SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Efficient Genomic DNA Isolation and Quality Assessment in Prunus Rootstocks GF-677 and MaxMa-14 Using ISSR and SCoT Markers

Mücahit Furkan Yeşilbaş0000-0003-1484-9390
Emel Sözen(ESKISEHIR TECHNICAL UNIVERSİTY)0000-0003-4859-8198
Yasemin Evrenosoğlu(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ, BAHÇE BİTKİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-0212-8492
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-07
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the results demonstrate that the applied CTAB-based protocol provides a reliable, cost-effective, and practical approach for isolating high-quality genomic DNA from Prunus rootstocks.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The quality of genomic DNA is a critical factor for the reliability of molecular analyses in clonal plant materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, a CTAB-based DNA isolation protocol was evaluated for its efficiency in extracting high-quality genomic DNA from leaf tissues of GF 677 and MaxMa-14 Prunus rootstocks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the results demonstrate that the applied CTAB-based protocol provides a reliable, cost-effective, and practical approach for isolating high-quality genomic DNA from Prunus rootstocks.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Prunus rootstocks · CTAB DNA extraction · genomic DNA quality

Abstract

The quality of genomic DNA is a critical factor for the reliability of molecular analyses in clonal plant materials. In Prunus species, DNA isolation is often challenging due to the high content of polysaccharides and phenolic compounds in leaf tissues, which can interfere with downstream enzymatic reactions. In this study, a CTAB-based DNA isolation protocol was evaluated for its efficiency in extracting high-quality genomic DNA from leaf tissues of GF 677 and MaxMa-14 Prunus rootstocks. The integrity of the isolated DNA was initially assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis, which revealed intact, high-molecular-weight genomic DNA with no evidence of degradation. Spectrophotometric analyses showed that DNA concentrations ranged from 200–285 ng/µl for GF 677 and 260–300 ng/µl for MaxMa-14. The A260/280 and A260/230 absorbance ratios fell within the accepted ranges, indicating minimal contamination by proteins, polysaccharides, and phenolic compounds. The quality of the extracted DNA was further confirmed by successful restriction enzyme digestion using BamHI and HindIII, demonstrating the effective removal of inhibitory substances. In addition, PCR amplification using ISSR and SCoT marker systems produced clear, bright, and reproducible banding patterns, confirming the suitability of the isolated DNA for PCR-based molecular analyses. Overall, the results demonstrate that the applied CTAB-based protocol provides a reliable, cost-effective, and practical approach for isolating high-quality genomic DNA from Prunus rootstocks. This method is suitable for routine laboratory use and supports downstream molecular applications such as marker-based genetic analyses and clonal identity verification.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yeşilbaş, M. F., Sözen, E., Evrenosoğlu, Y. (2026). Efficient Genomic DNA Isolation and Quality Assessment in Prunus Rootstocks GF-677 and MaxMa-14 Using ISSR and SCoT Markers. International Journal of Agriculture Forestry and Life Sciences, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.66598/ijafls.1888824

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (52)

  1. Aboul-Maaty, N. A. F., and Oraby, H. A. S. (2019). Extraction of high-quality genomic DNA from different plant orders applying a modified CTAB-based method. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 43(1), 1-10.
  2. Afonso, S.; Oliveira, I.V.; Meyer, A.S.; Aires, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Gonçalves, B. (2020). Phenolic Profile and Bioactive Potential of Stems and Seed Kernels of Sweet Cherry Fruit. Antioxidants, 9, 1295.
  3. Ali Q, Salisu IB, Raza A, Shahid AA, Rao AQ, Husnain T. (2019). A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from cotton (Gossypium spp.). MethodsX. 2019 Jan 30; 6: 259-264. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.01.010.
  4. Anonim (2025). https://www.fuab.org.tr/upload/dosyalar/mevzuat/Doku_Kulturu_Tebligi.pdf
  5. Arıcı, Ş. E. (2008). Bazı Sert Çekirdekli Meyve Anaçlarının Doku Kültürü İle Çoğaltılması. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 19-23.
