Journals / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 1

The usage of palm (Washingtonia filifera) fibers for the removal of crystal violet from synthetic dye solution by adsorption

Buket Karabaş(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2612-9737
Olcayto Keskinkan(University of Çukurova)0000-0001-8995-756X
Bülent Sarı(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5171-9491
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-07-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was also understood that palm fiber, which is an environmentally advantageous material, can be used in the removal of crystal violet dyestuff.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective to obtain cheap and easily synthesized adsorbents from natural materials is gaining importance day by day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to determine the contact time, the first set of experiments employed 0.5 g of palm fibers and initial dye concentrations between 2.5-160 mg/L.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was also understood that palm fiber, which is an environmentally advantageous material, can be used in the removal of crystal violet dyestuff.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Washingtonia filifera · dyestuff removal · crystal violet

Abstract

The objective to obtain cheap and easily synthesized adsorbents from natural materials is gaining importance day by day. Adsorbents should be environmentally friendly, non-toxic, easily produced, insoluble in water, have a porous structure, have a large surface area, and be scientifically accepted. In this study, the removal of crystal violet dye from synthetic dyestuff solution was investigated using palm tree (Washingtonia filifera) fibers. In order to determine the contact time, the first set of experiments employed 0.5 g of palm fibers and initial dye concentrations between 2.5-160 mg/L. As a result of the study, it was determined that the crystal violet removal was 87.96% at the end of the 180-minute contact time at equilibrium, and the removal complied with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model type 1. The equilibrium time for the highest initial adsorbate concentration (160 mg/L) was 2880 minutes (2 days) in stationary phase systems while it was 180 minutes (3 hours) in mobile phase systems. It was also understood that palm fiber, which is an environmentally advantageous material, can be used in the removal of crystal violet dyestuff.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karabaş, B., Keskinkan, O., Sarı, B., Yeşiltaş, H. K., Ersü, Ç. B. (2022). The usage of palm (Washingtonia filifera) fibers for the removal of crystal violet from synthetic dye solution by adsorption. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 6 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1131313

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Chowdhury, M. F.; Khandaker, S.; Sarker, F.; Islam, A.; Rahman, M. T.; Awual, M. R. J. Mol. Liq. 2020, 114061.
  2. Roa, K.; Oyarce, E.; Boulett, A.; ALSamman, M.; Oyarzún, D.; Pizarro, G. D. C.; Sánchez, J. SM&T. 2021, 29, e00320.
  3. Sirajudheen, P.; Poovathumkuzhi, N. C.; Vigneshwaran, S.; Chelaveettil, B. M.; Meenakshi, S. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2021, 273, 118604.
  4. Bagotia, N.; Sharma, A. K.; Kumar, S. Chemosphere. 2020, 129309.
  5. Lan, D.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Chen, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, T.; Xu, M. Chemosphere. 2021, 133464.
  6. Januário, E. F. D.; Vidovix, T. B.; Beluci, N. D. C. L.; Paixão, R. M.; da Silva, L.H.B.R.; Homem, N. C.; Bergamasco, R.; Vieira, A. M. S. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021,789, 147957-147957.
  7. Abu-Nada, A.; Abdala, A.; McKay, G. J. Environ. Chem. 2021, 9(5), 105858.
  8. Demir, E.; Yalçın, H. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, 2014, 2(7), 70-79.
  9. Reynolds, T.D.; Richards, P.A.; Çeviri Editörü: Ülker Bakır Öğütveren. Efil Yayınevi, Ankara. 2011.
  10. Wong, Y.C.; Szeto, Y.S.; Cheung, W.H.; McKay, G. Process Biochemistry. 2004, 39/6, 695-704.
  11. Eckenfelder W. W. McGraw-Hill international editions, New York. 1898.
  12. Waranusantigul, P.; Pokethitiyook P.; Kruatrachue, M.; Upatham, E.S. Environmental Pollution. 2003, 125/3, 385-392.
  13. Saravanan, P.; Josephraj, J.; Pushpa, B.; Thillainayagam, B. P. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100560.
  14. Koyuncu, H.; Kul, A. R. Applied Water Science. 2020, 10(2), 1-14.
  15. Fawzy, M. A. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31(9), 3724-3735.
  16. Rajesh, Y.; Jeeru, L. R. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022, 57, 34-37.
  17. Srinivasulu, D. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2021.
  18. Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X. Chemosphere. 2022,135048.
  19. Dey, S.; Basha, S. R.; Babu, G. V.; Nagendra, T. Cleaner Materials. 2021, 1, 100001.
  20. Giri, D. D.; Alhazmi, A.; Mohammad, A.; Haque, S.; Srivastava, N.; Thakur, V. K.; Gupta, V.K.; Pal, D. B. Chemosphere. 2022, 287, 132016.
  21. Kachangoon, R.; Vichapong, J.; Santaladchaiyakit, Y.; Srijaranai, S. Microchemical Journal. 2022, 107194.
  22. Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Han, W.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances. 2022, 11, 100295.
  23. dos Santos Escobar, O.; de Azevedo, C. F.; Swarowsky, A.; Adebayo, M. A.; Netto, M. S.; Machado, F. M. J. Environ. Chem. 2021, 9(4), 105553.
  24. Kua, T. L.; Kooh, M. R. R.; Dahri, M. K.; Zaidi, N. A. H. M.; Lu, Y.; Lim, L. B. L. Appl. Water Sci. 2020. 10(12), 1-13.
  25. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/TR/en/product/sigma/c0775?gclid=Cj0KCQjwgYSTBhMİNARIsAB8KukvGmjuXjJqdMZkmH2JbB_WtR9h1hY4x87gB6GomcfyBE2wSVDdsNXIaAnlCEALw_wcB.
  26. Behnamfard, A.; Salarirad, M. M. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170(1), 127-133.
  27. Sulyman, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Gierak, A. Inżynieria i Ochrona Środowiska. 2016, 19.
  28. El-Sayed, G. O. Desalination. 2011, 272(1-3), 225-232.
  29. Sultana, S.; Islam, K.; Hasan, M. A.; Khan, H. J.; Khan, M. A. R.; Deb, A.; Raihan, M.A.; Rahman, M. W. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2022, 17, 100651.
  30. Rani, S.; Chaudhary, S. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022, 60, 336-344.
  31. Kumbhar, P.; Narale, D.; Bhosale, R.; Jambhale, C.; Kim, J. H.; Kolekar, S. J. Environ. Chem. 2022, 107893.
  32. Alshabanat, M.; Alsenani, G.; Almufarij, R. J. Chem. 2013, 4.
  33. Dabagh, A.; Bagui, A.; Abali, M. H.; Aziam, R.; Chiban, M.; Sinan, F.; Zerbet, M. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021, 37, 3980-3986.
  34. Kyi, P. P.; Quansah, J. O.; Lee, C. G.; Moon, J. K. Applied Sciences. 2020, 10(7), 2251.
  35. Gök, O.; Çimen Mesutoğlu, Ö. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017, 32:2, 507-516.