SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Soilless Greenhouse Clusters: Part 1: The Geothermal GOAZ (Greenhouse Organized Agricultural Zone) Model in Türkiye

Dr. Adil Özdemir(New Energy Source GmbH, Bern, Switzerland)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, the Geothermal GOAZ model offers a mathematically validated, financially reliable, and scalable framework for sustainable agriculture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, global crises, geopolitical conflicts, and climate change have brought food security to the forefront of the macroeconomic agenda and necessitated a transition to technology-intensive agricultural systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistical regression models empirically demonstrate the project’s high financial predictability and confirm that spatial clustering meticulously optimizes capital expenditures (CAPEX) through economies of scale.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, the Geothermal GOAZ model offers a mathematically validated, financially reliable, and scalable framework for sustainable agriculture.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Geothermal greenhouse · Geothermal GOAZ (Greenhouse Organized Agricultural Zone) · Agro-industrial clustering

Abstract

In recent years, global crises, geopolitical conflicts, and climate change have brought food security to the forefront of the macroeconomic agenda and necessitated a transition to technology-intensive agricultural systems. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic evaluation of soilless greenhouse clusters, drawing on a nationwide empirical case study of the Geothermal GOAZ (Greenhouse Organized Agricultural Zone) model in Turkiye. The analysis examines in detail the cost-reducing effect of centralized geothermal heating, its capacity to make agricultural production independent of fossil-fuel price shocks, and the stability of market supply dynamics in the context of the Cobweb Theorem. Additionally, this framework evaluates the integration of industrial symbiosis, Public-Private Partnership (PPP) governance, and the structural alignment between the EU Green Deal and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). Statistical regression models empirically demonstrate the project’s high financial predictability and confirm that spatial clustering meticulously optimizes capital expenditures (CAPEX) through economies of scale. The study also highlights the model’s strong Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance, particularly in generating zero-emission carbon credits and promoting rural employment that supports gender equality. In conclusion, the Geothermal GOAZ model offers a mathematically validated, financially reliable, and scalable framework for sustainable agriculture. Furthermore, by integrating shallow geothermal heat pump technologies into the model, this central clustering model becomes globally applicable across all geographic and climatic conditions, including regions without hydrothermal resources.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdemir, D. A. (2026). Techno-Economic Evaluation of Soilless Greenhouse Clusters: Part 1: The Geothermal GOAZ (Greenhouse Organized Agricultural Zone) Model in Türkiye. International Journal of Earth Sciences Knowledge and Applications, Volume: 8 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1494589

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (86)

  1. Anifantis, A.S., Pascuzzi, S., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., 2016. Geothermal source heat pump performance for a greenhouse heating system: an experimental study. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 47 (3), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2016.544.
  2. Apostolopoulos, N., Goulas, C., Flouros, F., Papadopoulos, G., & Apostolopoulos, S., 2026. The impact of the energy crisis on the food market, the energy transition, and energy poverty after the outbreak of the Russia–Ukraine war: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Energy Policy 3, 1755555. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2026.1755555.
  3. Argento, S., Garcia, G., Treccarichi, S., 2024. Sustainable and low-input techniques in Mediterranean greenhouse vegetable production. Horticulturae 10 (9), 997. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090997.
  4. Ataseven, Y., 2023. Evaluation of the possible effects of the European Green Deal process on agricultural policies in Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 (1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1108754.
  5. Barbier, E. 2002. Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6(1-2), 3-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00002-3.
  6. Bas, T.G. 2025. Globalization vs. Glocalization: Learn lessons from two global crises, such as the Russia–Ukraine conflict and the COVID-19 pandemic, for the agro-food and agro-industrial sector. Agriculture 15 (2), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15020155.
  7. Bataineh, K. 2024. Hybrid fuel-assisted solar-powered Stirling engine for combined cooling, heating, and power systems: A review. Energy 300, 131506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131506.
  8. Benke, K., Tomkins, B., 2017. Future food-production systems: vertical farming and controlled-environment agriculture. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 13 (1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2017.1394054.
  9. Bhattarai, K., Ogden, A. B., Pandey, S., Sandoya, G.V., Shi, A., Nankar, A. N., Jayakodi, M., Huo, H., Jiang, T., Tripodi, P., Dardick, C., 2025. Improvement of crop production in controlled environment agriculture through breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 15, 1524601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1524601.
