Journals / International Journal of Chemistry and Technology / 2026 / Issue: 10

2-Quinolinone Derivatives as Potential Inhibitors of Glutathione-Related Enzymes

Pınar Güller(ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8482-7889
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future configuration modifications with higher selectivity and demonstrated efficacy are planned

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Glutathione, a thiol molecule, is necessary for healthy cells against oxidative stress and xenobiotics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the inhibitory potencies of 2-quinolinone derivatives on hGR and hGST and to reveal their structure–activity relationships by both kinetic and computational approaches.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future configuration modifications with higher selectivity and demonstrated efficacy are planned
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Glutathione reductase · glutathione S-transferase · structure-activity relationship

Abstract

Glutathione, a thiol molecule, is necessary for healthy cells against oxidative stress and xenobiotics. Two glutathione-related enzymes glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) were studied in this paper. This study aimed to investigate the inhibitory potencies of 2-quinolinone derivatives on hGR and hGST and to reveal their structure–activity relationships by both kinetic and computational approaches. For this purpose, firstly, GST and GR were collected from human erythrocytes with specific activities of 8.78 EU/mg protein and 5.85 EU/mg protein. Then, inhibitory potencies of 2-quinolinone derivatives on hGR and hGST were assayed in vitro. IC50-[inhibitor] and Lineweaver-Burk graphs were generated. QU3, 6-hydroxy-2(h)-quinolinone, was found to be the most effective inhibitor against two enzymes with Ki values of 5.18±1.57 µM and 27.69±5.412 µM. Besides, binding energies of QU3 on hGR and hGST receptors were estimated as -5.59 kcal/mol and -5.81 kcal/mol. These findings suggest that the 2-quinolinone structure is a promising pharmacophore for use in new hGR and hGST assays. Future configuration modifications with higher selectivity and demonstrated efficacy are planned

🔖

Cite This Article

Körükmez, M., Güller, P. (2026). 2-Quinolinone Derivatives as Potential Inhibitors of Glutathione-Related Enzymes. International Journal of Chemistry and Technology, Issue: 10. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1835534

