted (AVE) value of 0.752. Internal consistency was found to be high (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.901; Spearman-Brown = 0.897). In terms of criterion-related validity, analyses revealed that GIL was positively associated with employee voice and negatively associated with work-related emotional exhaustion. In conclusion, the Turkish version of the GIL Scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable measurement tool. This study not only contributes by introducing the scale into Turkish but also provides a valuable instrument for measuring inclusive leadership practices that promote pro-environmental behaviors within the leadership and sustainability literature. Furthermore, the findings offer both theoretical and practical implications for strengthening sustainability-oriented organizational cultures.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Yeşil Kapsayıcı Liderlik (YKL) Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlilik ve güvenirlik analizlerinin yapılmasıdır. Çalışma, nicel araştırma desenlerinden tarama modeli çerçevesinde yürütülmüştür. Yapı geçerliliğini incelemek amacıyla Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. AFA sonuçlarına göre tek faktörlü yapı toplam varyansın %75,17’sini açıklamış ve özdeğer 2,255 olarak bulunmuştur. DFA’da ise üç maddeden oluşan modelin faktör yüklerinin yüksek (0,856–0,882) ve hata varyanslarının düşük (0,221–0,268) bulunması modelin kuramsal yapıyla güçlü biçimde örtüştüğünü göstermiştir. Yakınsak geçerlilik bulguları, Bileşik Güvenirlik (CR) = 0,901 ve Ortalama Varyans Açıklaması (AVE) = 0,752 değerleriyle desteklenmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı yüksek düzeyde bulunmuştur (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0,901; Spearman-Brown = 0,897). Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlilik kapsamında yapılan analizlerde, YKL’nin çalışan sesliliği ile pozitif, işe bağlı duygusal tükenmişlik ile negatif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, YKL Ölçeği’nin Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Çalışma, yalnızca ölçeğin Türkçe’ye kazandırılmasına katkı sunmakla kalmayıp, liderlik ve sürdürülebilirlik literatüründe çevreci davranışları teşvik eden kapsayıcı liderlik anlayışının ölçülmesine yönelik önemli bir araç sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, araştırma bulguları, örgütlerde sürdürülebilirlik kültürünün geliştirilmesine yönelik hem akademik hem de pratik düzeyde değerli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yalpa, B. G. (2026). Green Inclusive Leadership Scale: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1, 292–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/1504075

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (100)

  1. Abdel Majeed, A. A., Hashad, M. E., Abd El-majeed, E. A. A. ve Mahmoud, H. A. H. (2025). Green transformational leadership and green innovative work behavior in hotels and travel agencies: Roles of green knowledge sharing and green commitment. Journal of the Faculty of Tourism and Hotels-University of Sadat City, 9(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.21608/mfth.2025.415402
  2. Aboramadan, M., Dahleez, K.A. ve Farao, C. (2021). Inclusive leadership and extra-role behaviors in higher education: does organizational learning mediates the relationship?, International Journal of Educational Management, 36(4), 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0290
  3. Aboramadan, M., Crawford, J., Turkmenoglu, M.A. ve Farao, C. (2022). Green inclusive leadership and employee green behaviors in the hotel industry: does perceived green organizational support matter?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103330
  4. Afridi, S.A., Shahjehan, A., Zaheer, S., Khan, W. ve Gohar, A. (2023). Bridging generative leadership and green creativity: unpacking the role of psychological green climate and green commitment in the hospitality industry. SAGE Open 13 (3), 21582440231185759. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231185759
  5. Asghar, M., Gull, N., Xiong, Z., Shu, A., Faraz, N.A. ve Pervaiz, K. (2023a), The influence of inclusive leadership on hospitality employees’ green innovative service behavior: a multilevel study. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHTM.2023.07.007
  6. Asghar, M., Ullah, I. ve Bangash, A.H. (2023b). Green inclusive leadership and green creativity in the manufacturing industry: Do green human capital and employee voice matter?. International Journal of Innovation Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2023-0087
  7. Avey, J. B, Reichard, R., Luthans, F. ve Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070
  8. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 16(2), 296–298.
  9. Bhutto, T.A., Farooq, R., Talwar, S., Awan, U. ve Dhir, A. (2021). Green inclusive leadership and green creativity in the tourism and hospitality sector: serial mediation of green psychological climate and work engagement. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(10), 1716-1737, https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1867864
  10. Bourke, J. ve Espedido, A. (2019). Why inclusive leaders are good for organizations, and how to become one. Harvard Business Review, 29(3), 2–5.
  11. Braun, L.M., Perez Cuso, M., Mayer-Besting, E. ve Marcelino Santos Lima, V. (2024). Advancing the green transition of SMEs: Insights for SME development agencies to support sustainability practices and reporting. Bangkok: SACAP.