  10. Boyacı, S., Kocięcka, J., Jagosz, B., Atılgan, A., 2025. Energy efficiency in greenhouses and comparison of energy sources used for heating. Energies 18(3), 724. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030724.
  11. Bozoğlu, M., Gündoğdu, H., 2024. The Structural and Regulatory Status of Fragmentation in Agricultural Lands in Turkey. In M. Yağbasan (Ed.), Academic Research and Evaluations in the Social Sciences II, 131-146. https://doi.org/10.58830/ozgur.pub493.c2087.
  12. Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K.E., 2022. Cost-effective climate policies and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energy Economics 115, 106365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106365.
  13. Bui, H.T., Nguyen, H.K., 2021. Market access and premium pricing through GlobalGAP certification: A study of modern greenhouse systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 294, 126298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126298.
  14. Carotti, L., Gori, V., Marrocchio, C., 2023. Hybrid (gas and geothermal) greenhouse simulations aimed at optimizing investment and operative costs: A case study in NW Italy. Energies 16 (9), 3931. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093931.
  15. Chaudhry, M.I., Miranda, M.J., 2018. Complex price dynamics in vertically linked cobweb markets. Economic Modelling, 72, 363-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmode.2018.01.021.
  16. Cowan, N., Ferrier, L., Spears, B.M., Drewer, J., Reay, D.S., Skiba, U., 2022. CEA systems: the means to achieve future food security and environmental sustainability?. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6, 891256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.891256.
  17. Çelmen, O., Elidemir, S., Karadağlar, M., 2025. Update on the utilisation of geothermal energy for space and greenhouse heating in Türkiye. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 177, 146-157. https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.1716476.
  18. MEUCC, 2024. İklim Değişikliği Azaltım Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2024-2030) [Climate Change Mitigation Strategy and Action Plan (2024-2030)], Ministry of Environment, Urbanization, and Climate Change of Turkiye. https://iklim.gov.tr/db/turkce/icerikler/files/İklim_Değişikliği_Azaltım_Stratejisi_ve_Eylem_Planı_(2024-2030).pdf.
  19. Dikili Geothermal GOAZ, 2025. Faaliyet Raporu (2024-2025) [Activity Report (2024-2025)]. https://www.dikilitdiosb.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/DIKILI_OTB_FAALIYET-RAPORU-26.12.2025.pdf.
  20. Dimitropoulou, A.-M.N., Giannini, E.N., Maroulis, Z.B. 2025. A greenhouse profitability model: The effect of the energy system. Energies 18 (17), 4748. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18174748.
  21. DiPippo, R., 2012. Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact (3rd Edition). Butterworth-Heinemann, 624 p.
  22. Dsouza, A., Newman, L., Graham, T., Fraser, E.D.G., 2023. Exploring the landscape of controlled environment agriculture research: A systematic scoping review of trends and topics. Agricultural Systems 209, 103673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103673.
  23. Du, M., Chen, Y., Liu, S., Xiao, L., 2026. From segmentation to linkage: The spatial effect of technological structure change on driving high-quality agricultural development in Xinjiang. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 10, 1781650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1781650.
  24. EGEC, 2022. EGEC Geothermal Market Report: Shallow geothermal energy sector and regulatory frameworks. European Geothermal Energy Council, https://www.egec.org/media-publications/egec-geothermal-market-report-2022/.
  25. Elshehabi, T., Alfehaid, M., 2025. Sustainable geothermal energy: A review of challenges and opportunities in deep wells and shallow heat pumps for transitioning professionals. Energies 18 (4), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040811.
  26. Esenlikci, A.C., 2023. Türkiye'de organize sanayi bölgelerinin yeşil dönüşümü: Yeşil organize sanayi bölgesi projesi [Green transformation of organized industrial zones in Turkey: Green organized industrial zone project]. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi 13 (1), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1212711.
  27. Fiankor, D.D.D., Flachsbarth, I., Masood, A., Brümmer, B., 2020. Does GlobalGAP certification promote agrifood exports? European Review of Agricultural Economics 47 (1), 247-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz023.
  28. Filimonau, V., Hattingh, L., Neave, S., Parfitt, C., 2024. The opportunities and challenges of provisioning low pesticide risk fresh produce by smallholder farmers to hospitality and foodservice organizations. Journal of Foodservice Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2024.2372483.