  6. Ban S, Jung JH. (2023). Somatic Mutations in Fruit Trees: Causes, Detection Methods, and Molecular Mechanisms. Plants (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;12(6):1316. doi: 10.3390/plants12061316. PMID: 36987007; PMCID: PMC10056856.
  7. Bastos, C., Barros, L., Dueñas, M., Calhelha, R.C., Queiroz, M.J.R.P., Santos-Buelga, C., Ferreira, I.C.F.R. (2015). Chemical characterisation and bioactive properties of Prunus avium L.: The widely studied fruits and the unexplored stems. Food Chem. 173, 1045–1053.
  8. Bisht, V., Rawat, J.M., Gaira, K.S. (2024).Assessment of genetic homogeneity of in-vitro propagated apple root stock MM 104 using ISSR and SCoT primers. BMC Plant Biol 24, 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04939-3
  9. Buljević, N., Preiner, D., Šikuten, I., and Tomaz, I. (2025). Comparison of Different DNA Isolation Methods from Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) Leaves. Separations, 12(11), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/separations12110316
  10. Cantín, C. M., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y., and Moreno, M. Á. (2010). Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae, 123(3), 329-335.
  11. Carli, M., Pedrelli, A., Panattoni, A. (2025). An optimized DNA extraction protocol for reliable PCR-based detection and characterization of grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma. Plant Methods 21, 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01460-y
  12. Demirsoy, H., Köse, D. and Macit, I. (2016). Stone fruits in Turkey: a brief overview. Acta Hortic. 1139, 459-466 DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1139.79
  13. Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19, 11D15.
  14. Duru, S., Hayran, S., and Gül, A. (2022). Türkiye’de Sert Çekirdekli Meyvelerin Üretimi ve İhracatta Rekabet Gücünün Değerlendirilmesi. Bahçe, 51(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.53471/bahce.1019023
  15. Elsayh, S. A. A., Abd Elaziz, Y. S. G., Mageed, Y. A., Ewes, H. K. M., and Afifi, E. H. (2025). In vitro morphological and genetically studies variation using different medium concentration and phytohormones in apple rootstock (Malus domestica borkh). Doi 10.21608/ejas.2025.463403. Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 40 (9-10)
  16. Ferreira, M. d. S., Rocha, A. d. J., Nascimento, F. d. S., Oliveira, W. D. d. S., Soares, J. M. d. S., Rebouças, T. A., Morais Lino, L. S., Haddad, F., Ferreira, C. F., Santos-Serejo, J. A. d., Fernández, J. S., and Amorim, E. P. (2023). The Role of Somaclonal Variation in Plant Genetic Improvement: A Systematic Review. Agronomy, 13(3), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030730
  17. Fogle, C. A., Nagle, J. L., and Desai, M. M. (2008). Clonal interference, multiple mutations and adaptation in large asexual populations. Genetics, 180(4), 2163-2173
  18. Friar, E.A. (2005). Isolation of DNA from Plants with Large Amounts of Secondary Metabolites, Methods in Enzymology, Academic Press, Volume 395, 1-12, ISSN 0076-6879, ISBN 9780121828004, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)95001-5.
  19. Giovannini, D., Sirri, S., Dichio, B., Tuzio, A. C., and Xiloyannis, C. (2013). First results of the evaluation of six Prunus interspecific rootstock selections in comparative trials set up in two different environments. In VIII International Peach Symposium 1084 (pp. 263-269).
  20. Glasel JA. (1994). Validity of nucleic acids purities monitored by 260 nm/280 nm absorbance ratios. Biotechniques.18: 62-63.
  21. Guajardo V, Solís S, Almada R, Saski C, Gasic K, Moreno MÁ. (2020). Genome-wide SNP identification in Prunus rootstocks germplasm collections using Genotyping-by-Sequencing: phylogenetic analysis, distribution of SNPs and prediction of their effect on gene function. Sci Rep. 30;10(1):1467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58271-5.