  12. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  13. Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  14. Cao, M., Zhao, Y. ve Zhao, S. (2023). How CEOs’ inclusive leadership fuels employees’ well-being: A three-level model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(11), 2305-2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2085436
  15. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R. ve Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  16. Chen, Y.S. (2011). Green organizational identity: Sources and consequence. Management Decision, 49, 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111120761
  17. Cheng, B., Yu, X., Dong, Y. ve Zhong, C. (2024). Promoting employee career growth: the benefits of sustainable human resource management. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12371
  18. Cho, M. ve Yoo, J. J.-E. (2021). Customer pressure and restaurant employee green creative behavior: serial mediation effects of restaurant ethical standards and employee green passion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(12), 4505-4525. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0425
  19. Choi, S.B., Tran, T.B.H. ve Park, B.I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior of Personality: An International Journal, 43(6), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
  20. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  22. Comrey, A. L. ve Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  23. Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
  24. Çetin, Ş. ve Çakmakçı, C. (2012). Çalışan sesliliği ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması çalışması. KHO bilim dergisi, 22(2), 1-19.
  25. Detert, J. R. ve Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
  26. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE.
  27. Edmondson, V.C. (2006). Organizational surveys: A system for employee voice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(4), 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600908635
  28. Eladawi F.M.I., Elnaggar, M.K., Hashad, M.E., Awad A.H.I. ve Abd El-Halim, A.A.E.K.G. (2024). Effect of green inclusive leadership on employees’ green work engagement in hotels and travel agencies: The role of green intrinsic motivation. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 54(2), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.542spl12-1263
  29. Farrukh, M., Raza, A. ve Rafiq, M. (2023). Environmentally specific authentic leadership and team green creative behavior based on cognitive-affective path systems. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(10), 3662-3680, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0530
  30. Fawehinmi, O., Yusliza, M.Y. ve Farooq, K. (2022). Green human resource management and employee green behaviour: Trends, issues, challenges and the way forward. Green Human Resource Management Research: Issues, Trends, and Challenges (167-201). Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06558-3_8
  31. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
  32. Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18 (1), 39-50 https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  33. George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.
  34. Günay, A. (2021). İşe bağlı duygusal tükenmişlik: Bir ölçek uyarlaması çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30 (1), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.828921
  35. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  36. Hu, K., Chen, Y., Mu, S. ve Tan, Z. (2024). Green inclusive leadership, green policy, and pursuit of sustainability in natural resources: A firm-level analysis in context of Ukraine-Russia war. Resources Policy, 89, 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104607
  37. Huo, X., Azhar, A., Rehman, N. ve Majeed, N. (2022). The role of green human resource management practices in driving green performance in the context of manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability 14 (24), 16776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416776
  38. Hussain, Y., Abbass, K., Usman, M., Rehan, M. ve Asif, M. (2022). Exploring the mediating role of environmental strategy, green innovations, and transformational leadership: The impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 76864–76880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20922-7
  39. Huy, P.Q. ve Phuc, V.K. (2025). Changing times: does the critical success factors boosting green transition of SMEs remain unchanged?. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00449-6
  40. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zaffar, M., Haque, A. ve Rubab, U. (2019a). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management and Organization, 25 (4), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.50
  41. Javed, B., Naqvi, S.M.M.R., Khan, A.K., Arjoon, S. ve Tayyeb, H.H. (2019b), Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of psychological safety. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.25
  42. Javed, B., Fatima, T., Khan, A. K. ve Bashir, S. (2021). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: The role of creative self-efficacy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.487
  43. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
  44. Khalil, G.G. ve Abdallah, H.S. (2023). The impact of green leadership behaviours on sustainable performance development. Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality, 24(2), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.21608/jaauth.2023.200761.1436
  45. Khan, N.A. (2021). Determinants of proactive work behavior of employees during the COVID 19 crisis. European Journal of Psychology Open, 80(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1027/2673-8627/a000015
  46. Khan, N.A., Khan, A.N., Soomro, M.A. ve Khan, S.K. (2020). Transformational leadership and civic virtue behavior: Valuing act of thriving and emotional exhaustion in the hotel industry. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(4), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.001
  47. Khan, A.N. ve Khan, N.A. (2022). The nexuses between transformational leadership and employee green organisational citizenship behaviour: role of environmental attitude and green dedication. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(3), 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2924
  48. Khan, J., Jaafar, M., Mubarak, N. ve Khan, A.K. (2024). Employee mindfulness, innovative work behaviour, and IT project success: The role of inclusive leadership. Information Technology and Management, 25(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-022-00369-5
  49. Kim, T.T., Kim,W.G., Majeed, S. ve Haldorai, K. (2023). Does green human resource management lead to a green competitive advantage? A sequential mediation model with three mediators. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 111, 103486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103486
  50. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  51. Li, T. ve Tang, N. (2022). Inclusive leadership and innovative performance: A multi-level mediation model of psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831
  52. Li, N., Bao, S., Naseem, S., Sarfraz, M., ve Mohsin, M. (2021). Extending the association between leader-member exchange differentiation and safety performance: A moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1603–1613. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S335199
  53. Liu, X., Cifuentes-Faura, J., Zhao, S. ve Wang, L. (2024), The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 67, 102124, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2023.102124
  54. Ma, Y.R., Jiang, S.S. ve Zhang, J. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of inclusive leadership on medical team performance. A team cognition perspective. Journal of Hunan University, 33, 1–11.