  29. GeoPLASMA-CE, 2019. Strategies for the planning, mapping, and management of shallow geothermal energy in Central Europe. Interreg Central Europe Program. https://programme2014-20.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/GeoPLASMA-CE.html.
  30. Githiga, J., Elias, A., Yasunobu, K., 2024. The effect of GlobalGAP certification on horticulture production in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development 15 (1), 8-15. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ijerd/15/1/15_8/_article.
  31. Glassley, W.E., 2014. Geothermal Energy: Renewable Energy and the Environment (2nd Edition). CRC Press, 424 p.
  32. Gomez, C., Currey, C.J., Dickson, R.W., Kim, H.J., Hernandez, R., Sabeh, N.C., Raudales, R.E., Brumfield, R.G., Laury-Shaw, A., Wilke, A.K., Lopez, R.G., Burnett, S.E., 2019. Controlled environment food production for urban agriculture. HortScience 54 (9), 1448-1458. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14073-19.
  33. Guarino, S., Catrini, P., Buscemi, A., Lo Brano, V., Piacentino, A., 2021. Assessing the energy-saving potential of a dish-Stirling concentrator integrated into energy plants in the tertiary sector. Energies 14 (4), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041163.
  34. Guiné, R.P.F., 2024. The challenges and strategies of food security under global change. Foods, 13(13), 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13132083.
  35. Gürpınar, K., Aktürk, A., 2023. Evaluation of the Competitive Advantage of Afyonkarahisar Province Sandıklı District Geothermal Greenhouse Sector in the Light of Executive Opinions. Journal of Strategic Management Research 6 (2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.54993/syad.1336595.
  36. Haehnlein, S., Bayer, P., Blum, P., 2010. International legal status of the use of shallow geothermal energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (9), 2611-2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.069.
  37. Hamam, M., Spina, D., Raimondo, M., Di Vita, G.D., Zanchini, R., Chinnici, G., Tóth, J.R., D'Amico, M., 2023. Industrial symbiosis and agri-food system: Themes, links, and relationships. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 6, 1012436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1012436.
  38. Hao, S., Liu, L., Wang, G., 2025. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of China's agro-processing industry. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9, 1685935. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1685935.
  39. IKA and UNDP, 2022. IKA (Izmir Development Agency of Turkiye) & UNDP (United Nations Development Program) Endüstriyel simbiyoz: [Industrial Symbiosis]. https://endustriyelsimbiyoz.ikvp.izka.org.tr/.
  40. IPCC, 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
  41. IRENA, 2023a. Global geothermal market and technology assessment. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Feb/Global-geothermal-market-and-technology-assessment.
  42. IRENA, 2023b. Socio-economic footprint of the energy transition: Geothermal energy and rural employment. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2023/Jul/IRENA_Socioeconomic-footprint_energy_transition_SE_Asia_2023.pdf.
  43. Işık, S.E., Adedoyin, F.F., Bekun, F.V., 2023. Impact of the European Green Deal (EGD) on the agricultural carbon (CO2) emission in Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 18 (3), 859-866. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180307.
  44. Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, H., Yun, R., Park, C., Nam, Y., Cho, H., Lee, H., 2021. Comprehensive feasibility investigation of river source heat pump systems in terms of life cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 188, 116655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.116655.
  45. Kapur, B., Solmaz, D., Kekeç, U., Erkan Can, M.E., 2024. The development of greenhouses in the southern Türkiye, with an emphasis on their structural and agricultural features: The case of the Mersin province. Çukurova Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences 39 (1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.36846/CJAFS.2024.134.
  46. Karagöl, V., 2025. Global food prices in the shadow of uncertainties, risks and volatilities. International Journal of Economics 40 (4), 1001-1019. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.1554013.
  47. Karytsas, S., Mendrinos, D., Radoglou-Grammatikis, P., 2022. Examining the development of a geothermal risk mitigation scheme in Greece. Clean Technologies 4 (2), 346-364. https://doi.org/10.3390/cleantechnol4020021
  48. Kındap, A., 2023. Tarımda jeotermal devri [The geothermal revolution in agriculture]. Geothermal Energy Association of Turkiye. https://jeotermalenerjidernegi.org.tr/public/pdf/99840590.pdf.