  22. Gür, İ. (2003). GF 677 Anacı. Eğirdir Bahçe, Eğirdir Bahçe Kültürleri Araştırma Enstitüsü Online Tarımsal Bilgi-Magazin Dergisi, Sayı:3, Ekim
  23. Healey, A., Furtado, A., Cooper, T. (2014). Protocol: a simple method for extracting next-generation sequencing quality genomic DNA from recalcitrant plant species. Plant Methods 10, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-10-21
  24. Jafarlou, A. M., Pirivatlo, S. P., Salehi, B., and Mogbli, A. H. H. (2021). Establishing an efficient in vitro propagation system for sweet cherry rootstocks Gisela 12 and Maxma 14 and assessment of genetic homogeneity by ISSR markers. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 24(4), 449-460.
  25. Kaya, Ç., and Şahin, E. (2025). Determination of the Effects of Different DNA Isolation Methods on Quantity and Quality. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi, 14(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.29278/azd.1689058
  26. Korkmaz, K., Bolat, I., Uzun, A., Sahin, M., and Kaya, O. (2023). Selection and Molecular Characterization of Promising Plum Rootstocks (Prunus cerasifera L.) among Seedling-Origin Trees. Life, 13(7), 1476. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071476
  27. Krishna H., Alizadeh M., Singh D., Singh U., Chauhan N., Eftekhari M., Sadh RK. (2016). Somaclonal variations and their applications in horticultural crops improvement. 3 Biotech. 6(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0389-7.
  28. Krishnan R., Misra M., Subramanian J., Mohanty A. (2025). Emerging Trends and Application of Edible Coating as a Sustainable Solution for Postharvest Management in Stone Fruits: A Comprehensive Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 24(3):e70179. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.70179.
  29. Ling J., Yu W., Yang L., Zhang J., Jiang F., Zhang M., Wang Y., Sun H. (2025). Rootstock Breeding of Stone Fruits Under Modern Cultivation Regime: Current Status and Perspectives. Plants (Basel). 27;14(9):1320. doi: 10.3390/plants14091320. PMID: 40364348; PMCID: PMC12074155.
  30. Majumder, S., Igamberdiev, A. U., and Debnath, S. C. (2025). Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives. Agronomy, 15(6), 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061489
  31. Manen, JF., Sinitsyna, O., Aeschbach, L. (2005). A fully automatable enzymatic method for DNA extraction from plant tissues. BMC Plant Biol 5, 23 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-5-23
  32. Manoj K., Tushar B., and Sushama C. (2007). Isolation and purification of genomic DNA from black plum (Eugenia jambolana Lam.) for analytical applications. Int. J. Biotech. Biochem. 3, 49D55.
  33. Mawarni, S. N., Khairunnisa, D., Larasati, I., Rizqo, N., Erfianti, T., Kusumaningrum, H. P.,. and Pujiyanto, S. (2021). Application of Doyle and Doyle method for DNA isolation from pamelo yellow orange (Citrus maxima Merr), lime orange (C. limon) and sunkist orange (C. sinensis). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1943, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP Publishing.
  34. Ozturk, B., Belen, S. and Aglar, E. (2025). Assessing the impact of Krymsk 5, Piku 1 and Gisela 6 rootstocks on morphological and quality characteristics of sweet cherry. BMC Plant Biol 25, 512. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06455-4
  35. Özongun, Ş., Dolunay, E., Pektaş, M., … Öztürk, G. (2016). Farklı Klon Anaçları Üzerinde Bazı Elma Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Değişimleri. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 53(1), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.179870
  36. Pineda-Rodriguez, Y. Y., Pompelli, M. F., Jarma-Orozco, A., Rodríguez, N. V., and Rodriguez-Paez, L. A. (2023). A new and profitable protocol to DNA extraction in Limnospira maxima. Methods and Protocols, 6(4), 62.
