SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

Determination of Biological Activities of Wood Samples Impregnated with Multi-Functional Compounds and Synergistic Effect Analysis Based on Fungal Resistance

Ayşenur Gürgen(OSMANIYE KORKUT ATA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2263-7323
Sibel Yıldız(KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8448-4628
Sabrina Palantı(Trees and Timber Institute,)0000-0002-9033-8827
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that binary combinations of A+G and G+N and also the ternary combination (A+G+N) have a synergistic effect in binary variations for pine wood samples while A+G and A+N binary combinations show synergistic effect for beech wood samples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the biological resistance of Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus orientalis) wood samples which impregnated with individual and combinations of multi-functional compounds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Artificial antioxidant (A), GRAS compounds (G) and nano-SiO2 (N) were chosen as multi-functional compounds.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that binary combinations of A+G and G+N and also the ternary combination (A+G+N) have a synergistic effect in binary variations for pine wood samples while A+G and A+N binary combinations show synergistic effect for beech wood samples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Insecticidal · impregnation · fungal activity

Abstract

In this study, the biological resistance of Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris) and beech (Fagus orientalis) wood samples which impregnated with individual and combinations of multi-functional compounds. Artificial antioxidant (A), GRAS compounds (G) and nano-SiO2 (N) were chosen as multi-functional compounds. Firstly, the wood samples were impregnated single, binary and ternary combinations of impregnation solutions. Larvicidial resistance of pine samples was investigated against to Hylotrupes bajulus. Termitidicial resistance of all samples were determined using Subterranean termites Reticulitermes. Also, Gloeophyllum trabeum and Poria placenta were used for fungal resistance of beech and pine samples, respectively. Synergistic effects were calculated based on the fungal results. It was concluded that binary combinations of A+G and G+N and also the ternary combination (A+G+N) have a synergistic effect in binary variations for pine wood samples while A+G and A+N binary combinations show synergistic effect for beech wood samples. In addition, it is seen that the ternary combination also has a synergistic effect as in beech wood samples.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürgen, A., Yıldız, S., Palantı, S. (2025). Determination of Biological Activities of Wood Samples Impregnated with Multi-Functional Compounds and Synergistic Effect Analysis Based on Fungal Resistance. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1678298

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Dumarçay, S.; Iaych, K.; Lemor, A.; Gérardin, P. Int. Wood Prod. J. 2015, 6, 31-35.
  2. Brocco, V.F.; Paes, J.B.; da Costa, L.G.; Brazolin, S.; Arantes, M.D.C. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2093-2099.
  3. Shiny, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Mamatha, N.; Lingappa, B. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol. 2019, 21, 347-356.
  4. Hwang, W.J.; Kartal, S.N.; Yoshimura, T.; Imamura, Y. S. Pest Management Science: formerly Pesticide Science 2007, 63, 90-95.
  5. EN, 47. Wood preservatives. Determination of the toxic values against larvae of Hylotrupes bajulus (Linnaeus) - (Laboratory method). 2005.
  6. EN, 117, E. Wood preservatives. Determination of toxic values against Reticulitermes species (European termites) (Laboratory method). 2013.
  7. EN, 113. Wood preservatives. Test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes – Determination of the toxic values. 2006.
  8. Colby, S. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 1967, 15, 20-22.
  9. Chiappini, E.; Molinari, P.; Busconi, M.; Callegari, M.; Fogher, C.; Bani, P. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored product protection, 2010, 97-103.
  10. Robinson, W.; Cannon, K. Melsheimer Entomol. Ser. 1981.
  11. Yalçın, M.; Taşçıoğlu, C.; Plarre, R.; Akçay, Ç.; Busweıler, S. Kastamonu Univ. J. For. 2018, 18, 83-91.
  12. Baker, J. The insecticidal action of some components of wood preservatives. Pestic. Sci. 1972, 3, 229-239.
  13. Clément, J.-L.; Bagnères, A.-G.; Uva, P.; Wilfert, L.; Quintana, A.; Reinhard, J.; Dronnet, S. Insectes Soc. 2001, 48, 202-215.
  14. Smythe, R.V.; Carter, F.L.; Baxter, C.C. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1971, 64, 59-62.
  15. Nagnan, P.; Clement, J. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990, 18, 13-16.
  16. Bultman, J.D.; Beal, R.H.; Ampong, F.F. For. Prod. J. 1979, 6, 46-51.
  17. Peralta, R.C.G.; Menezes, E.B.; Carvalho, A.G.; Aguiar-Menezes, E.d.L. Rev. Árvore 2004, 28, 283-289.
  18. França, T.S.F.A.; França, F.J.N.; Arango, R.A.; Woodward, B.M.; Arantes, M.D.C. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2016, 107, 88-91.
  19. Clausen, C.A.; Kartal, S.N.; Arango, R.A.; Green, F. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 1-5.
  20. Bak, M.; Németh, R. BioResources 2018, 13, 7886-7899.
  21. Mankowski, M.; Morrell, J.J. Wood Fiber Sci. 2000, 32.
  22. Stanojevic, D.; Comic, L.; Stefanovic, O.; Solujic-Sukdolak, S. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 15, 307-311.
  23. Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Shao, A. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 193.
  24. Hussain, A.; Alajmi, M.F.; Khan, M.A.; Pervez, S.A.; Ahmed, F.; Amir, S.; Husain, F.M.; Khan, M.S.; Shaik, G.M.; Hassan, I. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 8.
  25. Jin, T.; He, Y. Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 6877-6885.
  26. Arroyo, B.J.; Bezerra, A.C.; Oliveira, L.L.; Arroyo, S.J.; de Melo, E.A.; Santos, A.M.P. Food Chem. 2020, 309, 125566.
  27. Shiny, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Mamatha, N.; Lingappa, B. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol. 2019, 21, 347-356.
  28. Chiappini, E.; Molinari, P.; Busconi, M.; Callegari, M.; Fogher, C.; Bani, P. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 10th international working conference on stored product protection, 2010, 97-103.