  49. Kurpaska, S., Janowski, M., Gliniak, M., Krakowiak-Bal, A., Ziemiańczyk, U., 2021. The use of geothermal energy to heating crops under cover: A case study of Poland. Energies 14 (9), 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092618.
  50. Laili, N., Djatna, T., Indrasti, N., Yani, M., 2024. Optimization of industrial symbiosis in coffee-based eco-industrial park design. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 10 (2), 621-642. https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2024.02.13.
  51. Lee, C., Kang, G.C., Jang, J.K., Yun, S.-W., Moon, J.P., Mun, H.-S., Lagua, E.B., 2020. Numerical simulations on the application of a closed-loop lake water heat pump system in the Lake Soyang, Korea. Energies 13 (3), 762. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13030762.
  52. Lee, C.G., Kang, G.C., Jang, J.K., Yun, S.-W., Moon, J.P., Mun, H.-S., Lagua, E.B., 2025. Efficacy of hybrid photovoltaic–thermal and geothermal heat pump system for greenhouse climate control. Energies 18 (20), 5386. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18205386.
  53. Liew, Y.S., Tan, L.K., Chua, S.C., 2021. Seawater as renewable energy in air conditioning and plumbing systems for coastal development. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research 9 (9), 540- 555. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol9.iss9.3361.
  54. Li, X., Wei, J., Chen, H., 2025. Exploring the driving mechanisms behind the formation of agricultural science and technology innovation clusters. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 9, 1607580. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1607580.
  55. Lu, H., Li, Q., Liu, B., Chi, Z., Ye, Y., 2023. Research on the dynamic changes of China's agro-processing industry agglomeration and spatial impact of production factors on agglomeration. PLOS ONE 18 (12), e0292870. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292870.
  56. Lund, J.W., Toth, A.N., 2021. Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2020 worldwide review. Geothermics 90, 101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101915.
  57. Mertoğlu, O., Şimşek, Ş., Başarır, N., 2020. Geothermal Energy Use - Projections, Country Update for Turkey. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352478313_Geothermal_Energy_Use_Projections_and_Country_Update_for_Turkey.
  58. Ngirubiu, I.I., Batlles-delaFuente, A., Franco-García, M.-L., 2026. Circular Economy in Agri-food Greenhouses: Lessons from the Netherlands. In Evidence and Action on the UNSDGs: Reviews and Case Studies. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83662-602-220261005.
  59. Niyommaneerat, W., Maclean, M., Salam, P.A., 2022. Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and its impact on financial performance: Evidence from farming clusters. Land Use Policy 119, 106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106197.
  60. Overland, I., Sabyrbekov, A., 2022. Know your enemy: How the carbon border adjustment mechanism works and why it matters. Energy Research & Social Science 92, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102809.
  61. Özel, E., Esmer, Y., 2024. Social and economic problems of agricultural enterprises: The case of Bayburt. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 11 (4), 890-903. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1445211.
  62. Özkan, M., 2024. We aim to expand geothermal greenhouse farming to 100,000 acres. We rank fourth in the world and second in Europe in terms of greenhouse capacity. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Turkiye. https://www.turktarim.gov.tr/Haber/1104/jeotermal-seraciligi-100-bin-donume-cikarmayi-hedefliyoruz.
  63. Pająk, L., Tomaszewska, B., Bujakowski, W., 2024. Assessment of potential heat resources in stratified lakes in Poland in the era of the search for clean energy sources. Resources 13 (2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13020027.
  64. Poitras, G., 2023. Cobweb Theory, market stability, and price expectations. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 45 (1), 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383722200028X.
  65. Porter, M.E.,1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press. 352 p. Ptak, M., Amnuaylojaroen, T., Sojka, M., 2025. Heat resources of rivers in the Odra River Basin as a potential element implement for sustainable development in Poland. Resources 14 (12), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14120184.
  66. Rezaei, F., Burg, V., Pfister, S., Hellweg, S., Roshandel, R., 2024. Spatial optimization of industrial symbiosis for heat supply of agricultural greenhouses. Journal of Industrial Ecology 28 (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13543.
  67. Rosas-Casals, M., Gamarra, A. R., Smaniotto, C., 2022. Sustainability and economic viability of decentralized geothermal systems for agriculture in rural areas. Journal of Cleaner Production 358, 132045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132045.