  55. Maslach, C. ve Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (2nd Ed.), Consulting Psychologist Press.
  56. Mehmood, S., Zaman, K., Khan, S., Ali, Z. ve Khan, H.ur R. (2024). The role of green industrial transformation in mitigating carbon emissions: exploring the channels of technological innovation and environmental regulation. Energy and Built Environment, 5(3), 464-479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.03.001
  57. Mehmood, K., Iftikhar, Y., Suhail, A., Jabeen, F., Ashraf, R.U. ve Bader Alkatheeri, H. (2024). Driving twin transition in green SMEs: The role of platform leadership in sustainable practices. Academic Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 20300. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.20300abstract
  58. Meng, J., Murad, M., Li, C., Bakhtawar, A. ve Ashraf, S. F. (2022). Green lifestyle: a tie between green human resource management practices and green organizational citizenship behavior. Sustainability, 15(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010044
  59. Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R. S. ve Quisenberry, D. M. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources, and interpersonal relationships: A modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. In K. Törnblom ve A. Kazemi (Eds.), Handbook of social resource theory (99–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_6
  60. Mohd Suki, N., Mohd Suki, N., Afshan, S., Sharif, A., Ariff Kasim, M. ve Hanafi, R. M. (2022). How does green technology innovation affect green growth in ASEAN-6 countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Gondwana Research, 111, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2022.06.019
  61. Nembhard, I.M. ve Edmondson, A.C. (2006). Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  62. Nikolajenko-Skarbalė, J., Viederytė, R. ve Šneiderienė, A. (2021). The significance of green skills and competencies making the transition towards the greener economy. Rural Sustainability Research, 46(341), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/plua-2021-0017
  63. Nguon, V. (2022). Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction, innovative behavior, and work performance: A conceptual review. International Journal of Business and Management, 17(12), 75. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v17n12p75
  64. Nunnally, J. C. ve Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  65. Ogiemwonyi, O., Alam, M. N., Alshareef, R., Alsolamy, M., Azizan, N. A. ve Mat, N. (2023). Environmental factors affecting green purchase behaviors of the consumers: Mediating role of environmental attitude. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 10, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100130
  66. Orekoya, I.O. (2024). Inclusive leadership and team climate: the role of team power distance and trust in leadership. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45(1), 94-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2023-0142
  67. Patwary, A.K., Mohd Yusof, M.F., Bah Simpong, D., Ab Ghaffar, S.F. ve Rahman, M.K. (2022). Examining proactive pro-environmental behaviour through green inclusive leadership and green human resource management: An empirical investigation among Malaysian hotel employees. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-06-2021-0174
  68. Priyankara, H. P. R., Luo, F., Saeed, A., Nubuor, S. A. ve Jayasuriya, M. P. F. (2018). How does leader’s support for environment promote organizational citizenship behaviour for environment? A multi-theory perspective. Sustainability, 10(1), 23–58. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010023
  69. Quan, D., Tian, L. ve Qiu,W. (2022). The study on the influence of green inclusive leadership on employee green behaviour. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1, 5292184. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5292184
  70. Rawat, P. S., Lyndon, S., Pradhan, M. R., Jose, J., Kollenchira, M. ve Mehta, G. (2021). Employee reactiveness and inclusive leadership: Time to manage emotional diversity. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 10(3), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-02-2020-0042
  71. Rayner, S. (2009). Educational diversity and learning leadership: a proposition, some principles and a model of inclusive leadership?. Educational Review, 61(4). 433-447, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903404004
  72. Saether, E.A. (2019). Motivational antecedents to high-tech R&D employees’ innovative work behavior: Self-determined motivation, person-organization fit, organization support of creativity, and pay justice. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30, 100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2019.100350
  73. Sahoo, S. ve Jakhar, S.K. (2024). Industry 4.0 deployment for circular economy performance—understanding the role of green procurement and remanufacturing activities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 1144-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3542
  74. Salama, M. E. W., Khairy H. A. ve Badwy, H. E. (2024). Sustainable leadership and work behavior in hotel businesses: The influence of perceived environmental corporate social responsibility. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(11), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i11.4503
  75. Shah, S. G. M., Tang, M., Sarfraz, M. ve Fareed, Z. (2019). The aftermath of CEO succession via hierarchical jumps on firm performance and agency cost: Evidence from Chinese firms. Applied Economics Letters, 26(21), 1744–1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1593932
  76. Shakil, R.M., Memon, M.A. ve Ting, H. (2021). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of job autonomy. Quality & Quantity, 56(4), 1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01102-0