  37. Porebski, S., Bailey, L.G. and Baum, B.R. (1997). Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772108
  38. Ramachandran, R., Babu, V., Appukuttannair, G., and Elenjikkal, S. (2022). Effective and Reliable Protocol for DNA Isolation from Polyphenolic Leaves and Fruits of Garcinia gummi-gutta (L.) Robs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 92. 10.1007/s40011-022-01356-0.
  39. Remya R., Syamkumar S., and Sasikumar B. (2004). Isolation and amplification of DNA from turmeric powder. Br. Food J. 106, 673D678.
  40. Rezadoost MH, Kordrostami M, Kumleh HH. (2016). An efficient protocol for isolation of inhibitor-free nucleic acids even from recalcitrant plants. 3 Biotech. 6(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s13205-016-0375-0.
  41. Rom, R.C., and Carlson, R.F. (1987). Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. A WileyInterscience Publication, 494 p. USA.
  42. Sahu SK, Thangaraj M, Kathiresan K. (2012). DNA Extraction Protocol for Plants with High Levels of Secondary Metabolites and Polysaccharides without Using Liquid Nitrogen and Phenol. ISRN Mol Biol. 14;2012:205049. doi: 10.5402/2012/205049.
  43. Sambrook J. (2006). The condensed protocols from molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  44. Sarwat M., Negi M. S., Lakshmikumaran M., Tyagi A. G., Das S., and Srivastava P. S. (2006). A standardized protocol for genomic DNA isolation from Terminalia arjuna for genetic diversity analysis. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 9, 86D91.
  45. Shepherd LD., McLay TG. (2011). Two micro-scale protocols for the isolation of DNA from polysaccharide-rich plant tissue. J Plant Res.124(2):311-4. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0379-5.
  46. Sözen, E., and Poyraz, I. (2008). Rapid and high quality DNA isolation from Origanum onites for RAPD and ISSR analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Section Ca Journal Of Biosciences, 63 (7-8).
  47. Tashmatova L.V., Matsneva O.V., Khromova T.M. (2023). Clonal micropropagation of apple trees // Vestnik Rossijskoj selʹskohozyajstvennoj nauki. -. - N. 6. - P. 71-76. doi: 10.31857/2500-2082/2023/6/71-76 USDA, 2022. https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/release-files/0g354f20t/8336j9716/fj237b216/StoneFruit.pdf
  48. Poonam V., Raunak, G. Kumar, C. S. Reddy L., Jain R., Sharma S. K., Prasad A. K., and Parmar V. S. (2011). Chemical constituents of the genus Prunus and their medicinal properties, Curr. Med. Chem., vol. 18, no. 25, pp. 37583824.
  49. Wilfinger WW., Mackey K., Chomczynski P. (2006). In: DNA sequencing II optimizing preparation and cleanup. Sudbury KJ, editor. MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers;. Assessing the quantity, purity and integrity of RNA and DNA following nucleic acid purification; pp. 291–312.
  50. Yarılgaç, T., Uzun, S., Karakaya, O., Ates, U. and Öztürk, B. (2023). Phenological, morphological and yield characteristics of apple cultivars grown on different clonal rootstocks in Ordu ecology. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 27(3): 325-332. DOI: 10.29050/harranziraat.1294315
  51. Mawarni, S. N., Khairunnisa, D., Larasati, I., Rizqo, N., Erfianti, T., Kusumaningrum, H. P.,. and Pujiyanto, S. (2021). Application of Doyle and Doyle method for DNA isolation from pamelo yellow orange (Citrus maxima Merr), lime orange (C. limon) and sunkist orange (C. sinensis). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1943, No. 1, p. 012079). IOP Publishing.
  52. Ramachandran, R., Babu, V., Appukuttannair, G., and Elenjikkal, S. (2022). Effective and Reliable Protocol for DNA Isolation from Polyphenolic Leaves and Fruits of Garcinia gummi-gutta (L.) Robs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 92. 10.1007/s40011-022-01356-0.