  68. Schreinemachers, P., Grovermann, C., Praneetvatakul, S., Heng, P., Nguyen, T.T., Buntong, B., Le, N.T., Pinn, T., 2020. Safe and sustainable agriculture: The impact of Good Agricultural Practices certification on pesticide use and farm income. Ecological Economics 176, 106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106733.
  69. Semerci, A., 2021. Tarım işletmelerinde tarımsal kredi kullanım durumunun analizi [Analysis of agricultural credit usage in agricultural enterprises]. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 8 (2), 396-410. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.860909.
  70. Seo, J., Seo, U-J., 2021. Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems for horticulture greenhouses adjacent to highway interchanges: A case study in South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 135, 110194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110194.
  71. Shortall, R., Bakhtiari, F., Hashemi, M., 2024. Socio-economic impacts of geothermal direct use in agriculture: Job creation and sustainable rural development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 189, 113940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113940.
  72. Şener, M.F., Uzelli, T., Akkuş, İ., Mertoğlu, O., Baba, A., 2023. The potential, utilization, and development of geothermal energy in Türkiye. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration 171, 69-90. https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.1229381.
  73. Şirikçi, B.S., Çetinkaya, G., 2025. Economic structure of tomato production in geothermal energy-heated greenhouses: Simav district case of Kütahya province. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 12 (4), 1139-1152. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1759246.
  74. Trabert, U., Jesper, M., Bergstraesser, W., Best, I., Kusyy, O., Orozaliev, J., Vajen, K., 2021. Techno-economic evaluation of electricity price-driven heat production of a river water heat pump in a German district heating system. International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management 31, 121–142. https://doi.org/10.5278/ijsepm.6291.
  75. TDİOSB, 2017. Regulation on the Implementation of Agriculture-Based Specialized Organized Industrial Zones. Official Gazette of the Republic of Turkey, No. 30250. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=24116&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5.
  76. TRGM, 2024. Investor Guide to Organized Agricultural Zones. General Directorate of Agricultural Reform of Turkiye. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TRGM/Belgeler/YATIRIMCI%20REHBERI%CC%87%202024.pdf.
  77. TTB, 2020-2025. Activity Reports for 2000-2025. (Ministry of Agriculture of Turkiye). https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Plan-Program-Ve-Faaliyet-Raporlari/faaliyet-raporlar%c4%b1.
  78. Ulusoy, K., Doğan-Sağlamtimur, N., Çiner, F., Sternik, A., Sekula, P., 2024. Industrial symbiosis practices: A case study of Türkiye and Denmark. Environmental Research and Technology 8 (1), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1271679.
  79. Xie, H., Wang, B., 2017. An empirical analysis of the impact of agricultural product price fluctuations on China's grain yield. Sustainability 9 (6), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060906.
  80. Xu, S., Zhang, Y., 2023. Impact of manufacturing agglomeration on the green innovation efficiency-Spatial effect based on China's provincial panel data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (5), 4238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054238.
  81. Ye, W., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Li, X., 2023. The impact of food production comparative advantage on green total factor productivity: The moderating role of environmental regulation. Agriculture 13 (11), 2058. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112058.
  82. Zheng, Q., Wen, X., Xiu, X., Yang, X., Chen, Q., 2022. Can the part replace the whole? A choice experiment on organic and pesticide-free labels. Foods 11 (17), 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11172564.
  83. Zhong, J., Pei, J., 2022. Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy 162, 112802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802.
  84. Zhou, B., Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Li, K., Wang, J., Chen, J., Papadakis, G., Guo, B., 2026. Smart energy supply for smart farms: A hybrid ground source heat pump in seasonal greenhouses for growing cherries. Smart Agricultural Technology 13, 101709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.101709.
  85. Zhu, J., Bai, H., Wang, Y., 2022. Technical and economic evaluation of decentralized vs. centralized geothermal heating for industrial-scale greenhouse clusters. Energy Reports 8, 1245-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.035.
  86. Porter, M.E.,1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press. 352 p. Ptak, M., Amnuaylojaroen, T., Sojka, M., 2025. Heat resources of rivers in the Odra River Basin as a potential element implement for sustainable development in Poland. Resources 14 (12), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources14120184.