Journals / International Journal of Sport Culture and Science / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: Special Issue 3 Özel Sayı

Review of Relationship between Personality Characteristics and Leadership Power Perceptions of Karate-Do Athletes

Pages
762–773
Publication Date
2016-12-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When we examine correlation analysis based on gender, in terms of female aspect, there is an avoidant relationship between emotional instability and referent power (r:-,422 p<.050).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective in this study is to analyse the leadership power perceptions based on the personality characteristics of karate-do athletes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the research consists of licensed, national athletes above 18 (A-B-C) under Turkish Karate Federation and the samples are made of 149 athletes selected via random sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When we examine correlation analysis based on gender, in terms of female aspect, there is an avoidant relationship between emotional instability and referent power (r:-,422 p<.050).
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Karate-do · personality · leadership in sports

Abstract

The objective in this study is to analyse the leadership power perceptions based on the personality characteristics of karate-do athletes. The population of the research consists of licensed, national athletes above 18 (A-B-C) under Turkish Karate Federation and the samples are made of 149 athletes selected via random sampling. The research has been limited to the scale of leadership power perception, the scale of personal characteristics as well as the questions regarding the demographic characteristics and the athletes at the age of 18 and above. In the study, the Scale of Leadership Power in Sports-Other (SLGÖ-D: Athlete Form), adapted by Konter (2008) from Wann, Metcalf, Brewer and Whiteside (2000) and the Personality Test Based on Attributes (SDKT), developed by Bacanlı, İlhan and Aslan (2009) have been used as a means of data collection. The data has been analysed by SPSS package program and correlation analysis have been performed. When we examine correlation analysis based on gender, in terms of female aspect, there is an avoidant relationship between emotional instability and referent power (r:-,422 p<.050).

🔖

Cite This Article

Öktem, T., Öktem, G., Güzel, P., Özbey, S. (2016). Review of Relationship between Personality Characteristics and Leadership Power Perceptions of Karate-Do Athletes. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, Cilt: 4 Sayı: Special Issue 3 Özel Sayı, 762–773. https://ajindex.com/articles/1498554

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Alkan N, Çolaklar A (2001). Shito Ryu Karate-Do. Ankara, 80-124
  2. Bacanlı H, İlhan T, Aslan S (2009). Beş Faktör Kuramına Dayalı Bir Kişilik Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara Dayalı Kişilik Testi (SDKT). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2): 261-279.
  3. Bass BM (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, & managerial applications. (3rd Ed.). New York: Free Press.
  4. Buchanan D, Huzynski A (1992). Organizational Behavior an Introductory Text, 3th ed. U.K: Prentice Hall Publishing.
  5. Chelladurai P (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and perceptions of leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27-41.
  6. Cook CW, Philip L, Hunsaker R, Coffey E (1997). Management and Organizational Behavior, Chicago: McGraw Hill Book Com., USA.
  7. Davıs K, (1988). İşletmede İnsan Davranışı, (Çev. Kemal Tosun, Tomris Somay, Fulya Aykar, Can Baysal, Ömer Sadullah ve Semra Yalçın), 3.Baskı, İstanbul: Yön Ajans.
  8. Description of karate-do. http://karateturkey.org/karate-do.html (02.04.2015)
  9. Description of personality. http://www.tdk.gov.tr (06.04.2015)
  10. Doğan E (2003). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde Karate Sporunun Tarihi Gelişimi, Master Thesis (Unpublished)., Marmara Üniversitesi, Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, İstanbul
  11. French J and Raven BH (1959). The bases of social power. In. D. Cartwright, (Ed.). Studies in social power (pp.150-167).Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.
  12. Hedlund J, Forsythe GB, Horvath JA, Williams WM, Snook S, Sternberg RJ, (2003). “Identifying and Assessing Tacit Konowledge: Understanding Practical Intelligence of Military Leaders”, The Leadership Quarterly, 14, ss. 117-140
  13. Koçel T (1984). İşletme Yöneticiliği, İstanbul Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Yayını
  14. Konter E (2007). Antrenörlerin ve Sporcuların Cinsiyetlerine Göre Liderlik Gücü Algıları. Spormetre, 5 (2): 85-90.
  15. Konter E (2008). Towards Adaptation Of Self And Other Versions Of Leadership Power İn Sport Questionnaires For Turkey.13th. Conference Of Personality, Motivation, Sport, National Sports Academy, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  16. Konter E (2009). Antrenörlerin ve Sporcuların Yaş Gruplarına Göre Liderlik Gücü Algıları, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4 (31): 61-68.
  17. Northouse PG (1997). “Leadership: Theory and Practice”. Thousand Oaks Ch. 7: Sage Publications
  18. Özkalp E, Kırel Ç (2001). Örgütsel Davranış, Eskişehir: ETAM A.Ş Matbaa Tesisleri
  19. Robbins, Stephen P,(1998). Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications, 8. Press, New Jersey, S347
  20. Wann DL, Metcalf LA, Brewer KR and Whiteside HD (2000). Development Of The Power İn Sport Questionnaires. Journal Of Sport Behavior, 23, 423-443.
  21. Tatlıcı M, Kırımoğlu H (2008). Atletizm Antrenörlerinin Mesleki Tükenmişlik Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 2, Sayı 1:34-47
  22. Zel U (2011). Kişilik ve Liderlik. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.