  77. Sharma, L., Agarwal, P., Joshi, B.P., Kumar, N. ve Tiwari, S. (2023). A study of impact of inclusive leadership on innovative behaviors and diversity at workplace. Environmental Social Psychology, 9, 1721. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i7.4122
  78. Simmou,W., Govindan, K., Sameer, I., Hussainey, K. ve Simmou, S. (2023). Doing good to be green and live clean!-linking corporate social responsibility strategy, green innovation, and environmental performance: evidence from Maldivian and Moroccan small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384, 135265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135265
  79. Siyal, S., Xin, C., Umrani, W.A., Fatima, S. ve Pal, D. (2021). How do leaders influence innovation and creativity in employees? The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Administration and Society, 53(9), 1337-1361, https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399721997427
  80. Sousa, V. D. ve Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  81. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  82. Thabet, W. M., Badar, K., Aboramadan, M. ve Abualigah, A. (2023). Does green inclusive leadership promote hospitality employees’ pro-environmental behaviors? The mediating role of climate for green initiative. The Service Industries Journal, 43(1-2), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1970519
  83. Van Dyne, L. ve LePine, J.A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behavior: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256899
  84. Verma, J. ve Gupta, M. (2023). Green environmental sustainability: Initiatives by government and corporate sectors. In M. Kumar (Ed.). Handbook of research on safe disposal methods of municipal solid wastes for a sustainable environment (212–221). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8117-2
  85. Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sáinz, A. ve Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079
  86. Walumbwa, F.O., Peterson, S.J., Avolio, B.J. ve Hartnell, C.A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service, climate and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63, 937-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01193.x
  87. Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Su, D., Li, S., Zhang, T. ve Li, H. (2019). The mediating role of inclusive leadership: Work engagement and innovative behaviour among Chinese head nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12754
  88. Wang, C., Zhang, X. ve Teng, X. (2023a). How to convert green entrepreneurial orientation into green innovation: the role of knowledge creation process and green absorptive capacity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1260-1273, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3187
  89. Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhang, S. ve Su, Y. (2023b), Research on the impact of digital inclusive finance on regional carbon emissions: based on the sustainable green innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 428, 139513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139513
  90. Wharton, A.S. (1993). The affective consequences of service work: Managing emotions on the job. Work and occupations, 20(2), 205-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888493020002004
  91. Xiao, C. ve McCright, A. M. (2015). Gender differences in environmental concern: Revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environment and Behavior, 47(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513491571
  92. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P. ve Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00177
  93. Zhang, X. (2024). Sustainable practices, CSR, and brand reputation: Influencing purchase intentions in luxury green marketing. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 27, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.54097/6k8rxz55
  94. Zhang,W., Zhang,W. ve Daim, T.U. (2023). The voluntary green behavior in green technology innovation: the dual effects of green human resource management system and leader green traits. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114049
  95. Zhang, M., Hu, E. ve Lin, Y. (2023). The impact of flexibility-oriented HRM systems on innovative behaviour in China: A moderated mediation model of dualistic passion and inclusive leadership. Asia Pacific Business Review, 29(1), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2022.2076446
  96. Zhang, G. ve Zhao, W. (2024). The impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior – an intermediary model with moderation. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2023-0287
  97. Zhong, J., Li, Y. ve Luo, J. (2022). The trickle-down effects of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: the joint moderating effects of vicarious learning and organizational inclusion climate. Journal of leadership & organizational studies, 29(3), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211059941
  98. Zhou, S., Zhang, D., Lyu, C. ve Zhang, H. (2018). Does seeing ‘mind acts upon mind’ affect green psychological climate and green product development performance? The role of matching between green transformational leadership and individual green values. Sustainability, 10(9), 32-56. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093256
  99. Zhu, J., Xu, S., ve Zhang, B. (2020). The paradoxical effect of inclusive leadership on subordinates’ creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02960
  100. Quan, D., Tian, L. ve Qiu,W. (2022). The study on the influence of green inclusive leadership on employee green behaviour. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 1, 5292184. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5292184