Journals / İmgelem / 2026 / Sayı: 19

From Faith to Prosperity: The Relationship Between Increasing Secularisation in Türkiye and Sustainable Development Goals

İnançtan Refaha: Türkiye’de Artan Sekülerleşme ile Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları Arasındaki İlişki

Özcan Garan(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8126-6473
Journal
İmgelem
Pages
374–402
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, the increase in secularisation in Türkiye in the first quarter of the 21st century appears to follow a trajectory that coincides with indicators related to the human dimension of sustainable development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Secularisation, a multidimensional process that refers to the transformation of religion’s position in the social, political and cultural spheres of modern societies, has long been debated in sociological literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, data from the sixth wave (2010–2014) and seventh wave (2017–2022) of the World Values Survey (WVS) are examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, the increase in secularisation in Türkiye in the first quarter of the 21st century appears to follow a trajectory that coincides with indicators related to the human dimension of sustainable development.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010–2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Türkiye'de Sekülerleşme · Dünya Değerler Araştırması · Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları.

Abstract

Secularisation, a multidimensional process that refers to the transformation of religion’s position in the social, political and cultural spheres of modern societies, has long been debated in sociological literature. In this context, data from the sixth wave (2010–2014) and seventh wave (2017–2022) of the World Values Survey (WVS) are examined. The Inglehart–Welzel culture map created with these data evaluates secularisation within the framework of the traditional–secular-rational (vertical) and survival–self-expression (horizontal) axes. The findings show that Türkiye experienced a significant shift towards secular-rational values on the vertical axis between WVS 6 and WVS 7; however, no significant transformation occurred in terms of self-expression values on the horizontal axis. The study discusses the findings obtained by Inlgelhart-Welzel in a relational framework with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) “People” dimension, namely SDG 1 (No Poverty), SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality) within a relational framework. Accordingly, the increase in secularisation in Türkiye in the first quarter of the 21st century appears to follow a trajectory that coincides with indicators related to the human dimension of sustainable development.

Özet

Modern toplumların sosyal, siyasi ve kültürel alanlarında dinin konumunun dönüşümünü ifade eden çok boyutlu bir süreç olan sekülerleşme, sosyoloji literatüründe uzun süredir tartışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Dünya Değerler Araştırması'nın (WVS) altıncı dalgası (2010–2014) ve yedinci dalgası (2017–2022) verileri incelenmiştir. Bu verilerle oluşturulan Inglehart–Welzel kültür haritası, sekülerleşmeyi geleneksel-seküler-rasyonel (dikey) ve hayatta kalma–kendini ifade etme (yatay) eksenleri çerçevesinde değerlendirmektedir. Bulgular, Türkiye’nin WVS 6 ile WVS 7 arasında dikey eksende seküler-rasyonel değerlere doğru önemli bir kayma yaşadığını göstermektedir; ancak yatay eksende kendini ifade etme değerleri açısından önemli bir dönüşüm gerçekleşmemiştir. Çalışma, Inglehart-Welzel tarafından elde edilen bulguları, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları’nın (SKA) “İnsan” boyutu, yani SKA 1 (Yoksulluğa Son), SKA 2 (Açlığa Son), SKA 3 (Sağlık ve Kaliteli Yaşam), SKA 4 (Nitelikli Eğitim) ve SKA 5 (Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği) ile ilişkisel bir çerçeve içinde ele almaktadır. Buna göre, 21. yüzyılın ilk çeyreğinde Türkiye'de sekülerleşmedeki artış, sürdürülebilir kalkınmanın insan boyutuyla ilgili göstergelerle örtüşen bir yörünge izliyor görünmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Garan, Ö. (2026). From Faith to Prosperity: The Relationship Between Increasing Secularisation in Türkiye and Sustainable Development Goals. İmgelem, Sayı: 19, 374–402. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1879520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Alev, Ç. (2005). Modernity, Islam, and secularism in Turkey: Bodies, places, and time. University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
  3. Awass, O. (2023). Reconceptualizing secularization and secularism: The value-inversion theory. Critical Historical Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1086/724272
  4. Azak, U. (2010). Islam and secularism in Turkey: Kemalism, religion and the nation state. I.B. Tauris.
  5. Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Polity Press.
  6. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Anchor Books.
  7. Berger, P. L. (Ed.). (1999). The desecularisation of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  8. Blanton, M. (2025). Institutional decline and resilient belief: Understanding secularization in Latin America. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 11.
  9. Bruce, S. (2011). Secularisation: In defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford University Press.
  10. Carvalho, J. P., Rubin, J. & Sacks, M. (2024). Failed secular revolutions: Religious belief, competition, and extremism. Public Choice, 200, 561-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01112-6
  11. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. University of Chicago Press.
  12. Comte, A. (1974). The Positive Philosophy (Freely translated by Harriet Martineau). AMS Press. (Original work published 1830-1842)
  13. Corcoran, K. E., Scheitle, C. P., & DiGregorio, B. D. (2025). Social locations of secularization and worldview (dis)enchantment: Education, income, and belief in religious and paranormal phenomena. Sociology of Religion, 86(2), 164-190. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srae016
  14. Davie, G. (2000). Religion in modern Europe: A mutating memory. Oxford University Press.
  15. Dhima K, Golder M. (2021). Secularization Theory and Religion. Politics and Religion, 14(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048319000464
  16. Durkheim, É. (1995). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
  17. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1-29.
  18. Ertit, V. (2024), Can the Scope of Secularization Theory Be Expanded Beyond the Modern-Christian-West? Exploring the Alevi Experience in Turkey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 63(4), 977-999. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12937
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
  20. Göle, N. (1997). Modern mahrem: Medeniyet ve örtünme. Metis Yayınları.
  21. Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17-29.
  22. Haustein, J. (2021). Development as a form of religious engineering? Religion and secularity in development discourse. Religion, 51(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1792049
  23. Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010a). Modernisation, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
  26. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010b). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernisation and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001258
  27. Karaşahin, H. (2024). Talcott Parsons Sosyolojisinde Din ve Sekülerleşme. İmgelem, 15, 183-204. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1566889
  28. Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. Macmillan.
  29. Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. Columbia University Press.
  30. Mardin, Ş. (1973). Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics? Daedalus, 102(1), 169-190.
  31. Marx, K. (1975). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 (M. Milligan, Trans.). International Publishers. (Original work written 1844)
  32. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
  33. Sachs, J. D., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Drumm, E. (2023). Sustainable Development Report 2023: Turkey profile. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/profiles/
  34. Saktanber, A. (2002). Living Islam: Women, religion and the politicization of culture in Turkey. I.B. Tauris.
  35. Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Harvard University Press.
  36. Toprak, B. (1981). Islam and political development in Turkey. Brill.
  37. Tuğal, C. (2009). Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  38. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
  39. Weber, M. (2005). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1905)
  40. World Values Survey Association & European Values Study. (2023). World Values Survey & European Values Study (2005–2023) data set. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.orghttps://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
  41. Yavuz, M. H. (2003). Islamic political identity in Turkey. Oxford University Press.
  42. Yeşilmen, H. (2026). Kültürel Tamamlanma Süreci Olarak Sekülerleşme: Moderniteden Dijitalleşmeye Doğru Dinin Dönüşümü ve Yeniden Üretimi. İmgelem, 18, 499-528. https://doi.org/10.53791/imgelem.1828255
  43. Zürcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: A modern history. I. B. Tauris.