Journals / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Investigation of value-added compounds derived from oak wood using hydrothermal processing techniques and comprehensive analytical approaches (HPLC, GC-MS, FT-IR, and NMR)

Yunus Başar(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7785-3242
Fatih Gül(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4297-786X
Mehmet Salih Nas(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1092-5237
Mehmet Hakkı Alma(IĞDIR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7011-3965
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the experimental results of the pyrolysis, it has been detected that the temperature and time interval are very effective parameters in the conversion of oak wood to the amount of liquid product.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, slow pyrolysis of oak woods was carried out in a fixed bed tube reactor at four different temperatures ranging from 100 °C to 400 °C and at 5 °C/min speed time intervals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Several pyrolysis parameters were carried out to reveal the distribution of pyrolytic products under different pyrolysis temperatures (100–400 °C) and times (1–4 h).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the experimental results of the pyrolysis, it has been detected that the temperature and time interval are very effective parameters in the conversion of oak wood to the amount of liquid product.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomass · Pyrolysis · Oak Wood

Abstract

In this study, slow pyrolysis of oak woods was carried out in a fixed bed tube reactor at four different temperatures ranging from 100 °C to 400 °C and at 5 °C/min speed time intervals. The compositions of the produced bio-tar and bio-oils were determined in detail using FT-IR, GC-MS, HPLC, and NMR devices. Several pyrolysis parameters were carried out to reveal the distribution of pyrolytic products under different pyrolysis temperatures (100–400 °C) and times (1–4 h). During the slow pyrolysis process, oak wood started to decompose to form organic volatile products at a set temperature of 100 °C and reached a maximum yield of volatile products at around 400 °C. GC-MS analyses revealed that different valuable components such as furans, phenolic compounds, carbonyls, linear, aromatic compounds, acids, and hydrocarbons have been formed. Based on the experimental results of the pyrolysis, it has been detected that the temperature and time interval are very effective parameters in the conversion of oak wood to the amount of liquid product.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başar, Y., Gül, F., Nas, M. S., Alma, M. H., Çalımlı, M. H. (2024). Investigation of value-added compounds derived from oak wood using hydrothermal processing techniques and comprehensive analytical approaches (HPLC, GC-MS, FT-IR, and NMR). International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1365592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (34)

  1. Tun. M. M.; Juchelkova. D.; Win. M. M.; Thu. A. M.; Puchor. T. Res. 2019. 8. 81.
  2. Jaroenkhasemmeesuk. C.; Tippayawong. N.; Shimpalee. S.; Ingham. D. B. Alex. Eng. J. 2023. 63. 199–209.
  3. Bridgwater. A. V. J. of Anal. App. Pyr. 1999. 51(1–2).
  4. Zhao. W.; Liu. S.; Yin. M.; He. Z.; Bi. D. J. Anal. App. Pyr. 2023. 169. 105795.
  5. Biswas. B.; Singh. R.; Kumar. J.; Singh. R.; Gupta. P.; Krishna. B. B. Ren. En. 2018. 129. 686–694.
  6. Yu. J.; Ramirez Reina. T.; Paterson. N.; Millan. M. Apl Ener. and Com. Sci. 2022. 9. 100046.
  7. Wang. W.; Wang. J.; Meng. J. For. Eco. and Man. 2023. 528. 120631.
  8. Jia. G.; Liu. Z.; Chen. L.; Yu. X. Ecol. and Evol. 2017. 7(24). 10640–10651.
  9. Naqvi. S. R.; Tariq. R.; Hameed. Z.; Ali. I.; Naqvi. M.; Chen. W. H. Ren. Ener.2019. 131. 854–860.
  10. Ghorbannezhad. P.; Kool. F.; Rudi. H.; Ceylan. S. Ren. En. 2020. 145. 663–670.
  11. Kwon. H.; Xuan. Y. Fuel 2021. 306. 121616.
  12. Mora. M.; Fàbregas. E.; Céspedes. F.; Bartrolí. J.; Puy. N. Fu. Proc.Techn.2022. 238. 107509.
  13. Abbas-Abadi. M. S.; Van Geem. K. M.; Fathi. M.; Bazgir. H.; Ghadiri. M. Ener. 2021. 232. 121085.
  14. Lopez. G.; Arregi. A.; Abbas-Abadi. M. S.; Santamaria. L.; Artetxe. M.; Bilbao. J.; et al. ACS Sus. Che. and Eng. 2020. 8(46). 17307–17321.
  15. Bhatnagar. A.; Barthen. R.; Tolvanen. H.; Konttinen. J. of Anal. and Appl. Pyr. 2021. 157. 105219.
  16. Murwanashyaka. J. N.; Pakdel. H.; Roy. C. J. of Anal. and App. Pyro. 2001. 60(2). 219–231.
  17. BenBelkacem. I.; Bouhafsoun. A.; Jamaladdeen. R.; Coudour. B.; Roudaut. C.; Garo. J. P.; et al. Bior. Tech. Rep. 2023. 21. 101353.
  18. Lee. H. W.; Jeong. H.; Ju. Y. M.; Lee. S. M. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 2020. 37(7). 1174–1180.
  19. Mullen. C. A.; Boateng. A. A. En. and Ful. 2008. 22(3). 2104–2109.
  20. Zhang. X. S.; Yang. G. X.; Jiang. H.; Liu. W. J.; Ding. H. S. Sci. Rep. 2013. 3:1 2013. 3(1). 1–7.
  21. Li. Z.; Choi. J. S.; Wang. H.; Lepore. A. W.; Connatser. R. M.; Lewis. S. A.; et al. En. and Ful. 2017. 31(9). 9585–9594.
  22. Black. S.; Ferrell. J. R. RSC Adv. 2020. 10(17). 10046–10054.
  23. Drugkar. K.; Rathod. W.; Sharma. T.; Sharma. A.; Joshi. J.; Pareek. V. K.; et al. Sep. and Pur. Tech. 2022. 283. 120149.
  24. Lam. S. S.; Azwar. E.; Peng. W.; Tsang. Y. F.; Ma. N. L.; Liu. Z.; et al. J. Cle. Prod.2019. 236. 117692.
  25. Kim. J. S. Bior. Tech. 2015. 178. 90–98.
  26. Chen. N.; Ren. J.; Ye. Z.; Xu. Q.; Liu. J.; Sun. S. Bio. Tech. 2016. 221. 534–540.
  27. Sukiran. Am.J.App. Sci. 2009. 6(5). 869–875.
  28. Ma. B.; Agblevor. F. A. Bio. and Bio. 2014. 64. 337–347.
  29. Wu. F.; Huang. S.; Jiang. Q.; Jiang. G. J. Ana.l and App.Pyr. 2023. 175. 106179.
  30. Grewal. A.; Abbey. Lord; Gunupuru. L. R. J.Anal. and App. Pyr.2018. 135. 152–159.
  31. Ma. H.; L. H.; Zhao. W.; Li. W.; Long. W. Ener. Proc. 2019. 158. 370–375.
  32. Safavi. A.; Richter. C.; Unnthorsson. R. Ener. 2023. 280. 128123.
  33. Sukiran. Am.J.App. Sci. 2009. 6(5). 869–875.
  34. Ma. H.; L. H.; Zhao. W.; Li. W.; Long. W. Ener. Proc. 2019. 158. 370–375.