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Asif, M., 2014. Chemical Characteristics, Synthetic Methods, and Biological Potential of Quinazoline and Quinazolinone Derivatives. Int. J. Med. Chem. 12; 395637. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/395637.
  2. Cadenas, E., Davies, K.J., 2000. Mitochondrial free radical generation, oxidative stress, and aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 29 (3-4), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00317-8.
  3. Carlberg, C., Mannervik, B., 1985. Glutathione reductase assays. Methods in Enzymology, 113, 484-495. Academic Pres, Orlando, FL. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(85)13062-4.
  4. Cetin, A., Bursal, E., Türkan, F., 2021. 2-methylindole analogs as cholinesterases and glutathione S-transferase inhibitors: Synthesis, biological evaluation, molecular docking, and pharmacokinetic studies. Arab. J. Chem. 14(12), 103449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103449.
  5. Demir, Y., Türkeş, C., Küfrevioğlu, Ö. İ., Beydemir, Ş., 2023. Molecular docking studies and the effect of fluorophenylthiourea derivatives on glutathione‐dependent enzymes. Chem. Biodiversity, 20(1), e202200656. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200656.
  6. Esarev, I. V., Karge, B., Zeng, H., Lippmann, P., Jones, P. G., Schrey, H., Ott, I., 2024. Silver Organometallics that are Highly Potent Thioredoxin and Glutathione Reductase Inhibitors: Exploring the Correlations of Solution Chemistry with the Strong Antibacterial Effects. ACS Infect. Dis. 10(5), 1753-1766. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.4c00104.
  7. Güller, P., 2021. The in vitro and in silico inhibition mechanism of glutathione reductase by resorcinol derivatives: a molecular docking study. Journal of Mol. Struct. 1228, 129790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129790.
  8. Güller, U., 2021. Resorcinol derivatives as human acetylcholinesterase inhibitor: An In Vitro and In Silico study. IJCT, 5(2), 156-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.32571/ijct.944620.
  9. Güller, U., Taşer, P., Çiftci, M., Küfrevioğlu, Ö.İ., 2014. Purification of Glutathione S-Transferase From Bonito Sarda Sarda Liver And Investigation of Metal Ions Effects on Enzyme Activity. HJBC 42, 435–442.
  10. Habig, W.H., Pabst, M.J., Jakoby, W.B., 1974. Glutathione S-Transferases. JBC. 249, 7130–7139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42083-8.
  11. Harshbarger, W., Gondi, S., Ficarro, S.B., Hunter, J., Udayakumar, D., Gurbani, D., Singer, W.D., Liu, Y., Li, L., Marto, J.A., Westover, K.D., 2017. Structural and Biochemical Analyses Reveal the Mechanism of Glutathione S-Transferase Pi 1 Inhibition by the Anti-cancer Compound Piperlongumine. JBC. 292, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.750299.
  12. Jobbagy, S., 2018. Impact of Nrf2 signaling on thiol homeostasis and renal physiology. Dissertations & Theses, University of Pittsburgh.
  13. Korkmaz, I. N., Güller, P., Kalın, R., Özdemir, H., 2024. Assessment of 3‐Amino‐Benzoic Acid Methyl Ester Derivatives as Glutathione S‐Transferase and Glutathione Reductase Inhibitor: Supported by Molecular Docking Studies. ChemistrySelect, 9(26), e202401362. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202401362.
  14. Korkmaz, I. N., Güller, U., Kalın, R., Özdemir, H., Küfrevioğlu, Ö. İ., 2023. Structure‐activity relationship of methyl 4‐aminobenzoate derivatives as being drug candidate targeting glutathione related enzymes: in vitro and in silico approaches. Chem. Biodiversity. 20(5), e202201220. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202201220.
  15. Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom. W., Sanner, M.F., Belew, R.K., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J., 2009. Software News and Updates AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated Docking with Selective Receptor Flexibility. 2583-2791. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21256.
  16. Mukanganyama, S., Bezabih, M., Robert, M., Ngadjui, B. T., Kapche, G. F., Ngandeu, F., Abegaz, B., 2011. The evaluation of novel natural products as inhibitors of human glutathione transferase P1-1. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 26(4), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.3109/14756366.2010.526769.
  17. Ninfali, P., Orsenigo, I., Baronciani, L., Rapa, S., 1990. Rapid purification of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from mammal's erythrocytes. Prep. Biochem. 20(3-4), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/00327489008050202.
  18. Savvides, S.N., Karplus, P.A., 1996. Kinetics and Crystallographic Analysis of Human Glutathione Reductase in Complex with a Xanthene Inhibitor. JBC. 271, 8101–8107. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.14.8101. Schafer, F. Q., Buettner, G. R., 2001. Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 30(11), 1191-1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00480-4.
  19. Srinivasan, S., Avadhani, N.G., 2012. Cytochrom ecoxidase dys function in oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 53, 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.07.021.
  20. Taşer, B., Güller, P., Özkan, H., 2025. Exploring the Antibacterial and Enzyme Inhibitory Potential of Selected β-Carboline Derivatives: In Vitro and In Silico Insights. IJCT, 9(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.32571/ijct.1648820.
  21. Taslimi, P., Işık, M., Türkan, F., Durgun, M., Türkeş, C., Gülçin, İ., Beydemir, Ş., 2021. Benzenesulfonamide derivatives as potent acetylcholinesterase, α-glycosidase, and glutathione S-transferase inhibitors: biological evaluation and molecular docking studies. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn, 39(15), 5449-5460. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1790422.
  22. Wang, D., Gao, F., 2013. Quinazoline derivatives: synthesis and bioactivities. Chem. Cent. J. 3(7), 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-7-95.
  23. Weyesa, A. and Mulugeta, E., 2020. Recent advances in the synthesis of biologically and pharmaceutically active quinoline and its analogues: a review. RSC Adv. https://doi.org/10(35):20784–20793.
  24. Zhang, X., Liu, M., Qiu, W., Zhang, W., 2024. 2-Azidobenzaldehyde-Based [4+2] Annulation for the Synthesis of Quinoline Derivatives. 29(6), 1241. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061241.